I was one of 2700 people who pledged to visit members of congress on July 19 and let them know I won’t vote for anyone who votes to cut Social Security or Medicare benefits. I went to Capitol Hill and visited some 40 offices with FDL readers weedpicker and Noel Q, who acted as cameraman. I gave each office a copy of our handout on Social Security and Medicare (PDF), and told them that 50,000 people had pledged not to vote for anyone who voted to cut Social Security and Medicare benefits.
I also let them know that “benefit cut” also included voting for a Chained CPI, raising the retirement age, or the creation of any kind of commission with the ability to write legislation that would bypass normal Congressional procedure (aka Catfood II).
Others have posted diaries on their visits, including Kelly Canfield and RFShunt. We also put up a feedback form where people can send us their reports, and attach photos and videos from their visits.
Here are some of the reports we’ve already received:
Courtney visited Earl Blumenauer and Ron Wyden “Their aides said that they do not plan to cut Social Security or Medicare benefits. Blumenauer’s aide said there will probably have to be cuts but not til 2037.”
James visited Kathy Castor: “Her staff received the fact sheet, and I told her staff that I would not vote for her (something I’ve done since working for her County Commission and initial House races)if she voted to cut the social safety net.”
Mark visited Henry Waxman: ”I spoke to a case worker. He listened and said that he would tell Congressman Waxman. I told him that I represented not only myself but all of my friends and associates who couldn’t take time off from work as I did to vist the Congressman’s office. I have no idea how effective my visit was, but I was glad to show up in support on this vital stance against cutting the safety net benefits.”
Bret visited Carolyln Maloney: ”I visited the Queens Office of Rep. Carolyn P. Maloney/14th C.D./N.Y. in Astoria. I met with her District Representative & expressed my concerns due to being dependent on SSDI/Medicare & how cuts affected already. I also delivered the Strengthen Social Security fact sheets & a p/o of the Obama’s Last Lecture URL the FDL article URLs. I also made sure that he (the rep) would vet the video & the articles as they called into question the “strategy” of the President & how it’s affected his coalition’s needs that remain unaddressed by policy & legislation. The Dist. Rep. assured me that he would make sure my concerns reached Rep. Maloney. The meeting went very well & lasted approximately 10 minutes. At home, I noticed that I neglected to drop off the FDL fact sheet, so I am dropping that off ASAP.”
Julio visited Mike Honda: “My congressman is on board and pushing apparently very hard against any kind of cuts.”
Mary visited Joe Wilson: “My husband and i visited Rep. Joe Wilson’s office in downtown Beaufort, SC. One of his staff greeted us and we had a pleasant conversation. I presented her with the 3 forms that I had downloaded from your website. After reading them, she said she was sure that Rep. Wilson would protect Social Security and Medicare.”
Mark visited Xavier Becerra: ”I briefly spoke with someone in the office about no cuts in social security, medicare, medicade. They took my name ect. and that was it.”
Arthur visited David Price: “Spoke with his District Director. Our statement that we will not vote for Price again if he votes to fray the country’s inadequate safety net was received and understood. We received assurances that Price was a full supporter of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid but o unequivocal statement to protect the safety net was made.”
Christie visited Nancy Pelosi and Senator Diane Feinstein:
PELOSI VISIT: “I was told to submit my comments on a form. When I insisted, someone finally came out to talk with me. He said Pelosi was committed to “strengthening” Social Security but hedged on the retirement age and admitted that the politics were difficult. I gave him an earful. I’m almost 65, jobless, and have run through 2 years of Unemployment benefits after losing my home to foreclosure).”
William visited Jim Gerlach: “I talked to the staff member and relayed my message. She was very courteous and said she would relay my message to the representative.”
Jane visited Duncan Hunter: “Spoke with an aide; she took a 2 sentence synopsis & tried to tell me SS & Medicare would dry up without immediate changes. I countered. Told her the state of CA was ALREADY taking 40% of my fully quartered SS because I am a teacher. She said it would not affect ME. I said I cared about the future teachers, too.”
Ann visited John Dingell: ”Sadly, Rep. Dingell had just left to return to DC. However, we did speak to his staff, who assured us that Dingell does not support any cuts to these programs. In fact, he would like “Medicare for All.” The visit went well and the staff spent quite a bit of time with us – and then, as we were walking out of the office, we got to watch someone back into my car and drive away!”
