I remember during the end of the health care reform fight how top Democrats promised activists unhappy with the bill that they would “fix it later.” I remember being told that it was very important to pass a bill despite many serious problems, design flaws and terrible compromises, because it would be easy to fix those issues later.
Well, it is two years later, and the Democratic Party has basically dropped any pretext that they want to seriously improve the Affordable Care Act. Not only has basically every top elected Democrat stopped even paying lip service to the idea of trying to make the law more progressive, but improving it is basically absent from the Democratic platform. As far as I can tell, this is the only mention in the platform that the ACA may need improvements:
At the same time, the Affordable Care Act is not the end of efforts to improve health care for all Americans. Democrats will continue to fight for a strong health care workforce with an emphasis on primary care. We remain committed to eliminating disparities in health and will continue to make sure families have access to mental health and substance abuse services. We will strengthen Medicaid and oppose efforts to block grant the program, slash its funding, and leave millions more without health insurance. We will continue to invest in our public health infrastructure – ensuring that we are able to respond to emergencies and support community-based efforts to prevent disease.
These are relatively minor issues about increasing the number of doctors and coverage of certain conditions. There is no call for a public option or single payer. There are no calls for adding an early Medicare buy in, as was talked about during the health care debate. There’s nothing about drug re-importation or Medicare direct drug price negotiation. There is not even a reference to the idea Obama previously endorsed of speeding up when states can experiment with better systems.
The platform of the Democratic Party is basically that the ACA is great how it is and there is very little need to improve it.
This is an important lesson about legislative fights. Inertia is an overwhelming force in Washington. Things rarely get improved later even when politicians say improvement is needed. That is why it is so important to fight to get the design right to begin with, or we end of living with the design flaws for a very long time. The bad state/federal partnership design element of Medicaid is still causing major issues decades after it was started.





41 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Hey, the ACA shuffles billions of dollars to health insurance corporations. What’s there to improve? Mission accomplished!
The ACA is, of course, really the Big Health Industry Players Profit Protection Plan (BHIPPP). The for-profits got what they wanted. The individual physicians and ratepayers, along with many hospitals, may not be doing so well from this, but the BHIPPers are plenty happy.
What’s not to like about forcing people to buy junk insurance that won’t do much for them?
I guess I can be patient; after all, I’m still waiting for the fixes on NAFTA, which I’m sure are going to be implemented, ooooh, just any day now! You know, those “side” agreements on the little stuff nobody really cares about like environmental considerations and worker rights? After all, there’s money to be made! Who cares if you can breathe the air, drink the water, or afford to move somewhere else? Jobs!
So, those little fixes to the ACA will just have to wait a little longer. If you don’t die in the meantime, just think how swell it will be one day. Besides, our fearless leaders are all well covered, thank you. That should be sufficient warmth for the cockles of everyone’s heart, doncha think?
But, but,…
Jon Chait,
And the Rest Is Just Noise:
Why the health care bill is the greatest social achievement of our time.
The New Republic, Dec. 24, 2009
You never actually believed that “later” line, did you?
I was so enthusiastic about Obama last time. Nonetheless, when Senator Obama said he would fix his FISA vote after he was elected, I felt I was being blackmailed for my vote.
Obama was so popular when he was first elected and the Democrats had majorities no party may see again in the foreseeable future.
He had run on a strong public option and won handily. He had a mandate.
The country was polling 70% in favor of a public option.
There was never going to be a better time. Anyone who did truly did not know that, be it Obama or anyone else, was far too dense to be in office. He knew it.
He lost me when he called the public option a sliver during the summer of 2009. By the time he and Mitch McConnell agreed on the Obama tax cuts, I was probably irretrievable.
The entire goal was to use “tax code,” as gun to force American’s servitude to another powerful monopoly. State based health insurance corporations, under fear of tax penalty. They fucked the governed hard for years Leroy!
