Last week, Los Angeles Sheriff Lee Baca held a press conference to announce that his department had a suspect in custody who confessed to three West Hollywood murders. Baca used the platform to advance the political message of the No on 19 campaign, claiming that the murders were the result of increased violence caused by the presence of medical marijuana dispensaries. On the same day, the No on 19 campaign announced that Baca would serve as campaign co-chair with Dianne Feinstein.
Former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper, a member of the Just Say Now advisory board, responds:
Sheriff Baca says ‘there are predators armed and seeking easy dollars in sales of marijuana.’ He’s right. There is altogether too much marijuana-related violence in California. It’s been going on for years and, unless the marijuana prohibition is lifted — and replaced with a taxed, regulated, and controlled system — it will continue unabated. It’s that simple. The sheriff needs to ask himself, Would the three recent murders in West Hollywood have happened if marijuana were legal, its commerce controlled like alcohol? He knows the answer to that question, and so does Senator Feinstein. Marijuana prohibition is the cause of violence, not the cure.
Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan and also a member of the Just Say Now advisory board, says that Baca should not abuse his role as Sheriff to promote a political agenda:
Since banks, jewelry stores, and wealthy homeowners attract thieves and robbers, presumably Sheriff Baca will next campaign for financial, jewelry, and wealth prohibition. After all, there wouldn’t be any bank robberies if there were no banks.
In fact, as has long been evident, it is drug prohibition that generates untold violent and destructive crime. The sheriff is entitled to his opinion as co-chair of the anti-marijuana legalization campaign, but he shouldn’t distort his official duties to promote his political pursuits. The only way to end drug-related violence is to stop arresting users and turning production and sales over to criminals.”
Baca also claimed that many dispensaries purchased their marijuana from Mexican drug cartels. The Associated Press reported that “Baca presented no evidence to support his claim,” and the Drug Enforcement Administration indicated they could not substantiate Baca’s assertions either.
Los Angeles Police Chief Charles Beck has also challenged the claim made by Baca that marijuana dispensaries attract a criminal element. “I have tried to verify that because that, of course, is the mantra,” said Beck. “It doesn’t really bear out.“
Baca has close ties to Scientology, and has used their materials to train deputies in his department. In 2004, the California Department of Education issued a report indicating that the claims made in the Scientology-sponsored Narconon drug treatment program were “exaggerated” and contained “inaccurate and misleading drug-related information” that would “confuse students and be perceived as designed to arouse fear.” As a result, California Superintendent of Schools Jack O’Connell recommended that California schools ban the Narconon program from classrooms.
More on the controversy surrounding the Scientology claims advanced by No on 19 Co-Chair Lee Baca can be found here.




7 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Great post Jane.
I see this as another example of an elected official thrusting their personal religious beliefs on the public. Seperation of church and state, my ass.
They may use religion as an excuse but I don’t believe it for a minute. The Bible says nothing about MJ and Jesus turned water into wine so I guess they weren’t opposed to drinking either. This is just nonsense and I think they are going to find themselves on the wrong side of the issue.
The ‘religion’ of Scientology, if I’m not mistaken, preaches purity. That means no booze or drugs. Don’t wanna polute the mind or body, don’tchaknow.
I have religion in quotes because L Ron Hubbard made it up. Scientology is not a religion, per se. A modern fiction writer invented it. The fact that this information is common knowledge but people continue to dedicate their lives to the principles and teachings of Scientology blows me away.
So is his religion why my entire family refuses to speak to me? I consider it torture.
This is just the beginning of things to come from almost every public official in California. Now that school is back in session I expect to hear something very soon about “evidence” of the harmful effect of weed on grades, etc. The DMV might even get in on the action with some bogus stats about the number of traffic violations committed while under the influence.
I’ve said from the beginning that the PTB will not ALLOW this to pass. I expect all state and local officials will work toward that end. Possibly even those in charge of the voting if they have to. I know that sounds like conspiracy theory garbage, but I really believe the PTB will do WHATEVER IT TAKES to see this fail.
Sure hope I’m wrong again.
And good comments above about religion. That’s really all prohibition is about anyway, they just feel it’s WRONG to use weed, therefore every shouldn’t use it. And you can relace alcohol, coke, etc in place of weed. I would just say drugs, but that would be wrong.
I’d bet my last dollar that if a DRUG were invented that increased focus and productivity at work, it not only wouldn’t be illegal, there would probably be laws passed to allow employers to force you to use it. Just look at how almost every workplace in the country already has all the paraphenalia and supply of one drug now. Caffeine that’s found in coffee. This is somehow a “good” drug which you hear no objection to.
All we gotta do is keep using phrases which juxtapose Senator/Dianne “Feinstein and Scientology” advocate/Sheriff Baca.
Feinstein and Scientology.
Feinstein and Scientology.
Her profile in No on 19 will plummet. Like a hawk on a squirrel.
The illegal drug trade is now estimated to be somewhere in the region of $400 billion a year ( equal to the defense budget ). This “former land of the free” arrests 1.5 million of it’s citizens a year for drug law violations, half for marijuana alone, The majority of the 2.2 million inmates in the USA are incarcerated because of this insane drug war (Prohibition 2) at a staggering cost to all taxpayers and trauma to their families.
Prisons have been filled to capacity. Violent criminals, murderers, rapists and child molesters are released early to create space for these so called drug offenders. Half of court trial time and also a huge chunk of police officers time is pointlessly wasted. Enormous untaxed profits from illegal drugs fund multi-national criminal empires which bribe law enforcement authorities and spread corruption faster than a raging bush fire. These laws take violent criminals and turn them into multi-billionaires whilst corrupting even entire countries such as Columbia, Panama, Mexico and Afghanistan. The extreme violence on and south of the border is drug gangs fighting for turf in this lucrative business. The drug laws are also funding the Taliban whose illegal opium profits allow it to buy weapons and pay it’s fighters more than $300 a month, compared with the $14 paid to an Afghan policemen.
The definition of insanity is great folly, madness, extreme senselessness, lunacy. The present drug laws cause all of the above and may therefor be deemed insane.
There will be many of you who probably fear a theoretical free-for-all, but that overlooks one major point: That’s exactly the situation we have at the moment. Sure, there are laws against the possession and sale of these drugs, but they have no impact on actually restricting either one. When we allow such drugs to remain in the criminal market, they finance the activities of street punks, violent gangs, drug lords and terrorists. That’s why there is now such an urgent need to legalize, which will not only allow us to properly regulate these substances, but also strip the illegal cartels of their main income.
So please consider the following very carefully : It wasn’t the alcohol that caused the surge in crime and homicide during alcohol prohibition, it was prohibition itself. That’s why many of us find it hard to believe that the same thing is not happening now. We clearly have a prohibition fueled violent crime problem. A huge number of these violent crimes are perpetrated by criminal syndicates and gangs who use the proceeds form the sales of illegal substances to further even more of their criminal activities.
Prohibition is nothing less than a grotesque dystopian nightmare. We have to regulate and we have to do it now!