Cherie visited Ann Eshoo: ”When I arrived at the office, I was the only constituent there. An aide took down my message. While he said the Congresswoman listens to her constituents, he was not able to assure me that she would never support cuts to Social Security and Medicare.”
Walter visited John Dingle: ”We had a long discussion with the aid and were assured that representative Dingle would not support any reductions in benefits.”
Claudia visited Mick Mulvaney: ”My father 93yrs, and I went to Mulvaney office in person and we wrote down on a legal pad that we wanted him to vote for raising the debit ceiling, to vote for raising revenues, hands off social security and medicare and make the rich pay their fair share, in so many words. I also asked if Malvaney sighned the Grover Norquist pledge. They said he had not signed it…??? I told the sec. that we were against the bill that was just passed in the house, he voted for, that was worthless waist of time. She said we were the only ones that came by and that she only got a few call from people in favor of ” the cut, slash and ba-lanced bull”? bill that just passed. We were polite and were treated likewise the same.”
Gary visited Jason Chaffetz: ”Dropped in during the lunch hour, the door was locked – actually the door had a security card reader, so you can’t enter unless you have a card or someone lets you in. I couldn’t see anyone in the front office, but I could hear voices, so I knocked a couple times until two people came out of the back office. The woman, I guess who was in her early 40′s, asked, without opening the door, if I had an appointment. I said no but I said (waving the letter) that I had a letter for Congressman Chaffetz. She opened the door, the young man with her asked what it was about. I explained I was there because of all the talk in Washington dragging SS and Medicare into the debt ceiling discussions, and that the letter was to tell Rep. Chaffetz that I will not vote for anyone who supports cuts or ‘reforms,’ and that others like me were tired of the crap going on in Washington. The lady said they were just watching the news about this in the back office, and they were very concerned about the debt limit and whether an agreement would be reached. I said that this whole debt ceiling matter didn’t have anything to do with SS/Medicare, that SS was totally funded separately by its own payroll deduction, it pays for itself and doesn’t contribute to the deficit. I said Medicare was also mostly funded by a separate means. The young man, early 20′s, obviously an intern, said yeah, but the budget lumps all gov’t spending together, including SS, defense, etc. I reiterated that SS pays for itself, told them that SS is a large part of many seniors’ income, and they depend on that just to survive. He said that yes it pays for itself now, but it needs to be fixed, I said it can support itslef until 2035 or so, and if it ever needs fixing, there are easy ways to fix it like increasing the maximum income level that is taxed (now about $106,000). The woman then asked if that would mean that SS check amounts would be adjusted upward for the higher-income contributors because they were taxed on a higher amount of income, I said yes, there could be some formula that would do that. These two seemed to be nice people, and they were courteous, but it was clear to me that these two were schooled in their talking points, and it seemed to me that we were just ‘talking past’ one other. Finally I told them I had to leave to go to another meeting (which I did), and they thanked me for coming in and leaving the FDL fact sheet (which the lady had glanced through as we were talking). She said they don’t get many visitors, and that the fact sheet would be very helpful, because most people just call or come in to complain and don’t offer any solutions or information to back themselves up. She said she would see that Rep. Chaffetz got my letter and the fact sheet. I thanked them both, shook their hands and left. So thank you, Jane, Brian & the FDL folks, for putting this fact sheet together, and for organizing this day, and your leadership in making it happen. You rock!”
Steven visited Russ Carnahan: ”He was not there but I spoke to the lady in the front. I told her that I was concerned about Congress trying to cut the big 3. I told her I was disabled and that my daughter and I depended on that money to survive. Her facial expression changed quite a bit. I told her I was a member of FDL and that I would do what ever I could to make sure no one votes for Rss or the dems if they touch the big 3. She said she would forward the letter to Mr. Carnahan and that I would receive a response via mail. When I get it I will scan it and send you a copy to post on your website if you are so inclined. I was the only one in the office but maybe others will show up.”
Steve visited Carolyn Maloney: ” Visited her office with 3 friends of mine. Explained to a staffer why we were visiting. Filled out constituents’ forms expressing our views & left. Note: I also educated a wider audience (approx. 10-15 people)via email about FDL’s action prior to our visit.”
Bryna visited William Keating: ” I spoke with 2 people in his Quincy, MA office. I was the only person to visit at that time. I asked what position the congressman is taking on cuts to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and they could only tell me that Keating had been in communication with AARP. They were unable to tell me if the congressman would take the pledge not to support any bills that included cuts to benefits. I advised that these programs had nothing to do with the deficits and that any cuts to them would hurt the most vulnerable. I did advise that if Keating did vote for any cuts in these programs that I would not support him in the next election.”
