Visit FDL’s US v. Dan Choi archive for all documents related to the case.
![]() |
An email chain turned over by the Department of Homeland Security in response to a subpoena in the Dan Choi case reveals that it was the White House that tipped off the Secret Service with the information that 3 days later there would be a DADT protest in front of the White House.
Brian Bond, Deputy Director of Public Engagement, sent an email to then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough, Dan Pfeiffer, Melody Barnes, Tina Tchen, Shin Inouye and others telling them he had it on “pretty good authority” that “Choi will be a part of it.” The email was forwarded less than 3 minutes later by Brad Kiley to Bary Coffey and Paula Reid of the Secret Service:
Get Equal DADT Protests – Monday
I have it on pretty good authority that Get Equal is planning to do a major protest Monday in front of the WH to “kick off” lame duck — Choi will be a part of it — and if my sources are right — looks like they are planning on having 10-15 people handcuffed and arrested. Probably would be good to give Service the heads up.
Also there are likely two more brilliant moves that day — they are supposedly planning to do sit-ins in Reid and Levin Senate offices as well.
Brian K. Bond
Deputy Director
White House Office of Public Engagement
Coffey forwarded the email to Ryan Lemasters, Secret Service Intelligence/Liaison Sergeant, at 12:07 pm. Lemasters forwarded it to Stephanie Clark, Special Forces Coordinator for the US Park at 12:48 pm with a note asking for any information they might have on the upcoming protest: “OS only reveals that the group is collecting cash for an upcoming “large action” (No specifics given).” Clark then forwarded the email at 2:06 pm to Robert LaChance of the US Park Police, who testified about the email in court.
Why the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Security is keeping a file on GetEqual unless they consider them a “terrorist organization” is anyone’s guess.
The emails were sent in response to the 8-30-11 subpoena requested by Choi’s attorney .
The White House email written by Bond makes it clear that the recipients would know who “Choi” was and that they would share his contempt for the “brilliant moves” of the activists. Jim Messina would later be hailed by Joe Solomonese of HRC as the “unsung hero” when DADT was repealed, and three days prior to Bond’s email he had been briefed on a Pentagon study regarding potential impact.
During the Choi trial, U.S. Park Police Officer Jerome Stoudamire testified that in his experience of 22 years and 2,000 arrests including in front of the White House, Choi’s case was the first time he had seen White House protesters papered on federal charges. An email to Obama Senior Advisers, quickly disseminated by Secret Service to DC and Park Police, no doubt impacted the decision to come down hard on Choi and the other GetEqual protesters. On the morning of the protest, an email written by Randolph Meyers of the Department of the Interior indicated that meetings had been held to discuss what to do in response, in which he advised the Park Police to charge not only Dan but many first-time protesters with federal statutes that carry more severe penalties than the municipal ones.
It’s ironic that the “unsung hero” of the DADT repeal would later become Obama’s campaign manager in January of 2011, and rely heavily on gay donors to take the place of bundlers who would not return from the 2008 campaign. Obama’s appeal to them rested largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT. But Messina also appears to have been instrumental in a thin-skinned vendetta against the very activists whose courage and determination “made them do it.”
When asked about the revelations that the White House seems to have it in for him at the highest levels, Choi responded: “To the entire White House: We have put you on notice. We will not disappear.”
Can you please chip in $10 to help us purchase and publish all court documents for Dan’s trials?





69 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
So who was the “good authority”?
That’s an oxymoron these days.
Thom Hartmann stepped out of his usual Obama cheerleading role and had Dan Choi on air to explain his views.
Choi was powerful and shared a healthy balance to the usual elation of people like Rachel Maddow over this repeal of DADT. Choi pointed out that the Obama administration made sure that although LGB folk are now allowed to serve openly they don’t have full equality and full opportunity. He said that when Truman repealed segregation in 1948 that the order included specific language about full equality and full opportunity and that it went beyond race and included religion. He pointed out that the Obama administrated nixed this new repeal having such language. It seems that survivor benefits do not extend to married partners if they are same sex. It seems that a husband or wife of a service member who gives his or her life in service will not receive an American flag at at funeral with the words “A grateful country etc.” IF the husband or wife is the same sex as the service member killed in action.
