In the Affordable Care Act the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) was given the power to review health insurance premium increases, but it wasn’t given the power to actually do anything about unreasonable increases. HHS can only say an increase is “unreasonable,” but it has zero regulatory power to force the companies to change their premiums. Not surprisingly this totally toothless provision is now proving to be mostly worthless. From Politico:
HHS can use its bully pulpit to publicly shame insurers whose rates don’t pass its sniff test – and HHS has done just that, holding four media calls since November to scold insurers each time it’s made a new “unreasonable” determination.
Faced with the choice of dealing with some negative press on the national stage or upending their business plan, the four insurers that have been dinged by HHS have all chosen to stick with the business plan.
Even though a provision with zero enforcement obviously has almost no value, this hasn’t stopped Democrats from claiming the rating review process is amazing and should be super effective. The White House’s official overview of the law still falsely implies the law has regulatory teeth:
Stopping Unreasonable Rate Increases: In every State and for the first time ever, insurance companies are required to publicly justify their actions if they want to raise rates by 10 percent or more.
The reality is that the law now merely lets us officially know that HHS thinks the rates are “unreasonable,” but it does nothing to actually stop them.
During the drafting of the ACA, efforts were made to include a provision that would give HHS the power to stop unreasonable rate increases, but the provision didn’t make it into the final law. Instead the Obama administration seems to be just pretending it did.
With so much over promising and under delivering around the health care law, it is no wonder it is still unpopular.




21 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Insurance companies: “Because we said so.”
There. Done.
“Public Healthcare
Because Government Knows What’s Best For You”
Yeahhhh….uhhh….I’m not feeling it.
Oh. So you think insurance companies would be better administrators for Social Security?
And Public Health is 100% Government operated. It works well.
Considering that the feds have robbed the SS coffers to pay for other schemes, I’m not sure I’d be touting their record as one of stern fiscal control.
Government isn’t some machine to be programmed to your will, it’s as much a collection of people as private business and subject to the same human failures. You’re asking me to trade the guillotine for the headsman’s axe, in the end I’m still a corpse.
One must simply stand in utter amazement at what our government does.
From Sternly Worded Letters™ to Sternly Worded Phone Calls. What’s the next step? HHS threatens to unfriend them on Facebook?
Yet another wonderful aspect of The Rube Goldberg Health Insurance “Reform” Act of 2010. Just think, this legislative pile of pink slime is the signature accomplishment of the Obama presidency.
Either that or, “We just want more moneyz.”
‘Publicly justifying’ a massive rate increase in no way requires them to have that justification make sense or even be true.
Yes, since the ACA slithered through Congress my employer provided insurance premiums, co-pays and prescription costs continue to rise like a tsunami wave.
We got nailed for hefty increases twice in one year by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan. Both times, BC/BS accompanied the notice of rate increase with a flyer that expressly blamed the Rube Goldberg Act for making the the increase necessary.
Last year, I paid $400 a month. This year, they raised it first to $800. Then they decided that was not enough. So they raised my monthly payment to $1200. The average for a family is $400 a month. We mere “consumers” have no protection against corporate health care and the health care predators who steal our health care and our money.
Obama, GO TO HELL!
This was exactly Obama’s plan to talk up something worthless in order to sell his backroom deal with the insurance companies – this is a feature not a bug, just Obama thought he’d be able to sell ACA better than he actually did.
There has been no theft of funds from Social Security for other purposes.
The SS Trust holdings of US Bonds are as solid as China’s holdings of US bonds. Both are just claims on future taxes with the only difference being the rich and corporate do not want to pay back the money they borrowed from Social Security for the Bush tax cuts for the rich – indeed both the GOP and the Dems are trying to avoid going back to the Clinton tax rates that would provide the money to pay both Chinese and SS Trust bonds off as they presented to Treasury for payment.
The pretense that Social Security has no money is the GOP BULL SHIT (and of late Obama grand bargain bull shit) that we need to stop eating up as truth.
Americans want real health care reform…the Democrats bill is NOT health care reform.
This bill FORCES-MANDATES every American…for their ENTIRE LIVES… to buy [give their hard earned money to] something from private co’s that Americans do NOT want to do business with…it is a corrupt giveaway to the health insurance companies.
Even worse….this bill has NO cost controls….and it institutionalizes a binding relationship between our government [the people] and private companies…
The Obama-Democrats bill is a recipe for corruption… the likes of which this country has never seen. This is third world country level corruption.
The American people know this.
Lies, lies and more lies…
From Obama The Fake.
Two identical slimy, corrupt liars… ObamaRomney… are running for president of the United States.
Health care “reform” was never anything more than a policy crafted by the Health Insurance Industry for the benefit of the Health Insurance Industry to the detriment of the citizens of USA,Inc. Don’t forget that this disaster is Obama’s “signature piece of legislation” gift to the insurance industry.
100% correct.
A Maryland Board – which they have had for more than 30 years – is needed. The board sets the amount that 3rd party payers can pay for any procedure. It is approved via waiver for Medicare claims in that state.
It is not far from setting a national health budget – and then setting the rates paid by the Federal/state – in any universal basic benefits plan – where health care providers are required by law to accept the amount paid as payment in full for those basic benefits. Insurance – as in Canada and Britain – would be sold to provide benefits above “basic benefits – but the process keeps all health care costs down.
Just pray that Vermont’s single payer gets off the ground in 2014 as a replacement for the “exchanges”.
99.44% correct. One is slightly darker in complexion than the other and Obama may be more dangerous wearing that “D” on his chest.
But don’t you know Tam, that during Obama’s second term he’s going to be so much more different and super-duper Progessivey? At least that’s what all the ‘bots from Daily Kos believe after he came out in favor of same sex marriage equality – if the state you live in doesn’t ban it first, of course. The ACA was a George W Bushism proved true – something about the “soft bigotry of lowered expectations”, once the Public Option was auctioned off to the highest bidding health insurance lobbyist.
Everything about Obama and his Reagan-loving, neo-liberal, centrist, lesser of two evils, civil liberty shredding, goat-fucking train wreck of an administration makes me want to vomit in my mouth. After Bush, I swore to never vote for a Republican. I may have to make the same pledge with regard to Democrats after Obama.
“Faced with the choice of dealing with some negative press on the national stage or upending their business plan, the four insurers that have been dinged by HHS have all chosen to stick with the business plan.”
Pretty much says it all.
BTW, it’s 60 a month for single and approx. 160 a month for a family of three or more … in BC, Canada.