Seven Eight Democratic Members of Congress spoke out against the Obama Administration’s proposed Colombia “free trade” agreement and its onerous assassination stress tests. They were joined by the United Steelworkers Union, the first major union to speak out against the deal after the AFL-CIO labor federation. Each centered their opposition on the laughable “Action Plan” to reduce assassinations of union members.
The members of Congress include Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), Rep. Betty Sutton (D-OH), Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), Rep. Mike Michaud (D-ME), Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and Rep. George Miller (D-CA).
While Sutton and Slaughter released separate statements, the other Reps issued a joint statement criticizing Obama and the Assassination Stress Tests, saying that “genuine change” in the levels of violence and murder must be “in reality,” and “not just on paper.”
No other nation in the world is as notorious as Colombia for murders, violence and threats targeting trade unionists. The violence, threats and rights abuses take place within a perilous landscape of human rights abuses that affect broad sectors of Colombia’s people, especially in rural areas. These include human rights defenders; journalists; Afro-Colombian and Indigenous leaders; land rights, victims’ rights, religious and other community-based leaders – all of whom have experienced dramatic increases in threats over the past nine months, and many of whom have seen dramatic increases in murders of their leaders around the country.
We stand by the concerns and recommendations we provided to President Obama on March 17th. While we wait to see the details, the Action Plan thus far does not appear to meet those concerns. When so many lives are at stake, we do not believe this is a matter to be rushed to Congress until we are able to determine, including through consultation with the targets of violence and human rights violations in Colombia, whether genuine and lasting change has taken place on the ground – not just on paper, but in the reality that so adversely affects so many Colombians every single day.
The United Steelworkers have actively opposed trade deals with Colombia, and in a statement this morning, renewed its opposition, citing 6 murders of unionists this year, including 2 this week.
The reality on the ground in Colombia has not changed since the agreement was first signed. A record 52 unionists were killed in Colombia last year. Since 1986, only five percent of more than 2,800 union killings have been prosecuted, making impunity the standard for justice in the killings. This year alone, six unionists have been killed in Colombia, including two in the past week, even as the U.S. and Colombia were finalizing their new accord over the FTA.
These two most recent victims, Hector Orozco and Gildardo Garcia of the agricultural union known as Association of Peasant Workers of Tolima, were killed in a heavily militarized zone and were in fact threatened by the official Colombian army just before their killing.
USW President Leo W. Gerard decries the proposed Colombia FTA as a shameful reflection on America’s values. “These most recent killings put into grave doubt whether the Colombian government and its military are truly prepared to reform as the Administration presumes. The fact is, despite the newly negotiated ‘Action Plan,’ the situation in Colombia has not changed, and therefore, should not be rewarded with a Free Trade Agreement.”
It’s going to take more than a half dozen eight Members of Congress and the Steelworkers to stop this deal, but it’s a good start.




23 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Heh, Headline is a little misleading IMO.
DEMOCRATIC REPS OPPOSE TRADE DEAL.
Then you read it’s 7.
7 out of whatever the hell number is now, well let’s just say that ain’t much.
Although to be fair I suppose it’s 7 more than I expected in DC. Assuming, of course, they’re ACTUALLY OPPOSED and not, you know, just saying the words.
Free trade that isn’t should be a non-starter given everything that has happened since the first of these execrable ‘treaties’ were signed.
As you say Michael, this is but a start to killing this job killing agreement
Isn’t that mostly a list of reliable-sellout DINO’s? Schakowsky is Robert “Veal Pen” Creamer’s husband and was recently described (Greenwald?) as “The White House’s designated Pivot Queen”. DeLauro and Sanchez, IIRC, pooped on their HCR pledge. I believe Slaughter has proven to be all talk and no spine as well.
Wow-eee. What a great line-up. And even more important…seven whole Dems are against this. Boy, that’ll make the WH sit up and take notice!
Got to keep the “heroes” rotating as much as the “villains.”
It’s a development and I do appreciate the post, but … as that well-known political brain without a pulse (Cheney) has been known to say …
SO?
Sorry for the ignorance, but I truly am not sure.
Do House members even get a vote at all??? I guess I was thinking that all trade deals were basically treaties, and treaties are only ratified by the Senate. If that were the case, WTF difference would it make if 170 D House members were against it? Guessing that must not be the case.
Only 7 reps and the Steelworkers? Yeah, it’s a start.
Of course, in the best case scenario this will work out just like the PO campaign: altering public opinion, forcing the politicians to respond to the pressure and….then they find a way to sell us out behind closed doors while saying all along they don’t want this new law that they will vote for, fund, and enforce.
Awesome.
Drug Dealers will love this increase the amount of trade from Columbia and you increase the amount of pure coke that gets to America. Street level junkies might even be able to afford the pure stuff good product thats easily available always leads to an increase in people who get addicted.
The hate for trade unions in Columbia caused me to put on my thinking hat because I had memories that were ugly from another trade deal.