Linda visited Adam Schiff: ” I was given a form to fill out to list the concerns that I had. They had a receptionist take it. A secretary came out to say they were glad to get my input and seemed to want me to leave it at that. I asked to speak to one of the Congressman’s representatives, and they said I could. So I waited just a very short time and a lady named Elizabeth escorted me to her office. I said I was opposed to any cuts or changes to Medicare, Social Security, or Medicaid. She assured me that Congressman Schiff was very protective of these programs. She was very nice. I was the only one there at the time I got there. I hope Schiff will not vote for this “deal” Obama has brokered with the Republicans. It is an awful deal for the middle and working class. This morning I heard that it will even eliminate the deduction folks can have on their income tax for the interest on their mortgage. I was appalled. That is the ONLY deduction most people have. It is not a loophole for the rich. It is also a huge disincentive for young people to buy a home–dealing another blow to the housing market and to the construction industry and to the American Dream. What folly!”
Marie visited Chaka Fattah: They said he was not in. I told the receptionist my concerns, and she put me on the in-house phone to the Washington office. They basically said Fattah agrees with us, but hasn’t decided how he would vote on a compromise.”
Gerald visited Sandy Adams: ” My older son and I (Jerry’s wife) went to her office, spoke briefly with the young man in the office, telling him that our entire family of 5 voters would not vote for someone who made cuts to social security and medicare. We also indicated our dissatisfaction with endless wars. We provided our names, email, etc. It took us an hour to drive there, from one end of the district to the other. Her employee was very pleasant and said he would officially record our visit–good hire on her part.”
Ryan visited Henry Waxman: ” The receptionist was very cordial and hi-fived when i told her why I was there. I wrote out a note outlining my concerns and she said that the congressman would get it.”
Ursula visited Paul Ryan, WI: ” I’ve been to Ryan’s office on several other occasions, appealing for/against his votes. I received NO RESPONSES to any of my appeals thus far and I’m sure this time will be no different. The woman in the office that I ranted to (not really – I was civil but straightforward) seemed indifferent, but wrote down what I said and asked me it I’d like a response from Mr. Ryan. I emphatically answered “YES”, and was given a choice of a phone response or an email response.
I chose email, but as I write this, there is nothing from Ryan in my inbox. Sadly, when you have a “Representative” (and I use the term loosly), you cannot expect much in return for your efforts if your adgenda conflicts with HIS adgenda/ideology).”




60 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Way to go everyone!
Blumenauer’s aide said there will probably have to be cuts but not til 2037.”
go jane
me likey
Just signed the pledge but could not find the latest count.
A vote for a delayed cut is still a your not getting any of our votes right?
What’s the point? A third party will never win, and both parties are exactly the same.
The media reports that Boehner and Obama are getting together on a bigger plan, better than the Gang of 6 plan that was too left wing, that must be passed because of the emergency, as they kill the McConnel Senate plan, and notify the Dems they must pass the bigger plan because of the emergency.
Indeed the new plan is likely to have tax cuts like the elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax for a cut of $1.7 trillion tax revenue over 10 years, as they eliminate corporate tax on profits made on jobs sent overseas, lower the tax rate on domestic profits, and cut the personal tax rate for the rich – offset by “loopholes” to be closed such as the home interest deduction in the amount of $800 billion, but if those loopholes are not agreed to, the Democrats will be “allowed to let the Bush tax cuts expire” relative to the rich. They have already lined up Grover Norquist to “allow those tax rates to expire” (how do they not expire without Democratic help?), but there would be no legislation that actually ends those Bush tax rates.
So we are likely to get reductions in health care spending in Medicare and Medicaid but not through cost reduction – they cut payments to Medicare suppliers, but then you just don’t have coverage, or pay a higher deductible or premium, or get more means testing in some of areas of those programs. Of course we cut Social Security benefits via the chained CPI, and raise the eligibility age of Medicare and Normal Retirement age of Social Security.the program.
Seems like Nancy is playing games.
I hope your meetings will kill this “bigger plan” – and good on ya for confronting our politicians – but this seems so pre-planned.
Weeeee! I love the idea of almost 3,000 of these interactions happened.
Good job all!
Great job!
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/07/18/similarities-between-obama-and-louisi-xvi-america-might-be-heading-toward-its-own-french-revolution/
Louis the XVI I am sure thought the same thing that is until Things Came Undone!!!
