Mike Bloomberg’s White House aspirations look a bit dimmer today in the wake of the drubbing that Reshma Saujani took in her primary race against Carolyn Maloney yesterday.
The conventional wisdom among Democratic “strategists” is that if the economy is good in 2012, Obama wins the presidential election in a walk. And if it’s not, Mike Bloomberg will probably run a third party challenge.
Per Gallup, the net favorable/unfavorable ratings for both the Democratic and Republican parties is at an all-time low since 1992, with Republicans going from a +14 to a -22 and Democrats from a +16 to a -9 (as of May 2010). That, and Mike Bloomberg’s fat bankroll makes the consultant class think that circumstances will be fertile for a 3rd party run.
So it doesn’t bode well for Mayor Mike that the campaign spearheaded by his girlfriend Diana Taylor, namely Reshma Saujani’s primary challenge to Carolyn Maloney, was such an enormous failure. The Wall Street class fully understood that Taylor was a proxy for Bloomberg, and they opened up their wallets accordingly.
Taylor campaigned aggressively with Saujani up until the last minute.
The campaign brain trust, such as it was, included Taylor, long-time Bloomberg supporter Jerry Speyer of Tishman Speyer , and Bloomberg financial adviser Steve Rattner. (Rattner’s wife Maureen White, who also pulled out all the stops for Reshma, is the former DNC finance chair.) Even Bloomberg’s daughter Emma maxed out to Saujuani in the final days. Bloomberg’s inner circle spent months currying the support for Reshma from the same donors he would tap for a 2012 bid, and their very presence on a campaign finance report was enough to tank her campaign — even in New York.
Team Bloomberg thought they could kill two birds with one stone — install a Bloomberg loyalist, and send a message to members of Congress that they could and would exact a price for perceived lack of loyalty to Wall Street. In this case, by taking out Carolyn Maloney, who backed the financial regulation bill (and which, as Jon Walker notes, is the only action taken by the Democrats since Obama took office popular with a majority of the country).
There is some really twisted logic behind the notion that Obama would be vulnerable in 2012 if the economy’s bad, and yet the country would look to a creature of Wall Street like Mike Bloomberg for salvation. Of course, it’s equally twisted that the tea parties exploded in response to the bank bailouts, and yet Bain Capital billionaire Mitt Romney is their favorite for 2012. Maybe that gave them hope.
But it didn’t work out so well yesterday. The millions that Wall Street pumped into Saujani’s campaign at the behest of Team Bloomberg cast her irrevocably as a tool of Wall Street in the eyes of voters who have had quite enough from the financial oligarchy. She wound up with only a pathetic 19% of the vote.
Michael Bloomberg and his proxies couldn’t even orchestrate a serious challenge to a congressional seat in a year of unprecedented dissatisfaction with incumbents. If 19% doesn’t qualify as a public rebuke of their organizing abilities, I don’t know what does.





39 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
I can’t quit you, Schadenfreude …
actually watched the returns on this last night – so much for the ‘sicilian message’
gonna have to do some googling to see if anyone in TradMed is connecting these dots as you have so deftly done here Jane – somehow I have my doubts – thanks
I’m glad to see this too and of course I voted for Maloney yesterday but I do have to say, just to keep Maloney on her toes with some public criticism — she sucks at constituent services. Like, really badly.
Maye the TradMed didn’t get it, but I’m sure Bloomberg did.
My take form last night and the entire primary season is that:
1]The GOP has a revolt on their hands; and,
2]Democrats are not happy, but for the most part, at least to this point, are staying the course, albeit with frowns on their faces.
The pundits in analyzing the GOP’s current position have chosen to emphasize the energy and de-emphasize the disharmony resulting from this uprising.
Short term the situation is dicey for the GOP. Long term it is a disaster.
Did Wolfson manage to keep his paw prints off this one, do you suppose?
I fear that the T-B’s will do better in the general election than we think. This scares me.
The Wall Street Journal came to a funny conclusion.
Why? Because both Wall Street vets and critics lost. Or something.
http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/09/15/how-did-wall-street-vets-fare-in-primaries-not-well/
Except that it is the Democratic Party on the other side — the Blue Dogs of which (President included) are dedicated to reviving the GOP and keeping it safe from disaster.
YES!– another creature of Wall Street unmasked (hattip Kelly Canfield for pointing out that linked video) and standing in the spotlight!!
fyi – that paragon of opportunism, Mitt Romney has endorsed O Donnel ’bout an hour ago
Hell, Bloomie spent $109 million — about what a major presidential candidate would spend to get to the White House — just to keep his mayor’s job, and he still barely beat a Democratic challenger who he’d outspent by 20 to 1. He’s Steve Forbes with a better taste in restaurants.
I agree with you about all the proxy symbolism Jane, completely. But Saujani, like Kathleen Rice for AG, and to a large extent Gillibrand exemplify a new type of woman candidate; one that is every bit as self centered and narcissistic and power grabbing as any man.
It used to be that they women who got into politics did so out of a sense to total frustration with the person who held the office they sought. A person like Carolyn McCarthy, who was unable to get her congressman to sponsor gun control legislation (or even talk to her about it) after her husband was killed and son permanently injured by a shooter on the Long Island Railroad.
So, McCarthy got mad, and ran against her incumbent congresswoman and won. She didn’t set out to be a politician, she was cause driven.
