
I was at the White House once again yesterday protesting the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline along with many of the folks I was arrested with on September 9 including Dan Choi, Jessica, Ari, Scarecrow and Bill McKibben. It was really gratifying to see that our relatively small crew of 65 who were handcuffed, hauled off in paddy wagons and sent to jail with almost zero media attention that first day had now swelled to a crowd of over 12,000 that the media could not ignore.
A lot of folks had been pretty shook up at being locked up for 2 days over what basically amounted to a parking ticket in order to deter future protesters. Yesterday we got a chance to shake hands with many of the Day 2 protesters, who went out and got arrested anyway knowing that they might face the same consequences, but they refused to be deterred. It was nice closure.
Van Jones was conspicuously absent when we were getting arrested at the White House that day in September (Overheard in the paddy wagon: “Where’s Van Jones? You think he would want to be here.”) He couldn’t come yesterday either, but he sent along a rather unequivocal condemnation of President Obama for even considering approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, calling for people to respond with mass civil disobedience if he does.
Following yesterday’s action, in which 12,500 people were standing three-deep surrounding the White House, McKibben spoke briefly and read an email he had just received from Jones:
I wish I could be there, helping you to surround my old workplace. Only unavoidable family obligations are keeping me away; I would be there with you under any other circumstances, and my spirit absolutely is.
That affirmation is good to hear. There shouldn’t have been anything to keep him from lifting a pen and signing onto the October 4 letter from environmental leaders protesting the questionable relationship between Hillary Clinton and other State Department officials with Trans Canada and the process that they are using to determine approval of the pipeline. But 12,500 people is a lot more than 65, and it’s hard for a leading environmentalist to retain any street cred within the community and remain silent on this:
We have a duty to support the president when he is right (for instance, fighting for the jobs bill). And we have an equal duty to oppose him when he is wrong. And if he is even considering approving this monstrous, planet-killing proposal, President Obama is flat-out, absolutely, and 100 percent wrong.
Let the message be clear: We, the People, cannot accept this. If the White House lets the proposal go forward, there should be nonviolent civil disobedience and mass arrests along every mile, foot, and inch of the construction route — until it is impossible to complete. August was the beginning of the “people’s veto” of this whole proposal; we will never give up until the very idea of Keystone XL is dead and buried.
But is should never come to that. I call upon President Obama to stand with the people who stood with him and who stand for future generations: reject Keystone XL.
All people of conscience reject it. I stand with them, loud and proud. So should President Obama.
Green jobs for all!
There has been speculation that because the pipeline has become such a political hot potato, Obama will punt on the decision until after the 2012 election. That was my guess anyway, but Scarecrow had another one in the wake of Obama’s announcement last week that he would personally take responsibility for whatever decision was made. Scarecrow thought Obama was telling Trans Canada to move the pipeline route away from the Ogallala aquifier — which would mitigate the right-wing opposition to the pipeline from Nebraska ranchers, and “give something to the kids.”
It does sound like the kind of Solomonic baby-slicing that has become Obama’s trademark, and if what he’s really worried about is picking up a Nebraska electoral college vote again in 2012, he may think this solves his problems.
Regardless of whatever political calculus is happening behind the scenes, I was impressed by the unequivocal tone of the Jones’ email. It can’t sit well with the White House, because the President is clearly looking for a way to approve the pipeline. Calling for mass civil unrest if Obama does so will not only inflame Jones’s rabid right-wing critics (of which he has many), but it may be something he actually has to follow through on.
After Obama threw him under the bus, Van could have done many things. He chose to join the Center for American Progress, the think-tank whose job it is to slap the “good liberal seal of approval” on decidedly non-progressive things the White House wants to do, like perpetuating the War in Afghanistan. (CAP recently told Politico that environmentalists will be satisfied if Obama simply punts on the piepline until after the election, because “people who are concerned about this will feel he has been listening to them.”)
And he also recently launched his Rebuild the Dream organization, which clearly hopes to be on the receiving end of the massive Democratic 2012 election money gravy train. Maybe it just wasn’t flowing fast enough, and this was a warning shot. But now Van has put himself on the line, and even if Obama does punt, the Keystone XL pipeline will nonetheless continue to be a front-burner election issue with the young people Obama must turn out in 2012 — people with whom Jones has quite a bit of influence.
I just don’t think we live in a world where the oil companies don’t ultimately get their way, and some route for the pipeline isn’t approved. I look forward to participating in civil disobedience with Van Jones to protest construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, regardless of who is residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue when it happens.
Photo: Jon Walker





62 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
I guess I must not be young anymore, because I have no idea what is the big deal about Van Jones, especially given his tenuous grasp of cause and effect:
If the WH lets the proposal go forward… then it’s too damn late.
It would be much easier to stop it from the get go, than to try to fix it later. Or hasn’t Van been paying attention over the past couple of years?
