Reshma Saujani appeared with Chris Matthews on Hardball yesterday. She doesn’t appear to understand that a “PAC” is designation under the Federal Election Campaign Act, and there’s nothing inherently evil about them. Anyone can have a PAC. You fill out a form and set up a bank account. It’s pretty simple. Unions have PACs, blogs have PACs, communities have PACS. Janitors and teachers pool their money in PACS.
The problem is that people with lots of money use PACs and 527s to get around campaign finance limits. So for example, when chief Reshma backer (and Bloomberg money manager) Steve Rattner was raising money for an independent expenditure to help Joe Lieberman in 2006, he would call up all his rich Wall Street buddies and say “if you’ve already maxed out to Joe, you can still help him out by giving here.”
That was perfectly legal — as opposed to the kickback scheme to shake down New York’s pension system that Rattner’s hedge fund, Quadrangle, engaged in. Quadrangle recently settled with the SEC for $12 million in fines, but Rattner himself did not settle because the SEC wanted to bar him from trading securities for 3 years, and he felt that might conflict with the book he’s planning to publish imparting his financial wisdom to the world.
Anyway, Reshma seems to think that because Rattner and other Masters of the Universe maxed out to her directly, that somehow this makes the money more pure than if she got it through a PAC. Of course she doesn’t really believe this, because in the next breath she blasts her primary opponent Carolyn Maloney for inviting lobbyists to a party at a Carole King concert — you know, the kind of event where individuals like Steve Rattner give candidates money.
Here are just a few of the people who wrote big checks to Reshma. Someone is going to have to explain to me how it’s morally superior to take money directly from people than it is PACS, or how it makes a candidate any less free from the influence of their donors. That’s why campaign finance watchdogs like OpenSecrets don’t make any distinction.
And while they’re at it, they might want to explain to Reshma what her position is on letting the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy expire, because if her answer to Matthews is any indication, she doesn’t appear to know:
| Donor | Amount | Occupation |
|---|---|---|
| SCOBY, JOSEPH | 2400 | Recently retired head of UBS Global Asset Management, world’s largest fund of hedge funds business ($29.85 billion). |
| SEECHARAN, BEESHAM | 2400 | Goldman Sachs |
| SETTY, GAUTAM | 2400 | Minlam Asset Management |
| SHETTY, ROMITA | 2400 | Former Managing Director at Lehman Brothers, ran the Global Special Opportunities group |
| SHETTY, ROMITA | 2400 | Former Managing Director at Lehman Brothers, ran the Global Special Opportunities group |
| SINGH, GAGAN | 2400 | Senior VP, PNC Bank |
| STEINBERG, RUTH | 2400 | Senior VP, Avenue Capital |
| STRICKLER, ELLEN | 2400 | Wife of Dan Strickler, founder of Morgan Stanley’s mergers and acquisitions department in the 1960 and one its of the largest individual shareholders (3.8 million shares) |
| SUNDARAM, RAM | 2400 | Made partner at Goldman Sachs in 2008 after firm got 100 cents on dollar for his trades he insured with AIG, pushing them to the brink of collapse |
| TENENBAUM, ANN | 2400 | Wife of Thomas H. Lee, who founded one of the oldest and largest private equity firms in the world. |
| TUDOR JONES, PAUL | 2400 | Founder, Tudor Investments, worth $6.3 billion, |
| TUDOR JONES, PAUL | 2400 | Founder, Tudor Investments, personal worth of $6.3 billion |
| VARADHAN, ASHOK | 2400 | Goldman Sachs trader who recently payed $16.3 million for a unit at 15 Central Park West |
| WHITE, ANDREW | 2400 | Fortress Investment |
| WHITE, ANDREW | 2400 | Fortress Investment |
| WHITE, MAUREEN | 2400 | Mrs. Steve Rattner |
| WIJEGOONARATNA, S.P. | 2400 | CEO & CIO, Galle Global Macro Partners (Hedge Fund) |
| WIJEGOONARATNA, SRI P. | 2400 | CEO & CIO, Galle Global Macro Partners (Hedge Fund) |
| ZAFAR, KASHIF | 2400 | Managing Director at Barclay’s UK |
| ZAFAR, KASHIF | 2400 | Managing Director at Barclay’s UK |
| ZAFAR, SUJATHA | 2400 | Wife of Kashif Zafar, Managing Director at Barclay’s UK |
| ZAFAR, SUJATHA | 2400 | Wife of Kashif Zafar, Managing Director at Barclay’s UK |
| ZARIN, JUDITH | 2400 | Wife of Gerard Rosenfeld, former head of Lazard-Freres |




51 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Wow. Wonder if the paid Saujani trolls will dare show their faces in this thread?
