1. Worked across party lines for a year and a half passing Audit the Fed, and forced a 96-0 vote in the Senate. Chris Hayes on MSNBC called it “the single greatest act of bipartisanship since Obama took office.” It was popular with 80% of the country.
2. Backed Bill Halter in an accountability challenge to Blanche Lincoln, proving we were willing to hold the line against corrupt members of both parties.
3. Forced Blanche Lincoln, as head of the Agriculture Committee, to champion much stronger derivatives trading regulation than she had previously done in order to save her seat.
4. Rode Lincoln consistently to make sure stronger derivatives regulation didn’t disappear after she won her primary – she knew someone was watching, and if she flip-flopped it would be an issue in her race for the general election. A recent poll showed that the ONLY popular major Democratic program of the past year was financial regulation.
5. Launched the Students vs. Banks campaign to urge Democrats to pass student loan reform when they were too scared to do it (because it had to be done through reconciliation, and they thought they’d lose health care votes if they did so). The President himself has been touting Student Loan reform as one of the shining achievements of his administration.
6. Told the truth about the health care bill even when it wasn’t popular to do so. Exposed the games and the lies of members of both parties. Conducted polling that warned the Democrats in January of this year that if they passed their corrupt and flawed health care bill, they would get hammered in swing districts this fall:
- SurveyUSA/Firedoglake Poll: OH-01
- SurveyUSA/Firedoglake Poll: AR-02
- SurveyUSA/Firedoglake Poll: IN-09
- SurveyUSA/Firedoglake Poll: NY-01
7. On the heels of polling that indicated marijuana legalization motivated young people to turn out to vote when nothing else apparently would, we began our Just Say Now campaign in April of this year. The DNC has dumped $50 million into a campaign to turn out young voters, and the President has appeared at colleges across he country in an attempt to do likewise. There is no indication that effort has been successful, but pollsters believe California alone will see unprecedented youth turnout, where Prop 19 has a 94% awareness rate among young voters.
8. Campaigned to to save Social Security, which has been on the chopping block ever since Obama took office. Polling indicates that saving Social Security is one of the strongest issues Democrats have against Republicans this cycle.
9. Raised money for Russ Feingold’s race even when things weren’t looking good for him, proving that if people stick up for the things we believe in, we know how to show up for our friends. FDL raised $56,000, and Glenn Greenwald raised $78,000.
10. Protected the progressive brand. Consistently fought for progressive values and applied the same yardstick to both Democrats and Republicans, demonstrating that progressives aren’t just fickle hacks who only care about demagoguing issues they will readily sell out in a cynical attempt to gain power for themselves.




99 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
That is a proud record on which to head into Voting Tuesday! Thanks for the superb leadership.
Fantastic work!
Thanks for the summary, Jane, and for your excellent leadership efforts on these and other similar initiatives. Some say we’re wasting our time out here left blogistan. I heartily disagree. There’s many ways to work together to find solutions, and this is one powerful forum, imo. Thanks to all the firepups, too, for time, wisdom, insight and for not “giving up the ship”!
11. Used the Wall Street Journal and Fox News to get your progressive message heard by the people.
Obama’s Next Worry: A Restive Left Flank
Every president who lost re-election in the last half-century has first been weakened by a primary fight.
Nice list. Thank you, Jane.
Let’s face it, you could have done a hundred things and it wouldn’t be enough to overcome Obama’s unforced errors. He should be sued for political malpractice.
Thank you for campaigning to save Social Security for our children, for young people and for our seniors. It has been eye opening to see how these politicians operate/conspire to keep us in the dark in order to serve their money masters.
But thank you for your work and for keeping the faith.
Thank You! Jane
Jane you also showed a lot Democrats what Clinton and his people done to the democratic party of FDR, JFK.
I don’t think Axelrod, Gibbs, Jarrett, will be inviting you over to the white house any time soon. You sorta ruin their plans for the third CLinton adminstration.
Ya think?
And here I was dusting off my Louboutins.
Translation for Democratic Party “leadership”: Proved how disloyal and unreasonable we are.
The “Edit” button still expires immediately, at least for me.
