From Maine to Monterey, Utah to Utica — big energy corporations like Halliburton are bribing your local officials for the right to pump “proprietary chemicals” into open fractures beneath the earth that flow into local water formations.
In the huge Marcellus Shale natural gas deposit, which stretches from New York to Tennessee, 5 million gallons of contaminated water are left behind for every well drilled.
It doesn’t matter how many glasses of hydraulic fracking fluid Halliburton CEO Dave Lesar wants to drink as a publicity stunt. Does anyone really believe that chemicals used to fracture shale and release natural gas will present no danger to the people who have to live amidst the contamination long after the corporate looters are gone?
Are big energy corporations already using fracking in your area? Do they want to? Are they setting up astroturf groups to tell you how safe it is, or simply bribing your representatives to inflict misery on the rest of the country?
Many communities are affected by fracking contaminants in their drinking water supply, regardless of whether it is actually happening there. Affected areas include the Delaware River supplies drinking water to 15 million people in New York City, Philadelphia and New Jersey as well as Delaware. And now it’s at risk from fracking contamination, too.
There are plenty of people getting rich off of this, people who are spinning lies and bribing elected officials and destroying your community before you even know it. These are the same people who bought an exemption for fracking chemicals from the 2005 Clean Air and Water Act, so you have no right to know what chemicals are being pumped into your drinking water. They’re the ones who are trying to buy a permanent exemption right now.
FDL wants to rip the mask of anonymity from their faces, and expose them for what they are — craven handmaidens to an oligarchical class hell-bent on raping the the country and extracting every last nickel they can, indifferent to the blighted earth and human misery they leave in their wake.
The people at Fleishman-Hillard PR, for instance, who were just hired by the American Petroleum Institute to “sell the public on hydraulic fracking.” Or Orvile Cole, President of the Quebec company Gastem, who bought up 30,000 acres of leases in upstate New York and is trying to steamroll local community opposition. (Ironically, Quebec recently declared a moratorium on fracking.) Or Halliburton’s own Dave Leser.





33 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
A map of where fracking is occurring with a description of “accidents” that have already occurred. I put accidents in quotes, as I’m fairly sure they aren’t accidents but the
cost of doing businessbyproduct of greed.http://earthjustice.org/features/campaigns/fracking-across-the-united-states
AWESOME! Thanks, FDL, for doing this!
Voted this summer as the most beautiful place in America on Good Morning America, Sleeping Bear Dunes, Michigan AND right next door is where the frakcing is starting – right next to Lake Michigan, part of the largest fresh water source in the world.
http://glenarborsun.com/%E2%80%9Cfracking%E2%80%9D-gas-companies-target-northern-michigan/
http://michiganradio.org/post/new-requirements-fracking-michigan http://www.crainsdetroit.com/article/20110527/STAFFBLOG10/110529913/fracking-in-michigan-appears-on-the-upswing#
sorry – one more because it’s a good one – http://www.watershedcouncil.org/learn/hydraulic-fracturing/
Plenty of others are getting rich too. Landowners who sit atop of the shale get thousands of dollars (sometimes tens of thousands of dollars) per acre as a signing bonus to sell the gas companies their mineral rights, even if the companies don’t disturb a blade of grass on their land.
On top of that the landowners are usually paid for 20% to 25% of the gas that is eventually processed, the gas companies take the rest for costs and profit.
And if you should have a desirable enough plot of land that the companies actually sink a well on your property, that’s more money.
One more thing, if you should have a large body of water on your land, the drilling companies will pay top dollar for water, especially because of the current drought conditions.
Wow Royal Oak, thanks so much for that.
We really want to have a map of where we have readers/activists so that we can help them elevate their conflicts with big energy company and expensive PR firms to the national level. It would be a tragedy to pollute Lake Michigan like that.
Totally. That’s how Gastem got their 30,000 acres. It really is prisoner’s dilemma — get rich selling your rights or wait for them to destroy the value of your property by exploiting everyone else’s. First in gets the money.
You get double points and double dollars for polluting water during a drought.
It’s the same cast of characters that comes up with this shit and then bribes government officials/bamboozles the public. Offshore drilling, tar sands pipeline, gas subsidies…I’m looking forward to doing profiles on them and really putting names and faces to the deeds. They get away with it because nobody calls them out, they hide behind sanitized astroturf banners and focus group-tested slogans.
If pesticides in the local drinking water raises breast cancer rates, are you gonna tell me the chemicals they use to blast fractures in shale will not?
I am getting SO tired of those ad nauseum glowing Fracking-Is-Wonderful commercials on the TeeVee (e.g., those ExxonMobil “
Scientists” pimps).These people have just about fucked up the oceans with acidification and now they are going to poison the aquafers.
It’s a race. I’m not sure if they are first going to kill off the oxygen producers or just poison us all with our drinking water.
Also the ad nauseum glowing Shale-Oil-Is-Wonderful commercials on the TeeVee
Experts agree: “Everything is fine.”
Thank you for focusing on them. We will all take great pleasure in working to ruin them individually and collectively once you have flushed them out of their holes.
Well there you go!
Oh, and I forgot one more.
The companies are also looking for places to dispose of drilling sludge, so if you’re tired of running cattle on your property, the drilling companies will pay more for your grazing land than you could ever make in agriculture. They’ll put up nice little earthen walls around your field and truck in drilling mud 24/7, sometimes raising the elevation 4 or 5 feet. The landowner gets paid for every shipment and he doesn’t have to worry about working the land anymore – it’s too toxic.
