Facebook is censoring marijuana.
Just last week, the social networking giant abruptly changed its policies and decided to ban images of marijuana leaves from ads, claiming pictures of the plant promote “tobacco products.”
Just Say Now, our campaign for marijuana legalization with Students for Sensible Drug Policy, ran ads promoting our campaign that showed our logo, which uses a marijuana leaf. Despite the ad running more than 38 million times, Facebook flip-flopped and started censoring our ads and our political speech.
We’re fighting back against Facebook’s censorhip with a massive campaign to call out the social networking site.
Ryan Grim at Huffington Post has more on the story:
For a typical college student, if it didn’t happen on Facebook, it didn’t happen. That gives the social networking behemoth an out-sized influence on the confines of political debate, if that debate falls outside what Facebook deems acceptable discourse.
Proponents of marijuana legalization, which is on the California ballot in 2010, have hit a Facebook wall in their effort to grow an online campaign to rethink the nation’s pot laws. Facebook initially accepted ads from the group Just Say Now, running them from August 7 to August 16, generating 38 million impressions and helping the group’s fan page grow to over 6,000 members. But then they were abruptly removed.
Adam Noyes, a spokesman for Facebook, said that the problem was the pot leaf. “It would be fine to note that you were informed by Facebook that the image in question was no long[er] acceptable for use in Facebook ads. The image of a pot leaf is classified with all smoking products and therefore is not acceptable under our policies,” he told the group in an email, which was provided to HuffPost.
Just what kind of devious, subversive ad ran 38 million times on Facebook? See for yourself. These are the ads Facebook saw fit to censor:


Two of the ads say “End the war on marijuana,” asking Facebook users to “Sign the petition to President Obama to support states’ rights to legalize marijuana. Another says “Legalize marijuana” and “It’s time to Just Say now to marijuana legalization. Sign up to show your support.” All three ads use variations of the Just Say Now logo with a pot leaf.
As Ryan Grim notes, we’re not promoting “smoking products.” Facebook’s ad policies specifically prohibit “tobacco products,” and have guidelines for how to advertise alcohol on the site (you can show alcohol products, but can’t encourage intoxication).
We’re not running ads encouraging Facebook users to smoke pot, tobacco, or to drink alcohol. We are clearly advocating for a political issue that will be voted on in Facebook’s home state in less than three months. If we can’t use the most recognizable image to organize supporters in favor of marijuana legalization, it’s essentially like being banned from showing our candidate’s face in an election.
Marijuana legalization isn’t a fringe issue: our campaign has the support of law enforcement like former Seattle police chief Norm Stamper, former Reagan Assistant Deputy Attorney General Bruce Fein, and people all across the political spectrum.
Facebook’s censorship of this political issue only advances the failed drug policies of our country by blocking an open discussion of these critical issues. Marijuana legalization on the move, but Facebook wants to block the issue.
Jordan Marks, of the Young America’s Foundation and a member of Just Say Now’s advisory board, summed up Facebook’s censorship best:
“If Facebook censorship policies continue to reflect those of our our government by suppressing freedom of speech then they won’t have to wait until Election Day to be voted obsolete,” said Marks.
Aaron Houston, also of Just Say Now and Students for Sensible Drug Policy, echoed those sentiments:
“Facebook’s business will suffer if they don’t reverse this decision” says Aaron Houston, Executive Director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy, whose organization has over 150 chapters on campuses across the country. “We’re way beyond reefer madness and censorship. Facebook should get with the times.”
Fight back against Facebook’s censorship: sign our petition to Facebook to stop censoring marijuana as political speech.
In addition to fighting back with this petition, we’re going around Facebook by running ads on hundreds of political blogs
Jeff Cosgrove of Common Sense Media placed the ads on blogs from across the political spectrum. “Blogs from both the right and the left were delighted to accept the ads” says Cosgrove. The ads will begin running today on sites including: Reason, The Nation, The New Republic, Human Events, MyDD, Red State, Antiwar, Drug War Rant, The Young Turks, Pam’s House Blend, Stop The Drug War, The Daily Paul, Lew Rockwell, Think Progress and AmericaBlog.




49 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Just participating in FaceBook drags anyone down into the slavery, manipulation, corruption, and stupidity. To hell with FaceBook, let it die. I quit months ago when they censored my updates about the oil spill. Best thing I ever did, BTW.
weed postpones Alzheimers disease,shhhhhhhhhh dont te1l
http://www.thelantern.com/2.1345/marijuana-could-prevent-alzheimer-s-1.72932
http://www.thelantern.com/2.1345/marijuana-could-prevent-alzheimer-s-1.72932
On a personal level, perhaps. But there are millions of people to be organized, and it’s a great place to find people who may support your issues. Facebook shouldn’t decide to censor political speech.
I was right about the head of that company. He’s a smug little prick.
I switched out my Facebook avatar: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Jane-Hamsher/108138195910816
Will Facebook accept the ad if you tell them the leaf is a baking product?
I have been using the JSN logo as my profile picture for weeks – guess I’m gonna switch this morning
damn ! if it aint one thing, it’s another in this game
Or a Texas Star Hibiscus leaf?
Will Facebook be returning the money they earned from the 38 million ad impressions?
Surely they don’t want to sully their hands with such obviously tainted funds.
someone just pointed out on Jane’s FB thread that FB allows for “Pot Island” and “Potville” as apps
was wondering that as well
Done. FB pic not as handsome as that old white haired hippie but…
My daughter just logged in to facebook and there was a Marlboro ad (picture of the cigarette box).