People like Saujani, Rice and Gillibrand come from a different place. Like ambitious men who stand for nothing but their own advancement Harold Ford Chris Cox, they are simply about their own ambition, their own power and will do 180′s on any issue, if they think it will get them an endorsement, a major donor, or a voting block.They have no core principles and they will stand up for nothing and no one but themselves.
In a sad way, it is sign of how far women have come in politics, we are now free to be just as self centered as any man.
I think this is purposeful shadow play to keep the electorate so disgusted and, therefore, disengaged so they don’t mess up the rigged “football game” of the Red shirts versus the Blue Shirts and those Casino bets involved. The idea is to keep the TV and Media-A-Go-Go distractingly full of the images of preening, self-serving substitutes-for-real-leadership in the public mind. Romney could have been queued up intentionally for that deflationary purpose.
With unverifiable Direct Recording Electronic devices deployed in most states, you have a well-founded fear.
Has anyone outside the NYC political echo chamber really thought Bloomberg had a chance at the WH? He’s divisive here; there’s literally no fucking way he plays in the midwest, west or likely even New England.
I thoroughly enjoyed it yesterday when, as I entered the train station, I was offered literature on Saujani and I responded with “no thanks, Wall St. has enough representation in congress…” The crestfallen look on the faces of the two college-aged volunteers passing it out was priceless.
just saw on the google Reshma Saujani was a lawyer for HillPac . . . aah, the Circle of Life
They can’t directly elect their own, and as a response will continue to buy those who they can. What’s the effective difference?
They aren’t C-Koch’ing on the results. They are considering their option$.
The foot soldiers of the Veal Pen-ers were out in force in one of the top shopping districts during prime-time foot traffic last weekend. One 20-something knew he was hawking bullshit and was trying to bully me into forking over a credit card for his “cause.” I called him out on it in a way other potential signers could hear it. Disgusting complicity– fie!
Had Democrats done as they should have, Republicans would be a vanishing species. And many Democrats would be calculating much diminished financial futures. At base, you’ll pardon the expression, it’s almost all about self-serving.
I’m sure you’re right. Hadn’t thought about it, but Bloomberg doesn’t play in most of the country. What next for him after this term?
Let’s see, she lost 81 to 19. But Saujani says she will run again. Where I want to vote too?
What is your take on Gillibrand? There are political pros who tip her as a presidential possible. Anne Applebaum’s description of all of the type as “egotistical egomaniacs” comes to mind, altho Gillibrand doesn’t project that way.
And I am sure they were plenty of pissed off phone calls late last night lighting Bloomberg up.
Yes! Americans use to consume 90% of the world hard drugs, but due to the economy this statistic may be falling.
The last thing the elites who rule america need is a bunch of sober americans!
Bloomberg better go buy a pick up truck, and some wrangler jeans, I have a feeling the day of the Armani Suit lying politician from Chicago, New York, may be over!!!
My God, it’s Lord Farquaad!
Remember Occam’s Razor: The simplest explanation is usually the correct one. No need to invent a grand conspiracy when the simple fact is that with the collapse of even weak limits on corporate campaign spending, the TV and radio advertising arms race is going to be won, most of the time, by those who can afford the most air time for ads.
That’s why I tell people to check out http://www.publicampaign.org.
Diane Feinstein has been doing it for decades. There’s not much new about it I’m afraid.
The Wall Street Journal under Rupert’s hand has changed from a tool of news for the Oligarchy and their lackys to a Propoganda arm of the Oligarchy to the middle class masses. A big diffference and as such it should be taken with a big grain of salt.
Ouch!
Thanks for such a juicy story, Jane.
The voters of NY failed to fall at the feet of a Bloomberger? What’s got into those people?!
Yeah, that Liddy Dole, no opportunism or self-centeredness there.
She lost because marionettes can’t hold elected office, unless the strings are less apparent.
He’s cynical enough to go for another.
Um, Jane. Incumbents win re-election in New York 99% of the time. The Democratic machine had for two decades kept all serious challenges to Maloney off the ballot. Saujani is well positioned to succeed Maloney eventually. That’s what this race was about.
Great news, thanks Jane.
Most New Yorkers, if they recognize the names, know Speyer as part of evil real estate developer/landlord Tishman Speyer (despised throughout Stuy-town and Peter Cooper Village!) and Rattner, sketchy as he is, has a name uncomfortably close to that of Bruce Ratner, another hated NYC developer. New Yorkers generally despise the Wall St. types; adding rapacious developers to the mix is fatal.
Bloomie’s a terrible mediocrity. One of these days, some clever journalist is going to tot up Bloomie’s wins and losses, and it’ll be another fat nail in the Little Emperor’s coffin. On the other hand, love the bike lanes!
oldgold,
Wrong answer on the first count. There is no GOP “revolt”. Why? These misfits from the Ghengis Khan wing of the Republican party, should they succeed in winning office, will do what Turtleman Mitch McConnell and A Clockwork of Orange TanMan John Boehner tell them to do…………..
Trust me, there are more important fish to fry than worrying about Michael Bloomberg……………
Ah Reshma. I almost miss her already.
Let me know as soon as an “unnamed” white house proxy for Rahm castigates all the wal st backers of Reshma as “morons” who “flushed thier money down the toilet”…ill just be waiting over here.