I blame that darn super minority of Republicans. If it were not for that super minority!
I can only imagine what the poor Dem’s will do if the Republicans get a mega super minority – or worse win a house…. oh wait that would mean the Dem’s are the mega super minority (and that is where all the power is)!
Good work here, though I would say participating in a progressives unite for march/rally organized by groups and blogs would be a great thing.
Good Post!
I agree with you! A below average Democratic President could have kept the GOP on the sideline.
“Obama should be sued for political malpractice” Great Line
It’s there simply to be a teaser.
It seems that some Dems are starting to pay attention to our point of view and that’s a hopeful sign. I also think that Obama is sort of shaken over what is happening. FDL has done major work this past year and I applaud your work, Jane. Thanks for all you do.
Somewhat disappointing that there is no concerted effort to end the unjust warz the country is currently engaged in. That would have been item #1 in a recap of an earlier progressive era.
Once upon a time, peace was important. Now, not so much.
Politically strong Presidents aren’t primaried. Politically weak presidents don’t win the general. If you haven’t secured your base to the extent that you can survive a primary challenge, you can’t win the general.
Excellent summary. And a job well done.
We’ll see how shaken Mr Neoliberal is when he appoints a successor to Summers. My guess he’ll appoint another Rubinite Clintonista.
Thanks, Jane, for fighting. Rest up: there’s a tough fight straight ahead in regard to saving Social Security.
If folks have noticed it’s no longer kos who’s appearing on MSNBC as a rep of the left blogosphere.
We’ve had to learn a lot of things over a short period of time and by 2012 we’re gonna be a mos muthafucker.
Obama declining to run, then Dean doing so would be incredible.
If folks have noticed it’s no longer kos who’s appearing on MSNBC as a rep of the left blogosphere.
Mr. Moulitsas has reinvented himself as a party insider–the very person he castigated in his book Crashing the Gates–and turned Daily Kos into a cheering section for the Democratic Party.
It will be interesting to see what happens to his career after the votes are counted tonight.
Well done Jane and FDL!
It would be nice if he did reevaluate in light of his failures, but he seems incapable of admitting a mistake, and in any case, it’s too late.
Kos figures if he sucks enough ass he’ll land a position at the WH. Bo’s pooper scooper would be about right.
That true. He appears to be a little uncertain now and I was still getting e-mail yesterday asking for just $5 ! Amazing. I think the Dems are starting to notice the lack of money coming in.
Hey, that’s a good point: however depressing the election returns are, at least Blanche Lincoln will lose – badly.
Of course, she’ll blame her vote FOR health care for her loss, and not her dithering around and back-stabbing on the issue, followed by demonizing her own base.
Hope no one breaks an arm patting themselves on the back. More victories like this and we are ruined.
Great work.
FDL remains the most honest progressive/liberal org I know
I was really dismayed to see another “firebagger” comment at Steve Benen’s. It was on an earlier thread so it probably is pointless to go add this post to the comments, but I have been challenging every snide “firebagger” slur I see.
Jane and Glennzilla seem to be paired. They were even called “closet Libertarians” on another thread this morning.
Those low dollar asks are to get your name and to get you a bit more invested in voting.
Man, there’s a deep thinker. *groan*
I used to be a regular over there, but during the health care debate, the people there became rigid, hateful Obamabots with no willingness to even entertain differing perspectives. I found FDL at that time (wish I’d known of it sooner) and never looked back. Thank goodness for FDL and thank Jane for all her hard work (and the others for their excellent reporting). I don’t know how Jane can keep fighting like she does without ever getting so discouraged she’s ready to give up, but I appreciate it.
The pundits count 1968 as a case of Democrats losing after a primary fight. However, Kennedy was the likely winner had he lived. Humphrey inherited the plague of voters angry over that, and still almost won.
And when did the challenger ever get the nomination? Things might be quite different if they ever did. The Party commits suicide when it suppresses the challenge ruthlessly rather than attempting to ride it …
WTF?
“Closet libertarians”?
Really?
Pretty sure that word doesn’t mean what whoever said that thinks it means.
