There are few things that frustrate me more about political writing than reporters helping to promote the myth of powerless top government officials. It most commonly takes the form of the false claim that it takes 60 votes in the Senate to pass anything. Or it’s the insistence that the President wants to do something, but can’t, because he is powerless on his own. This myth of the toothless President is perfectly exemplified by this article about drug policy from Marc Ambinder in CQ:
According to ongoing discussions with Obama aides and associates, if the president wins a second term, he plans to tackle another American war that has so far been successful only in perpetuating more misery: the four decades of The Drug War.
Don’t expect miracles. There is very little the president can do by himself. And pot-smokers shouldn’t expect the president to come out in favor of legalizing marijuana. But from his days as a state senator in Illinois, Obama has considered the Drug War to be a failure, a conflict that has exacerbated the problem of drug abuse, devastated entire communities, changed policing practices for the worse, and has led to a generation of young children, disproportionately black and minority, to grow up in dislocated homes, or in none at all.
emphasis mine
This is just nonsense spun in a way that politically helps President Obama without holding him to any form of democratic accountability. Basic translation: “See, young people, unnamed sources claim Obama will be cool despite his past behavior, but you shouldn’t hold him accountable since there is nothing he can do now.”
The reality couldn’t be more different. While some important reforms would require Congressional approval, a determined President has incredible latitude on the issue of drugs. One of the biggest things the President can do is instruct his administration to legalize medical marijuana by reclassifying — “rescheduling” — marijuana from schedule I to schedule IV. Through rescheduling, the Controlled Substance Act actually gives the Executive Branch the power to unilaterally change the legal status of any drug without Congressional action.
In addition any President has both the power of executive discretion and the pardon. Just as Obama did with certain young undocumented immigrations, he can issue executive directives regarding the use of executive resources which could have huge real world implications. The Presidential power to pardon, while underused, is real. Obama could in theory pardon or commute the sentences of a large number of people convicted of minor federal drug crimes, which could be a powerful statement about what is an appropriate punishment.
Finally there is the bully pulpit. Ambinder says we “shouldn’t expect the president to come out in favor of legalizing marijuana,” but there is no reason he can’t. Marijuana legalization has near the identical level of popularity as same-sex marriage had right before Obama recently endorsed it.
Using his bully pulpit would be a way for Obama to “act by himself” and have a big impact. It would draw attention to an issue and give it legitimacy. Importantly, as we saw with marriage equality, his endorsement could easily cause some in his base to re-evaluate their opinions. That alone could be enough to push several state marijuana legalization initiatives over the top at the ballot this year.
For a proper democracy to function we should judge our officials both by how they choose to use their power and by how they choose not to use their power. Of course the only way to really do this is for people to understand exactly how much power any elected official actually has.
Those promoting the myth of a toothless president create an excuse for the President’s failure to act. which frees them from blame, when in reality no excuse is justified. This undermines basic democratic accountability. Whether or not you support or oppose a current policy, you cannot properly hold a President accountable for it unless you know how much power a President actually has to change it and which powers the President is choosing not to exercise.





35 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jon does that include hemp as well? That would be an incredible boon the the economy…and this is off point: But where is Jane?
I think it’s positively adorable that Marc thinks people are so stupidly unaware that this administration has gone after medical marijuana users but is going to do a complete 180 and not only stop that but actively support legalization for regular usage.
what does Marc think I’m smoking? My brain cells are all intact thankyouverymuch.
Since O has been going all out in shutting down medical marajuana dispensaries, it will be very easy for him to put his money where his mouth is. He could “Just Say No” but my bet is he won’t.
Interestingly, a recent front page headline on HP said that O was losing his grip on the youth vote. It can’t be coincidence that amost the very next headline suggests he going to tackle the “War on Drugs”.
Since the “War on Drugs” is like Miricle Grow for the private prison industry, I just won’t believe he has anything I would support in mind. More likely we will see a call for an expansion of drone warfare into the drug wars.
Miracle Grow has positive use.
Toothless? Those fucking drone attacks ain’t exactly toothless but their victims sure are, and headless, and legless, and armless and fucking dead.