Mitt while Gov. of Mass said its “not a tax.” It is a fee a penalty. Hey Mitt you lie, just like the rest of the corporate appeasers. We said it was an “illegal tax” all along and it came from your fiends at the heritage foundation? Slave-owners use law to protect a monopoly on labor. That got us the reconstruction Amendments precluding monopolies on labor. Yup them recon amendments where for poor white folk also. America ignorant of our own history!
New Democrats=Old Republicans. Well, to the right of Old Republicans actually, but why quibble?
I’m shocked. Well ok, most of us here at the lake (‘cept of course the ‘bots) never believed the bullshit about the fix.
The fix was already in when they did this bailout and all the so-called liberals who were cheerleaders for obamacare all the way to the Supreme Court.
Well, according to the four Justices who were appointed by Clinton and Obama, and Roberts, it was a legal tax.
This is an astounding decision, that the government can tax you unless you buy something from a private vendor. (People cite auto insurance, but you can avoid auto insurance. There’s no way you can avoid the health insurance tax.
And according to the Justices who were appointed by Republicans, plus Breyer and Kagan, the federal government has no power to deny Medicaid funds to states who refuse to expand Medicaid, as Obamacare provides.
So, the poorest among us are likely be in a triple bind–no Medicaid, no ability to pay for health insurance and a new tax.
That’ll teach ‘em!
It’ll be “fixed” all right, just the way pols “fix” everything for their corp contributors and against the voters.
It not what the governed wants or really needs. Its what the corporations want and how corps can game system to to protect their models and profits, at republics expense. At life’s expense. Fuck them all!!!!!!!!
This was a con job, not “Washington” defeating a bunch of high minded idealists. What Obama and the Democrats delivered was what they promised they would to the corporate lobbyists. Obama isn’t about to break his secret business deals, so whatever changes would be made would be corporate lobbyist friendly. The “fix it later” line was just part of the con.
After describing the benefits of the ACA (p.4) the platform states that “As a result, all Americans will have access to health care.” [my bold]
Even the bots have usually said they know they didn’t get a pony, but apparently for the Democratic Party an imaginary pony is just as good as a real one.
“This is an astounding decision, that the government can tax you unless you buy something from a private vendor.”
Just like how assissination of US citizens and drones in the US are being done by Democrats, so to is the corporatization of the federal government, which the privitization of the tax code for corporate benefit was passed 100% by a Democratic Congress and President. This is why the whole lesser-evilism thing just doesn’t work for me. Obama was supposed to rein in the drones and the corporatization, but instead he embraced-and-extended it.
Democrats have been spinning themselves into a circle on this since the reason for the mandate was that 100% percent of people had access to ERs, but people going to ERs are a bunch of free-loaders where Demcrat sound like Ayn Rands’ step-children.
Like I say… “Protect the fucking slaveowners?” However the MA SJC said it was not a “Tax.” MA SJC said it was a fee, a penalty. As a Tax its unconstitutional under mass constitutional law which gives greater protection for citizens from monopolies in commerce, gained by punitive tax penalty, financial coercion? We are enslaved by corporate who buys America’s enslavement with money!
They fucked America hard and continue to fuck USA hard…..
Fascism……….
Heck, if he loses this election, he won’t have to guess why. There are a multitude of reasons. Pick one.
To heck with lesser-evilism, what we’ve been getting with the Dems is more effective evil.
Passing and implementing federal legislation was relatively simple when there were 13 states, tweaking was also manageable. The more states added, the more the change. Hence, secession.
With 50 states you get ulcers and despair, but plenty to blog about.
Who could have anticipated?/s
Just to be the devil’s advocate, IIRC the bulk of the ACA doesn’t become active until 2014, so there’s little point to stirring the pot before then.
“Just to be the devil’s advocate, IIRC the bulk of the ACA doesn’t become active until 2014, so there’s little point to stirring the pot before then.”
This is about the promise of Democrats to reform ACA, which was used a justification for passage. The Democrats stirred this pot already with their false promises. Also BTW more than a few people on FDL had said that the implimentation date should be changed to an earlier date, which that would be a reform. If the bulk of ACA is good and people will like it, then it should be implimented sooner, while if it is bad, it should eliminated – either of which are reforms where there’s no reason to wait until 2014 to start talking about.
