The Obama administration officially released its budget for fiscal year 2013 yesterday. As much as I like writing about policy, I frankly lack any desire to write about the substance of this budget proposal.
The simple fact is that the President’s budget is basically a long, vaguely political document that is effectively meaningless. After a few days of news stories about individual provisions and the Republicans’ perfunctory cries of “socialism,” “tax and spend liberalism” or “accounting gimmicks,” this budget will be quickly forgotten. It is basically dead on arrival in Congress, another package of ideas destined to go nowhere.
The fact that Republicans control the House of Representatives and have taken an uncompromising stance makes this particular budget especially meaningless. But even back when Obama had some of the largest Democratic Congressional majorities in modern history, his budgets didn’t really mean much.
One of the biggest financial aspects of this budget, as well as Obama’s previous budgets and Obama’s political campaign, is ending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and closing the carried interest loophole. Yet Obama and the Democrats made almost no effort to quickly deal with this big aspect of Obama’s budget plans during all of 2009 or 2010. Even when the Bush tax cuts were about to expire and Obama was forced to confront the issue, he broke his promise by extending them.
Of course there was always some excuse for not taking care of the huge tax issue, like the need to get 60 votes in the Senate or not wanting to risk letting the tax cuts on the middle class expire, but they were mostly face saving nonsense. These tax components could have been put in a reconciliation bill and taken care of in a day if the Democrats wanted. If Democrats had really wanted to, they could have used their majorities to pass almost all of Obama’s campaign platform into law in 2009.
As a result I feel little desire to evaluate the merits of proposals that the White House may never intend or attempt to advance or give Obama praise for restating the same tired old unfulfilled promises on taxes. Maybe some can glean some indirect insight into Obama’s true thinking from the budget, like a shaman reading the future in the entrails of oracle sacrifice, but it seems like a waste of effort. Too many broken and purposely unfulfilled promises have me concluding I should not bother judging until there are concrete actions.
I wish it weren’t this way. I would personally love it if these budgets really did matter. I think it would be great if the American people knew that if they gave Democrats a victory in the 2012 election, that the Democrats would quickly implement Obama’s whole budget plan. One of the best things that I think could happen to our democracy is if it we considered it a huge scandal if a party didn’t quickly implement its platform if it won full control.
Sadly this basic democratic accountability isn’t how our system works. We are taught that it is naive to even expect politicians to do what they said they would, told there is always some insane rule or tradition that magically prevents the party that won from governing like it promised.




25 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
If Democrats weren’t such craven hypocrites, they would have brought impeachment charges against Bushboy after they won the majority in 2006. Instead, their fearless leader Pelosi took impeachment “off the table.”
True, last years budget was voted down by the Democratically controlled Senate 97 to 0. What does it matter.
“SOLD”
First time in my memory that we have had a lame duck prez in his first term. It will be much worse in his second – yes, I do think he will win but not with my vote.
There are hints in the budget – like the implication he will not allow the Clinton Tax rates to return and thinks he has Congressional Democratic support for that give away, to that refusal to cut the deficit by $4 trillion – because he can again hide the give away to the rich as protection of the middle-class – as if letting the Clinton rates return and passing new tax cuts is impossible with the GOP in Congress.
Other than that it is mental masturbation – and I’m too old for that.
Well, I wish the President actually mattered. On second thought, maybe I’m glad he doesn’t.
She couldn’t get impeachment off the table. She was too busy peeing on the powder.
Thank goodness Obama has made one of his top priorities clear — CUTTING corporate tax rates.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204883304577223152165302614.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Excerpts: ‘ “We’re going to propose a broad reform that will lower rates, broaden the base and eliminate or wipe out…dozens and dozens and dozens of special tax preferences for businesses,” Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said Tuesday at a Senate Finance Committee hearing….’
“The U.S. corporate-tax rate is 35%, though many companies pay less due to credits, deductions, exclusions and exemptions. Still, the headline rate is significantly higher than in other developed nations. Last year, Mr. Geithner suggested that the corporate-tax rate should move toward the “high 20s” from its current level.”
