After pressure from activists from Firedoglake, the National Organization for Women, CREDO Action and Social Security Works, the AARP has listened to its membership and dropped its narrow survey on the future of Social Security and Medicare. In April, I wrote about how AARP’s “You’ve Earned a Say” survey seemed like nothing more than a [...]
AARP Listens to Members; Drops Falsely-Limited Survey on Future of Social Security & Medicare Benefits |
| By: Brian Sonenstein Friday June 8, 2012 9:27 am |
AUDIO: Clyburn Supports Social Security Means Testing, Benefit Cuts |
| By: Jane Hamsher Thursday August 11, 2011 11:39 am |
James Clyburn has just been appointed to the Super Congress Catfood II Commission, and will now have powers above those or an ordinary member of Congress when it comes to determining the future of Social Security and Medicare. So I thought it would be a good time to re-run Mike Stark’s interview with Clyburn from May of 2010 regarding Clyburn’s support for cutting Social Security benefits.
Does Hoyer Count Changing the COLA as a Benefit Cut? |
| By: Jon Walker Wednesday July 20, 2011 12:27 pm |
I called Hoyer’s office this morning to ask if he considers cutting the COLA a benefit cut, but haven’t received a response.
Dear AARP: Enough With the Weasel Words. Will You or Won’t You? |
| By: Jane Hamsher Thursday June 23, 2011 8:06 am |
If AARP is really opposed to cutting Social Security benefits as part of a “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit, you’d think they’d come right out and say it. Instead, they’re just recycling all of President Obama’s weasel-word tactics about “supporting” the public option (and we all know how well that worked out).
Leave Social Security Alone: Not Just Good Policy, It’s Great Politics |
| By: Jon Walker Thursday March 31, 2011 7:29 am |
I previously wrote how from a policy perspective I think it would be idiotic for progressives to even allow the idea of changing Social Security to be entertained right now, but it is equally important that elected Democrats realize that from a purely political perspective, refusing to make any changes to Social Security is an [...]
A Winning Progressive Strategy for Social Security: Refuse to Do Anything – Ever |
| By: Jon Walker Monday March 28, 2011 9:30 am |
Looking at the current political environment and gaming out the possible actions that could be taken it seems abundantly clear that progressives best course of action on Social Security is to simply refuse to even think about allowing any changes in the program. Progressives should also follow Harry Reid’s advice by sticking to this “just [...]
Obama Packs Debt Commission With Social Security Privatization & Benefit Cut Supporters |
| By: Jane Hamsher Monday May 10, 2010 8:39 am |
President Obama has packed the Debt Commission (also known as the cat food commission) with members who have an overwhelming history of support for both benefit cuts and privatization of Social Security. The “National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform” is operating in secret over the objections of both parties. John Boehner and John Conyers [...]
Budget Hawk John Spratt and the “Grand Bargain” on Social Security |
| By: Jane Hamsher Monday May 3, 2010 4:09 pm |
John Spratt, Chairman of the House Budget Committee, was recently appointed by President Obama to the Debt Commission. I’ve been going through documents looking at his history regarding Social Security reform, and his involvement in “secret meetings” in 1997 authorized by Clinton Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles. Bowles was at the time negotiating a deal [...]



16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action