Reshma Saujani is the kindest, bravest, warmest,
most wonderful human being I’ve ever known in my life.
She may be kind, brave and warm, but she is clearly a Wall Street tool who will NOT have my vote
As opposed to the Independent Democrat who ran against Bill Young in 06 and 08 and had 2 people who gave the max.
Couldn’t tell…was there a /s on that opinion? Just wondering.
I think he just forgot his snark tag (or figured it was implied).
Saujani is a dreadful, inept corporatist candidate. She is an example of the non-choices we keep getting. Bad Democrat runs against bad Democrat in the primary, to be followed by bad Democrat running against bad Republican in the general.
The British Raj was replaced by an equally oppressive Indian Raj.
Good to see more of the same, coming of age in America. /s
Well there you go again, screwing up Saujani’s message with a bunch of pesky facts…
Hello, Captain Manco! Would you hold still for a moment while I show you this playing card?
Allan’s riffing on a line from this movie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Manchurian_Candidate
From The Manchurian Candidate.
What drink am I buying you this afternoon?
Link. Think that sentence can’t be repeated too often.
Reshma Saujani is from what Indian Cast?
Thanks….sorry I missed it….but we got good explanations!
Lovely writing, Jane. Had me chuckling the whole way through. And gettin’ edumacated to boot!
Poor Reshma ~ she doesn’t have a chance now that Jane is on her case.
Apparently, she is not from the backwards looking caste … *g*
Gin and tonic, if you please. Would you like to pass the time with a game of solitaire?
I’m still astonished that she’s so lightweight that Chris Matthews — who was asking her pro forma questions and wasn’t even trying to be mean to her — was able to demolish her without trying.
All part of her campaign slogan … Float like a Butterfly and sting like Aunt Bea …
Her manner makes my skin crawl. Yek.
Michael Whitney has a fresh cross-post available: New Data from BP’s Coverup Firm Shows Dispersants in 20% of Offshore Workers
What’s she doing on Hardball? Wouldn’t she feel more at home on Faux.
Just curious. Why is Rattner allowed to publish and profit from a book deal and the alleged Russian spies are not. I already know Rattner’s story; he’s a damn crook. I’d be more interested in learning the inside details of the alleged spies.
When did we take political refugees from India?
And did you ever see someone so unable to meet the ‘eye’ of the camera?
It really does say it all, doesn’t it.
One of the MOTUs probably pulled a favor and got her on MSNBC after that disastrous WaPo article yesterday (quoted by eCHAN above), hoping she could recover.
They forgot to clue in Matthews that he was not to point out the obvious when she gave her canned answers to questions he wasn’t asking.
That’s only the third time I’ve posted it. I look forward to many more.
She mentioned her parents, who were probably refugees from Sindh, during the Indo-Pak partition.
Better to look at why Quadrangle got off with only 12 million in fines. I recall that Quadrangle management was very dismissive of Rattner and criticized him for his conduct. I do not believe any former NYT reporter has ever done as well as Rattner.
LOL … great work !
And now she’s trying to play “I know you are but what am I?”:
Jane,
“You are a general without an army in a war that you can not win”.