Choi didn’t point out the even worse aspect of this whole thing. Notice I left the T out of LGBT so it was just LGB. This was intentional since Transgender folk like me were excluded from this repeal.
Choi was very angry that Obama is getting cred for this in the community when Obama resisted it and never worked for it. Choi did by protesting continually and the Obama’s administration response was to take unprecedented steps of pressing federal charges for protesting in front of the White House, which always before has only been a city infraction.
Meanwhile Rachel and Ed focus on all this hoopla and the terrible injustice of Troy Davis but totally ignore the protests on Wall Street.
That’s a very good question.
No Such Authority
The entire cabal in Washington is rotten from top to bottom. And no one is safe from them and we had better realize that.
Reminds me of the last line of White Rose’s Leaflet #4:
“We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will not leave you in peace!”
Fuckin’ A.
Bradley Manning is our Sophie Scholl.
So where does is leave us with the question of warrantless wiretaps? Does this e-mail open the door to further discovery?
We are conscience.
Yes, SD.
DW
Well, let’s not forget her brother Hans and the other 6 who died for what they believed. I can’t help but compare our neoconservative Justices of the Supreme Court with one Roland Freisler, Hitler’s judge and the one who sentenced Sophie and the others.
Wanna bet the line will be “You’ve gone far enough. Any more information will only give the terrorists insight?”
No vindictive
persecutionprosecution going on here folks, just move along and make way for the next in line.Brian Bond
About the Office of Public Engagement
Obama preaching to the Chinese, Nov 16, 2009
Jaaaaaannnnnneee- Brian Bond=Double Agent. Im so over this administration. Why are they spending so much energy on Dan Choi, when they should be focused on jobs, equality, and world peace. Im so over this…..
Dangling modifier question
Messina was put in place “largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT.” Or “bundlers who would not return from the 2008 campaign largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT.” Be really interesting if bundlers dropped out because of the DADT repeal.
Good grief. Obama never listened to one of his critics in his life. He doesn’t like for people to disagree with him and listens only to those who are eager to grab more power. A pox on them.
Wow, Jane. The cc list for the first e-mail shows the writer saw this as both a political issue — otherwise why include the political advisers — and a matter for possible Secret Service interest. Since the e-mail was forwarded over and over, the question is, did those cc’s show up on the email as it was forwarded towards those with police/security responsibilities? If so, that would create more evidence of the suspected link that the political concern was driving the decision about which charges to file. Because the security/police people would see that the highest WH policy people were following and concerned about this, and not for security reasons.
Meant no disrespect toward the rest, I guess I’m thinking of how young she was.
With this government there is one difference though, they’re not making the example using “off with your head,” it’s “we’ll just reprogram you after we’ve taken some sadistic pleasures with you for a few years.”
we’re all domestic extremists now.
our militarized police have been given the green light to respond to our constitutional rights to peaceably assemble or petition for governmental redress of grievances with every dirty trick in the vast security state’s coffer, given legal cover by some super secret Patriot Act subsection that we the people are not allowed knowledge of, but are subjected to without recourse.
witness the scene last night outside Troy Davis’s prison: a large group of every day citizens silently protesting the grievous injustice about to take place met with an army in black armed to the hilt with bags of plastic handcuffs at the ready.
this is not my America.
The subpoena requests that the Secret Service appear at trial and bring with them:
Since the trial is in recess at the moment, nobody from the Secret Service appeared. But by inference it appears that the source of the White House’s information was not given to the Secret Service. If that’s the case, I don’t see how there is any alternative other than to subpoena Brian Bond and other White House officials who have it.
I think the WH long ago decided to make examples of those who go against Obama’s policies. The raids on anti-war protestor’s homes, etc, are another example. The only problem is that none of these people are intimidated by the authorities.
With the exception of a professor they were all in their 20s iirc.
I’ve done a lot of research of White Rose. They’ve been my mentor in anti-war activities all these years.
