If AARP is really opposed to cutting Social Security benefits as part of a “grand bargain” to reduce the deficit, you’d think they’d come right out and say it. Instead, they’re just recycling all of President Obama’s weasel-word tactics about “supporting” the public option (and we all know how well that worked out).
Here’s their latest missive to their email list, promoting their new damage-control ad:
Poetry for zoo animals. Shrimp on a treadmill. Federally funded pickle technology?!
It may sound ridiculous, but these are real programs receiving federal funds – while Congress is pushing for harmful cuts to Medicare and Social Security!
I’m going to go out on a limb here and say that the Bush-era tax cuts, the bank bailouts and three wars take a bigger bite out of the federal budget than zoo poetry, but I guess they don’t want to piss off their fellow “grand bargain” oligarchs (well not much of a limb really, the CBO says just that in the chart above).
Instead, here’s AARP:
Congress should be focusing on cutting tax loopholes and wasteful spending, including high health care costs – not critical programs like Social Security and Medicare. That’s why we’ve created a new ad to remind them what they should be cutting, instead of the hard-earned benefits millions depend on.
The whole frame is as anti-government as you’ll find at any Tea Party rally. Their form letter to members of Congress says “it’s important that we work together to address the nation’s long-term debt.” Really? Then where was AARP when they were extending the Bush tax cuts, which created the deficit problem they now find so alarming?
You guessed it. AARP signed off on the Bush tax cuts.
But more importantly, do they really expect people to believe that cutting pickle technology is going to make up the difference for the hole that the AARP-approved tax cut extension punched in the deficit?
Like most Americans, we opposed extending the Bush tax cuts. Like most Americans, we oppose the wars in the Middle East. Like most Americans, we opposed TARP. Without those expenses, the deficit would be a small fraction of what it’s projected to be.
AARP got $18 million in stimulus funds for a “work training program for mature workers.” I wholeheartedly support the goals of the program. But the project is listed as “completed” and the jobs created is listed at “0″. If AARP wants to cut wasteful government spending, maybe they should start with themselves.
The email continues:
There are just a few weeks left before the vote, and it’s up to us to make sure Congress keeps its priorities straight. From pickle technology to tax loopholes, there are plenty of places Congress can make real cuts – but your benefits shouldn’t be one of them.
Okay, good to know. AARP didn’t have to come out right now and announce their support for benefit cuts, and the fact that they did was a real tell: they believe that cuts to Social Security benefits could be a part of the upcoming vote to raise the debt ceiling.
AARP’s public support for benefit cuts in the Wall Street Journal is making members of Congress a lot more comfortable with the idea. Sure they did the predictable yo-yo and tried to reel it back in to do damage control, but we saw that tactic get a good work-out during the public option debate: Yes we do, no we — uh — well, we never said that. Exactly. Just kind-of. The people they were sending the signal to got the message. Now they’re trying to hoodwink their members and salvage their brand.
If AARP wants credit for protecting Social Security, they actually need to do it. That means drawing a line in the sand, and saying “absolutely no cuts” — not hiding behind weasel-words while they sign off on some Joe Biden/GOP grand bargain behind closed doors.
Protect Social Security from AARP – sign the pledge to fight for Social Security benefits.




40 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jane,
Any chance you can find out what Betty White has to say about AARP’s weasel words?
AARP Press Release (Jan 25, 2011): Betty White Gets Her AARP Card and Signs on to Help Engage Membership in Living Their Best Lives
facts are stubborn things
AARP is United Healhcares…vehicle to the senior dollars
their CEO one man aged 59,walked away with over a BILLION dollars
senior dollars to one mans coffers
heres a funny link
http://www.selectsmart.com/DISCUSS/read.php?16,706138,706631
Actions speak louder than words. AARP has not fired John Rother.
“The truth is that corporate America, which is the government, doesn’t need us anymore. It’s comfortable with permanent 15 or 20 percent unemployment; it’s not hurting their profits. In fact, 15-20 percent unemployment is the result of multinational corporations maximizing their profits.”
Awesome debt chart! Guess we can’t trash CBPP completely if they keep on cranking out such useful truthiness.
Dagger in the heart for AARP was supporting Obama’s disgusting deal to extend Shrub’s tax cuts. Did AARP also endorse the astounding payoff to trust fund heirs with the massive cut in the estate tax?