Thank you, Jane. Thank you, Firedoglake.
(I won’t tell anyone about the Muppet fetish.)
Words are just thrown around with no knowledge of their meaning. The idea of Jane and Glenn being libertarians is just laughable.
They’ve obviously never seen how libertarians get treated at the Lake. Only one very small step up from troll.
Back to work. Got the rest of the day to give shit to Rethug boss.
Namaste
I especially appreciate you providing the progressive framing. Now who gets the credit for Catfood Commission?
- Tom
This is a great list.
Thanks, Jane, and Team FDL for keeping it really real.
Many of us can add an Eleventh Thing We Did To Help Progressives in the 2010 Election: we voted third party. Without an outside organization to which the left can turn when Democrats stab us in the back, the Democrats will continue to spit in our faces even as they demand absolute obedience at the polls come election time. Democrats have perfected the art of capitulating without a fight, and they expect the left to do likewise. Fortunately, many of us are refusing to follow orders. We’re voting Green, Progressive, Working Families, Socialist, href=”http://www.ohiostatelaborparty.org”>Labor, and other independent organizations to help move America back to the left. We’re using tools for strategic voting and organizing for the challenges in 2012.
Oh yes, we are doing all these things and more. FDL is a powerful force with a lot of potential that can and should become even stronger as we apply much-needed pressure to those in power.
Unless you’re running against Palin….
Credit for the name? Not sure where it popped up first but the corporatists sure did lash out at it… truth hurts when you’re busy lying your ass off.
Credit for the commission itself? Obama’s paymasters… but they’ll happily let him hog all the glory.
Thank you, Jane! I think without FDL I would’ve been sorely depressed these last many years, thinking I was one of only a handful of progressives left. I appreciate all your effort and promise a contribution later this month.
It certainly would be interesting to learn how many write-in votes “Public Option” receives….
There’s at least one “Medicare for all” write-in: mine!
I don’t think Obama will be primaried. I’m fine with him, and support him over Dean. While I’m 2 steps to the left of Obama, he ran as a centrist and I believe in a two-party representational democracy. I like leftist legislators and centrist presidents.
If Hamsher or others here want to primary him, force him left, or whatever, you should argue your case more persuasively and in better venues than the Wall Street Journal and Fox News. Those interviews are harmful to a progressive agenda, and it’s 10 steps foward, 3 steps back.
A list of great effort and accomplishments, framing the progressive and perfectly reasonable views of most Americans very well.
Democrats and Republicans like to pretend that the problem with the health care “reform” that passed is that it went too far, and the MSM seems to love repeating this bs.
Obama’s going to spend the next two years trying to sell the pos health care bill that he worked hard to ruin on its way to being passed. Every bit of bullshit that comes out of his mouth should be exposed.
I doubt we will hear anything about the Public Option write-in. The paper ballot i used here in NM had a write-in for the Govenor race that i filled in with Public Option. The write-in was for a teabagger candidate and my vote will probably go to him because the ballot will be scanned. Only if the race is close will these ballots be verified and since the law requires the name to match the candidate these votes will be thrown out.
Big thanks to you and everyone at FDL, Jane! This has become one of my favorite sites, and it’s refreshing to find a place where policy can be discussed with honesty rather than the Dems vs Reps crap that keeps the oligarchs going strong.
In item #10:
Consistently fought for progressive values and applied the same yardstick to both Democrats and Republicans.
The link is to a post about the fight we led against the supplemental war funding. It wasn’t a success (we knew it wouldn’t be…all they had to do was sever it from the IMF funding and the GOP would’ve voted for it) but we did it because of the principle.
Since the post was about what we did that was helpful to progressives in the election, that was the part that applied. It wasn’t a post about what we did that had value in general — that would be a different list.
Many thanks, Jane, for your hard work. I left the Krazy Orange Satan some time ago and have never looked back. Hang tough, it’s going to be a rough ride going forward.
kinda OT: I just voted in downtown Indianapolis – at about 2:00 P.M. I was the 210th voter.
Not good.
My votes won’t even get that close to being counted–this Maryland county uses Diebold machines!
Hey, stranger.