As likable as you are, me thinks it be time for you to pack it in and throw in the towel. You and your miniscule cult following CAN NOT DETHRONE the Democratic and Republican Aristocracies that destroy lives in America and all over the world. Blanche Lincoln has already mopped the floor with you and half term Gov. Sarah Palin is not going away any time soon, if at all, much to your dismay; and Gretchen Carlson and Megyn Kelly of Faux News are more powerful than ever. I find it comically ironic that while you and your “natural allies” on the “fake” left: Obama kool-aid drinkers Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, Joan Walsh, Stephanie Miller, Randi Rhodes, and Ed “Cannon Ball Head” Schultz fiddle, the country and the world burns. With this all star line up for liberal causes no wonder Bill Kristol, Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin are laughing all the way to the bank while the torture and warmongering idiocy continues.
Take my advice, Jane, move to Canada and start an orphanage for abandoned children. That would be a much wiser use of your time and talents rather than trying to bring enlightenment to an American population that is more cretinized than Nicholas Sarkozy of France and the clown prince of fascist right-wing lunacy himself, Rush Limbaugh……………..
As someone who would be “represented” by Saujani (that is to say, I live in that CD in Manhattan), I find her rather scary in a Stepford-wife kind of way.
For example, in this post and the comments there are quotes from a TV interview with Tweety and a posting at Huffington Post which seem rather alike. The really scary part for me is that she was interviewed on NY1 (Time-Warner’s local cable news show) last night, and repeated almost verbatim the exact same quotes to that interviewer.
I guess, to be positive, we know that she can memorize and read her lines rather well.
All Firedoglakers,
The war is over, you can all go home. The far right neoconservatives have won!
Seriously people, until you become prepared to make the ultimate sacrifice, then all of this internet chatter is for naught…………
Well, that makes Saujani highly qualified for Congress, right?
In her bio, she states that her parents were originally from India, but fled Uganda when Idi Amin took over.
And that’s the way it is, July 9, 2010. “The bad, the detestable and the outright disgusting,” a new political saga of our times.
You wasted all that time and bandwidth to post that garbage? Typical reichwinger.
My, my. Aren’t we a little touchy today! Besides, it wasn’t bandwidth wasted at all. It proved a point. You got all bent outta shape shooting the messenger. You don’t have to take my word for anything. The Republicans and the Democrats are ramming all the information you need on the policies they desire right down your throat…………….I merely suggest the wiser course of action and that is to give up this exercise in vanity and futility and to acknowledge that “RAW POWER ALWAYS WINS”
corporation money?
What’s the song: “Don’t know much about history, geography…etc.”
Just to say….Anyone who grew up on “The Little Engine that Could” will never agree that raw power always wins…just do not agree. Even Dick Cheney has been having a pretty bad run; can hardly show his face. Bullies may think they’re having fun; they do not always win.
may you not ever eat it raw, but learn that everything requires preparation, has a season and then courses off.
Ugh. Another Rachel Paulose type waiting for coronation and b
rought to you to you by Wall Street?This should make the road to transforming the Democratic Party about 1000 times harder. Corporations are going to start finding their own candidates to primary Democrats. Obviously they have the power to run a lot of candidates. That should make running progressive candidates against establishment Dems incredibly difficult, particularly since the electorate is so out of touch.
I get suspicious anytime Tweety goes on the warpath. His the ultimate establishment player. And the WaPo article was a total hit piece. If I was the editor I wouldn’t have published it. It makes me wonder if Saujani is actually the good guy here. Can someone name one way that Maloney is better than her?
You are wrong friend. Rocky Balboa does not exist and underdogs always get smashed in the end. It’s time for the common man to accept his fate, that of being the serfs doomed to poverty and misery at the hands of the Aristocracy. Why is this so, because the militan law enforcement arm will make sure that it happens.
Who are you and what is this? Confucious’s last pupil? Why do you people not accept the fact that you are a ragtag army of a renegade general who can not possibly win?
~~~Your comments are welcome, but if this is the sum total of your contribution, perhaps you could shift it to something within the topic.~~~
Thank you, mod. How tactful. ;)
I am not part of any FDL army.
my allegiance is elsewhere.