Once again health care spending in America grew much faster than the economy as a whole. After a few years of slowdown in growth (likely resulting from the broader economic downturn), health care spending in 2011 picked up. According to a new report by the Health Care Cost Institute, spending among people with employer-sponsored insurance grew by 4.6 percent in 2011.
The report found spending did not increase because of greater utilization. Americans with employer-provide insurance are using about as much healthcare as they did in previous years. The growth came primarily from hospitals, labs, and doctors charging more. From the report:
In 2011, spending on inpatient facility services, per capita, grew 4.8 percent to $963. Inpatient admissions declined by 0.5 percent whereas inpatient prices, which were the highest average prices of any service category, rose 5.3 percent to $15,674. Increases in inpatient unit prices — the price paid adjusted for the resource mix to serve patients — outpaced increases in intensity (a metric indexing complexity of service), leading HCCI to conclude that in 2011 rising unit prices drove increases in inpatient spending.
[...]
Despite some increases in utilization, HCCI found spending growth was driven primarily by increases in the prices paid. In 2011, utilization increased for outpatient facility services and professional procedures, and declined for inpatient admissions and filled prescriptions. However, the growth in prices at the major service level outpaced changes in service use. For all major service categories, increases in prices paid were driven by increases in the underlying unit price.
This is the ongoing cost problem with the American health care system. It is not that Americans are unusually fat or sick. It is not that Americans just love going to the doctor more than anyone else; our utilization rates are often lower than most other countries.
The problem is primarily that we pay radically more for the same procedures, tests and medications than any other first-world country. Until we adopt one of the proven price control systems other first-world countries have used for decades — single payer or all-payer — our health care costs will continue grow at a crushing rate.Once again health care spending in America grew much faster than the economy as a whole. After a few years of slowdown in growth (likely resulting from the broader economic downturn), health care spending in 2011 picked up. According to a new report by the Health Care Cost Institute, spending among people with employer-sponsored insurance grew by 4.6 percent in 2011.
The report found spending did not increase because of greater utilization. Americans with employer-provide insurance are using about as much healthcare as they did in previous years. The growth came primarily from hospitals, labs, and doctors charging more. From the report:
In 2011, spending on inpatient facility services, per capita, grew 4.8 percent to $963. Inpatient admissions declined by 0.5 percent whereas inpatient prices, which were the highest average prices of any service category, rose 5.3 percent to $15,674. Increases in inpatient unit prices — the price paid adjusted for the resource mix to serve patients — outpaced increases in intensity (a metric indexing complexity of service), leading HCCI to conclude that in 2011 rising unit prices drove increases in inpatient spending.
[...]
Despite some increases in utilization, HCCI found spending growth was driven primarily by increases in the prices paid. In 2011, utilization increased for outpatient facility services and professional procedures, and declined for inpatient admissions and filled prescriptions. However, the growth in prices at the major service level outpaced changes in service use. For all major service categories, increases in prices paid were driven by increases in the underlying unit price.
This is the ongoing cost problem with the American healthcare system. It is not that Americans are unusually fat or sick. It is not that Americans just loving going to the doctor more than anyone else; our utilization rates are often lower than most other countries.
The problem is primarily that we pay radically more for the same procedures, tests and medications than any other first-world country. Until we adopt one of the proven price control systems other first-world countries have used for decades — single payer or all-payer — our health care cost will continue to grow at a crushing rate.




14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
hakuna matata…this moocher gets it for free at the ER.
And that’s okay. Just ask Mitt Romney.
I was talking about this last nite in RL. Everyone agrees that the student loan bank changes where a good thing and got rid of a needless middleman. How is insurance not the same. What service do they actuallu provide? Every DemPol should be asked if the agree with the student loan changes and then be asked how the exact same priciples wouldnt apply to insurance.
While i agree we pay more than otehr countries, I also doubt that in other countries you get an MRI and any other number of “tests” and procedures that dont do anything but fill someones pocket and act as CYA for the doctors. This is hyperbole but no one needs an MRI to treat a skinned knee.
