This country’s subsidies for blending ethanol with gasoline is one of our government’s most wasteful and corrupting uses of taxpayer money. The subsidies distort the market, they don’t create jobs, they fail to improve the environment, and most of the funds flow to a few wealthy individuals and well-connected companies. I’m glad to see there is a strong bipartisan push to finally let them all expire. From Greg Sargent:
The letter, which I obtained from a source, was authored by senators Dianne Feinstein and Jon Kyl, and includes a number of Democrats and Republicans, including John McCain, Susan Collins, Richard Burr, and Mike Enzi. This is key, because the question of whether the subsidies should expire is emerging as a key test — just like earmarks — of whether Republicans are serious about reining in spending and the deficit.
The letter (PDF) lays out a clear and concise case for why this program should be eliminated. A five-year extension would cost $31 billion; a one-year extension would directly lead to only 427 jobs.
A statement from individuals across the ideological spectrum that there is simply no place in our federal budget for wasteful, ineffective spending that is basically just corporate welfare. This is what good trans-partisanship looks like. And it is remarkably rare.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Wow!!!! Three pieces of good news in one day. Must mark it on my calendar. And I started out the day in such a shitty mood that I relegated myself to cleaning the hand & power tools out of my basement that I hadn’t touched in the nearly 24 years since my husband died, that’s how bad it was.
About time just who sold their soul to the Devil to make Dems and GOPers agree to that?
Great Q. Guessing that it’s blackmail to up Monsanto & ADM political ‘contributions.’
Farm States Pols will try and blame the other party for this. I think the fix is in farm states that voted for Bush get to see the chickens of tax cuts during wartime come to roost.
Wasn’t ADM Clinton’s (the male) biggest contributor?
Big Food’s lobby Monsanto & ADM political ‘contributions.’ are a force to be reckoned with something big, huge must have happened to upset their plans.
But what?
Don’t merember, as I was ‘gainfully’ employed then & didn’t have the time to delve into such matters, but it sounds about right.
Blanche’s defeat?
Normally something like this would not be mentioned seriously at all in Washington. This is like Israel getting denied funding, this is like SS getting cut, or Military funding.
Sure its possible but rarer than an albino bullfrog.
Maybe? could you explain more how even that could have upset big food’s lobbying dollars and contracts for the souls of both parties.
Just how bad is the economy that SS and farm subsidies are on the table?
It’s not farm subsidies – it’s corn for ethanol, only a small chunk of the whole Farm package.
And look at the Corn State Senators; half the big corn producers are purple; 1 Dem (blue dog) 1 Repub.
Monsanto and ADM have nothing to worry about, as the Corporate farms will only switch from one seed product to another that Monsanto probably already produces, and ADM will buy.
The real winners are the Oil guys who have a lot more many than the Farm block by far.
Complete speculation on my part. I have no clue how this might have happened.
A statement from individuals across the ideological spectrum that there is simply no place in our federal budget for wasteful, ineffective spending that is basically just corporate welfare. This is what good trans-partisanship looks like. And it is remarkably rare.
This is wonderful news. Hope it happens. Now let’s expand this to so called “GREEN” industries!!!
Wait, what ideological spectrum, again?
Maybe the center-right, the far right, and the loony fringe right?