Accused Wikileaks whistleblower PFC. Bradley Manning will be removed from solitary confinement and placed in medium security at Fort Leavenworth prison, according to reports from journalists who took a tour of the Kansas facility today.
The first report of Manning’s move came from National Catholic Review reporter Joshua J. McElwee, who said that after the tour of the Leavenworth facility, military officials announced that Manning would be moved to medium security tomorrow morning.
Suspected WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning, whose treatment in custody has spurred protests from supporters and human rights groups, is now considered a “medium custody” prisoner and is allowed three hours of recreation a day, the U.S. Army announced this afternoon. [...]
The commandant of the facility, Lt. Col. Dawn Hilton, said the suspected Army private will be classified as a medium custody prisoner “starting tomorrow morning.”
The new classification allows Manning to receive Army inspected mail freely, make phone calls, and meet with preapproved visitors, Hilton said.
Kevin Zeese from the Bradley Manning Support Network seemed to confirm that report with a tweet saying that Manning would be removed from solitary confinement. The AP also reports that Manning will be housed with about 10 other pre-trial detainees at Leavenworth, and will have access to common areas during the day.
The ease with which the Army decided to put Manning in medium security, and out of almost a year of solitary confinement, makes the unending excuses out of the Pentagon pathetic. All we heard about from December onward was how Bradley Manning was a threat to himself. DOD Flack Geoff Morrell said Manning was being held in maximum security because other prisoners could possibly harm him – or, because everybody at Quantico was in danger of self-harm. He was stripped naked every night because of a sarcastic quip.
But now, Manning is in medium security. No prevention of injury order. No maximum custody. He’s like any other detainee (you can say that now without lying, Morrell).
Barack Obama said the Pentagon “reassured” him that Manning’s treatment at Quantico “met our basic standards.” Better get a second opinion on that. Either 7 days in Kansas did wonders for Manning, or the folks at the Pentagon and Quantico are a bunch of lying sadists who tortured Manning out of, what? Retaliation? Punishment? Sick enjoyment?
Dennis Kucinich sums up the high stakes that still surround Manning’s detention and the unquestionable abuse that Manning suffered:
Instead of responding to criticism from the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture, the Army will offer the media a scripted fantasy of Manning’s brand new facility. With this stunt, it is clear that the Department of Defense and the Army are more concerned with public relations than the rights and security of Pfc. Manning.
This fake transparency ignores the central question: How was Pfc. Manning treated during his long, solitary pretrial confinement at Quantico? What is his mental state after suffering the indignity of being left naked for an undetermined period of time, and after being continually disrupted in the manner of a continuous interrogation?
If it is determined that there has been a deliberate effort to break Pfc. Manning physically and/or mentally prior to his trial or subvert his rights in any way, then the news media, which is participating in the public relations exercise today at Ft Leavenworth, could become complicit in a cover up.
The Department of Defense must grant my legitimate request to meet with Pfc. Bradley Manning and fully answer serious questions about his treatment.
Make no mistake. This is not over. The Pentagon did today what it should have done, at a minimum, five months ago when allegations of Bradley Manning’s abuse first came to light. We don’t know what Manning has really endured under the abusive watch at Quantico. And Manning supporters won’t stop the campaign to ensure he’s still treated fairly, and that the truth about his abuse at Quantico is told. There’s also the little matter of the Commander in Chief exercising undue command influence in declaring Manning guilty.
There’s little doubt that Bradley Manning’s conditions wouldn’t be improving, starting tomorrow, if it weren’t for the tireless efforts of his supporters, including the more than 50,000 FDL activists who protested, donated, and wrote in support of his humane treatment. Thank you for all you’ve done. I’m looking forward to continuing our campaign to ensure Bradley Manning is treated fairly.




39 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
I hope you will let us know when we can send postcards to Bradley Manning in Kansas. There are a lot of us out here who want him to know, directly, that he has our support. Many of us think about him every single day with great worry and concern. I look forward to being able to let him know how many of us there are who care a great deal about him.