And the Foo Fighters song in back of the video is PERFECT! Love it.
Maybe if we offered to buy the Reps lunch where Rep Ryan eats our people could meet with Reps more and not staff.
Its sad but this is the best Democracy Money can buy.
Epic Fail in the works for the Democrats and Obama Administration.
Just read this at Daily Kos, who has seen this reported in HuffPots, TPM, NYT, and Politico.
There is a ‘grand bargain’ that slashing SS and Medicaid and all the other trillions in spending will happen now, and tax revenue issues will be dealt with later.
WTF?! They are going to trust that the Republicans will some how be more open to compromise later, AFTER THERE IS NOT ON DAMN THING TO BARGAIN WITH??!
This is truly stunning and completely unbelievable. Obama is officially a Republican President, I don’t care if there is a (D) by his name!
Cheering y’all’s efforts here from Charlotte, where my Rep is Sue ‘Revoke Jimmy Carter’s Passport’ Myrick. She doesn’t favor SS/MM cuts, she’s an absolute abolitionist, privatizer and eliminationist. If the cuts are big enough, though, she might just fall right through her butt and hang herself. A happy outcome, but not enough to wish for. But almost!
(Well, I did contribute to your campaign and hope your sandals-on-the-ground efforts win the day.)
I’m be extremely skeptical of all reports coming out right now. I have every confidence that whatever happens won’t be good for the middle class, but the media environment is a petri dish for rumors at the moment.
I think I know where they get that info, from the SS admin.
http://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/index.html
So if we succeed in doing nothing, there will be 25% cuts in 2036.
It’s like saying Huns will lose in an epic fail to Nazis. That’s great, we get Nazis over Huns. No one with integrity in government is in a position of power, votes or no votes. Obama won by a landslide with massive public support and a Congressional supermajority and promptly flushed it in the nearest toilet.
I have no illusions that any meetings will kill anything. But it does lay down a marker.
I believe that people are still deluding themselves that this is not going to happen, that all we’re hearing about is “posturing.” We’ll see how they respond when something real and undeniable emerges.
Tax cuts for the rich will happen later this is Lucy with the football if the Dems sign onto this then they look stupid as well as bought and paid for sellouts.
That’s 25 years away you know. Not exactly an “urgent must-do today” kind of thing.
Let us hope there is no truth in this! I would think I slipped through some alternate dimension. I mean, I think we can all agree Obama has to be one of the worse negotiators ever, but come on, this would just be DUH-UMB!
And I am sure whatever comes out of the sausage factory will benefit the wealthy and screw the middle class and more so the poor class. But I never would have dreamed the D’s would come out of this TOTALLY empty handed?
Still weird, 4 different pubs come out with a similar take.
Banks and the Stock Market seem confident of a deal they will like otherwise they would be selling like mad.
That’s true. I’ll have mine by then, let the next generation fend for themselves.
I’m done with Liberal Dem compromisers already. Courtney, thanks for the feedback on Oregon’s Blumenauer and Wyden. I’ve already quit voting for Rep Blumenauer. He has a “safe” Dem seat and is automatically re-elected no matter what he does, such as voting for war funding year after year. Last year, for Rep in Congress, I voted 3rd party for the first time in 50 years of voting. He and Wyden are waffling. Dems have already done great damage by echoing the conservative definition of the deficit issue and all the assumptions involved, which we now have to fight against. I’ve also pledged to contribute not a dime to the Democratic Party or Obama’s campaign, but I’ll work for our Senator Merkley; he’s cool.
Maybe they just don’t think it will be the end of the world as we know it?
Since everyone is in the same mess in one way or another, we all will sink evenly. That may still make us the best of the worst.
I’d prefer the Huns to the Nazi’s. At least they were a Monarchy and not xenophobic Fascist Corporatist like the so called ‘conservative’ Republicans are.
“but the media environment is a petri dish for rumors at the moment.; what a great metaphor; my Rep is Brian Bilbray and all he can say is he thinks the Ryan plan is THE way to address Medicare/Medicaid. But he’s an addict to Repub election monies.
I pray that the marker that is laid down stops some of these folks.
Indeed Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, is still pushing hard for the Obama “grand bargain”. I fail to understand the political benefit he sees.
Before you can hold the line, you have to draw the line.
And even if you can’t hold that line (your assessment is pretty realistic on this, Jane) you can still point out who’s out of line and extract a cost.
