Jamie Galbraith responds to the question: What can Obama do now, without the need of 60 votes in the Senate, to address our current problems?
- The President should announce that cuts in Social Security and Medicare benefits are off the table for the lame-duck session, and thereafter. He should point out that the mandate of the Bowles-Simpson Commission, which is published on their web-site, did not authorize it to opine on the finances of the Social Security or Medicare systems. For this reason alone, should the Commission include recommendations to cut Social Security benefits (such as by increasing the nominal retirement age) for the alleged purpose of maintaining balance in Social Security finances, the President should urge Congress to refuse to take up such a recommendation.
- The President should name a commission of independent experts to recommend within three months concrete steps to reduce unemployment significantly by 2012 — that is to say, practically immediately — including jobs/investment programs and steps to reduce the size of the labor force, including through work-sharing, increased vacation time, more attractive early retirement under Social Security and access to Medicare at a younger age.
- The President should direct Jacob Lew, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, to suspend the use of the present baseline macroeconomic forecasts and to impanel a commission of inquiry into the models and methods underlying medium-range forecasts, to best determine how those models and methods should be modified (a) to take account of the experience of the financial crisis, and (b) to correct major inconsistencies and mutually improbable assumptions in the long-term forecasts.
- The President should name Damon Silvers to the position shortly to be vacated by Larry Summers.
James K. Galbraith holds the Lloyd M. Bentsen Jr. Chair in Government/Business Relations and is a professor of government at the University of Texas at Austin. He was executive director of the Congressional Joint Economic Committee in the early 1980s. He is the author of six books and several hundred scholarly and policy articles, as well as a stinging critique of President Obama’s deficit commission: Why the Fiscal Commission Does Not Serve the American People.
Other posts in this series:




71 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Awesome! Excellent!
I doubt we’d be in this mess had Economists demonstrated in force against the Boskin Commission & Gramm-Leach-Biley boondoggles. Until Economists decide upon a methodology for tracking inflation that correlates to a population sampling (what could be easier for these math wonks?), they should be accorded all the authenticity due Fox News Analysts.
ps. Yes, Galbraith is better than most, so what?
Until Economists decide upon a methodology for tracking inflation that correlates to a population sampling (what could be easier for these math wonks?
Google is on it.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-10-12/google-is-developing-inflation-index-using-web-figures-ft-says.html
As always, Galbraith is the voice of reason. He’s easily the best possible candidate to be director of the National Economic Council (Damon Silvers, per Google, is associate general counsel of the AFL-CIO). As I mentioned the other day, he’s been warning of the dangers of an inadequate stimulus package since the summer of 2008. Galbraith was up on the Hill in the fall of that year with Dean Baker and Bill Isaacs lobbying against the bank bailout. A lot of congressman are going to be out in the private sector in January because they didn’t listen to Jamie’s advice. In a column he wrote at that time, he made a salient proposal, reestablishing the New Deal’s:
Home Owners Loan Corp., which would rewrite mortgages, manage rental conversions and decide when vacant, degraded properties should be demolished. Set it up like a draft board in each community, under federal guidelines, and get to work.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/24/AR2008092403033.html
Great idea. I’d point out that since we don’t actually have a draft presently but the Selective Service has the machinery ready to go if that ever changes, instead of standing up and staffing new organizations, we might as well just use the actual draft boards.
http://www.sss.gov/fslocal.htm
Excellent, but why not dissolve the Catfood Commission completely and immediately? They’ve clearly gone beyond their charter, misunderstood their charge, and abrogated their mission.
If we want a blue-ribbon panel to undertake the actual mission of the Deficit Reduction Commission, put one together after the Lame Duck, with Congress’s support. (Maybe)
Or simply direct Congress to hold hearings and legislate (novel idea, I know!)
Adding: Jane, this is a wonderful series, I look forward to each contributor every day. Will these be accumulated on a special FDL page (yes, I know — another one!) so that readers and decision-makers can refer to them easily?
if the president wants democrats elected this is the template right here
this is perfect, it’s what everyone wants to hear
everyone wants to know, if they don’t have a job they will get one, one that’s gainful
everyone wants to know, if they lose their job they can get another.