I’ve never said I had any interest in a primary challenge to Obama. I think you’ve misread something.
As I told the reporters who asked me, Obama purged the party of anyone who didn’t support him after he took control. There is neither the political will nor the financial support for another candidate within the party, and nobody who is strong enough to do it on their own. If there’s going to be a challenge to Obama over his lack of support for progressive issues, I think it will come from outside the party.
There may, however, be calls for him to step aside from the professional Democratic class who think it will mean the end of the party if he doesn’t. That’s not a group that includes me, however, as I’m more concerned with issue advocacy that party perpetuation.
How ya doin’, pal?
Been taking a sanity sabbatical.
You come here to try and starve the mods again and demand they work for free?
Heh, until we get a real left wing govt there ain’t no sanity but I know what ya mean. Some days I think I’m gettin’ too old for this shit day in, day out.
Who is we?
There are no hard feelings like family hard feelings.
Well, well. I went back and read the summary of the Greenberg poll. Democrats were polling well on Social Security and retirement. So it was a puzzle why more of those who were running did not sign the pledge. Hmm. And it was a mystery why they did not tout their commitment to not raise the retirement age or to not cut benefits too. Now in light of this morning’s announcement of the secret intentions of the Catfood Commission to change benefits, I understand why there was not even a half-hearted attempt to do more than smear Republicans for wanting to privatize it. Probably the public only heard the privatization bit and heard what they wanted to hear. Hey, happens to me everyday too. If this Commission of Ratfinks guts Social Security, this will be tragic for many.
But you could do a lot worse than being paired with either of them. I would take it as the highest compliment.
Anecdotally, the ol’ polling place was busier than usual for a mid-term election. My guess is that all the local hippies turned out for Prop 19.
Dood !
xoxox
Jane, who do you think this [professional Democratic class] DOES include, since, as you’ve astutely pointed out, he’s purged large swatches of what one normally though of as “Democrats.”
Unions? Are there any that are pissed at him and/or whose leaders haven’t drunk the Obama Kool-Aid?
Women? Perhaps. But look at the idiots at Emily’s List, Planned Parenthood and all the “traditional” women’s groups.
Gays? Yes!!!
I ask in all earnestness, because I am in total despair over where a challenge to this monster might come from.
Ok I think. So do we want Republicans in office instead of Democrats because we don’t like President Obama? Would we rather someone like … oh…. Senator McCain? or how about President Palin?
I applaud the work. But we don’t all agree on everything. However, cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face isn’t the answer. The reality is this. If we don’t as Democrats/Progressives get our acts together, in 2012 this country is going to elect a Palin for President. And if that happens we can all kiss our progressive a@@es goodbye. President Obama isn’t the monster. Palin is. Stop drinking the koolaid.
If Hamsher or others here want to primary him, force him left, or whatever, you should argue your case more persuasively and in better venues than the Wall Street Journal and Fox News.
Think of it as a fundraising tool. The conservatives would probably throw a lot of money at anyone willing to primary Obama. As John Fund notes in his WSJ column, presidents who face serious primary challenges invariably lose in the general.
Thanks JH.The actual JOURNALISM “perpetrated” by FDL during the HCR “debate” MADE Firedog Lake, really, at least as a left liberal fount. Leading to- The best thing FDL did for left liberals was No.10, NO DOUBT. If left liberalsim is a brand worth saving (and sometimes I think it is at least parts of it) then they owe and will owe FDL a lot. Although, More Marxist analysis please! (would help). I see that i can contribute stuff now so maybe i will take some of that chore.
It’s clear from most of these posts that people don’t like Obama, don’t expect him to become more progressive (which I think is true) and don’t want him to get a second term.
So in the perfect but also realistic world, what happens from here? In this election, blue dogs may be going down, but to people just as conservative if not worse. Joe Manchin looks like he could win, but I’m not sure he or many of the potential slate of Democratic Senate hopefuls would pass the purity test for a progressive. Progressive heroes Alan Grayson and Russ Feingold are going to lose to people who couldn’t be more their polar opposites (Feingold is the saddest loss of all in my opinion).
