The American people haven’t been sold on our military actions in Libya according to two new polls. An AP-GFK poll found that 48 percent approved or leaned toward approving US involvement while 50 disapproved or leaned toward disapproving. Similarly, a Quinnipiac poll found 47 percent opposed, with only 41 percent in support.
This is not a good starting base of support for an action only a week old. The general trend is that most unnecessary foreign wars “kinetic military actions” become less popular as they drag on and their costs rise.
There is also reason to believe that the people will likely sour on this conflict very quickly. The same AP poll found the American people have little stomach for mission creep in Libya, with 78 percent opposed to sending in American ground troops. Yet, almost daily, the mission has been expanding as it morphed from a no-fly zone, to bombing operations, to anti-ground force attack, to possibly arming the rebels.




35 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
You mean to tell me Obama’s
oratory masturbation sessionspeech on Monday night didn’t work?Thanks for the news, Jon.
Obviously, it’s all a result of a communication problem.
The same was true with Obama’s wonderful health care reform, which just wasn’t explained well enough to the American people.
(SNARKISH SARCASM)
AP-GFK poll taken before the speech. Couldn’t find the date on Quin with quick scan (only date I found was today’s, which is the date of the newsrelease, not the survey date(s)).
The CIA has been supplying arms to whoever wants them for decades. Why aren’t the rebels armed to the teeth by now?
It’s all in the messaging.
Hey you cat expert. I need some help. Can you email me? notorious2again AT gmail DOT com.
Sorry to go OT early.
We can all see just how well arming the Afghani’s back in the eighties worked for us .What was that CIA backed guy’s name now
Osama something or other?
Idiots, they never learn.
When informed public opinion was against the Iraq War, Dick Cheney famously remarked, “So?”
Obama will put it more suavely than that, of course. But the thinking is the same.
Stupid rebels. We practically hand them victory on a silver platter, and they still manage to die on us. That’s why we need robots. Giant Battle Mechs (TM) with machine guns shooting depleted uranium rounds, remotely piloted from air-conditioned bunkers in the States. That’ll change a regime for ya!
Star Wars thingies that resembled metal camels. That should do it.
Doesn’t is seem that all Obama’s problems simply “a failure to communicate?”
Well, at least that’s what they keep telling us.
Can’t have too many warz. /s
Yeah like the one that had a system error and killed a bunch of folks?:
(excerpt from “Robot Cannon Kills 9, Wounds 14” by Noah Shachtman, Oct. 18, 2007)
Or how about “Mini Mexican drone falls near El Paso” (Dec. 17, 2010 ; video).
Ya gotta love the timing. The day after teh west announces that the NFZ is in place, Gaddafy drives the rebels back.
Reply to strangely enough @ 11
“Doesn’t is seem that all Obama’s problems simply “a failure to communicate?”
If that’s Obama’s only problem, I’ll eat 50 hard boiled eggs in an hour.
Hey, it was just a little glitch. You wanna make an omelet, you gotta break some eggs. I think it was Napoleon that said that. Another unitary executive. With a nice hat. That’s what Obama needs – a nice hat.
ygm
Here are some choices for the photoshoppers among us.
I recall he had trouble in North Africa, too.
this should not be a surprise to anyone.
Main street USA is in a Depression,
the last thing Americans want to hear about is another war that has nothing to do with USA security.
Poor ED found this out yesterday,
Ed two guest did not buy into the idea of helping the freedom fighters of Libya. WHY? because Main Street USA needs the help more.
the question is do we lay off USA teachers, fireman, police to help freedom fighters in Libya? no American is going to vote for this idea
Me thinks Obama F UP, it is going to be hard for Dems to preach cutting social security, when Obama has money for wars that have nothing to do with USA security
Prolly not photoshopable but I like this one.
Yeah, and his moron troops used the Sphinx for target practice.
How about this classic?
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is up: New CNN Poll: Only 32% of Americans Like the Tea Party
I’m pretty sure that if the Libyan operation fizzles that that will be just fine. I think a big part of focussing on Libya rather than any of the other uprisings occurring is that the Libyan uprising wasn’t sparked by Wikileaks. Mission accomplished, if the goal is to prevent WL from getting positive press in the US. Just sayin’.
P.S. Comment preview is broken.
Since we only have the ballot we can vote the bums out; of course we then get to choose between dumb and dumber. Oh, wait; I forgot the GOP is gearing up to disenfranchise anyone stupid enough to vote against them. Citizenship—a quaint notion.
This is actually a myth
http://www.napoleon-series.org/faq/c_sphinx.html
In rfesponse to manys @ 25
Focusing on Libya also takes the heat off the depression at home
Depression has several meanings, you choose…
Hey where are all those Cruise Missile Liberals to inform us about how GREAT this conflict is, how it won’t take long, and how we just hafta doooo it for the rebels ‘n stuff??? And P.S. absolutely no boots on the ground ‘n all and just fine to
spendwaste $55million per day on this while US citizens are jobless and hungry. YAY TEAM!!! USA USA USA/sI personally have a real problem with working on an industrial task that gets re-purposed to be part of whole interlocking system (or systems) solely for torture, killing and mass extermination. I knew folks who actually volunteered to go into robotic systems development for the military and I flat refused besides thinking that they were nuts. Artificial Intelligence (AI) may be an oxymoron but a lot of damage can be done with the systems possible thus far. I recently took a stroll through Scientific American. It is shockingly and unapologetically re-purposed giving me a glimpse of how the whole American research arena was turned into a military operation. I find that really repulsive.
The same Liberals that were part of Bush’s sky high approval rating when the “Mission Accomplished” speech was given. They fell for the BS then and now they’ve done it again.
Me predicts old lady Clinton is contemplating a face saving stab in the back resign job on Barrack. Payback is sweet as well. See you in 2012 sucker. Talk about being in way over your head.
I’ve noticed this for quite a while now. I used to love Scientific American but I’m to the point of allowing my subscription to expire.
Don’t forget all that toxic depleted uranium dust we are spreading around as a humanitarian gesture.
In the 1990s I knew earnest bench scientists that took the trouble to craft excellent pieces for the magazine as a labor of love. Up to that point what was published was so good and concise that we used them to study for our qualifiers. Somewhere in the late 1990s/early 2000s the drift was apparent. The junk science was appalling. When I touched in more recently for the heck of it to analyze a bunch of things including who and what was being advertised, it was almost as bad as looking at a Beltway Bandit white paper. As far as I am concerned, they completely went to the Dark Side. I won’t give them a dime. Instead I’d rather spare my dime for FDL. If you still want to see Scientific American, it’s a whole lot cheaper to page through it at the library. :-)