A funny thing happened last week with our Just Say Now campaign. Well, a couple of “funny” things. Large online communities proved, en masse, that they were waaaay ahead of both corporate America and our political leadership when it comes to their readiness to discuss an end to marijuana prohibition.
Moreover, it’s an issue they feel very strongly about.
Facebook Just Says No
Facebook initially approved and ran 38 million impressions of the “Just Say Now” ad featuring our logo, a marijuana leaf in a “speech” balloon. The logo is a very specific symbol of what the Just Say Now campaign is trying to do: get people to talk about marijuana policy. It transcends the boundaries of culture, language and class.
Inexplicably, Facebook suddenly banned the ads. They subsequently gave us ever-shifting excuses as to why they did so — we were told that “that the image in question was no long[er] acceptable for use in Facebook ads. The image of a pot leaf is classified with all smoking products and therefore is not acceptable under our policies.”
But the Just Say Now campaign isn’t trying to get people to smoke more pot. Americans consume 113 billion dollars worth of weed each year, so I doubt that would even be possible. Rather, it’s a political campaign directly related to ballot initiatives in five states this November. As Michael Whitney of the Just Say Now campaign said, “It’s like running a campaign and saying you can’t show the candidate’s face.”
The ads with the marijuana leaf in them were iconic, immediately recognizable in Facebook’s small ad format to anyone who cares about the issue. The ads with that logo performed twice as well as any other ad on Facebook. Moreover, Facebook knew this. They could see the same statistics we could.
Maybe Facebook would like to give up the use of the blue Facebook “F” button that is ubiquitous across the internet? In a 2.0 world, the Just Say Now logo of a marijuana leaf in a speech balloon is just as important to us.
We launched a petition to get Facebook to reverse its decision, and took out ads on both right and left blogs across the internet. We asked people to replace their Facebook avatars with Just Say Now logos with “censored” across the marijuana leaf.
Much to our surprise, it caused a minor tsunami in the media:
Ryan Grim’s story drew 6,282 comments, was retweeted 4,365 times, and shared on Facebook 5,597 times off the Huffington Post alone.
The story was covered everywhere:
| Boing Boing | PC World | CBS News | UPI | NBC | Gawker | Wired |
| Alternet | IT World | Mediaite | LA Weekly | Network World | Computerworld | Reuters |
| Bay Area Indymedia | Colorado Springs Independent | Drug War Chronicle | San Fransicso Chronicle | Product Reviews | OverTheLimit | Fast Company |
| Newser | MyStateline | HULIQ | Gather | Adotas | NewsOXY | Young Turks |
| Independent Political Report | 420 Times | SmartTrend | St. Louis Globe-Democrat | Arizona Daily Wildcat | Austin Chronicle | Herald & Review |
| LA Times | CNET | PoliJAM | CWCBD | RightTV | Thaindian | CIO |
| Drug War Rant | Liberty Papers | Marketing Pilgrim | Small Gov Times | Salem Libertarian Examiner | Computerworld UK | The Olympian |
| Lexington Herald Leader | Modesto Bee | Myrtl Beach Sun News | Centre Daily Times | Bellingham Herald | The Republic | Sun Herald |
| Kansas City Star | Belleville News Democrat | Macon Telegraph | Good Gear Guide | Computerworld Austrailia | Stop the Drug War | LA Times Blog |
| OC Weekly | IT World | Atlantic | SF Weekly | NY Times | LAist | CNET |
We couldn’t measure the impact of the campaign across Facebook itself. The Just Say Now avatars seemed to be everywhere. But when we asked the Facebook folks if they knew how many had been swapped out, they said they didn’t know.
Google Says Yes
At the same time we launched the campaign to get Facebook to relent, we also submitted the ads with the Just Say Now logo to Google. Google said they’d run them, and subsequently got a lot of good press for that decision.
From the LA Times:
“Facebook’s concocted prissiness over political advocacy is more to be disparaged than imitated,” Bruce Fein, a lawyer and author who worked in President Reagan’s Justice Department and a Just Say Now advisory board member, said in a statement. “Freedom of expression is made of sterner stuff. Google deserves applause for exposing Facebook to shame.”
We also learned that Facebook had done the same thing to the Libertarian Party. On July 23, Facebook pulled the ads they had already approved for the campaign that was getting very successful:
We do not allow ads for marijuana or political ads for the promotion of marijuana and will not allow the creation of any further Facebook Ads for this product.
But Facebook subsequently accepted the Just Say Now logo ads on August 7, so that was a crock.
Conde Nast and Reddit Go To War Over Just Say Now Ads
When they heard that Facebook wouldn’t run the Just Say Now ads, the Reddit advertising sales people contacted us. Reddit has several popular marijuana pages (“sub-reddits, or redit sites dedicates to specific topics and managed by users). It seemed like a natural fit.