Never. Give. Up.
Back to work.
Namaste
Can’t you just imagine Angela George’s rankling at those words?
“Does this Judge have no respect for the Omnipotence of the Police State!? OUTRAGEOUS!”
“I don’t see how there is any alternative other than to subpoena Brian Bond …”
The WH may try every “executive privilege” dodge they can think of but they will drop all charges before they will turn over more data.
@Rosalind
” this is not my America.”
Yes, it is. It may not be the America you want but it is most certainly the America you have.
post
How many more black eyes will the WH have to get before someone there wakes up and realizes that they are committing political suicide?
sweet jesus
we’re living a fucking Costa Gavras film
Jane Hamsher, my sincere gratitude for all you have done to uncover and report this – bless you sister
Firedogs – respectfully ask all of you to Facebook and tweet the sh** out of this story – thanks !
I just looked up the membership. One of them, Traute Lafrenz, survived and is living in SC. I found a link to a 2010 der Spiegel article about her. I’ll see if I can find a translation of the article.
I was thinking LA Confidential.
Thanks for the post Jane.
Those words…”I have it on pretty good authority… and if my sources are right…”
The “light bulb” was not on when that email was written. THIS email spells political death, not the protest. This email, and the domino effect that followed, which resulted in a power play against individual rights, was…oh how did Bond put it? That’s right. A brilliant move. s/
The stupid burns. The attack on rights stemming from the highest office in our nation means there is a failure to uphold the oath of office.
I’m guessing Boener will say “Impeachment is off the table.”/s
“Choi will be a part of it”
ah yes, the Heathers Administration
Thanks, I truly appreciate hearing the details.
Not much to see.
Only to be used in case of sex/real estate scandal.
Agree with Jane.
A post please, Scarecrow.
Might this be the equivalent of a smoking gun, if not a steaming pile?
DW
Hi Jane. Thanks for bringing this to us. Of course, all those SOB’s are in collusion, guess that’s to be expected.
Speaking of which, do you have any insight on what can be expected for the October 6th continuing event in DC? What do you think the White House, their police & the courts, etc. have in store for the protesters? I’m asking because it would help those who attend in planning. I’ve been trying to find a way to get there to attend, but haven’t committed yet.
It’s probably best you don’t answer in these threads, or even by email, never know who’s ‘listening.’ Some other means of responding, maybe even snail mail, may be more secure. Thanks.
It is pretty creepy, isn’t it.
I don’t know. But I do know that Kevin Zeese (one of the Oct 6 organizer, who will be here for a member webinar on the 29th) was in court when Dan was brought in wearing leg irons and chains after his Tar Sands arrest. I sat with Kevin who wanted to see how the government was handling protesters expressly because of the October 6th demonstration, in order to be prepared.
So I do know that they’re doing their homework.
ROFLMAO
Don’t you just love the irony of the words “Brilliant move?”
And police cars circling with their flashing blue lights and sirens. And helicopters circling overhead. My thought about the helicopters was that it may have been partially to make livestream news reporting difficult to hear.
I read that to Jon Walker. He’s laughing. “That’s what if felt like,” he said.
First, Jane’s post is no laughing matter.
That said, your comment, has me rolling!
‘…everyone knows you never go full Mean Girls’
Spew alert! TOO funny!
Cleaning up some coffee now.
Thanks. Is Kevin going to share any of his findings or suspicions, or do I need to write him? I have a specific question, but I don’t want to share it over the intertubes; again, don’t want to give the lurking SOB’s a tip-off.
They are always listening and watching. The best thing to do is be a good little boy or girl scout.
Pack up your mess kit, bed roll, weather gear, and ALWAYS BE PREPARED!
(smiles)
Dangling modifier question
“It’s ironic that the “unsung hero” of the DADT repeal would later become Obama’s campaign manager in January of 2011, and rely heavily on gay donors to take the place of bundlers who would not return from the 2008 campaign — largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT.”
Messina was put in place “largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT.” Or “bundlers who would not return from the 2008 campaign largely on the strength of the repeal of DADT.” Be really interesting if bundlers dropped out because of the DADT repeal.