No way is he going to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire. That is a given. Other than that, this is just a joke.
If he did it right he could cut corporate tax rates while eliminating many loopholes. But what are the chances of that? He will make it sound good though.
Because loopholes are easier to keep track of than basic rates. Riiiiight. BTW, there’s a bridge in Brooklyn that’s going for a bargain rate…. :-P
Looks as if he may be running agqinst Santorum………
I didn’t think he would win a second term but I MAY have to reconsider.
Me, I’m voting “Green”.
I was kinda “for” the former but, like you, switched to the latter.
I’m voting for Margaret.
Ann ?????????
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qiJ7uQfogKA
Nay, Margaret the commentor here.
See my #16. You MIGHT want to reconsider.
I’m fully aware of how smokin’ hot Ann Margaret was :)
This is another well deserved & well written piece by Jon. But, so what? If Progressives, and ideological Dems for that matter, vote to reelect Obama we deserve everything he’s done to us, our kids & our grandkids. Obama’s the WORST Democratic President in history. I honestly don’t know a single action that would better predict the continued decline of America than voting to reelect him. Me, I will vote against EVERY Incumbent, both Parties, who seeks reelection and I will agressively support any challenger I believe is most likely to try to do what he/she campaigns on. If the election were tomorrow, I’d proudly vote for Gary Johnson.
But, I’d like to know where FDL stands on reelecting Obama. Is this an issue it sees as a no win proposition?
Send the Valentine c/o ‘Ann-Margret’ if you want it to reach her.
Didn’t know she was running…
Should Big Zero win, the Democratic Party will no longer exist in 20 years. Unfortunately, neither will the middle class.
Obama is a neo-liberal in the worst Clintonian tradition, and will not rest until all public goods and utilities are privatized, and all middle and working class safety nets are ripped apart. Yes, Romney is even more of a corporatist, and Santorum is delusional, but the lesser evil argument no longer works when the economic policies practiced by both parties are virtually the same. And at least the Repubs are honest with us when they say they want to dismantle the New Deal; but that’s also where they fail. Because they overreach and try to enact their agenda with the subtlety of a flamethrower every time they gain the White House – it galvanizes a normally placid Democratic Party to actually stand up and fight them.
When the push to knock off our New Deal protections comes from “our” side, however, who’s left for us to fight against? The spineless bastards who claim to represent us in Congress, solely because they have a “D” after their name? They’ll sell us down the river the first chance they get so once they leave office they can make millions on K street.
At this point I’m convinced that the only chance we have of avoiding mimicking Russia of the 1990′s is for divided, grid-locked government to be the order of the day for the next several years – until a political party that truly represents the interests of the people is viable. And I’m not saying the Dems couldn’t be that party, just that I haven’t seen any evidence of it for the last several decades.
The political process no longer matters.
Not the Judiciary, not the Executive, not Congress.
Not any elected or appointed official at the national, state, county, city, town level.
It’s all owned and operated by the corporate fascist 1%.
Changes will only come thru great pains and horrid losses, be it from collapse of empire thru and of its own volition, mama nature or a revolt by the masses.
There ARE no good endings at this point, only some kind of inevitable change that will be massively devastating.
Ergo, the analysis of the political process, the erection cycles, and such, is . . . well it don’t change anything and altho it’s informative I think the masses are now well aware of the screwing they are getting.
I’m PRETTY sure anyone who reads FEDL and MyFDL are pretty hep to it all . . . it’s all been analyzed to death. ;-)
And I for one am THANKFUL for FDL and any and all proggy reporting and writing the past 10 years on the internet.
But at this point, we all pretty much know the game is gamed, and how it got and gets gamed.
Time to move on to something new . . . just sayin.
PERHAPS, perhaps, Occupy is a spark to bring that something new, I don’t know.
I remain somewhat skeptical until the masses are energized fully into some kinds of actions.
Now THAT will pass.