No, no, necrophilia is not allowed on FDL.
“… that it takes 60 votes in the Senate to pass anything. ” The Dems played along.
Bush, appointed President in 2000 with a 50/50 senate, and the media says he can pass anything as the VP will cast the tie breaking vote. The Dems played along.
Oh, just in foreign policy?
Of course they did. I used to think Hill Dems were the 1962 Mets. Now I think they’re the 1919 Black Sox.
I would also like to point out that the ongoing erosion of constitutional rights began with and is firmly rooted in the “War On Drugs”; most notably the relaxation of search and seizure and forfeiture rules.
Clearly, someone needs to send him this memo. His advisors are letting him down….
Hundreds of thousands of young people are in American prisons serving long sentences for “hotboxing” and similar activities to what Obama did as a young man. The difference? They got caught. He didn’t.
Generally, though, this is absolutely spot-on, Jon. As we saw with his pseudo-DREAM actions, the president has lots of power, should he choose to use it. He could also direct the Department of Justice to keep his 2008 campaign promises about not pursuing patients and their providers who are in full compliance with state laws.
And he could sign an EO regarding LGBT discrimination at federal contractor workplaces.
The list goes on. Ambinder is a tool of the establishment.
The 4th Estate and the MSM have about as much in common as President Obama and Bill Bennett when it comes to reporting the real skinny on The Drug War and it horrendous negatives for our country. Er,… let me rephrase that Bill Bennett and President Obama have the same position on The Drug War. And lots of other shit, too. That’s why it’s so important to pick a Democrat or Republican for Fearless Leader in 2012. This country can’t afford to elect a real Progressive/ Socialist/ Doctor type who actually knows something about something. The times are way too perilous to have a science-based approach to any federal or state policy or law. ” Can’t do it, wouldn’t be prudent. “
That would be a bingo!
The first “endless war” laid the groundwork for those to follow, from promoting mindless scapegoating, to glorifying privatization, and establishing “SWAT” teams, Coach Bill, and the forfeiture laws were a test-run for gutting the Constitution …
Thank you Jon, a superb take-down.
DW
The “powerless” bullshit has been used as an excuse for every failure and sellout of the Obama presidency and the “powerless” bullshit leads right to the “lesser of two evils” bullshit.
If Obama had wanted to address the failed deug war, the issue of marijuana prohibition and the impact it had, he would have by now. The Department of Justice is not concerned with economic recovery or foreign wars. Marijuana could have been declassified and new drug enforcement policies put in place by now.
Instead, Holder went after John Edwards and has fought against State legalization initiatives and decriminalization policies.
This “we’ll take on the Drug War” bullshit is just that, bullshit. Obama is losing his liberal activist base (referred to as “the youth vote” as if noone over 30 can legitimately be part of that base) and this is because he has continued some of the worst Bush policies, has been a slut servicing corporations and the rich, and has otherwise failed to deliver most of what he promised in many cases with cynical deliberation.
I hope he loses, he’s a fraud, and four years of rule by a dickhead finance executive and capitalist parasite will teach the people much.
Excellent. The poor got caught and went to jail, the Harvard guy gets to be president. Could be either Bush or Obama we refer to.
“… four years of rule by a dickhead finance executive and capitalist parasite will teach the people much.”
I would like to think so but people do cling to their mis-perceptions.
This “Myth of the Toothless President” plays well with the voters. I have encountered this argument from some friends, family, and neighbors – all obama supporters. When I point out the power that he does have e.g. changing the legal status of any drug, I am met with blank stares and no response.
I’ve given up talking politics with these people. They’re hopeless but I truly wonder what’s gotten into them? I actually had a friend? of mine (for 20 years) tell me that she no longer wanted to continue a phone conversation we were having about obama. We discontinued the phone conversation and I never heard from her again – this was over a year ago.
What is about these obama supporters that they are willing to throw away friends because you don’t agree with them how wonderful he is. I have never seen anything like this.