This article is being too kind, or too trusting …
When the Democrats deliberately shafting things like early Medicare buy-in, which would have both improved joblessness whenever it took effect plus pulled down total health care costs in the USA (plus helped a set of people over 55 or 60 but under 65) they had NO intent of ever going back and correcting their “mistake”.
Just like when Wyden-Oregon came to our town hall and said he was going to vote against drug re-importation or government drug price negotiation for Medicare part D, but it would be in the plan “within two years for sure” that was not only not true, but he had no intent (and never did) of putting any effort into making those two good things happen.
The BS about improvement is always BS. More misdirection to the dummies which by the way is us.
http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/113404/ocn769687749.pdf?sequence=1
Fountas vs MA DOR…. You will note, penalty / fee was not a “tax.” It was upheld under the police powers of the state, to assess a fee and penalty for not compliance. Just like a zoning violation. Now that the SCOTUS has called it a “tax,” it is coercion under fear of tax penalty, as we said all along when Mitt signed it into law! Fuck Mitt Romney!!!!!!!!!!!
Don’t see this “shit” on Fox, CNN, or MSNBC do you? Meanwhile look at all the fucking money the media takes in advertising for health insurance corporations. It reminds me of an incestuous “cluster fuck,” where corporations win and people get fucked, as usual….
“What has re-emerged in recent weeks is the spirit of the New Left–distrustful of evolutionary change”
Evolution, of course, proceeds because a portion of the population isn’t able to survive and so they die and don’t have children. Not a good metaphor to use when discussing health care, Mr. Chait.
The only thing that gets ‘improved’ is the national surveillance state. No problems there. It’s relentless.
De facto “Fascism,” Knut. Ike’s warning rings loud and clear to those who value history more than the regurgitated corporate bullshit on cable TV, or Snookie, speaking of bullshit!!!
Nah. Texas can deliver ulcers and despair, all on its own.
Corporations profit while people die. This is evolution. Pretty soon HAL will have a melt down and kill his mentor, then HAL will (“think therefore I am,”) take over the corp then country and exterminate all life in search of profit! Who would have thought we would really land on the moon, when Buck Rogers first appeared anyway? Who needs people. We are just liabilities, on a ledger or excel program sheet in corporate America!
TBogg, paging TBogg. Please pick up the ‘you can apologize now’ phone.
Can’t argue with that. Just making a point about leaving it out of the platform this year.
Re: 31
Haw haw haw. I say he doubles down on the Obamalingus. He would be wise to trim that dude-stache when he’s finished. If he ever finishes…
Obama promised to revisit and reform NAFTA as well. He liked it so much he initiated the push for more FTAs like the TPP.
I rejected Obama when he gave that passionate speech in the Senate in opposition to the retroactive telecom immunity legislation, right before voting in favor of it. We should have been aware of his duplicity the moment he requested Joe Lieberman as his Senate mentor.
One of the primary arguments used by his crowd of commenters is “This is a building block! A foundation! It will get better. The Dems even said so!”
So much for that horseshit.
Doodley squat, Obama and dems won’t fix anything,what’s done is done.
Mandate to buy a product for other’s profit is unimaginable and there it is.
Voting machines control the parties now. What if more money and effort is going into controlling precinct results? Diebold can be bought, we have seen it before and we still believe we have a vote?
We have no representation now, for we are only people. Our parties have disenfranchised their voters because they can, and were well paid for their treason. They are paid by the machine.
Isn’t it time to put sand in the gears to stop the engine of destruction? Sugar the gas tank so no one will waste fuel on something that no longer runs. Take the road forward away from those that destroy it as they go.
Oh, I got ya. I thought you were talking about it being discussed on FDL.
He’d have to pull his head out of his ass to hear that phone.
Quadruple – they are still talking about raising Medicare eligibility age.