I remember an extremely jarring moment during one of President Obama’s press conferences about extending the Bush tax cuts, when Obama said he must give in to hostage-taking tactics. Via Huffington Post:
“I think it’s tempting not to negotiate with hostage takers, unless the hostage gets harmed. Then people will question the wisdom of that strategy. In this case, the hostage was the American people, and I was not willing to see them get harmed.”
It was a shocking moment in which Obama totally gave up the game. It was a validation of the Republican strategy and an acknowledgement that hostage taking is the best — and possibly only — way for the Republicans to get what they want.
The President might as well have directly told Speaker John Boehner, on national television, “if you ever want something just make a legitimate threat about possibly hurting the economy and I will give in to your demands.”
The current fight may have gone differently if Obama had made the GOP think he just might let the hostage get harmed this time; but since it was the administration beating the fear-mongering drum about default, that just wasn’t going to happen.
Similarly, the debate would have unfolded differently if Obama at least made the GOP think he would be willing to take extraordinary measures to protect the hostages from harm if the Republican didn’t act. For example, he could have hinted he might use the 14th Amendment or create a $1 trillion coin. Instead of at least pretending to potentially carry a stick, Obama had his Treasury Department actually close the door to the very idea of a possible fallback. Once that happened there was only one way this fight was going to end.
As the deadline moved closer and it looked more and more likely the GOP would be willing to harm the hostage, Obama rapidly gave up on his demands. All that is left is to run down the clock until the moment Obama folds completely, because he has told them in advance that he won’t allow the hostages to be harmed.





5 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
He’s a scared little boy in a man’s job.
Thanks, Jon.
Great analysis. [Why don't we get this from those superstars in the Lame Stream Media?]
And congrats on your mention in Politico.
Of course he is going to fold that is what he does best. He thinks he is so smart and reasonable when in reality he is a real doofus.I am sure the republicans laugh their ass off when they are in a room by themselves. What a dumb ass they must think. He negotiates like a crackhead who needs the next one and will give up anything to get it.
At the very least if he was going to cave Obama should have gotten a debt limit increase trade off for the Bush tax cuts.
He is in way over his head. You do not ‘negotiate’ by offering huge cuts to our entitlements, then try to claim it was a tactic, please…he’s pandering to his employers on Wall Street again giving them what they want. There is no three dimensional chess here, he couldn’t win a conventional chess game even against an idiot like Boner. He doesn’t want to win, that’s the other part, he is a right wing Republican. He pretended to be a progressive to get elected, which shows you where the ‘middle’ really is, and they know it, it’s not right wing, it’s not even center, it’s moderately progressive. Check out americanselect.org. A new party forming up on the progressive side.