But Reddit’s owners, Conde Nast, decided to big foot the decision. Not only did they ban the image, they banned all marijuana issue-related advertising, saying “As a corporation, Conde Nast does not want to benefit financially from this particular issue.”
Michael Whitney wrote this post on FDL:
Reddit Won’t Run Any Display Ads for Marijuana Legalization
We submitted it to Reddit, and within hours, the community was in an uproar. The Reddit site has 5 million unique users a month who tend to be tech savvy, and they instantly began turning on “ad blockers” to deny Reddit and Conde Nast advertising revenue in the wake of the decision.
We didn’t have much of a way to measure the user revolt impact on Facebook, but shortly after Michael’s post appeared, this was what Reddit looked like:
The Reddit staff responded by saying that the decision by Conde Nast was made without consulting them, and they called it “bullshit.” The staff signed their names to a dissent letter, and said that the would run the Just Say Now ads for free. The Just Say Now ads are running now on the Reddit site.
Wired’s Ryan Singel has a good rundown of the Reddit/Conde Nast controversy on Wired.
EFF Enters the Debate
The Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote an important piece on the controversy surrounding the ads. In it, they said Facebook’s refusal to run the ads threatened to deprive voters of important information regarding the ballot initiatives this fall:
Facebook should lift the ban and show Just Say Now’s political ads. For better or worse, Facebook has become a important means of communication and organization for candidates and political campaigns. In this role, Facebook functions best as a neutral platform, hosting the debate without entering it. Whether or not Facebook wants to restrict depictions of smoking in commercial ads, it should not prohibit the open and robust political debate central to the value and promise of the Internet.
NYU Journalism school professor Jay Rosen also weighed in, saying “So Facebook is deciding what the sphere of deviance is now? They were supposed to be a platform.”
Where Do We Go From Here?
I had lunch with Allen St. Pierre of NORML on Friday. He’s been working with the organization for 20 years, and day in, day out they act as a resource for people who need help when they are arrested.
“By the time I get back to the office, 100 people will have called wanting help,” he said. The group has performed an extremely valuable service for decades now, and polls indicate that 25% of Americans know the NORML brand and what it stands for.
Allen indicated that one of the things the marijuana reform movement has been missing is a sustained messaging campaign around the need to end marijuana prohibition. He was happy that the major groups had now joined together with both law enforcement and criminal justice professionals, across party lines, to do just that as part of the Just Say Now campaign.
As Mexican President Felipe Calderon said only weeks ago, we need to start having a conversation about the possibility of ending marijuana prohibition. The war on drugs has clearly failed, and US marijuana policy is threatening the stability not only of Mexico but of Columbia and other Latin American nations. It’s also causing a crisis on our borders. Our prison population has quadrupled since Nancy Reagan began her “Just Say No” campaign in the mid-80s, and both the social and economic burden have become crushing.
The Just Say Now campaign will continue to fight to bring the discussion of marijuana policy reform out into the open. Our goal is to free it from the demagoguerey of the culture wars, and the sniggering insinuation that the only ones who care about the issue are potheads. It’s not “unserious.” It’s a matter of national security, and for many, an issue of life and death.
The decision of Facebook and Conde Nast to suppress legitimate political speech was roundly rejected by vast numbers of users within their communities. The Just Say Now campaign applauds those who are willing to step forward and declare their support for ending marijuana prohibition. It is a critical first action that people must take before we can have a sane and rational drug policy in this country, and the courage of those who are willing to do so is exemplary.
Sign the peition: Ask President Obama to end the war on marijuana.







39 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Petition is signed Jane. If I get this job offer, I’ll throw in a fat donation.
Sounds like the campaign is going well, Jane.
Hey, Margaret, is this the day you find out? fingers crossed for you.
Signed and expect Obama to ramp up arrests and incarceration as a result.
Margaret, loved your comments at the end of the thread this morning. Always wonderful to be associated with a scrapper.
All I know is that he was supposed to talk to the final candidate sometime today. And thanks for the crossed digits. :)
Thanks. I consider myself more of a survivor. I would really rather not have to fight with people but will if I’m pushed.
Digits crossed for you over here as well, Margaret.
Way to go Jane and firey pups.
Can’t survive without scrappin’ once in a while. It’s the willingness to do so that matters.
‘zup Scooter Boy !
You two lovebirds catch any part of Obama’s Grand Symbolic Gesture in NO the other day?
no, and damn it, I had a $20 on FLOTUS and the Girls washing a pelican !
face palm. I now see you were referring to N.O.
And that’s a MIGHTY pretty picture of the marijuana leaf on the Huff Post story!!
Excellent news, Jane.
And “What Can Obama Really Do?“– the answer is a whole heck of a lot.
