After the health care law passed, we were promised a massive, $125 million PR campaign staffed with top quality talent that would really sell the new law to the American people. In a fascinating article, Politico found that this promised campaign essentially crashed and burned:
Wal-Mart Watch founder Andrew Grossman unveiled the Health Information Campaign with great fanfare last June. Tom Daschle and Ted Kennedy’s widow, Vicki, were expected to lead the effort. They’d have help from former White House Communications Director Anita Dunn. They’d have an office in Washington with 10 or 15 operatives backing the Affordable Care Act and those who supported it.
And they’d have money to spend: Grossman hoped for $25 million a year for five years.
But nine months later, the Health Information Campaign has all but disappeared. Its website hasn’t been updated since the end of last year. Its executive director and communications director are gone. There’s no sign that it has any money. And neither Daschle nor Dunn will return calls asking about it.
It seemed the game plan was to pass corporate health care reform and expect the corporatists, in gratitude, to spend big, convincing everyone to love the new law. I don’t know if the strategy was simply some wishful vision of Rahm Emanuel ala Field of Dreams, “sell it out and they will fund,” or was meant to be part of the secret deal the White House cut with the big industries players until the corporations reneged. What is clear, though, is that it failed miserably.
This is a big problem because to pass the corporate bill Democrats had to go out of their way to destroy any hope of producing an organic, grassroots PR campaign to sell the law. It wasn’t just the lack of a public option, or the lying by Obama as he literally sold out his base. No bones were thrown to the hardcore progressive activists, like an immediate waiver that would in theory allow states to adopt single payer, so they could have a glimmer of hope instead of feeling like their dream was just sold into corporate servitude.
The result is that 13 percent of the country still opposes (PDF) the law for not being “liberal enough.” Democrats managed the unbelievably dysfunctional “accomplishment” of turning a large segment of the most dedicated part of their base against a purely Democrat-passed law.
What makes that 13 percent so critical is that a lot them are the true diehard activists that attend local meetings, write letters to the editors, and canvas neighborhoods in the winter. Basically, the dedicated volunteers whose work makes grassroots campaigns possible.
So, we have a law without a grassroots campaign to show it love or a corporatist PR campaign to sell it. It’s no wonder a whole year after the signing of the Affordable Care Act, public support, on average, has dropped.




69 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
This is suspicious. Who was supposed to provide the money, and why didn’t they follow through?
Unfortunately “Health Information Campaign” is a 501c(4) so we can’t find out much about them.
The veal pen does have some anniversary events going on, under such inspiring themes as “We Can’t Go Back!” and “Don’t Play Games with Our Healthcare!”
How can anybody support servitude to an insurance corporation? I guess those that would “profit” by the mandate, or a monopoly in commerce and trade? The alleged benefits of health insurance servitude, to society are an illusion. Just like being addicted to cancer sticks and killed by lung cancer or heart disease constitutes some for of freedom? An illusion created by corporate scum! Love those PR campaigns where money buys nothing but lies repeated often enough that the gullible, believe it is truth! BTW is it not wonderful that the youth of America get to pay for the cost of medical care to older Americans for tobacco use related diseases, while the tobacco whores inflicted death on the governed, lied through their fucking teeth, made billions of dollars in the process, via their products. Corporate fucking scum!
Yes those wonderful “public charities” like BCBS??
Can’t Buy Me Love ♫
Shirley there must be some mistake. This is the crowning glory of the Obama administration.
And, as Matt Taibbi once reported, Tom Daschle would run over his mother to … oh, never mind.
Wow. Thanks, Jon. I am really happy I stumbled over this report. It’s amazing how these *prominent* and “respected” people squander their public trust. Without any worries? Oh, I guess no one notices anymore.
Ideological Democrats need look no further than Obama’s HCR to say “NEVER AGAIN” to him & ALL those who caved to him on HCR. I’d vote for Palin, Gingritch, Barbour, anyone before I’d vote for Obama again.
Did anyone go to one of those idiot rallies put on by OFA yesterday? It looked like it might rain, so I didn’t. Also, I had to wash my hair.
Then you’d get Wisconsin, Ohio and Maine. Congrats.
I was busy getting a tooth pulled.
And? That’s roused people to action. Batshit crazy republicans in control of state and local governments is finally waking people up.
Another O incompetence.
The Corp. scumbags Obama et al. loves so much keep plenty of sugar plum fairy ideas of the revolving door spinning in his inner circles little minds. These careerists only care about getting themselves set up for the BIG Corp. job when their Gov’t job goes south in a few yrs. They couldn’t care less if anyone but their Corporatist pals love this awful so called reform. Doesn’t mean in the end the Corporatists aren’t going to adjust this piece of shit to make it better for their companies though does it? As Trump loves to say a contract ( a law in this case) is just the beginning of the negotiation isn’t it?