Obama may not win in 2012, or may not even run, but I’m having a hard time plotting the scenario where a more liberal Democrat becomes president instead. Why didn’t McGovern do better in 1972 amidst an unpopular war and a wave of progressive civil rights movements? I know my negativity is somewhat due to the anticipated dismal election results, but I’m just looking for some sign that we really aren’t the center-right country those pundits say we are.
way waste money primarying a president? personally im not going to waste any more money on any kind of electoral schemes. Whats needed is a left movement (starting with any left at all).
As for 1968, you’re starting the movie at the second reel. Johnson announced he was not running for re-election only after Eugene McCarthy’s nomination challenge was unexpectedly popular in New Hampshire.
Besides the 1992 Bush-Buchanan primary race, 1980′s Carter-Kennedy, 1976′s Ford-Reagan, there was Truman retiring only after Kefauver beat him in the 1952 New Hampshire primary. And to take the wayback machine to 1912, President Taft actually lost to Teddy Roosevelt in those states which had primaries but Taft used the party machinery to get renominated at the GOP Convention anyway. Roosevelt bolted to the Bull Moose party and Wilson won by beating the divided Republican field.
Exactly. There aren’t enough Democratic donors willing to cross a sitting Democratic president by supporting a nomination challenge. But there are plenty of Republican donors who would get a kick out of stirring the pot. The enemy of my enemy is my friend and all that. :o)
“Jane and Glennzilla seem to be paired. They were even called “closet Libertarians” on another thread this morning.”
Thats hysterical. when confronted with a reaction that dosent fall into the network media trope of the two major parties they have to force fit some interpretation. There IS an alternative to capitalism. It dosent have to be right and righter.
Are you saying you were misquoted here?:
The WSJ reporter says you are always interested in a primary challenge to a sitting president.
With respect to bourgeoise electoral plotting, Its not that im against vigorously going after right wing democrats, its that a president is a hi cost, hi profile primary target that would soak up too many resources for little or no return. the Bill Halter challenge was PERFECT. Left Liberals should be looking for more opportunities like that if backing politicians is what they want to do(im not sure it helps much).
Jane Hamsher has never endorsed the idea of primarying obama. She has frequently endorsed the concept of democracy, and your deliberately, or stupidly conflating the two concepts.
It’s the WSJ deliberately conflating the two. Are you seriously denying that was their intent?
My point is that Hamsher hinders progressive goals by frequently giving these type of quotes to right wing outlets.
“She has always backed “a diversity of voices in the primary process as a sign of a healthy democracy”:WSJ
is the quote you use to support a claim that Jane Hmasher wants to primary Obama. WHERE does it say anything about primarying Obama? You Obama “progressives” are starting to, ahem “think” like republican spamers. You either know the difference between saying something,and not-saying something, or you dont. either way you are no longer my problem.
There is no indication in the WSJ piece of when Fund spoke with “liberals” or in what context. The paragraph preceding the one you quoted Fund speaks of Gibbs’ comments about the “professional left” in August. Is this perhaps when he spoke with Jane, if he in fact did or did he take her quote from another source, seeing as how there were a number of primaries being held that month and Jane was very vocal re primaries at the time? Speaking of sources the WSJ is not exactly a paragon of truth when it comes to the left.
Horseshit.
I would add one item to the list as an old gift that keeps on giving: FDL’s instrumental role in helping to defeat Joe Lieberman in the 2006 Connecticut Democratic primary means that, in the current election season, no one in the media has been able to solicit his opinion as a Democrat. Small but nonnegligible solace.
47% of Dems want Obama to be primaried (reported on Dylan show today)
I have a question for you? how in the world did the GOP come back from the dead?
Simple Answer, Obama the trojan horse ignored the only issue in the USA for the last two years the Economy and Jobs.
Instead Obama with the help of the other corporate dems went and got the crooked congress to pass the Romney, Bob Dole health care Bill.
an average Democrat could have kept the GOP on the sidelines for years
What is the GOP plan to get us out of this depression? “make the rich, richer”
wow…
an obamabota corporatist flailing in its own BS while desperately trying to elicit “no primary” promises… at a time when a betrayed and furious public just might consider that an option…We told you what would happen Obot. We told you fools and you ignored us. You got Robert “The Hamburglar” Gibbs and Rahm “Son of Irgun Terrorists” Emmanuel to diss us. We told you and you Obots heaped scorn on us. Get the fuck out of here with that crap and OWN IT.
