BP CEO Tony Hayward is testifying before the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigation. The meeting is chaired by Bart Stupak (D-MI). It is expected that the meeting will be interrupted throughout the morning for a series of House votes. You can watch the testimony live on CSPAN 3. You can find part one of the liveblog here.
12:15 – the committee has resumed after breaking for several House votes.
12:22 – Bart Stupak (D-MI) do you believe the government should allow companies with terrible records to continue to drill on public land?Hayward dances around the question without answering.
12:26 – Micheal Burgess (R-TX): I will not be apologizing to you. (Wow that is quick even his fellow committee members seem to be throwing Barton under the bus after his apology to Hayward.)
Is there any other well in the Gulf of Mexico that have the same design. Hayward says there are.
Hayward’s only briefing about the well before the explosion was when they told them they made a discovery. (Great exchange) Hawyard: with respect we drill hundreds of wells a year Burgess: Yeah that is what scares me.
12:34 – Henry Waxman (D-CA) Do BP make a fundamental misjudgment in the well design? Hayward keeps repeating “I wasn’t involved in that decision/discussion.”
Hayward tries to make the case it was an engineering decision but Waxman cites internal documents and claims that it makes it appear that it was an economic decision to use a less safe design.
This will be the standard go to line of the day from Hayward “I’m not prepared to make conclusions until the investigations are complete.”
12:44 – John Sullivan(R-OK): There is mounting evidence that BP has one of the worst safety records in the country. Hayward claims they acknowledge in 2006 they had serious issue and went about change that and the company’s culture. (The number of safety violations compared to BP is shocking) BP had hundreds of safety violations while competitors numbers were in the single digits.
Sullivan: other companies have not had your problems, I venture to say this would not happen if a different oil company was in charge of this well.
12:50 – John Dingell (D-MI) is building the case that the disaster was caused by the decision to cut corners to save time and money. He is going point by point asking how much each of these decision would have cost BP in time and money.
Hayward can’t answer if the decisions were made to save money because he was not there.
12:55 – There was a bit of a back and forward between Stupak and Burgress about getting MMS officials before the committee.
12:56 – The committee is on recess so that members can go to the floor to vote.




43 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Waxman is effectively chastising Hayward
Here’s the email I just got from my money manager friend in Houston:
I hope that all of Houston will show their anger in the voting booth.
how long before Hayward claims those decisions were made before he became CEO?
Houston elected a lesbian D mayor last November.
Everyone knows it’s all W’s fault.
We have a winnah! The safety probs were all in 2005-6 before he became CEO.
Wow.
There are knowedgable oil hands all over Texas. Spent the last few days in Dallas and “BP’s fault” seems to be the general opinion there as well. Every oil hand I talk to here in Austin is of that mind.
I forgot about that. wow!
On the streets?
Jeebus Gawd. He knows nothing about BP before his tenure?
My friend does some D grass roots political volunteering in Houston & Harris county.
He was only a lowly geologist for the company before his meteoric rise to the top.
/snark
Waxman is p.i.s.s.e.d. ~ and the cool British demeanor makes Master Hayward, Esq. look even worse when the setting is American. I doubt the PR people and the disaster consultants factor in this kind of cultural dynamic.
I wonder how he got to the top of that poo pile?
Something my friend told me early on was that BP was in a hurry to cap the well and move the equipment elsewhere, against the advice of Halliburton, Transocean, or whatever other corps that were involved in the decision making. Hayward seems to deny there was any disagreement as I was typing this comment.
Bio here.
The “why have I been forced to deal with these ignorant peasants?” smirk drove me nuts. I had to give up watching the little prick.
Waxman should NOT have sent him the questions…lawyers made his answers
Yeah, recess!
Ron Reagan on CNN,that oil discovered in our waters goes to THE GLOBAL OPEN MARKETS,not to Americans per se……….why isnt this trumpeted
As Thom Hartmann has stated, we should refer to them as Corporate Felon BP.
oy a dumbass on CNN live,dont know if they were negligent or not
The “drill in the Gulf and drill in ANWR” crowd don’t want yer basic Murican to know that. Many think that oil taken from the Gulf goes in only our gas tanks. Low info voters, keepin’ ‘em that way.
It’s a British schoolboy thing … truly. He can’t help it. Inbred.
It’s starting to sound to me like the congressmembers know more about the accident than Hayward does!
yes, the rig was to go to Alaska to close a well up there
I know. I grew up and went to school with one. His dad was with the British Embassy. We were great friends through high school. Lost contact after I went into the Navy.
C-Span callers …
One says Hayward is “arrogant.” Rut-roh. PR/disaster consultant FAIL.
Another says this all is the result of 15 years of lax regulations.
A 3rd from Texas says “first of all … Barton does not represent Texans!!!!” Angry as hell.
Tony obviously considers himself more than a bit of a “toff”, SD, and hoi poloi have NO idea how difficult it is to “do” the stiff-upper-lip thingy (just try it, any one unfortunate enough to be nearby is certain to appreciate it), especially if speaking through the nose while looking down said nose, as someone in Tony’s lofty position cannot help but do.
Bee Pee’s …lp (“they” all kind of sound that way, but it IS the finest kabuki money can buy … just wait ’til the lawyers start up. Will the Brit lawyers each wear a whig? That will be fine, long-lived entertainment, for a couple of generations, both during … and after).
DW
“BP is a strong and viable company and it is in all out best interest that it remain so.”
Yeah, this well wasn’t going to be put into operation until some time in the future.
I can’t wait to see BP barristers in their wigs. Ratty, nasty old things.
.
Never mind. Not worth it.
This has to be the most misunderstood thing of all!!!!
“Domestic” oil resources, my ass! What a fucking talking point that has people voting against their own interests to support ONLY one thing: the increasing profits of the Oil Barons!!!
Thank you.
The whigs are disreputable and mangy looking things, too …
;~DW
[Reposted from Part I]
Wow, some real fireworks between ranking member Burgess and Stupak there at the end. Stupak was adjourning (for another hour) when Burgess interrupted, demanding that MMS get its butt before the committee to explain its role. Stupak got testy, saying that they have decided on a rigorous procedure, that they have two more meetings scheduled. But he didn’t state that MMS would definitely testify.
Hmmmm….
LOL
I just enjoy giving “them” a little added “aitch”, once in a while, SD.
DW
Yeah. Get Salazar and all his sycophantic underlings in there. The continuing arrogance and ineptness of Interior needs full exposure.
The Brits have a saying when someone irritates them that “he really gets up my nose.” Tony does that for me. Arrogance personified.
That was a quote from the President. He thinks BP is ‘too big too fail.’
This just in.
Picture of Tony Hayward prepping this morning for today’s hearing.