There’s a huge battle brewing in Wisconsin over the creating of huge sand pit mining operations for taking sand for fracking. And Minnesota is banning the sand mining.
Jane, thanks for this. We own property in Otsego County on a hill on the west side of Otsego Lake, just north of Cooperstown. The lake is the origin of the Susquehanna River. No matter where anyone else votes as the ‘most beautiful’ area, I will show them this place. We will not sell the rights to our land, even if we lose all of its value. It is not the right thing to do and we couldn’t live with ourselves for doing it.
I believe that I was the first to write about fracking on FDL here. Since then it has been well followed by several diarists and front pagers. I will get back with an update on how things are going in Otsego County.
We have friends in PA whose parents sold rights to a fracker based on the pr. The parents didn’t consult with the children, and it may not have made a difference, but the parents didn’t have any idea of the problems.
Jane – have you seen http://fracfocus.org/ ?
It literally shows where the wells are. People can search and find one in their community.
Painful to relate, but:
FracFocus should be viewed, but viewed a bit skeptically, as in the information is astonishing, but nowhere near complete. Here are some names [emphasized] in the same article linked above that should be watched and tracked IMO:
Excellent. And the bolded highlights much appreciated.
If people are interested in noodling around in the map/finder here:
https://www.hydraulicfracturingdisclosure.org/fracfocusfind/
You don’t actually have to select a State or County. You can choose a driller from the “Operator” column and see their wells all over the US.
About the fracking process in the Barnett Shale in No. TX
Hydraulic fracturing (also known as “frac’ing”) is the process of creating fissures in underground formations to allow natural gas to flow. During frac’ing, water, sand and other additives are pumped under high pressure into the shale formation to create fractures. Frac fluid is approximately 99.5% water and sand, with a small amount of special-purpose additives. The sand is used to “prop” open the newly created fractures, which allows the natural gas to flow into the wellbore and up to the surface.
“Special purpose additives” — dontcha love the Orwellian words?
Sent this post out to others. This is a big deal and is going to require national level “push back”.
FRACCIDENTS IN THE U.S.
Has anyone else noticed the apparent rebranding of “frack” to “frac”? Seems the environmentalists and concerned public who talked about this early on call it “fracking” but now that corporate media are involved suddenly it’s “frac’ing” everywhere. I can only assume the corporate powers feel dropping the ‘k’ makes the word seem less vulgar.
We were recently in the Durango, CO area looking for potential places to live. Great natural beauty in SW Colorado, but intense oil/gas development as well (San Juan basin). There are also at least a couple of shale gas plays on the immediate horizon, the Mancos Shale and Gothic Shale. See http://www.sanjuancitizens.org/ for more info.
Coalbed methane is also in full development.
It may be overly specific to just focus on fracing, as bad as that is:
http://checksandbalancesproject.org/2011/01/10/small-time-landowners-continue-to-clash-with-big-frackers-in-colorado/
There are numerous issues besides that, including (no particular order), methane/water pollution, property value loss, gas-at-surface pollution, water-table depletion, noise pollution, loss of surface-owner rights… the list is extensive. Another aspect would be what appears to be the near-complete capture by oil/gas of both fed agencies like BLM/Interior and state “regulatory” agencies. So landowners and conservationists concerned with public lands have to fight not only the powerful private-sector but their own public agencies as well.
One other thing, my impression is that the vast majority of landowners dealing with oil/gas development do not own their mineral rights. Some do, for sure, but my hunch is that typically those impacted by this development are surface-owners only. In my area, mineral-rights ownership trumps surface rights ownership every single time.
Just in case nobody’s seen this, here’s another relevant bit:
http://youtu.be/hmHzzWagyzA
Here’s a useful map of existing shale-gas plays in lower 48.
http://205.254.135.24/oil_gas/rpd/shale_gas.pdf
Story in the morning papers about wasted natural gas being burned off instead of captured. Companies need to be forced to recover this gas or hire a subcontractor who will do so. This was infuriating!
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/27/business/energy-environment/in-north-dakota-wasted-natural-gas-flickers-against-the-sky.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha25
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2011/09/14/business/energy-environment/flare-ss.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=thab1
Re: “robgard” (28), right America is so very desperate for natural gas from “fracking” that”
“Every day, more than 100 million cubic feet of [North Dakota] natural gas is flared [open air burned without any use] this way — enough energy to heat half a million homes for a day.
The flared gas also spews at least two million tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every year, as much as 384,000 cars or a medium-size coal-fired power plant would emit, alarming some environmentalists.
All told, 30 percent of the natural gas produced in North Dakota is burned as waste. No other major domestic oil field currently flares close to that much, though the practice is still common in countries like Russia, Nigeria and Iran.” (NY Times 9/27/2011)
Yeah, we really need natural gas from “fracking”!
Who said he was drinking Fracking Fluid water lets collect some water we know is fracking fluid water and then give it to him or any Pol who defends fracking can we do this on tv get some GOPer like George Will who hates government regulation of the environment to be offered a drink on air?
Frack me. I live in a brown area.
Here is a news report from the promoters of fracking Texas Barnett shale:
http://www.bizjournals.com/houston/news/2011/09/27/study-barnett-shale-has-created-100k.html
It’s appalling regulatory agencies look the other way rather than require drillers to disclose the chemicals and only when determined nontoxic to give a pass. But that’s not the only problem. There are indications that fracking causes earthquakes. Read up! The Aug 23 earthquake in central Virginia was likely one of many anomalous quakes in the region of this drilling practice.