They have a lot of voters and own the biggest newspaper (WSJ), TV (Fox), and radio (hate wing talk) + they work the refs on all other outlets also. 1968-2008 was a conservative era, and twice as many Americans still self-identify as conservative, and naturally vote Republican. The next next 40 years will shift to liberal. Younger demographics are already starting to self-identify 2:1 as liberal.
Here are the Dem. vote percentages for presidential elections:
2008: 52.9% Yes, centrist Obama (or Hillary) are the best liberal we can elect for now. Not sure who you had in mind, but s/he didn’t win.
——————–
2004: 48.3%
2000: 48.4%
1996: 49.2%
1992: 43.0%
1988: 45.7%
1984: 40.6%
1980: 41.0%
1976: 50.1%
1972: 37.5%
1968: 42.7%
————-
1964: 61.1% The last liberal era.
Beats me, more tax cuts for the rich? They’re morally bankrupt and have no ideas.
… and Obama’s performance in office is not mentioned as the corporatist carefully conflates elections past with elections current… an evasion so lame it hurt to read it.
Great list– not enough to save this nation from falling apart, but I’m glad that all that was accomplished.
Thanks for everything you do, Jane.
With greatest respect, Jane, you and FDL are the sanest, strongest voices since the late Steve Gilliard.
Because I disagree with you doesn’t mean I want to starve mods, a bit of a non sequitur. When you did your fund raiser you said you believed the Dems were dead as a progressive force and we needed an alternative. Part of the purpose of the fund raiser was to create an alternative. When I asked what you had in mind, it turned out you wanted to pay the mods more. I have no problem with that although I thought you a bit disingenuous in your approach. I AM interested in an alternative to the Dems which I believe is essential to keeping the country from falling further. I don’t think myFDL, a name which INMO is too cute by three quarters, will do it.
Your top down approach won’t do it either. At some thread Jason Rosenbaum, I think that’s his name, said great changes were in store. Someone came on to ask what they were. He expressed interest in trying to help. Jason’s answer was he would know when the changes came out. I assume myFDL is what Jason had in mind. I’d very much like to join an ongoing discussion of what we can do to provide an alternative to the Dems. My idea needs lots of computing power (I wrote to Google and Facebook but got no reply). It could be up and running in six months. You say, why don’t I do it? I’d love to, but as you can see my people skills leave something to be desired. Because I have rough edges, doesn’t mean I’m wrong.
Sorry, but I don’t think your victories or whatever you call them mean anything. I know reading “Great thread, Jane” is more pleasant than reading it’s more of the same, but that’s how I see it. I’d really like to work with you to promote change, but I don’t see what you do is effective-remember the public option? I guess you can say the same about me. That’s the liberal dilemna. We can’t agree on anything.
And Obama’s WH thinks their only problem is a comparable form of messaging! Oh, teh Irony!
Lots of great work at FDL and by so many Firepups!
Well it looks like that progressive yardstick just spanked our own asses,does anyone realize how close alot of these races were and since alot of progressives went L or G we lost!!!!!!!!!!!!!Say hello to the new boss Sarah Palin!Now What???????
I don’t suppose you have the relevant poll statistics to back up this lame assertion?
And I meant relevant statistics… we’ve had enough irrelevant statistics from blazerx to do us for a while.
Sans corroboration by poll breakdowns your post cannot be regarded as anything but yet another attempt to shift the blame to anyone but where it belongs: Obama.
Amen to that.
Jane,
Is anyone working on lining up progressive candidates for 2012. I think if we would have started earlier with Halter and Romaoff we could have won those primaries. Having people be the first to declare for the primary prior to the party anointed coming in would make the disloyalty charges harder to make. The DNC will make the case that we have to vote for their load of conservadems or end up with Bachman city. Waiting till 2012 will probably be to late.