Edwin and Joyce Koupal and their People’s lobby technically “failed” three times in their efforts at California-wide direct democracy before passing their first successful ballot initiative, the Political Reform Initiative of 1974. Yet from each loss, the Koupals learned important lessons they applied to later efforts. One of the lessons they learned was the importance of keeping it simple.
Their first campaign to get enough signatures to recall Gov. Reagan helped them refine the skills needed to gather large numbers of signatures using volunteers, and it showed them that even though they failed to get enough signatures for a recall, with little money they could get enough signatures to put an initiative on the ballot.
Their second campaign was an attempt to deal with what was then the serious issue of smog in California. Here they violated the important rule of “keep it simple” in the signature-gathering phase. They were trying to gather two signatures from voters to put both an anti-pollution state constitutional amendment on the ballot, as well as an anti-pollution law. The effort confused potential signers, preventing the Koupals from getting enough signatures to put either measure on the ballot.
Learning from this mistake, their third attempt was the single omnibus Clean Environment Act. This time with a single petition to gather signatures for, they were able to qualify for the ballot despite spending almost no money. Of course, this time they had broken the “keep it simple” mantra in the construct of the initiative. It was a complex piece of legislation that dealt with a whole range of environmental and campaign reform issues. This caused several problems. First, it made it hard to quickly explain to voters. Second, it allowed the opposition to attack it based on its weakest links, most confusing and least popular provisions. (In ballot initiative campaigns, the most unpopular, weakest link is almost always what the opposition will go after to bring the whole initiative down.) Finally, by dealing with so many issues at once, the legislation brought together a diverse coalition of big spending corporations and special interests that each had a financial stake in making sure the whole law failed for different reasons. While this was the first proposition the People’s Lobby got on the ballot, it suffered solid defeat at the hands of the voters.
The Koupals eventually did win big by bringing together a solid group of allies on a single, easy to understand issue which had broad popular support. In the grand tradition of progressive ballot initiative reformers, the issue was corruption in politics. With then-California Secretary of State and gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown and Common Cause, the People’s Lobby crafted the Political Reform Initiative of 1974. The coalition got early buy-in from many of the important left-leaning groups at the time, including the NAACP and Sierra Club.
The proposition was a fairly easy to explain, direct assault on the corrupting influence of money in our politics at a time when the Watergate scandal was unfolding. It did things like require full disclosure of large contributions, prohibit contributions from lobbyists, limit campaign spending, require disclosure of potential conflict of interests and change signature requirements. This time the proposition won in a landslide. Unfortunately, Ed Koupal, sick with colon cancer, died only a few years later in 1976.
In politics in general, the motto “keep it simple” is just general good advice. In the ballot initiative process, it is critical. An initiative once put on the ballot can’t be changed and must be wholly rejected or approved. If you can’t easily explain to people what you want to do, you have almost no chance of convincing them to support you.



7 Comments







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jerry Brown’s straightforward agenda worked against the corrupting influence of big money in my state of California. Yes, it did.
After hearing the following real-life story, I despair that lefties will ever learn that lesson.
Woman, now in a position where she can’t be active in politics, was very active when she lived in Oregon. They were working on a mining ballot initiative. She wanted it to read: “Mine operators much return land to it’s original condition.” The initiate polled at 80-90% approval.
By the time the others finished working on the actual wording, it was 2 pages long in seven-point type, containing all kinds of detailed regs. The mining corps demonized it, with ads about job losses and the other usual talking points. It lost by double-digits.
I would still like to know how one fights against the powerful monied interests when they come out against even the most simply worded amendment? With enough money behind you, you can always convince at least 51% of the people that the earth is actually flat. Peace
Understandable, but see my #1 comment. It happened.
There were a few commenters here, not Californians, who questioned if he even had a campaign going. He won. Okay?
Resolved: Recall my new governor for already breaking campaign promises.
Im not saying that it ‘never’ happens. I’m saying that the odds are always against it happening in most cases. As for Brown. He’s mellowed. And this time around his opponent was a mental case. The oligarchy had the choice of dealing with an old, mellow fellow or a crazy person. Peace
Fat chance given the alternative. Peace