Several months ago when Republicans first made it clear they were planning to hold the debt ceiling hostage many wanted President Obama to issue a veto threat. Obama could have done this while still maintaining the deficit hawk image he so desperately craves with a statement like:
I would happy work on a bipartisan basis with the Republican party to reach a grand bargain on the deficit. I took the initiative to create my own deficit commission through executive order. But what I won’t negotiated while Republicans hold a gun to the head of the American economy and the full credit of the United States. I will veto anything besides a clean debt ceiling increase. We can deal with the deficit in its proper context, as part of the 2012 budget.
The reason this veto threat that progressive wanted wasn’t offered months ago, was basically that raising the debt ceiling was too important to play politics with. It was a must get done or else the economy would implode.
Recently though the President Obama is now threatening to veto any short term increase in the debt ceiling that doesn’t contain enough austerity for political reason.
It is the administration that has been warning how devastating it would be if the government default on August 2nd and how there is no plan B to get around the debt ceiling. Yet we are now to believe that if Speaker John Boehner passed a 30 day increase on July 29, Obama would veto it. A move that would send the country into the terrible consequences of default his administration has been warning against.
The White House is clearly more than willing to also play politics with and issue veto threats about the full credit of the United States. Unfortunately Obama has proven he won’t play politics to defend progressive principles. He will only do it to advance an his austerity agenda.





4 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
And you want me to believe that Obama wouldn’t sign a long-term debt ceiling raise? I don’t think so. Nice sensational headline, but it’s not true.
I have no idea what your comment means.
Jon,
What do you make of Lawrence O’Donnell’s reading of Obama’s behavior?
http://thelastword.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/11/7063413-breakdown-of-obamas-strategy
Bluffing or not, I think Obama is capable of throwing SS, Medicare and Medicaid under the bus because he buys into that Third Way thinking.
- Tom
Yes! Obama has begun his endgame.
Obama wants his maximalist program. He now sits to the right of the GOPers on this issue. The GOPers, thanks to their tax fetish, can’t accept an austerity program they seeming would support while Obama wants to destroy the few remaining welfare components of the New Deal and Great Society.
If the Congressional GOPers pass a debt ceiling increase or delegate to the President their statutory power to set a debt ceiling, Obama can rightly call them cowards on the debt issue. It serves the GOPers right for promoting an incoherent political program.
Of course, however this palace squabble plays out, the “lesser people” will suffer. Galbraith’s predator class will win out in the end.