Nit: It’s not ‘zoo poetry’ that’s funded, it’s poetry for zoo animals. The AARP email language is zoo poetry: recycled blather from Andy Rooney and Archie Bunker.
jane, sometimes you just swing for the fences!
now allow ME to correct aarp;
Can we not let Bush off the hook for bailing out the airlines? I know American Airlines got a whopper of a load of cash. Not sure if they paid it back with interest or not.
Nice juxtaposition with Jon’s previous post about AARP’s support for “changes in benefits.”
Lovin that point about the Weasel Words!
They will say anything to make a buck.
Ms Hamsher,
Oh you know I agree – and do with most of what you are fighting for.
I wanted to just pop in and say, “Thanks for doing this. You are really doing well, keep it up, please.”
That’s it.
Really, Jane, enough with the OCD preoccupation with meaning. That has nothing to do with it.
Dogs bark. Cats meow. Weasles speak in weasle-words.
Here is my opinion…. If my “contract” with the US government is substantialy altered, I want out. I want my money and I want out of the SS system.
I remember in the early 90s when early boomers and late “greatest” thought myself and other Xers simply cynical because we didnt believe SS or Medicare would still be around when it came time for us to collect.
One can only hope Walmart is still around in 30 years to all of us 70 year olds employeed
Game on! Keep it coming, Jane! Let’s go after these bastards for their lying and b.s.
AARP is NOT our friend. They are out to rip off as much as possible from “average” citizens. The CEO of AARP is like any THIEF CEO these days: out for as much as he can rip off from shareholders and anyone else possible.
AARP LIES to protect the obscene wealth of the upper 1%. AARP is NOT about protecting the rights and lives of “average” middle and working class Seniors (and those younger who will, one day, be Seniors, themselves) who mostly all *paid into* Soc Sec with their hard-earned money. It’s bogus to LIE that Soc Sec needs to be cut or changed. It does not. It’s a LIE to blame the bad economy for “forcing” the need to cut Soc Sec. Soc Sec has nothing to do with our nation’s other budgetary and fiscal issues.
Thank you. The support for the campaign has been incredible. People really get the connection between AARP support and building momentum in Congress.
I keep thinking “why would they do something as politically untenable” and can’t come up with a good answer. But certainly not for the first time.
just wanted to say, calling bush’s redistribution of middle class assets and investments over to the wealthy shouldn’t ever be called what the republicans want to call it, they were not ‘tax cuts” they were redistribution of middle class assets and investments in a class war against the labor class of america
I really think progressives have to frame that correctly because when we do we get even the tea partiers on our side
I don’t blame you for how you feel. It shouldn’t have to be this way. Soc Sec, as you perhaps know, is & should easily continue to be a very safe investment for you and anyone else. Soc Sec admin costs are very low. It is a good program that is actually doing quite well, and I’ve witnessed how helpful it has been for my elderly parents in their retirement (they had other savings & a small pension, but Soc Sec was very beneficial for them).
There is NO true reason why we should even be discussing this. It’s patented b.s.
But I, too, feel the way you do (and if you’re GenX, then I’m older than you). I’ve paid into Soc Sec all my life (quite a bit in fact) and am continuing to do so right now via 2 jobs. IF these f*ckers are gonna rip me off, then I’d prefer to get MY money back with interest. I can just as easily invest it, myself, thanks very much.
Yet I hate to stop this worthwhile program. I am capable of handling my investments, but far too many citizens need help with this process. Soc Sec provides all of us with a safe and convenient way to invest and then later withdraw our holdings. I prefer, at this point, to continue fighting for Soc Sec to continue as it is.
If that becomes impossible, then I’m with you: give me MY money + interst back.
Funny how AARP ads are popping up here trying to sell life insurance. I guess the idiots at AARP just buy keyword-based ads even if AARP is coming up negatively, then again AARP is just a bunch of insurance salespeople now working under the cover of an advocacy group.
O/T Ms. Hamsher have you been invited to Keith O. new show yet. That would be telling if you are not. We need to get this message out and Keith’s show would be a good platform for it. Thanks for all you and your writers do. It’s important work.
I have been saying he who controls the narrative wins the war. Thanks for illuminating this point. If we are not consistent our message is muddled. IMHO
Good point and thanks for that.
I HAVE framed conversations with conservatives I know in JUST that language. My conservative friends and relatives are the biggest whining crybabies about the so-called “socialistic re-distribution” of THEIR hard earned money to teh poorz & it’s soooooooooo UNFAIR, blah blah blah boo hoo…
I have jumped right back and said: well I feel that the Bush tax rates just re-distributed MY hard-earned tax dollars back UP to the super wealthy in this country, and that has resulted in needed services, such as infrastructure maintenance, to stop or slow down. Infrastructure maintenance benefits us all, and I’m tired of the super wealthy getting a FREE RIDE off of my hard earned money.
