The Republican congressional leadership have made their six selections for who will serve on the new Super Committee, according the National Journal. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (KY) chose Senators Jon Kyl (AZ), Pat Toomey (PA) and Rob Portman (OH). From the House side Speaker John Boehner (OH) selected Jeb Hensarling (TX), Dave Camp (MI) and Fred Upton (MI).
Senators Toomey and Portman are about as hard right on the issues of taxes as they come in the Senate. Of course, all six members have signed Grover Norquist’s anti-tax pledge. These are not the Republicans you would select as leadership if you want the Super Committee to reach some form of grand bargain that contains tax increases. These are members you can count on to inflexibly hold the line.
Looking at the Republican appointees to the Super Committee the two most likely results will be; there is no agreement or Democrats fold completely by accepting an all cuts package that might have some modest revenue neutral tax reform.
It looks like McConnell is betting on the fact that he can get the Democrats to fold. President Obama has been signaling. with his actions, that he cares more about cutting Medicare and Social Security to make it appear he is serious about the deficit, than he is about getting a relatively small amount of revenue increases.
Given the Democrats past behavior this is probably a safe bet for Sen. McConnell.




3 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
It is time for the Vermont Progressive Party, which has elected members of the Vermont legislature, to “go national”.
http://www.progressiveparty.org
Vermont is going for single-payer health care. In Vermont, Democrats know that they cannot shill for corporations and triangulate against their base because there IS an alternative.
Constitutional Option Avoided; Constitutional Crisis Provoked
A new beast has emerged called alternatively the ‘super committee’ or the ‘Super Congress.’ Under the deal struck between Obama and teabaggers, 12 legislators, six from each House and six from each party, will have to identify deep cuts in federal spending, which cuts must be ratified by each House of Congress and then signed into law by the President. If the 12 legislators fail to agree, then automatic cuts will be painfully endured in both the defense and civilian sectors.
There is just one colossal problem, there is nothing in the Constitution suggesting the propriety of such a system for lawmaking …
Article:
Constitutional Option Avoided; Constitutional Crisis Provoked
So what you’re saying is they will have a “grand bargain,” just not one with significant tax increases for the wealthy.
If they truly couldn’t come to an Grand
AppeasementBargain, is there some mechanism that would force tax increases?- Tom