Ambinder is a knave ,and he knows this issue has really hurt him with younger voters .I don’t anyone involved with med weed ,but everyone I know thought it was indefensible that he would he would target the sick and dying to impress Calderon .Even without knowing O could reclassify ,it was apparent that this guy could in no way be cool if he would bully such a vulnerable demographic .I guess he thought these people are worthless as voters and funders so what’s the downside ?
Thanks Jon ,this has been ,and still is ,a buzz in Berkeley ,but since we are a microcosm of nothing ,it was nice knowing that this issue has national traction ,as Ambinder confirms .
If the health care mandate didn’t teach people who Obama serves, nothing will. Obama is the person that thinks he is smarter than everyone else. The Bugs Bunny of Presidents that tricks Daffy into screaming “Duck Season”.
The Mandate will allow the banks owning the MHI to close in on private property and savings without so much as missing a beat should someone fall down. Don’t want to get into that because most people haven’t figured out what kind of hook they’re on and I’m ill just thinking about it.
The only “change” you’re gonna see from Obama concerning Marijuana is putting all rights and profits into the hands of the Big Pharma. Peasants will never be allowed to grow their own medicine. Oversight on any self administering of any kind of possible commodity will be reserved for the elite, period, and we will have controls just as invasive as now. Only different.
Rabbit season, duck season
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-k5J4RxQdE
I know it’s cliche but’s proven kabuki theater that works over, and over again Jon.
A lot of dems/obamabots fall for the poor me obama excuse every the time. Can’t fault team obama for sticking with this successful strategy. If the suckers want it, spoon feed it to ‘em. Kinda like going to some evangelical churches where people are eager to believe whatever crap you can shove into their skulls.
he is a gangster.
was always a gangster. the cia and its media manipulations caused you to overlook his history.
the craziest aspect of the purported progressive left is that it continues to consider obombya a liberal.
and ron paul some strong bit of craziness.
how does that work. obombya invades scores of countries, kills scores of noncombatants, but the left still sucks his dick.
ron paul advocates the end of these warmongerings, the left denounces him for being jejune.
and the left seem content to have a two asshole warmongerers contesting for the presidency, the capo di tutti capi.
and it is a tweedledum, tweedledee contest.
yet, the left appears to countenance endless warmongering.
you lefties want social justice? then you must fight to end obombya’s militarism.
to empty the usa inquisition’s prisons.
to drain the military industrial complex. you know, just taking out a fraction of its largesse could finance single payer, social security, for centuries.
savvy?
barry is not your friend. he is your enemy. and must be removed.
the two paragraphs you quoted are the sum total of the discussion of Obama in the article. Most of it is about some Eugene Jarecki movie that Marc Ambinder saw and liked.
The fact that “barry” is not my friend(duh, I’m aware I’m not going to be sharing a beer with any of the pols in DC) does not negate the fact that Ron Paul is a hypocritical and delusional man(and yes that is how I describe someone who believes that is governmental responsibility to regulate who you sleep with or medical decisions like family planning but believes the government should adopt a hands off policy regarding megacorps or discrimination by business.)
They’re in the throes of cognitive dissonance, one of the foundations of social psychology. It’s hard (but not impossible) to overcome even when you’re aware of its influence on you. The exploitation of cognitive dissonance is one of the primary means by which the oligarchy keeps the rabble under control — and it’s a brilliant technique, because it is self-applied by the same rabble, so there is no apparent oppression. Win-win!!
But it does explain why things are so gummed up.
http://youtu.be/e0q1PH_6Yys
“Jon does that include hemp as well? That would be an incredible boon the the economy…and this is off point:”
Phil,
This is, the point. Hemp / marijuana is one natural resource with versatile uses. The prohibition was for economic reasons first. It was called “competition!”
For instance.. Cellulosic ethanol from industrial grade hemp?? Why use corn? Now power the process with solar power and the resource. Could certainly lower food and energy cost if done correctly. But NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!