Dear Mexico, please go all the way on marijuana decriminalization and save yourselves (reference: “Mexico: Government Decriminalizes Possession Of Five Grams Of Pot“).
File under “In this day & age, don’t piss off the nerds!”
I hope the “nerds” consider this a practice run for blocking Obama ads in ’12.
I saw a short clip on Democracy Now! today and wanted to heave. Same ol’ shit from this worthless motherfucker.
Very busy.
Which means he’ll do nothing or something that benefits only Wall Street.
Yes, Margaret, crossed digits here too.
HuffPost changed out this headline, though, for one that said REEFER MADNESS 2.0. Makes me wonder if ZuckerBoy’s lawyers got on Arianna’s team about using their precious name in a big banner headline.
Anyway, thanks Jane, for this remarkable summary of the state of play. When I read this, it makes me realize that we never really know how the balls will carom when they are set in motion on the table.
Onward!
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is now available: I Don’t Think “Identity Politics” Means What Ross Douthat Thinks It Means
Jane,
In speaking with Allen St. Pierre did either of you happen to mention Rev. Roger Christie’s incarceration or his THC Ministry church in Hawaii?
I have been very frustrated by the cannabis community’s apparent lack of concern for our first amendment right to freedom of religion.
I have been at this for seven years and I have yet to hear an activist or lawyer, with rare exceptions, give any care at all to our freedom of religion. I just don’t think that is right. Is it possible the two of you discussed it?
If not, could you next time … please? I’d really like to know what he has to say about it.
Reefer Madness
It also might have been an attempt to add a little humor to the debate. It is a pretty schlocky flick. Heads were known to get 8mm copies and have a party around it.
Man! Rick Scott is an idiot.
Signed:
FaceBooked!!
Good Luck Today Margaret☺ Sure hope you get the job!
I think the Catfood Commission, before it disbands, should be urged to make the taxation of cannabis products the centerpiece of their deficit reduction efforts – a dedicated revenue stream sure to excite the truly fiscally conservative. Look what alcohol and tobacco taxes bring in for the general revenues.
Crossing my fingers too Margaret, let us know.
The topic of counter arguments came up on La Figa’a Farm report.
Maybe it’s just vested interests pushing back, but the mythbusting brought up some intersting issues.
Thank you, Jane!!!!
Now, can we do the same for making industrial HEMP legal? That it cannot be grown in this country is absolutely absurd. (Talk about the power of lobbies!) Primarily hemp saves trees (for making paper) and is superior to cotton. It also restores the soil, requires virtually no pesticides or fertilizers, and it cannot, repeat, cannot, be used as a drug.
I have signed the petition and believe in decriminalizing pot. I am worried that this drive seems to conflate pot with coke, H, etc., from Mexico and Columbia. the drive must be very specific when addressing drug shipments from said countries or suffer the PR consequences when The Powers That Be start their DFH campaign.
Margaret, here’s hoping you get the gig.
One more rooting for you.
Aside from using the marijuana leaf and the word “marijuana” in everything we do, I’m not sure what we can do about the “conflation” of something we’ve never mentioned (Coke, Heroin, etc.) in people’s imagination.
I know it’s a giving in (a little) to Facebook, but since they object to the leaf logo, how about the words “logo deemed inappropriate” (or similar) in a blank space where the leaf would be. Would kinda highlight their obtuse stance with a bit of humor.
I doubt it would happen but if Palin/Beck got the idea into their heads that they could boost their numbers by saying yes to Just Say Now and add a CAMPAIGN to legalize marijuana, I would be very sad the Right hi-jacked this also there too.
Carl Olsen has been trying to use UDV (ayahuasca SCOTUS decision) and the RFRA to over turn his conviction. He’s a bonafide Rastafarian, IA democratic party activist…
It’s a favorite drug warrior tactic: “You want crack vending machines in elementary schools”.
Ummm, no we want responsible adults to be able to make choices and support restrictions on access to children. We also support laws on DUI regardless.
Trouble is that image of the crack vending machine sticks with some people.
the facebook thing makes sense – I saw that smug little preppy fuck interviewed by Diane Sawyer, and, what else would you expect from a smug little preppy fuck?
rmm.
This might be our biggest success against the media not covering our popular stories yet. Now can we do the same for ending both wars now, a real stimulus bill, Social Security, Gay/Woman’s/Minority rights?
That was incredibly unsettling reading. The steering committee and drafters of the legislation (Richard Lee, Jeff Wilcox and others with a corporate stake in the outcome) have done something vile with this prop if, and I repeat, if, what that site says is true. I cannot believe these issues were not brought up when folks first perused the final language of the initiative. It is rather alarming, just as so much legislative wording is: Wall Street reform written by Wall St., HCRA written by the health care industry, etc.
I would like to hear more from the FDL community on this critique.
Thoughts?