Hah, now Reuters…
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/21/us-usa-debt-idUSTRE7646S620110721
Tax “Reform” in 2012! BS! Means permanent Bush Tax Cuts, Tax Repatriation Holiday for Corporations, Ending the AMT (good thing cause it is hitting people that are hardly wealthy, but would prefer an inflation index added to it), Losing Mortgage Interest Tax Credit.
I really loathe the tax code as it stands and would love to see it drastically simplified. Everyone pays a sliding percentage of income from poverty line up, no deductions, no coupon games, no BS. The only reason anyone should have to ‘file’ taxes is if they are self-employed or have experienced some catastrophic loss.
I went to visit Barbara Boxer’s and Diane Feinstein’s Los Angeles offices on that day. I gave a female aids (interns?) the FDL print-out and spoke to them about the importance of the issue. I think I might make regular trips to their offices from now on.
Yes. And thank you for your fantastic diary. It was great.
Your right wingedness is showing alan…
No one says do NOTHING. What we say is do NOT cut benefits.
Only a right winger would view that as the only option and therefore means doing nothing.
Yeah, seems pre-planned to me too.
I really think ALL of this back and forth is part of the show, and the final deal is already known… cuts, cuts, cuts and more cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security, and no tax increases for the wealthy.
The look of a “fight” is to gauge responses in order to see who can safely vote for it and who probably can’t. That’s what this is all for IMO.
Trolls on line 1 – They want to apologize for all those comments about FDL never doing anything…
You’re so kind.
I agree Jane. It’s delusional to think these guys aren’t going to fuck us on medicare and ss. These dims and rethugs know the people don’t want the cuts but they don’t give a rat’s ass what the people want.
A lot of my cynicism on contacting the so called reps is based on the time I wasted several years ago calling dems to filibuster Alito. To hell with all of ‘em!
Since the House is in session most of this week, its not surprising no one was at their home district yesterday. Hedge fund vet Jim Rogers has an interesting suggestion (he’s sort of the anti-Warren Mosler in his economics but a good idea is a good idea) that seems like a natural trans-partisan issue.
why allow congressmen to go to Washington, where as a group it’s easy to lobby them? Let’s make them stay in their home districts, conduct their meetings through video conferencing, and vote electronically. If lobbyists in this country had to go to 535 districts, our laws would be quite different…
http://www.govathome.com/
Thank you for your visit, Courtney! Thank you to all making these visits. :-)
Feinstein is up for re election. I can’t believe that her office treated a constituent like that.
FWIW I started the process to have a meeting with Russ Carnahan D-Mo. His email response was lacking specifics. I want him to tell me to my face what his position is and whether his for cuts to benefits. At least he will be on record.
I have a much better idea.
Rather than paying off only 535 members, let’s get so many they can’t afford to buy them all off.
How about a Senate of 10,000 and a House of 100,000? As a start.
Build huge stadiums for them to meet and vote in. Complete with the big screen TV’s and all.
Scratch that, screw the Senate, only need one House, the People’s House. No Senate. My bad.
I know I know, it’s a crazy plan…
I think we see huge immediate cuts in return for a mere promise of tax reform — as reported. He’s desperate for a deal and the Rs know it.
He’s desperate to cut Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.
If he was desperate for a deal he would’ve taken McConnell’s no strings attached offer.
That’s what I meant :-)
To everyone that represented this issue in person, and to FDL, Thank You.
I also recently e-mailed Senator Bernie Sanders to thank him for his efforts to save Social Security, medicaid, and medicare. FYI, he is a independent. We have to remember everyone that is trying to help, and let them know we do appreciate their help.
He can’t do it alone.
Some of those 17 senators and the House Democrats up for election in 2012 need to sign off on it too.
This is so sad. The fix is in. Of course, it always was.
Sounds like the Star Wars prequel.
Salon.com chimes in, White House still in denial. Obama has, as all President’s have shown the unabashed ability to bald faced lie directly to their constituents, so I am inclined to believe this is all about where it’s at.
http://www.salon.com/news/budget_showdown/index.html?story=/tech/htww/2011/07/21/obama_s_debt_ceiling_cave
I am reaching to as many people I know who are my age (late 50s) and getting them riled up…this is not just about the retired or soon (hope) to be retired,,it is also about those behind us! I have a nephew who after getting a Master’s in Education could not find a teaching job is now teaching English in China! While I give my nephew credit for moving to China (temporary role) and it is great experience for him what kind of future does he have? There stories of other young people leaving the country to find work…Obama should be ashamed of himself!!1 but I guess money makes things alright!