THAT will fix this damned corporate driven economy
And I was hoping that Professor Galbraith himself would accept either Larry Summer’s or Timeh Geithner’s job.
Seconded!!!
Thirded.
On a recent Olbermann show, Richard Wolffe revealed that Obama relies on an extremely small inner circle of advisors, and boy does it show.
Considering all the brilliant suggestions Jane and others have offered to help the country and the Obama administration, his actions and non-actions as well as the continued stream of snide comments publicly offered by he and his inner demons have long indicated, to me anyway, that he/they were secretly relying more on anti-Democratic forces to push his/their agenda through. Rahm Emanuel and co. used the same strategy to keep Clinton in office, at the expense of Democrats.
So here we are again, with Obama throwing his party overboard. He finally got caught in his own inner circle of bullshit, when he blurted out the truth. Days before a potentially devastating Congressional election, to his party and the country and without one lousy word of empathy to Congressional Democrats who risked their seats by working their asses off to help him, he now says he looks forward to working with a Republican majority and doesn’t really need a Democratic majority anymore.
Please, please vote for any Democrat who can stop/block the new Obama/Republican anti-democratic agenda.
Because, believe it or not, that’s precisely where we’re headed.
Precisely. #1 and #2 alone could turn out the Dems to vote in November.
ANYBODY IN THE DEM PARTY LISTENING?
Yeah, I thought not.
I like this series … :)
This is a great series. I can’t help but notice though that none of these policy wonks seem to care about LGBT civil rights.
Can you name any Democrats who can stop/block the Obama/Republican anti-democratic agenda? So far, not one incumbent Democrat in Congress has proven that he or she can stand up to them.
Ditto.
EXACTLY. And Barry knows it. This is what shows him to have evil intentions.
What I appreciate about this series is that the contributors are able to knowledgably suggest concrete steps that move toward progressive goals rather than just stating what needs to be done in general terms.
And as these steps won’t be taken by this one-term president, they suggest the need to find a real leader who can and will move toward achieving these goals.
And good luck with finding that “real leader”, eh?
Thanks for the series; I have found it insightful and educational. It also provides concrete, practical steps that can be taken to make improvements for the overall betterment of our nation.
At a time when it’s difficult to figure out what to do make improvements, these commentaries are a breath of fresh air and wisdom.
If only the PTB would sit up, take notice and follow some/all of the suggestions.
Exactly.
I hope he listens.
And I want a pony, too…
Forget 1.3 and 4.
Spend 100% of your time on number 2. JOBS!!!!
Lack of attention to the jobs problem is why dems will lose the house and maybe the senate.
fine idea.
this is a remarkable effort.
I’m holding out for a unicorn.
a pink one
For those who haven’t seen it, here’s a link to Jamie’s speech to Canadian Union folks recently. Warren and Jamie get along very well and have co-authored papers and Congressional testimony.
Also, here’s Randy Wray’s view of how to fix the foreclosure mess.
I agree that this is a great series, and also that it should have a separate link page.
Finally, I’d like to see Jamie appointed to Larry Summers position, Timmeh asked to retire to the big bank of his choice, and Warren Mosler appointed to replace him at Treasury.
Warren and Jamie have co-authored papers and Congressional testimony together, and would get along very well.
I have lost faith in all the Keynesian economists.
How about getting out of the 3 wars and dismantling the Empire, Mr Galbreith, Krugman, Stiglitz, et al?
How about Nationalizing the FRB and all the Banks, decoupling public from private GSEs.
How about killing unbridled capitalism?
I listened to a 40 minute talk by Jamie Galbraith See 28 above) and boy he seemed smarter than Gaither and Summers combined, so why isn’t he an inter circle administration adviser? What do they meet in a cramped coat closet?
And to you brilliant, wonderful, bright Jane….You rock like no other.
Jane,
Progressives are the only ones providing road maps of specific tasks that will result in change and perhaps, even some hope.