In Congress they protect corporate business models, and the contributions obtained from monied interests. Congress protects unequal pay for woman, protected slavery. This is now different!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellulosic_ethanol
The use of “pot,” only became a “social issue” once it could be used to pit people against people using racist stereotypes as a wedge issue. During WWII farmers could grow hemp for war effort? Another example of corporate scum buggery undermining the the republic. BTW, you can be sure at the end of a day’s work the fuckers probably tossed back a few cold ones. I do not drink alcohol. But yet they would use law and toss me in jail for possessing and smoking pot?
Intellectual scumbags. All of them… Its called protect the slaveholders………
It is called procedural hostage taking. Carving their own little exceptions to simple majority vote, to obstruct progress. Another example of how corpo-aristocrats have gamed the system and rule of law, fucking the republic and the governed!
>>What is about these obama supporters that they are willing to throw away friends because you don’t agree with them how wonderful he is. I have never seen anything like this.<<
karenb, bravo! You've hit upon something extremely irrational that has been observed in my world too about Obama and people's reactions to any hint of criticism of him including my own family full of die-hard liberals who refuse to see my view of O as a corporatist. A broader-brushwork of this defense of Obama at all cost (even old friendships) is found in a PNHP piece last Feb about CA single payer bill going down, in part, because Dems might have wanted to protect Obama by letting single payer die so that passing single payer in the largest state in the union would not embarrass their beloved Obama’s ACA just before election, keeping in mind too that when ACA was originally passed, major pressure was brought to bear on Dems to pass ACA to save the Obama presidency (or not destroy it). Bottom line: Not policy or principle at work with Obama but saving his skin — why?
Toothless!?
Every time I see the presididn’t flash those big incisors during another one of his re-election snow-jobs, I think about how he’s taking another bite out of us before he’s even finished chewing up the last one.
I wish you would cite the US Code to back up your claims that Obama can made changes in drug laws that won’t immediately result in round up of thousands of patients if Romney or another conservative Republican is elected president.
If Obama can simply remove pot from the controlled drug list and eliminate possession and sale as a felony, then a President Romney can make all those benefiting from Obama’s unilateral action felons on January 21, 2013.
Perhaps you see such an action as a motivator for drug users and dealers to get out the Obama vote out of fear they will go to jail if Romney wins, but by 2017, Obama will be gone no matter what, and any action Obama takes unilaterally can and likely would be immediately reversed if the only way progressives get the law changed is by electing a president instead of a Congress.
And how would Romney do that? Ex post facto laws? FISA aside, those are still viewed as unconstitutional; I think that the “strict constructionists” upon whom Romney relies would look askance at such an action.
The underlying issue about pot policy is not the pot.
Its the complete failure of policy makers to be realistic, reasonable and sane about it.
Driven by the absurd sci-fi hysteria of Reefer Madness delusions, they are like 6 year olds believing there are monsters under the bed.
Smoking pot is no more a punishable offense than drinking alcohol.
The effects are no more debilitating either.
Take a drinker and a toker. Sit them down and have the drinker swallow one shot of whiskey, while the toker takes 2 big bong hits. Do this every 10 minutes for 2 hours.
Observe the difference in impairment, behavior, and the next morning in hangover.
We allow drinkers to imbibe without penalty so long as they behave themselves otherwise.
The same standard should apply to tokers.
Demanding reform is not a pot issue, its an issue of demanding realistic perception and functional cognition from our law makers in governing We The People.
Happy 4th of July.
“Ambinder says we “shouldn’t expect the president to come out in favor of legalizing marijuana,” but there is no reason he can’t.”
Of course there are reasons he can’t. Same reasons John Brennan is his “security” “adviser”. Look, few people talk about it, but there are tens of thousands of people who make their living off the “War On Drugs.” Some of them make very good livings indeed. There’s the whole Prison-Industrial Complex, the Prison Guards Unions, the thousands of police who haven’t been downsized because the wingnuts want to keep them locking up the dreaded “addicts.” Besides, I get the strong impression that Obama really believes in that bullsh*t. Did you see what his people sent out in reply to the very popular petition to normalize marijuana use? All kinds of pseudo-scientific crap that it might be a gateway drug, or its effects still were in dispute, and that any change to the law would be imprudent.