The Hill has an article today talking about how much Republican Rep. Paul Ryan (WI) and Sen. Judd Gregg (NH) love what the Catfood Commission has been secretly scheming about. The fact that these two radicals admire what is happening in these private meetings is terrifying. But the article does contain an important detail about the depth of the Republicans’ endless infatuation with obstructionism. From The Hill:
While [Democratic co-chairman Erskine] Bowles called for a general spending target, Republicans are pushing for enforceable caps. Gregg suggested making any spending beyond set levels subject to approval of a 67-vote supermajority in the Senate.
Republicans are not happy with a mere 60-vote filibuster threshold and think their ability to obstruct legislation needs to be enhanced even more. Apparently, a year and a half of near-total gridlock has convinced Sen. Gregg that what our government really needs is even more ways for a minority party to bring legislating to a complete standstill. Republicans hate public programs so much they are prepared to subvert the clear Constitutional principle of majority rule in Congress to stop them.
You need to look no further than the complete mess in California caused by its two-thirds requirement for new taxes and passing budgets. Gregg looks at the dysfunction continuously gripping Sacramento and longs to replicate it in Washington, DC.
The great irony is that the Catfood Commission was supposedly created to appease the non-existent invisible bond market vigilantes. Bond market investors supposedly fear that the federal government will be unable to repay its debts in the future. There may be no greater way to make investors afraid of that than to create an almost-insurmountable two-thirds requirement to enact needed reforms, stimulus, economic stabilizers or public investments in new infrastructure.
There is no limit to the Republicans’ desire to obstruct the Constitutional right of the majority Democratic Party to govern. Allowing Republicans to get away with blocking legislation has not made them more willing to compromise; it has resulted only in Republicans asking for more ways to make obstruction easier. It is way past the time for Senate Democrats to finish with this nonsense of the filibuster.





19 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Man, this Gregg is a turkey. He’s so bad I’m surprised Obomba didn’t offer him a cabinet position. Oh, wait . . .
Hell! Why not make it a 100 vote majority. The blue side of the coin (spineless-ausaurus) will go along with it. Good cop/bad cop scenario.
Traitors all!
Rule by the minority party, just like in California. Gregg and his fellow travelers are – straight-up – pure evil. There just isn’t any other way to state it, or if there is, I’m surely incapable of finding it.
Who wants to bet that if and when the majority shifts, Gregg’s call for 67 votes will magically dissipate into thin air?
I never thought I would live to see the day I’d reference Lindsay Lohan as a role model, but Dems need to find out who her nail tech is, have him/her flown to DC and get their response to this crap put on their middle finger, too.
I thought CA was so progressive… Silicon Valley, champion of Gay & Lesbian rights, allow illegal immigrants to build communities and live the dream, land of Nancy Pelosi…
CA has money problems… I don’t believe it.
Obama’s first choice for Commerce Secretary Senator Judd Gregg (R-Evil) need only look to Arnold’s popularity — below Bush levels — to see that his prescription for a two-thirds majority will go nowhere.
FYI: It’s now known as the Sovereign Debt Default Commission. Much scarier to market scolds.
I’d like to modify the vote threshold,
If a Rep (or Senator) votes against a program, then the reps district gets no money from the program whatsoever, and when the presnit signs the legislation any work in progress is defunded immediately and work stops.
Take that NO and shove it.
These Rs are taking advantage, voting no and their districts get the money. No means no $.
I tell ya, Jon Stewart’s Gospel Group has more work than they have any idea what to do with… Here’s another group that FULLY deserves a personal visit from them – today..
Message? Same as it always was in the glaring reality of rethuglican stupidity – “GO F*** YOURSELF”…
…. because this strategy has worked out so well for CA that there’s an initiative in this year’s CA general to get rid of the 2/3rd majority rule.
And yes, Schwartzenegger’s popularity has plummeted as his booted-out predecesser, Grey Davis, correctly predicted it would… much as Davis was not the greatest leader, a lot of the bum rap pinned on him by Republicans was b.s. The only consolation if E-Meg gets elected Gov (please, NO!!!) will be to watch her hammered down in flames by how ineffectual a system this is.
That said, Obamma probably LOVES this suggestion and/or perhaps Gregg agreed to make the suggestion for him. Just more Kabuki show, imo.
What’s your point 0.10001?
Gregg is so sure of the power of his arguments and the rightness of his cause that he doesn’t think he can get 50 people to agree with him.
Affirmative action for Republicans.
Subsidized democracy for righties.
This site is about managed outrage, part of the outrage industry, which is increasingly profitable.
No need to be a hater yo. Just sign up for an account and eventually the SOROS money starts to fall down like rain.
Damn, this post just made me another grand.
There is a 2/3 vote requirement in the Constitution WRT a Presidential veto followed by reconsideration by the legislature:
Constitution Article 1, Section 7:
…If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law….”
So, Gregg and company are screwing with the original intent of the founding fathers that the only time a 2/3 vote is required of the legislature is to override a presidential veto.
Gregg hates America!
I certainly hope not. The Dems are not part of the solution, they are part of the problem.
Curious: do you have any constructive input or are you just here to holler at the natives?
You seem to think that forming another party is the solution. Would you please explain why your party would be something else than a social club. Talk is cheap.
I doubt you can even explain the general legal structures making modern U.S. parties fairly unique.
I’d love to do that too, but it would be unconstitutional, wouldn’t it?
There is no “clear constitutional principle of majority rule in Congress”. Which strategy would you like in place if the elephants try to repeal health reform?
Gregg, Conrad and Orzag all went to the same elite boarding school. It’s nice to be born with a silver broomstick up your…