It shuts them up for a little bit until they can come back with another one of Rush Limbaugh’s talking points. I don’t wish to sound dismissive, but it’s been my experience so far that *every* conservative with whom I have these types of conversations ALL tend to say almost exactly the same thing, using the same words. They are Rush’s talking points, which is just what the Galtian Overlords ordered.
William Novelli, the CEO of the AARP Foundation, made $1,607,848 in 2009, according to the Form 990. There are 529 employees who made more than $100,000. Total wages and benefits were about $223 million.
Revenues from dues were $246 million. Total revenue was about $1.09 billion.
That’s some kind of charity, let me tell you.
Pickles the clown act.
There is a Bush connection, of course.
Millions for pickles, not one cent for another 3 1/2 years of war in Afghanistan! Also, when are the troops coming home from Iraq?
How could they not be? Biden is running around saying gleefully that he has found $2 trillion in cuts. Conrad says more like $4 trillion is required. Where is that going to come from? Defense?
The thing for folks to keep in mind here is that, even if the $4 trillion cut in government spending occurs over 8 years — $.5 trillion per year — even with a multiplier of only 2, that amounts to a $1 trillion dollar fall in GPD per year.
The WH can’t maintain that an $800 million stimulus created jobs and also maintain that a $1 trillion cut in GDP won’t destroy jobs.
Heh. Jane wrote “Weasel Words” ! Catchy!
We’ve been using “weasel words” and “weasel weight” in the Scorecard group.
Never. See Japan, Germany…
Good point, perris.
As for this:
As someone who did get suckered into supporting TARP, I can simply say that I hope that I have learned my lesson.
Watching AARP’s behavior is simply revolting.
Feckless is too kind a word…
I find AARP pretty useless. Thanks, Jane and FDL, for jumping on this lame-o organization’s disgusting behavior. I’ve called them several times on highly questionable stands/non-stands they’ve taken and get either BS or a sales pitch to join in response. Useless.
Thanks Jane. PLEASE, put this post in an email to AARP & let me and every other responsible person in this country sign it.
That’s about the size of it. Where’d the quote come from?
I supported a stimulus however the obama tarp was NOT stimulus it was redistribution.
we needed JOBS with that money, we NEEDED to fund the infrastruct NOT employ a RIDICULOUS “austerity” plan that had as it’s main goal shedding union jobs
disgusting
defund em
they dont need taxpayer $$$$
remember acorn
“People really get the connection between AARP support and building momentum in Congress.”
Some take longer than others to see the fake out – like myself. I keep waiting for AARP to clarify that they mean an increase in the retirement age 30 or more years out from now – something logical and indeed unavoidable given mortality improvements and a desire to not increase the payroll tax. But they do not clarify – and indeed come out with a Simpson/Koch/GOP type ad about a few thousand spent on an animal reaction research project.
OK – United Health has started to pull strings – and the sad part is the fact our Democratic Party leaders, having no backbone, now bend to the new wind that AARP blew their way. So Obama has the cover he wanted – and all the quotes about FDR telling the party back in the 30′s that he wanted to do some progressive things but needed the party members to “make me do it” are not going to change the situation as long as Obama is President. We need to get active – but active in getting stronger Democrats elected.
AARP is a lobbyist, an insurance salesman for gosh sakes. Its metier is the use of weasel words.
It’s time for AARP’s entrenched lobbyist-managers to be thrown out or for its membership to vote with its feet and find better ones who will represent its interests, not those of its fellow lobbyists.
Y’know those boxes of magnetic words + phrases you can get, to create “sentences” or funny sayings on your refrigerator? You just take a word here, another there & slap ‘em up on the door to make a nonsensical phrase? That’s the AARP: grabbing a word here, a phrase there & stringing them together to create their “argument.”
They are “word salad” for the refrigerator poetry set.
I was under the impression that AARP was formed/developed to aid seniors not screw them over in favor of the mighty corporations. Recently it seems that everyone is out to kill off the seniors and starve the children. As a senior with grandchildren too young to care for themselves I am pissed and AARP will hear my opinion.
The Kock bros/GOP to the right of me; Pete Peterson/Dems to the “left” of me; AARP and Wall st Banksters behind me; with senior years of proverty in front of me…what has become of the American way of life?