Wow, great post. Do you think the DLC can read and UNDERSTAND how doing this GETS VOTES? And fixes the country?
Here is one of Mosler’s ideas:
“I believe that the surest engine for full economic recovery is a full payroll tax holiday. Payroll taxes take away over 15% of everyone’s paycheck, from the very first dollar earned. This is big money- about $1 trillion per year. Half comes from the employee and half from the employer. A payroll tax holiday does not give anyone anything. What it does is stop taking away $1 trillion a year from working people struggling to make their payments and stay in their homes, and businesses struggling to survive. A full payroll tax holiday means a husband and wife earning $50,000 a year each will see their combined take home pay go up by over $650 a month, so they can make their mortgage payments and their car payments and maybe even do a little shopping.”
Sounds fucking reasonable, until we remember that:
“Social Security is a social insurance program that is funded through dedicated payroll taxes called Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA). Tax deposits are formally entrusted to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, or the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund.[3]
Perhaps Mosler offers a solution elsewhere, otherwise, as far as I’m concerned he can go fly a kite.
I want Hobsyllwin.
Great stuff Jane!
How about, for a bit of contrast, Michael Hudson?!
Thanks Jane! And thank you Professor Galbraith!
Seems we have a good number of Americans with both vision and conviction…. but they almost all reside outside the widening gyre we call “The Beltway”. We need to keep working on this.
Obama should have the courage to explain to the American people the meaning of Monetary Sovereign, and how that affects the federal debt.
If he would talk with someone like Warren Mosler or Randall Wray, rather than listening to the likes of John Mauldin, this recession would be over in a month.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Actually, Social Security (and Medicare) are not funded through FICA. If FICA fell to $0, this would not affect by even one penny, the government’s ability to fund Social Security.
Federal Taxes do not pay for federal spending in a monetarily sovereign nation. What taxes pay for the Supreme Court? What taxes pay for Congress, the White House, the Department of Defense and the other 1,000 federal departments. Answer: None.
Try to learn the meaning of Monetarily Sovereign.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Are you kidding? That would make it way too easy to tell Republcans froom Democrats :>))
all great ideas in this series…
And does anyone get any tiny indication that the Obama Administration cares/is the least bit interested?
I have lost hope that they care. They are not showing it. It’s just empty rhetoric now. No significant action.
Huh? appoint more commissions? PLease. also announcing social security changes and medicare changes are off the table is just stupid. I agree actually the retirement age should not need to rise again now–but hamstringing yourself is stupid
commissions we don;t need.Here’s my list
stop enforcement of don’t ask don’t tell NOW do not appeal recent decision
close guantanamo by year end. move anyone capable of being tried to courts here
Change rules on bankruptcy to allow for mandatory modification of mortgages
Declare that any tax cuts for rich will be vetoed
But, a monetary sovereign nation does not exist in a vacuum. There are trading ‘partners’ to consider….!
Jane,
I am asking in a truly nice fashion, which is very difficult for me, so please try and bear with me,
But could you please stop asking people “What Obama Could Do Now”? It should be crystal clear even to you that Obama has no intentions of doing anything you or those you ask suggest…………..
thus the word “could”, not “would” or even “should”.
So what/ What he could or should do now, is very relevant for evaluating his the inevitable claims he will make later about his doing the only things that could have been given the grave crisis we are in. 2012 will come around all too soon and then we’ll have to decide what to do with him.
If the Republicans have their way, we may be asked to support him before then, since they may try to impeach him. So, anyone who may be called upon to make such a decision later, may need to know well in advance what he might have done that he did not do because he “. . . has no intentions of doing anything you or those you ask suggest . . .”
Btw, since the usefulness of an exercise like this for evaluating Obama as time goes on is so obvious, may I ask you why you raised this issue with Jane?
Hi Rodger, what makes you think Obama knows what a “Monetarily Sovereign” nation is?
fuckno, you need to be more careful. Warren’s payroll tax holiday proposals also includes the Government marking up the SS account in an amount equivalent to what that of the employer and employee contributions to FICA. So the problem you’re pointing to is covered in his proposal.