“Until we adopt one of the proven price control systems…”
Which is to say, until we get a preznint in office who will use his clout (…including BIG margins in both houses…)
to demand, at minimum, a real public option…then we’re going to continue to be screwed by Big Pharma, the HMO’s, the hospitals, etc…and, that failure, for the past 4 years, had nothing to do with Mitt Romney.
…X 2
CDC
I assume this means fifteen grand a night for a hospital room, which is clearly unsustainable and unaffordable.
Out-of-control health care costs is why we wanted health care “reform.” But the ACA does almost nothing to control costs, and there is no public option for Americans not eligible for Medicare or Medicaid. Instead we have a private insurance mandate that’s going to force 6 million Americans to buy insurance on the individual market or pay a fine. I think it will be more than 6 million, because more employers are going to drop company plans due to skyrocketing premiums.
Obama has insured, with his farcically named Affordable Care Act (which should be called the Already Unaffordable (and inadequate) Health INSURANCE Act) that the for-profit, privatized health insurance system (death by spreadsheet) will be in place for generations to come. Congress is more than satisfied with this bullshit bailout of the insurance industry and has absolutely zero concern for health CARE that’s affordable. Any suggestion that a single payer plan, or something like it, will ever be considered is willful blindness to the truth.
Just one of the reasons that good polling news for Obama’s re-election is BAD NEWS for the “liberal” hypocrites who will vote for him anyway.
Vote JILL STEIN for President.
Bigchin; no argument here. Just to keep it short, I’d say that practically nothing Obama has done is going to make things better, economically, in the next 4 years. And since he did so little when he had the clout, it’s fair to ask the “O” mousketeers what they think he will accomplish if he wins another term.
I do not believe the democrats will re-take the House, and that means that John Boehner will continue to be the de facto head of the republican party.
Speaking as someone who was an enthusiastic supporter of Obama in 2008, I would say that his track record in dealing with Boehner leaves a little something to be desired, if you’re a progressive.
One factor is that construction costs for hospitals are double the costs of apartment and hotel buildings — up to $400 per sq ft in NYC. Operating costs, salaries — all high. I know a hospital executive at $100K changed hospitals to a similar position in another hospital, received 100+100 for a while.
What we need is a presidential commission to examine the whole cost picture and then make some recommendations that will solve the problem.
Meanwhile, medical tourism is taking off.
Heart bypass: $8,500 in India; in the U.S., $144,000, etc.
Less than a 5% jump? Oh you pussies who have insurance through employment don’t know what pain is really like.
Like when my individual health insurance policy jumped from nearly $800 a month to nearly a $1000 a month.
That’s like a 25% jump in one year!
For just little ole me, who had been having health issues, of course. A policy which already didn’t cover $500 a month for the only treatment that worked.
So I rolled the dice, dropped the health insurance and ran through my savings to save my health.
Now I’m poor enough to qualify for the new Obamacare low-cost clinic care plan in my county, which is a damn sight better than what I got from $800 a month private “health insurance.”
Agree.
However, all those conditions existed in January 2009, plus a President who had campaigned on a strong public option being the only way to control health insurance costs, and who took office with tons of goodwill– and with about 70% of the nation polling in favor of a public option.
I don’t think we will be seeing that combination again for a good while.
We need Medicare for all, plus some price controls on medical providers and their malpractice insurers, all of whom have gone overboard.
Good job FDL, I wouldn’t have thought it possible to mention increasing HC costs without uttering a word about how Obama’s HCR addresses these huge concerns going forward. Isn’t this an election year? Isn’t it relevant to share with readers how Obama skewered the voters who supported him in ’08? How is it possible to write this post without even mentioning Obama’s name? Not a word crediting Obama for seeing that his HCR had NO cost controls, and that it provides NO ability to negotiate Medicare drug prices. Not a word that Obama’s HCR does include an anti-trust exemption for insurance companies sure to further reduce competition. Oh yeah, & not a word crediting Obama for personally seeing to it that that Dorgen’s drug importation amendment never even got a vote.
Wonderful coverage in an election year, FDL. Now maybe you can get back to updating us on how the Presidential horse race is going?