Let me tell you, this hat is straw and dripping with fruit! One particular fruit has a little blue label on it. You can refresh your memory as well here:
http://www.law.com/jsp/law/LawArticleFriendly.jsp?id=1188378146932
Why do we need trade with Colombia if we wanted to spur our economy wouldn’t it be cheaper to cut off aid to Colombia and use the money to pay down the debt? Is trade with Colombia even expected to pay us back all the cash we have given them over the years?
VS how much coke costs America remember increase trade with Colombia means America’s cost in Prisons, rehab lost lives, emergency room visits will also rise as more cheap pure coke starts hooking new people.
Meth and Oxy prices will also drop in as those dealers try and hold on to their customers.
For starters, the CIA and DEA can’t handle all the import business to the US and to cut that out would cause TPTB to lose way too much money. Also, you have to consider that Columbia shares borders with Venezula and Big Oil really has some hate on for Chavez.
10 ships from Colombia come to America each year 2 have coke 1 gets stopped by customs.
(I am making these numbers up) With a free trade agreement 50 ships a year come in but the number of customs officials remain the same because Obama and the GOP hate creating government jobs.
If Customs could only find one ship out of every 2 when ten ships come from Colombia if 50 ships come in the percent of ships caught will go down since Customs has limited resources.
Good point I agree but another point to consider is doesn’t the right wing progovernment death squads in Colombia also make cash from coke?
This deal goes through the government death squads will make lots more cash.
Cash to be able to afford to kill more union people this bill has side effects even a child can see.
If the Unions want to stop this deal play up the drug connection everyone is getting ready for the Presidential election no party wants to be connected to drugs now.
Amazing, it would seem that the majority of the folks in DC want to make business cards out of authentic Columbian bone.
Happy to see that a few unions are speaking out against the deal but why isn’t every union under the sun screaming about it? Why should we support any union that isn’t up in arms over this trade deal?
Unions will not be alone in stopping this deal
Faith groups, and progressives will soon, join the team that bashes this crazy deal.
the OBAMA WH political team needs to be fired.
as long as Obama is on the top of the DEM ticket, the GOP will have no problem turning out their votes.
However, Obama has huge problems getting his voters out.
what has to worry the WH, is the fact a lot of Dems may vote for House Dems and Senate Dems and not vote for OBAMA.
me thinks the OBAMA polls are not accurate, a lot of people are saying they are going to vote for OBAMA, and when the times comes, they will not.
if Obama keeps making these mistakes, he will be looking at a Dem House and Senate, and WH that goes GOP,
this scenario will Kill OBAMA!
Agree with you,only 7 members of congress, shows how damn corrupt both parties are.
When are my fellow Americans going to wake up,this is not a Dem vs GOP fight,this is a rich vs ordinary Americans war for chrissakes!
Teamsters are now out with a statement against the deal:
http://www.teamster.org/content/teamsters-question-scope-impact-colombia-action-plan
I have to disagree with my Progressive Brethern.
If Card Check were the “actualized” Universal Labor Standard that Clinton promised, and therefore inserted into all Free Trade Agreements, organized labor activism would proliferate throughout the Latin America Region. Consequently, one of the outcomes, would be reduced migration into the USA.
And if you ask an undocumented immigrant, his or her first statement is in recognition for, “If there was a decent paying job available in my home country, I wouldn’t have come to the United States.”
And from my perspective, this Columbia Free Trade Agreement will be approved by the Senate, and those of us in the rank-in-file category, will have received no actualized or tangible benefit. As such, “demanding” that Card Check be that missing labor standard, lays the ground work for addressing any FTA’s in the future.
In closing, these members of Congress are short-sighted and are not providing any “consequence” other blowing their own horn in public and relative to their opposition. Therefore, the “result” should be premised on in improving the economic lives of the “little guys” in Columbia.
Jaango
In O world, murdered trade unionists don’t count for much. They are just losers who have to get out of the way of the world’s winners, like O and Timmeh and the boys. If people are good for anything, they can’t be shot down like dogs. Q E D.
Same question as yesterday:
Ya but EFCA wasn’t about card check. Why would we try for something we never really cared about to begin with?
Sending USA jobs to Latin America during a Depression ?
What you are saying? send all USA jobs to latin america, so latin americans would not come to the USA?
where are all these USA jobs?
the last time I check USA un-employment was very, very, high!
Obama speaks to people like Jaango, he thinks they are rational and smart.
I like the people in Wisconsin, a Republican is one about to be recall
Steny Hoyer is true to form. This anippet from the National Association of Manufacturers site:
Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-MD), the House Democratic whip, issued a statement lauding the developments.
“Today’s development on issues of worker rights and violence against workers is a positive and important step towards passage of the Colombia FTA. These issues needed to be addressed, and I am pleased the Administration and Colombian government have agreed to a concrete action plan. Colombia is a key ally in South America, and it is in our economic and national security interests to further strengthen that relationship. I look forward to working with the Administration to advance the Colombia FTA, which I continue to support. As we work to enact the three pending trade agreements, we must also extend expired provisions of the Trade Adjustment Assistance program that help American workers who have lost their jobs as a result of trade.”
Rep. Hoyer has been a clear and consistent supporter for many years, which also warrants mention as political bravery.