“. . . PR campaign staffed with top quality talent that would really sell the new law to the American people. . .”
———————————-
Oh, dear! So we lemmings weren’t mustered properly. Whoever was at fault should be tied to an anthill, no?
Rather, in a democracy the pretext is supposed to be the opposite way around notwithstanding the piece above. The first course correction was in Nov, and I expect there will be more to come.
BTW I think I’m among that 13% and would robustly support single payer / single source, but not ObamaCare which is a worse diversion from progress than what it is trying to replace.
“What makes that 13 percent so critical is that a lot them are the true diehard activists that attend local meetings, write letters to the editors, and canvas neighborhoods”
You mean the f**king retards?
Wasn’t that, “Tom Daschle would suck off a corpse for a cheeseburger”?
I’m one of those folks who won’t be showing up, and who won’t be voting, either.
HCR was, for me, just the crowning glory of why I should not ratify Obama’s conduct with my time, money, effort or vote. My attention was twigged that Obama might be selling out the public option when the news of the WH meetings with lobbyists broke – here, on FDL – early in the summer. I was sure of it when I watched the body language at Teddy Kennedy’s funeral. From the character of his hug to/from Vicki Regie Kennedy at the funeral, Ray Charles could have seen that he was selling out Teddy’s legacy and effort and that she and everyone in the church knew it.
So, I wasn’t surprised when a corporate sellout was the result.
But there are more things which gripe me and make me certain to give Obama none of my time, effort, money or votes. During the Obama administration, I have:
And those reasons don’t address a lot of other wrongdoing by Obama, starting with failing to prosecute the criminals of the last administration and running through the gamut.
So, no, I have no interest in helping him. He hasn’t done shit for me and my interests, and has done (by action or, more likely, inaction) a lot against me and my interests.
Can we please start using quotation marks when writing about health care “reform”?
The corporatists have been stuck in their self-interested delusion so long that they can’t help but bash on Obama, even when he’s given them far more than the Republicans ever would have.
Rahm Emanuel is an ef’fing r*t*rd who should point his stubby finger up his ass rather than in our faces.
OOPS! I meant “premise” rather than “pretext.” Sorry!
Scribe –
Sorry to hear about what you’ve suffered, and agree completely about what a worthless POS Obummer is. (And the Vichycrats.)
About the only “good” thing I can say about HCR is that it ripped the mask off the Dem party and revealed once and for all what a cesspool of cowardice and corruption it is.
Wrong Lesson Learned?:
Suzanne Kosmas believes that she lost re-election because her Party was (at first) either overly agressive in pursuing it’s (liberal) agenda or perhaps not quite agressive enough to cram through good (liberal) legislation. By the time compromise with Republicans was effected, it was too little too late.
The choice is (or was) getting indefinite detention with Democrats actually opposing it or getting indefinite detention with Democrats supporting it. Now with the Democrats adopting what were once extreme right wing policies, they’ve now redefined the wings where the old right wing is the new left wing and anyone who wasn’t previously a right wing extremist is now “left of the left.” W’s policies are now the new moderate consensus positions thanks to the Democrats being in power now, while perpeturating what they once claimed to oppose.
Thanks. It could have been worse.
But, more to the point, Demcratic/progrsessive activists have to separate their devotion to principles from attachment to personalities. Obama’s campaign was a masterpiece of creating a cult of personality around him, but he stood for nothing. Dem/prog activists have to take a page from the Teabaggers and the wingnuts and primary and defeat the sellouts and the hacks and the whores.
It’s just that simple. We need more – not less – partisanship.
Scribe,
You’re a much beloved contributor and I am sorry to hear of your troubles.
I am in Rethug territory as well and it ain’t pretty.
Take care.
Where did the $125 million go??
Just find us a sugar daddy like Koch to fund the effort & we’ll be all over it.
Obama’s campaign was a masterpiece of creating a cult of personality around him, but he stood for nothing
Well we, on the right, saw that, plain as day. He is not Presidential material, nor is he a leader. He is no more that a freshman congressman and a lecturer: (he was never a professor)
As fore your round of bad times..We all have our bad times. That’s life. As for Obama “doing” something FOR you, Honey, that is not the job of any president or government. That is for you to do for yourself. One can never feel acomplished as long as we rely on others to do for us.
JFK, said: Ask Not…..
Perhaps you should look at a new profession. Might do you good.
Would certainly be a good career choice, except the only professions currently hiring en masse are fry clerk and burger flipper.
We all have bad times, you’re correct. However, when the United States Government is creating an economic climate to deliberately induce hard times on the masses, we have a right to complain.
As for your JFK line, how do you feel about Wall Street doing what they can do for their country? Do you feel that they were living the heart of JFK’s historic statement when they accepted $13 trillion in bailout funds?