Seriously, the man thinks that getting the critical mass of the number of people you would need to cover “every mile, foot, and inch of the construction route” is going to be easier than focusing all of your attention on the single city block occupied by the WH? Has he lost his mind?
Honest to God, Americans suck at math and evidently geospatial distances as well. Jones should be embarrassed to say something so gobsmackingly idiotic.
That’s why it is pointless to shut the damn barn door, after the horses have escaped.
Thanks Jane for everything you do.
We have a winnah.
Everyone who’s ever been associated with O seem to be gobsmackingly idiotic, to use your well crafted phrase.
That Occupy sign directly in front of the WH is so great! Thanks, Jane, for all your work. It was nice to see Dan there, too. He always shows up when needed, bless him.
Heh,
I’m sure he wasn’t being literal, but as you point out, covering every mile, foot, and inch of the 1700 mile pipeline would take about 3,000,000 people standing sholder to sholder.
But maybe less if they lay down head to toe.
Thanks eCAHN ; )
I’m still sputtering over this. What is it with the if-Obama-doesn’t-…-why-I’m-gonna crowd? What don’t they get? Action is required before The Pinhead-in-Chief does something bad, not after. Arggghhhh….
Thank God for Occupy, the only discernible sign of intelligence in the political universe.
What makes anyone believe that Van Jones is not still working for the Obama team, out on special assignment?
What about if there are more fracking-related earthquakes in the pipeline’s path, as we saw in Oklahoma late last week?
They’re going to have to choose between fracking and pipeline.
There is a report at HP that the Big Zero may postpone the decision until after the election. Not a victory but a slimy deflection to counter the Movement.
Reminds me of the Dorothy Parker saying: If all the girls at [Wellesley] were laid end to end, I wouldn’t be a bit surprised.
Had to substitute Wellesley for Vassar in the original, as Vassar is no longer an all girls school.
What gets me about that reasoning is that anyone still thinks O might do anything the lefties want.
Jane:
van jones is a phony. His actions and inactions as outlined in your essay confirm this. Why spend anymore time on him?
Excellent point.
(And great quote by the way at #9 ; )
Yup, saw that report too, that Obama was going to postpone a decision until after the election. I bet that means he’s going to okay it but is afraid if he did it now, he’d lose even more supporters.
He’s trying to straddle. On the one hand, he wants to keep his environmental credibility; on the other hand, he’s afraid of being called out by Obama partisans for not being supportive of the first black president.
Thing is, a manifesto such as the one of his that Jane’s reproduced in her post will have already burned his bridges with the partisans; he may as well go whole hog instead of trying to straddle.
Egggzacktly.
Or reroute it so it doesn’t go thru Nebraska, or reroute it so it doesn’t cross the Ogallala aquifer, or, or, or.
Our imaginations are not rich enough to figure out all the ways O is going to help his contributors loot the taxpayer.
It helps a lot when movement leaders who call for civilly disobedient actions participate in those actions.
Street cred = trust relationship between movement elite and the movement members
How many of those supposed supporters are going to vote O in 2012 knowing that he has deliberately put off the vote until after the election for the express purpose of tricking folks into voting for him? I didn’t read that article, but it makes me wonder what the purpose of that leak could really be.
agreed. I am baffled why Jane would post this? if jones was real what would stop him showing up at the WH and protesting any day of the week? please jones is a huge phony and the only thing he cares about is himself. saw him on Schultz acting as a spokesperson for OWS.
The drillers will figure out some way to spin the “fracking-related earthquakes” as a benifitial “pressure release.” Better to have those little “frack-quakes” than those big earthquakes like they have out in non-fracking Cali.
Jones in same category as Chu. Sell outs so they can be within the
stinkaura of the U.S. prez.I think what we are seeing here is proof of the old saying, the best defense is a good offense. The Occupy Movement is the first real showing of offense from the Left in many years. The only way to move forward is to quit playing defense and drive the PTB back, they are already showing how unprepared they are to play that role.
That is an awfully grandiose statement from someone who wasn’t standing anywhere near two landmark protests (and certainly nowhere near Scarecrow’s prison cell), and couldn’t even bring himself to sign the Trans Canada letter…..
Maybe Jane is calling him out and holding his feet to the fire?
It is heartbreaking to me how completely Obama has abandoned envmntl principles. From climate change to the polar bears to King Coal, Obama has not delivered anything and made things worse. Some would say that he has down some stuff compared to the last scumbag who fouled the Oval Office, but that is a false equivalency given the stark flashes of envnmtl collapse rippling through the global ecosystem that demand a reevaluation of how we live here today. I applaud you, Jane, for taking the lead on this, and putting yourself on the line.
It is interesting to see how the comments above are becoming an analysis of Van Jones effectiveness, but at least he is doing something. Who else in the Democratic Party leadership (current or former) has said anything about Keystone or the Tar Sands?