Will the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture be granted an unmonitored visit with Bradley Manning? (hat tip EmptyWheel)
Welsh, Irish, Scottish and English (WISE): WISE Up for Bradley Manning. Call-out for solidarity (Apr. 27, 2011)
I wouldn’t have kept up with this story without your reporting. I don’t recall seeing much coverage elsewhere.
This is important, we must know about it. Thank you for all you’re doing.
Good! Still keeping a watchful eye though.
I chose the latter option: retaliatory, sick, lying sadists, one & all, including the Commander in Chief.
Happy to hear this news, fwiw.
A huge THANKS to you for continued excellent reporting on this story (and thanks to others, like Zeese). There’s rarely anything about Manning in the corp-owned facist media, and what little is “reported” on is usually damning of Manning, much like Obama declaring Manning guilty until proven innocent when & if Manning is ever granted a trial.
Of all the sick, twisted, effed sh*t that this nation indulges itself in, Manning’s plight is at least towards the top of the list.
Like, Teddy, I would like to learn about when I can write to this young man personally expressing support and regret. I get tears in my eyes every time I see one of his photos; I have not doubt that he looks very different today after being tortured at Quantico. Horrible.
Thank you.
Thanks for some good news. I have wanted to write to Manning, and I hope things can go well for him. Maybe he can find a buddy who will be a companion in the days ahead. I am really hoping for the best….
I still view this move by the Obama Administration as a matter of politics rather than something done to ensure an objective and fair judicial process for Manning.
That it now provides some measure of fairness to Manning is a secondary result. The primary purpose is still a matter of removing a progressive political thorn from the side of the Administration.
Wonderful News!!!! and so many many thanks to everyone who fought to keep his story front and center! so happy for him!! I know there is still a way to go, but this is just wonderful! xxxx
Agree. But if it results in better conditions for Manning, then that’s a good thing. Not good enough, but better for him.
Great thought, Teddy. I’d write him, if I could.
Bradley Manning for Nobel Peace Prize.
For what he has endured for speaking truth.
Let’s be sure to thank Jane for (tirelessly) leading the effort and using her ability to get on MSM outlets to spread the word.
And I agree with Teddy: I, too, would like to send him a card or a note. It would also be nice if someone could find out what magazines (if any) he likes to read and if civilians can give him gift subscriptions.
Never thought I’d be happy to see someone sent to Leavenworth! I hope his new status and freedoms will help him heal from the abuse he’d undergone for so long. Whoever contacts Bradley, tell him that he has a lot of support. His bravery in alledgedly exposing war crimes and his performance under duress is to be commended.
There’s a continuing failure to take note of the fact that a gay Army soldier in a Marine brig isn’t (wasn’t) exactly a VIP. Quite the opposite. To make it crystal clear: Pfc. Manning might have been injured if he had been exposed to Marines.
Another thing that I think people are overlooking is just how strong Manning is. He withstood 9 months of solitary confinement and torture and hasn’t admitted to doing anything that the government has been torturing him to admit. How many of us would be able to do that? He really has been a very good soldier. We need more people like him in the military.
He never should have been at Quantico in the first place. And that reasoning doesn’t excuse the treatment he received while in solitary.
Oh yeah, also too, he WAS exposed to Marines. The guarts that tormented him and the CO that took his clothing. They were Marines.
I appreciate all that FDL has done on behalf of Manning and I’m sure it caught the attention of obama; however, this happened because obama is now campaigning for re-election.
Two questions:
1) What is obama going to campaign on? His accomplishments??? or “I suck less than the other guy.”
2) So we all know that obama is a corporate whore who has no principles, to say the very least. What are we going to do about it? Or are you all going to cave and vote for the “I suck less guy.”
Is posting on FDL just an exercise in futility or a just a place to vent? That’s not good enough for me.
I would love to hear from some of you and please no remarks showing how clever you are. I just want to hear some sincere remarks.
I heard Zeese on antiwar.com interview earlier today and thought his optimism unfounded. Happy to see I was wrong.
http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/04/27/kevin-zeese-6/
Please post a mailing address for Manning when and if it becomes available.
I’ll explain it to you.
First you have to understand that the Army and the Marines enjoy, shall we say, a certain rivalry. That’s key.