All you need to do to find out this and much else, it to spend a few hours reading Warren’s little book which you can download here.
Jamie is not a Keynesian. He’s an MMT guy. See: here, here, and here.
Also, I suspect Jamie is probably with you here to a very great extent:
As for the Wars, he has frequently expressed very strong opposition to them.
I didn’t limit anyone, but it was understood that I was asking people to write about their area of expertise.
Don’t worry, there will be someone addressing that soon. I’m liking this series a lot too.
I don’t expect him to do any of it. I’m trying to make a point.
By accepting the “60 vote” excuse we’re surrendering to gridlock for the next two years. That has devastating consequences someone should bear.
He is not powerless. He has choices. If he chooses not to make those choices, that’s a choice too.
Ask solerso, can probably explain it better than me.
Okay, lgid said it better than me.
Good to know, thanks.
I still would love to see Michael Hudson’s list in the mix.
“Perhaps Mosler offers a solution elsewhere, otherwise, as far as I’m concerned he can go fly a kite.”
i did qualify my comment.
Jane, thanks for the series and putting spot-light on public affairs. This quote I pasted verbatim from founder of the democratic party and in my opinion the greatest US president till now Pres. Thomas Jefferson and is for you and various bloggers at FDL even though most of you must have read many times,
Prof. Galbraith this quote is for you pasted verbatim from Pres. Jefferson which is as relevant today as if made by a nobel prize winning economist and you are probably aware of like many other but still good to reflect.
Glass Steagall Act prevented Great Recession whereas Social Security will prevent Depression.
Your suggestions actually increase the impact of social security in our lives de-linked from wall street by increasing its foot-print making it recession proof probably and provide opportunity for next generation of young people to be employed. These are too many good things in your suggestion and unless President and congress decides to do like President Thomas Jefferson chances of it taking shape are slim. But we never start the long trek to better town if do not start dreaming of better town. Thanks for the suggestion.
BTW In my opinion I recommend everybody to read Pres. Jefferson quotes which are as relevant today as then if one can spare a minute a day and you will find them giving you all a surge of idealism, hope and wish to do things better.
Thanks Jane,great stuff.Michael Hudson and Catherine Austin Fitts could make enlightening contributions .Thanks also for not highlighting free-trade frauds Krugman and Reich and their faux populism to grind book sales .I believe those two birds symbolize the most dangerous false choice in America.
Jamie, I have followed your and your father’s writings for many years with pleasure, and I appreciate your contribution here, but I think you’re wrong regarding the mandate of the Commission. A look at the website shows the following:
“3. Objectives and Scope of Activities. The objective of the Commission is to identify to the President policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run.
4. Description of Duties. The functions of the Commission are advisory only. The Commission shall propose recommendations to balance the budget, excluding interest payment on the debt, by 2015. This result is projected to stabilize the debt-to-GDP ratio at an acceptable level once the economy recovers. In addition, the Commission shall propose recommendations to the President that meaningfully improve the long-run fiscal outlook, including changes to address the growth of entitlement spending and the gap between the projected revenues and expenditures of the Federal Government…”
That said, I can’t stand how Simpson has been laying the groundwork for a deep-six of Medicare and Social Security, and I fear that Obama will buy into it after the Commission expires in December, no doubt in the name of (sigh) bipartisanship.
This exercise demonstrates how pathetic the leadership has been from Obama. He’s a protecter of the status quo to the nth degree and is on the wrong side of history. The absolute wrong man for the times demonstrated by the fact he lied to Americans to get elected. If this is the best we can do, we’ve got serious problems.
Riggsveda – yes, but notice that the charter makes no reference to the alleged solvency issues of the Social Security or Medicare *systems* – only the “long-run fiscal outlook” of the government as a whole.
Alan Simpson’s public remarks strongly suggest they will be making recommendations about the balance between FICA taxes and benefits, and they have no mandate to base recommendations on that.
JG
Yes, some are monetarily sovereign (Canada, China, Australia, Japan et al) and some are not (Italy, France, Portugal, Ireland). What is your point?