Michael, have there been any other political campaigns that Facebook has tried to stop from advertising with them, or is this a new feature of the site?
Can you get a screen grab of it? I’m sure Jane and Michael would like to see it.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Marlboro-Lights/244805480854
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=36409121446
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=85430222935
http://ga-ie.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2377869826
making screenshots of each
And people wonder what Net Neutrality is all about.
What we’re seeing is the selective throttling-back of the Internet so as to make it less useful as a tool for the education and organization of the populace, in the public interest, and more useful to those entrenched private interests who are already organized around the control and manipulation of information availible to the public, so as to protect private-sector profits.
Thank goodness someone beat me to it.
So i clicked on the button that says “make this your picture” (def an improvement!)
Then what? how do i import pic to my photos?
Absofuckinglutely
here’s another interesting screen grab – Medical Marijuana club
Cannabis Times
Jane and Michael Whitney – site proprietor said she had to fight FB to post it, but apparently won
Facebook probably received one complaint, which polling partner Research 2000 assured them represents one billion angry Facebook users.
Gotta go to your FB profile to change the pic, which ya gotta download to your machine then upload to FB.
yet more FB clusterfuckery
How about a religion?
http://www.thc-ministry.org/
I just tried to link to your “Cannabis Times” FB link and it timed out. Twice. Might it have been taken down? Also, about 20 minutes ago I posted a link to this post on my FB page and it’s still there and coming up OK.
And finally, I second (or I guess third) watt4bob’s point about the importance of net neutrality.
Maybe the real problem FB has with the JSN campaign is not the leave but the GOTV aspect?
Not “leave”, “leaf!” That’s what happens when you let the fingers do the
wtalkingforgive me if this redundant. I just scanned the previous comments.
Marijuana is illegal in most of the country. I think images may be considered advertising and it may be illegal to be displaying a clearly recognizable image of an illegal substance.
Screw Facebook. Corporate slime who manifest true colors; a propensity to control and manipulate thought via content control. This is a direct assault on a “political issue” by a corporation! People should be pissed….
success! thank you!
No it is not illegal to display an image of a marijuana leaf. The First Amendment has taken a beating in recent years but is still standing.
Also, note FB’s stated specious reasoning that it might promote the smoking of tobacco. This is a politically motivated policy decision, nothing more.
Bookface is for losers. I hate it. So of course I signed the petition. Thanks FDL for all that you do.
If that is the case why don’t we see ads for cocaine?
I really think designating something advertising makes it liable for regulation. and also subject to “the old fire in a crowded theater principle”
apparently FB has no problem with use of the leaf in comments, profile pictures, or promoting smoking it for whatever reason. haven’t had any trouble going back in to the Cannabis Times site myself – although I will note FB was “not available’ for almost 2 hours late yesterday afternoon – wonder if they are still experiencing problems
Nice try Stick. But you are definitely swimming upstream on the prohibition issue.
You are mistaken. Media outlets can decline ads for their own reasons but the Just Say Now ads do not promote any illegal activity. As far as I know voting is not illegal yet.
Anyway, if you won’t take my word for it do the research yourself and find data to support your supposition. You won’t but in any event, it is not the responsibility of anyone else to prove or disprove your theory.
All these “social networking” sites are pure unadulterated bullshit. There only purpose is to gather information about people and making money off of them through adds. You are being led around by the nose by the lowest members of society. They are the ones who jump on the bandwagon because it seems like a good time and everyone says it is fun, but they are bored silly. Don’t go with the crowd, think for yourself. If someone is making money by convincing you to do something, it is time to wonder if it is really the right thing to do.
WAKE UP AND THINK FOR YOURSELF.
So does that mean it’s illegal to depict prostitutes? Since prostitution is illegal. Then of course there’s all the times drug use, prostitution and other illegal acts have been depicted in TV, film, books, and pretty much every form of media ever. All of that would be illegal as well under your theory.
In the immortal words of James Taylor
F*ckbook
Done and done. I’m not nuts about Facebook anyway, I tried to delete it in May and it wouldn’t let me, so am happy to use it to help end an absurd and tragic crusade (here is a link to the 20/20 piece, Florida is a neanderthal state in many ways).
I guess we need to look up the facts. I am talking off the top of my head. But I do think it is illegal to advertise illegal goods and services, though the definition of advertising seems pretty tolerant.
Censorship is alive and well at firedoglake.
[modnote: dissing fellow commenters, as you well know, is not allowed.]
Again, illegal goods and services were NOT being advertised. This is not a campaign for the promotion of pot smoking, it is a campaign to reform laws, an exercise of the one of the most fundamental rights of all Americans.
So Facebook bans an ad with an image of a marijuana leaf, but has a game named “Pot Farm”, with hundreds of thousands of users, that uses an image of a marijuana leaf in its logo.
I think I will log in to that game and see if there is a way to send in-game messages…a hundred thousand pairs of eyeballs that play Pot Farm may be interested in the Just Say Now campaign, not to mention the developers of the game.
We know they are not being advertised but the law does recognize some images as inherently ads. eg Joe Camel.
Joe Camel was a copyrighted image created for the specific purpose of marketing an actual product, so of course it is inherently an ad.
Not analogous to a generic marijuana leaf.