Pfc. Manning, an Army soldier, was logically put in the Marine brig at Quantico to be near his judicial processes. As a gay Army soldier charged with almost treasonous acts he would have been in potential physical danger if he had been exposed to Marine prisoners.
The wrongful mistreatment by his guards gives us an indication of this potential, which might have been worse than the wrongful treatment he did experience. So in that sense his solitary confinement might have saved him from physical harm. Prisons after all are not Sunday social tea parties.
Any review of Pfc Manning’s treatment at Quantico, and his improved treatment at Fort Leavenworth, ought to include these basic facts.
You can.
Bradley Manning 89289
830 Sabalu Road
Fort Leavenworth, KS 66027
http://bit.ly/lFW8Du
Agreed.
It also occurs to me that if we can’t get a living, breathing politician to challenge Obama, either in the primaries or as an independent, then it might be a worthwhile project to run Manning for President as a protest candidate, thus helping to keep his cause in the spotlight during the long campaign season.
This sounds like justification for the torture of Bradley Manning at Quantico. It also sounds like the argument of whatever brilliant bureaucrat at Quantico said that Manning had to be deprived of his underwear because he might use it to hang himself.
This is so sick…are you asserting that our brave and strong Marines cannot protect one of their own who happens to be gay…Don’t ask that we wink at or tolerate that depravity.
Not one of their own…mistaken. How about another service man? Just sickening.
Hmmm…I wonder if Gates got fired, rather than resigning, because of his handling of Manning…? No? Yes? Maybe?
Manning is gay?
I love having an address for Manning. How many people will Leavenworth have to hire to sort and censor the additional mail? I’ll be writing him just to let him know there’s one more person who cares what happens to him and is proud of how he’s served his country.
teddy partridge@1
now that is a great idea.
and a great question to ask leavenworth officials:
“if folks send manning cards of support, will he receive them personally, and promptly (necessary to ask because the dod has proved itself slick as goose shit) ?”
” will he be allowed to retain them?”
“can he be sent money directly?”
Yes.
thanks everyone who did a great job here to keep this in the news and to keep us informed. See you in Kansas on the 4th of June for the protest. Let’s show them that leaving DC did not leave the supporters.
A grown man with a tear in his eye over this!
Jane, and all of you that worked on this, thank’s so much. All of us knew the pentagon and the president were lying over the torture of Pvt. Manning and their 10 month violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
I only hope Pvt Manning gets a fair day in front of a military court, generally referred to as “Kangaroo Courts.” People in the military who release tapes, even if they did release footage of people who obviously knew that the people on the ground they were murduring were civilians; a tape that shows people who don’t even have a clue what an AK-47 looks like and made no effort to make sure of their target, have an obligation to not cover-up murder, like the military does until they are caught. Then they white-wash it or prosecute some private.
I hope Pvt. Manning enjoys the dayroom!
A special shout-out to MSNBC as well!
I am not so sure they are so basic..or even facts. You don’t violate the UCMJ on that basis, and military prisoners are not like civilian ones, especially in pre-trial.
I was in the Army for 8 years. We did not treat NVA prisoners in Vietnam like this. And they were taken into POW status on the battlefield. And neither did the Marines.
How do we know Manning won’t kill himself as a political statement? I think Obama is taking a big risk. Or maybe Manning made a deal. Personally, I hope he gave them Assange.
Well he didn’t. The Army admitted to having found no connection. The Irony is that men on death row in Indiana get more free time and better conditions than Pvt Manning got at Quantico as a pre-trail detainee.
Absolutely. I would like to send him a card myself. Just a “we support you” kind of message. I’d like to say, “Many of us think of you as a hero, not a criminal,” but I’d be worried that the censorship would get that one thrown out.
Meanwhile, I think “trust and verify” is a good attitude about Manning’s actual conditions of imprisonment. Or, in case we can’t reasonably trust, then just verify.
Dersuuzala, that is a great idea! Nobel Peace Prize for Manning, and also for Wikileaks, if the Swedes can grant the prize to an organization. Whether Assange deserves to share it personally, I don’t know. I won’t hold his personality against him, but sexual assault is another matter entirely. Personally, I am guessing the rape charge is trumped up, so I conditionally support Assange until there is a way to learn more of his story.