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
I suspect he knows, but these days it is impolitic to discuss the fact that federal deficits are necessary for economic growth. So, on the one hand he pretends he wants to reduce deficits, while on the other hand, realizing deficits are necessary, puts forth “stimulus” (aka deficit) plans.
If he would stand up and tell the truth, he could cure this recession today.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
“If he would stand up and tell the truth, he could cure this recession today.” Unbelievable!
The truth is the economy is starved for money and federal deficits benefit the economy by adding money. If FICA were eliminated (See: FICA) the recession would end.
If, in addition, Social Security and Medicare benefits were increased to include all Americans, the economy would prosper as never before.
The fear of easy-to-cure inflation has cost us trillions.
Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
Yes, it is starved of money but the problem is diminished form of progressive taxation with the top 1% contributing little or nothing to the market (worlds second richest person said this truth) and on top of that companies are holding onto their cash-horde playing out the bailout game being run by non-good part of wall street. All this is stated can happen by Pres. Thomas Jefferson two centuries back if one takes a minute everyday to read his quotes. All that is required is for the current congress to take corrective steps to rectify this issue.
FICA taxes are good. That shows that Americans are saving for their long term future even in a bad economy.
Thanks, Progress, you saved me a post.
Jane, Why do you think Obama thought it was more important that Blanche Lincoln defeat Bill Halter in the Dem. Primary than it is for the Dems to keep that Senatorial seat? Over & over we see Obama talking up the importance of voting for Dems., yet he personally handed The Dem. Senate seat to the Repubs by taking Halter’s challenge of Lincoln personally. The message seems obvious to me – Obama would rather see another Republican in the Senate than see a Democrat win it who will stand up to him! Dem. voters who care more about Party ideals than Chicago political tactics would do well to send a message back to Mr. Obama by voting out every Dem. Incumbent Senator seeking reelection. Why? Because not one Dem. Senator stood up to Obama on HCR or Financial reform EVEN when the Polls showed almost 70% of all voters were opposed to his corrupt sell-out.
After HCR bill most important bill affecting our daily lives was Financial Reform bill in my opinion. I was following it closely as HCR bill.
Besides Sen. Sanders I saw two true exceptions from Democratic Party. Sen Feingold and Sen Cantwell who was holding out to bring back Glass-Steagall Act which would have been real reform. At-least I noted that these two senators tried to correct their HCR mistake and trying to do good for the country.
Alan Grayson.
I don’t understand why so many are so willing to forgive Feingold’s “mistake” on HCR. We had a once in thirty year opportunity for dramatic, substantive HCR the Country desperately needed. Feingold was the one guy we believed we could count on to do the right thing. Yet, he caved at the very moment we (the country) needed him to stand up & lead.
I hope he spends the next six years & longer back in Wisconsin thinking about why he chose that single moment to turn his back on the ideals he so staunchly argued for his entire career.
Honestly I do not know why Sen. Feingold voted like that for HCR bill.
Only reason I hold him in good account is because he is one of very few I know of who has $200,000 in assets after 20 years of public service. This honest hard ground reality besides the fact MSM is trying to make fun of him shows he is one of the few progressives left in the senate. We need more senators like him and not less in the senate. So right now we need to hold on to the few honest ones still left in the senate and by the way besides HCR bill vote I do not see any repeat performance in the financial bill even though he could have gained lot of campaign cash there by voting with the party. I see some one rectifying their mistake and we should support that by all means.
We all agree, it’s EASIER for a crowd to withstand the pressures of an enormous power block. But, personally, I refuse to dismiss or excuse Feingold’s abdication of the principles he called to our attention so often, for so long. Even now he chirps about his “Patriot” vote. Whoopty-doo!
My recollection is that polls reported almost 70% of people (that’s a lot more than Progressives & Dems.) WANTED the Public option. Didn’t the Dorgan Amendment deserve SOMEONE demand it get a floor vote? If not Feingold, who would we expect to have the nerve to stand up and demand it?
I say dismantle the Dem. Party before trusting those who value its ideals – until it’s expedient for them not to. Shame on Feingold!