Thank you! (Not you, alamode. Thanking the moderator.)
No one ever accused the wingnuts of being human beings.
The wingnuts are human beings? I never suspected it, much less thought to accuse them of it. *g
Absolutely. But that will be difficult given the one party/two faces situation we now find ourselves in. Unless, of course, the partisanship comes from a new, genuine progressive party.
It’s why, even in my youth, I couldn’t stand the Rs. They are just plain cruel, and for no other reason than that they get a kick out of it.
I think the saddest (or scariest) part of wingnutia is they are human beings. They just show no compassion for their fellow humans. It’s almost sociopathic, this single-minded focus on personal security and the damning of anyone who needs help.
Sociopaths by definition, the lot of ‘em.
That means you, alamode. To tell somebody who’s going through hard times because our government is systematically destroying the middle class that they need to change careers or pull themselves up by their own boot straps is just sociopathic.
Horses, monkeys, dogs, cats and birds have a better sense of shared community than right wingers.
I’d trust a dog with my life before a right winger.
((((my beez)))
They of course are one of the great colony animals.
NO ONE should have been bailed out..Not them, not you, not me
You are assuming that I don’t help…boy are you wrong..
Have you ever read “Goedel, Escher, Bach; The Eternal Golden Braid” by Douglas Hofstadter?
One of the best “characters” in the allegories is an ant colony. Quite illuminating.
Because you know things and community are “shared.” In fact you can’t even have language without “sharing” as icky as that sounds to the Randians.
But of course, that’s why Randians mostly speak gibberish.
(((scribe)))
t
So sorry to hear your story. Good thoughts out to you.
By then, I couldn’t bear to watch O anymore, so I find your observation quite interesting.
The only thing the corp media picked up on during the campaign was ‘no drama obama.’ But I found his demeanor to be completely detached except when he was performing in front of a cheering crowd. Performing in front of a crowd that is not cheering, not so much. And news conferences or announcements, fuggedaboutit. Clenched jaw.
In what ways do you help and how does that line up with your “every man for themselves” viewpoint?
No, I haven’t read it. Will put it in the list.
Ants are a lot less appealing to me than bees for a lot of reasons. Their colonies are underground, they don’t fly, they aren’t fuzzy & buzzy, they don’t make good stuff for humans to eat….
That said, ants are an amazingly complex society. I’ve sometimes watched them attack a scrap of human food dropped outside. It’s pretty amazing.
It’s not sociopathic if alamode’s being paid to do it. In that case, it would just be assholish, like an Allstate adjuster not paying a legitimate claim because it’s her job not to pay settlements if she can get away with not paying them.
If we all stopped paying attention, the paycheck would get cut off.
Now the 13% know how 18 million of us felt in June 2008. OFA doesn’t need any of the old Liberals and Democrats–they’re playing 11 dimensional chess.
So..a little bit of something is better than a whole lot of nothin’
What about changing careers and getting into the health care field??
I think alamode is paid by the word, in which case ignoring the comments wouldn’t make them stop.
Worth a try.
You make changing careers sound like changing your socks. Most people would need training or schooling to change – but there are not jobs anyway.
Agreed.
My sister has worked in the hr department of a for-profit health care provider in NY for over 4 years. Others in her office have been laid off already. She has been expecting to be laid off for nearly a year now…
You don’t know how corporations increases their profits, eh?
Here’s more on them:
AmericasFairHealthCare.org is a project of the Health Information Center (HIC), a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, and the Health Information Campaign, a 501(c)4 organization, founded in 2010.
http://www.americasfairhealthcare.org/pages/about-us/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-chiong
Despite claiming they’re operating as a 501C3, I’ve found no “Health Information” 501C3 that could match them:
http://www.melissadata.com/lookups/np.asp?zip=health+information
And I’m not seeing that they have a 501C3 or 501C4 at all on the IRS website as there is no “Health Information Campaign” with any non-profit status:
http://www.irs.gov/app/pub-78/
I don’t know what the penalty is for falsely claiming to be an IRS exempt organization is, but this does look extremely shady.
There are where I live..jobs that is..Changing careers is good for the soul.
Ask that guy Ali in the desert. The one the Cheney folks delivered the $9B (in cool, fresh-from-the-printer c-notes) to, in the middle of the night, without a receipt.
Rep.Anthony Weiner, a liberal lion in his own mind and avid supporter of the ACA, has been quoted in the media as planning to request a waiver for his constituents in NYC. He was on MSNBC last night arguing that the ACA may lead to a public option. The implication: the ACA is so bad that the government will have to intervene.
Why do progressives defend this horrible bill?
HUH? Sorry, I thought those were states.
Whiner is a ‘raise the drawbridge’ kinda guy.