And eCAHN, that Dorothy Parker is great. Don’t be surprised at how craven and corrupt our so-called ‘leaders’ turn out to be.
Add me to the list of those who don’t trust Jones.
He strikes me as a trojan horse. I’ve heard him talk about Occupy and he is very careful to avoid the culpability of the president and the administration’s exacerbation of the present mora$$.
That was sort of my thought when I read it.
But I do agree with phred above — “after it is approved” will be a tad bit too late.
Just received my third Democratic party fundraising envelope with a “Do not bend” on the outside.
I bent it.
Agree
Obama is going to delay his decision to approve until after the 2012 elections. TransCanada can line up shippers again if it needs to.
While I personally support the pipeline as better than our continued dependence on Mideast oil & all the wars & killing that that entails, I deplore Obama’s obvious dodge on the matter. If Obama delays his decision until after Nov 2012 it is as good as approved.
And no, I do not see the pipeline & tar sands and renewables as mutually exclusive alternatives, both should be pursued vigorously. The tar sands/piepline to decrease dependence on Mideast oil, renewables for the same reason plus to replace fossil fuel use entirely. I would prefer activism to insure tar sands oil, which will be mined and refined regardless of the pipeline (pipeline transport adds nothing to carbon emissions of tar sands oil), be mined & refined in the least impactful ways. It takes a lot of electricity so how about carbon free sources like wind, hydro and nuke? There are ways to minimize the global warming effect of tar sands oil and that should be the focus. Denying entry to US markets via the proposed pipeline simply forces our continued. murderous dependence on Mideast oil.
Again, oil use from whatever source does not, should not preclude a full speed ahead on renewables policy. It is, however, a fact of life in at least the near term.
about that dependence on Mideast oil thing -
NONE of the tar sands oil will ever reach US markets — all bound for China and India – just as with 81% of the oil that suffocated the Gulf
Of course the problem in Obama’s rendition of Solomon’s intellect, he would slice the baby asunder. He seems excellent at extracting a lose-lose situation from a win-win.
along with that October 4th letter – 50+ Major Environmental groups sent a letter at the time of the August arrests — it was unprecedented – the Obama Admin has been able to count on Sierra Club and a few other veal pen validators to remain quiet or go the “half full” route – ‘fracking is cleaner than coal doncha know !’ anyhoo, all of them signed the 8/2011 letter, putting this WH on notice — yesterday confirmed it
your move Mr President
x2
That’s my read.
grinning
I’m continually amazed at the number of people who repeat this “takes us off foreign oil” horseshit. Don’t these people know anything about the oil industry and how it works, or do they think we don’t? All oil goes on the world market. Oil delivered via the Alaskan pipeline ends up mostly in Asia. They’re either ignorant or trolls.
My gut won’t let me trust Van Jones. :-(
Why eliminate the possibility of “ignorant trolls”?
hej, didn’t see you come in :)
Obama is an audacious smuck. He will stand with the Kochsuckers because he will see it as politically advantageous. That’s his MO. Now people, are we going to elect him again, that’s the question. Granted no one for the people is running.
Like one big, happy bathtub.
What the heck does “hej” mean? (Hiya, cutie.)
heja, rc
just Swedish hi
you’re halfway there!
you’re halfway there!
Story of my life lol.
I laughed out loud at your ‘bind her up with rocks’ experiment! ohlolol
That’s “schmuck,” and yes, he is. At best.
here, I’ll come over the other half :)
Harumph. We don’t condone violent fantasies here. :-(
Is that for real? I was just trying to bust your chops for hitting the wrong key in “heh.”
but if she weighs more than a duck isn’t she a witch??
I assume you know that if you keep moving halfway toward me, you’ll NEVER get here?
ja, visst :)
not that I don’t hit a lot of wrong keys!
If she weighs less than a duck, she MAY NOT be a witch. ;-)
Better than hitting donkeys, IMO. (Unless they are politicians.)
hej då, realitychecker (bye)
Later, girl friend. ;-)
Never mind the fact that for every $100.00 dollars one spends on the monopolized commodity called gasoline, $80.00 of economic value is squandered in the form of lost heat energy. As with America’s instilled addiction to Cancer sticks, oil like tobacco has no interest in providing value to the consumer. Americans today, like slaves prior to America’s civil war find themselves leveraged into “servitude,” again concerning modern day corporate energy, hellbent on protecting their way of doing business, at the republic’s expense?
It’s just so sad to see Van Jones, who I saw speak with such clear justice back in … 2004? … on behalf of incarcerated youth and who now equivocates and maneuvers even when he was sold out by Obama … really sad.
Thanks to Jane and all our pals for showing up when it mattered.
And, Van Jones? This movement has all it needs of the sternly worded letter. Actions matter. You know this.
Pipeline may be on Hold
From the Guardian,
And a little farther down is this even better ? news.
“Only unavoidable family obligations are keeping me away”
LMFAO – was it BOGO day at his local Costco?
That is absurd.