I like where your heads at, but alas you can’t get rid of the Senate without a constitutional amendment (and perhaps not even then, changing “equal representation” clause may require a constitutional convention).
If we are going to amend the Constitution (the second idea definitely, the first idea probably) There’s always:
1. Pete DuPont’s great idea (which ties in nicely with the voting from home district proposal) that Congress be selected at random, like people called for jury duty. Indeed, it could be selected from jury pools. Federal grand jurors serve 18 to 24 month terms so a 2 year stretch as a Member of Congress isn’t such a, well, stretch (Congress could set up an ombudsman office to help constituents with lost passports or SS payments and what not).
2. As for US Senators, A constitutional amendment could repeal the 17th Amendment and put US Senate elections back in the hands of state legislatures again, with the proviso that they select senators by the same system South Carolina (among other states) selects judges.
SOUTH CAROLINA: The state employs a 10-member Judicial Merit Selection Commission to screen judicial candidates. This committee recommends candidates to the General Assembly, which appoints judges. Judges are subject to reappointment by the legislature.
http://courts.uslegal.com/selection-of-judges/state-by-state-summary-of-judicial-selection/
Bizarre, I’ve heard of negotiating against yourself, but I’ve never heard of throwing down the gauntlet against yourself.
This Politico article from just after the elections last year is the most important analysis to come out of the midterms, naturally both parties ignored it.
“Seniors fled Democrats in midterms”
The Republicans went from parity with Democrats among voting seniors– and boy do they ever vote–in 2006 midterms all the way to +21 in the 2010 midterms, the BIG issue was Obama’s $500 billion Medicare cuts. The Ryan plan was almost perfectly designed to nullify that advantage. The Obama White House seems hellbent on getting the Republicans back their seniors in time for 2012.
Jane, when you put “SME music content” on your youtube videos, it makes them impossible to watch for some of your members abroad….please refrain from schmaltzy toons and keep to the business side of things – your conversations – which aren’t subject to byzantine copyright laws.
Oh, and
“Barry Obama (R) Hades” – way, way, way, way to the right of Shrub!
The W. nostalgia will only grow. As he is with most things, Jamie Galbraith was ahead of the curve.
What we got was George W. Bush’s policies without Bush’s toughness, without his in-your-face refusal to compromise prematurely. Without what he himself calls his understanding that you do not negotiate with yourself.
It’s a measure of where we are, I think, that at a meeting of Americans for Democratic Action, you find me comparing President Obama unfavorably to President George W. Bush.
I’m getting nostalgic for Reagan. He told me it was morning in America. Obama tells me to eat my peas and sacrifice for someone’s good, certainly not mine. If nothing else he should be impeached for selling Audacity of Hope and delivering Banality of Despair.
While we didn’t actually make a visit, we did call into Wyden, Blumenauer and Merkley. We had different responses.
Blum’s office said he has no position. Wyden could not be reached. No one answered the telephone. Merkley in his e-mail to his constituents said he will not support any cuts to the Safety Net.
I agree about support of Blum. No way, and I did not vote for him in the last election.Merkley is actually a neighbor, and has been on friendly terms throughout the years. Don’t think that translates to much. He has a hard dude gate keeper! I’m a cautious observer with him, due to the water business in Portland.
Nostalgia ehh? Check out old Richard Nixon speeches. His 1971 State of the Union is an astonishing read. The guy sounds like Dennis Kucinich.
Guaranteed income (via a negative income tax), full employment budget, universal healthcare, state/local govt revenue sharing, more parks and green spaces (no mention of the EPA, however Nixon started up its operations the month before) and a rather smart govt reform plan which would work today (granted, we’re probably stuck with the post-9/11 Dept of Homeland Security).
I propose that the Departments of State, Treasury, Defense, and Justice remain, but that all the other departments be consolidated into four: Human Resources, Community Development, Natural Resources, and Economic Development. Let us look at what these would be:
–First, a department dealing with the concerns of people–as individuals, as members of a family–a department focused on human needs.
–Second, a department concerned with the community–rural communities and urban communities-and with all that it takes to make a community function as a community.
–Third, a department concerned with our physical environment, with the preservation and balanced use of those great natural resources on which our Nation depends.
–And fourth, a department concerned with our prosperity–with our jobs, our businesses, and those many activities that keep our economy running smoothly and well.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=3110#ixzz1SmdyZLyR