This is what I would consider excellent news for Dan.
Think I’ll reword a very old song for him. “Bumbling bungleweeds”
thanks, like hotdog, I am snarking because this is really dark shit – confirmation as it were
and I am thinking of Jane Hamsher – Dan Choi has been a perceived thorn in their side on a single issue, Jane has outed/embarrassed their sorry asses several times on numerous fronts
waving to the WH Hamsher Detail
it’s a one finger wave. . . in the form of a $10 donation oldnslow will be sending this evening
Good advice, I always try to prepare, at least for what can be anticipated. It’s the unanticipated stuff that’ll get ya.
Yeah, I can’t find much either. Maybe she just wants to live in peace.
I did find this though. You’ve probably already read it, but it’s very interesting.
I find the “600 marks for wear on the guillotine” especially cruel. Wonder what they’re “charging” Manning for at Fort Leavenworth.
Likewise, the same for my snark — this is really dark (and extremely stupid).
I have to confess to all, that as I read the email, for a brief moment, an Aaron Spelling evening soap “mash-up” somewhat zip through my thoughts.
cbl you have a way with words!
Please look at Dan Chois’ Court Response- he is seriously kicking butt. Dans lawyers are so smart and so on point, that the judge is going to have to throw this baseless case out.
http://metroweekly.com/poliglot/Choi%20Response%20to%20Mandamus.pdf
Brian K. Bond was hired by the Obama White House in part to be their “point person” on LGBT issues:
Something about the “pretty good authority” language makes it sound like low-tech infiltration to me.
OT– Looks like the White House is at it again using the State Department as its proxy for the Tar Sands deal (FOE.Org, Sept. 22, 2011).
Uh, why the fuck is the National Security Advisor in that email chain???
Terrorists are everywhere, probably under our beds even. That’s why the government has to collect your internet data, silly.
I don’t know what else people would expect from an administration that supported a coup in Honduras, actively attempted to keep Aristide from returning to Haiti, tried to silence Assange, branded Manning a criminal, worked with BP to minimize the truth about the Gulf disaster, expanded the use of drone warfare, etc.
What I find disconcerting is that an intelligent, moral individual like Dan Choi would want to re-enlist in the US armed forces to be a willing participant as a killer for corporations and in extending US hegemony.
“I have it on pretty good authority”
“And if my sources are right”
What, does he moonlight at DC Vice Squad? It would be interesting to get him on the stand to ask
Detective SerpicoBond who his confidential informants were. What’s more, that Homeland Security file sounds like it’d be an interesting read.Uh, why the fuck is the National Security Advisor in that email chain???
Well, not every US citizen gets to be on the Obamacide “kill or capture” list, one must be nominated first. To quote Dep. NSA Denis McDonough (who’s on the Choi email list):
For a long time, many in the U.S. thought that our unique melting pot meant we were immune from this threat – this despite the history of violent extremists of all kinds in the United States. That was false hope, and false comfort. This threat is real, and it is serious…
There’s Adam Gadahn, who grew up in California and now calls himself an al Qaeda spokesman. There’s Anwar al-Awlaki, who was born in the United States and now exhorts Americans to violence from hiding in Yemen as part of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. And there’s Omar Hammami, an Alabama native who joined the terrorist group al-Shabaab in Somalia and uses rap and hip hop in an attempt to reach young Americans.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/06/remarks-denis-mcdonough-deputy-national-security-advisor-president-prepa
“Brilliant move” to reveal your undying sarcastic contempt for the left and activists Brian Bond, you useless douche.
Stop reading my emails and listening to my phone calls you neo-liberal, neo-McCarthy thugs.
Joe Solmonese, and HRC. They were privy to the initial planning of the White House fence, and ratted to curry favor.
My thoughts exactly.
I don’t know why you would say that. Joe S & GetEqual were not close. Joe was furious that Dan’s first arrest eclipsed their celebrity photo op with Kathy Griffin six months earlier (Same day, remember?).
I don’t see him being looped into the plans. GE knew who their friends were. And HRC was not counted among them.