(That’s the punch line to a joke I’ve told here several times. If you haven’t heard it & you’d like me to repeat it, just let me know.)
Because they’re progressives in name only, maybe.
The only lesson I learned was that Obama is every bit as corrupt & morally bankrupt as those he “preached” against while campaigning.
No, forcing workers to change careers is only good for the corporations’ bottom line, and so workers aren’t given much of a choice but to fight for fewer and fewer jobs as most are shipped overseas and many of the rest are cut out of existence.
Frankly, if the a$$hole corporatists can’t stop themselves, then the best we can hope for is that the system that made them so rich in the first place falls apart sooner rather than later. They have far more to lose from their stupidity than the average American does at this point.
Yep, that was him alright.
The bill sucks ass anyway and was the single greatest act of legislative fellatio I have seen in my lifetime.
Sorry, ObamaCare is a fail and quite frankly I can’t even guess why any judge would believe that Congress can force citizens into commercial transactions with the insurance industry and then regulate same under Commerce.
That is NOT what Commerce regulates, even the wildly liberal Rhenquist court reined in such fanciful extensions of Commerce.
Congress has the right to assess and collect taxes and to use the proceeds for the general welfare and common good. So, Congress certainly could have established a second single payer plan or simply extended our existing one to all.
But Congress cannot, must not, and does not have jurisdiction over your disposable income, Period. Before you bother, spare me the false analogy of car insurance. States that have financial responsibility laws require you either to carry car insurance or to post a bond (aka “self insure”) Most of us elect the less expensive and more manageable insurance. Driving is optional anyway.
Breathing isn’t.
The USA is the only industrialized nation on Earth that does not use tax revenues to provide for its citizens. Instead, the parasitic obscenely wealthy class steal from the poor so they can profit by killing people indiscriminately around the globe. None of them gives a tinker’s curse about any of us and their bullshit “trickle down” economics is almost as big a con as their fractional reserve lending aka the Emperor’s New Money.
All Americans must unionize. They are trying to destroy the last bastion of unity and strength in this all out class war by the classless against the defenseless.
Fuck them all.
***Edited in Moderation***
TAX THE RICH.
***Mod note: Please do not suggest or advocate violence. Thanks.***
Oh my god! Next on my pile after I finish The Untied States of America.
Scribe, I’m feeling for you. This isn’t what any of us deserve but it’s what I expected wayyyy back in 1980. You’re in my thoughts.
Because progressives are nowhere near as practical about what needs to be done as revolutionary socialists are, except Americans have been taught from birth to ignore or belittle socialism.
Funny thing is, the ruling class, the oligarchs, the corporations, none of them could continue fucking over the rest of us so thoroughly without socialism for them and feudalism for the rest of us.
“Because they’re progressives in name only, maybe.”
We have been using the same name, “progressives“, for two different groups of people, whose interests only occasionally overlap.
One group is the party faithful. They may prefer left of center policies but they don’t treat those preferences as core values. Their only core value is party loyalty and (the perception of) winning. This explains their propensity to compromise (read capitulate). They are happy to claim victory and move on.
Other group is comprised of those that hold to actual progressive values and principles. This group is stuck with the democratic party rather than loyal to it. Unfortunately, we too often fall for the “lesser of two evils” gambit.
There is no one in elected office, at the federal level, that belongs to the second group. The values group needs to realize that elected democrats are not their friends. We need a label like the tea partiers that identfies us as being distinct from the democratic party.
“Progressive” just will not do.
Jon,
I come by FDL a couple of times a week. I have a hard time figuring out what your real position is, what you think should be happening, or who you think should be making whatever happen.
I care. I want to understand what you think.
Thought you’d like to know.
Eqbal00
This is a sectarian game played by our so called rulers to divide us, and along artificial lines they’ve created. (see Bahrain rulers play the Sunni/Shia split)
What we need is class consciousness, and unity among the have-nots.
The Democrats and Republicans are enemies of the people. The politburo decides the policies we get (staffed with the ever-revolving think tankers, sinecures, panels, commissions, guests of committee hearings, GS bankers, lobbyists as congressional staffers), the two branches of the moneyparty coordinate in back rooms to run the show for CSPAN, and Obama is the bobble-head.
Stalin called his system centralized (top down) democracy, btw :-/
Jon Walker:
I think it’s plenty “liberal”. The defining feature of liberalism is market based solutions and for the government to create markets where they don’t exist (even by force, which is where neocons and neoliberals overlap)
the word is “socialist. The health care “reform” we wanted was a socialist one, not liberal.
I’m reading the writings of Albert and Vera Weisbord who were communists. (died in 77, 89)
Foundations of Fascicm
I am really with you on the “reform” thing. I have been complaining about this abuse of the language for decades – and still contend that the mandate (absent a public option) is unconstitutional.