Faced with one of its worst budget crises in years, the state of California must cut many important services and contemplate raising taxes and imposing new fees. Legalizing, regulating and taxing cannabis is a huge potential source of state revenue. According to California’s State Board of Equalization, the revenue from legalizing and taxing cannabis should net the state roughly $1.4 billion annually. While that alone would not solve the budget crisis, it would help.
The state budget is a zero-sum game and services need to be funded. By failing to legalize and tax cannabis, the state is choosing to bypass potential revenue. Seen another way, to keep cannabis illegal, the state needs to cut $1.4 billion in needed public services or increase other taxes by $1.4 billion.
Below is a list of benefits the state of California could buy if it chose to generate that $1.4 billion by legalizing and regulating the use of cannabis by adults.
- Hire 23,000 teachers, police officers or firefighters.1
- Give quality private health insurance, with fully paid premiums, to 100,000 families.2
- Provide health insurance through SCHIP to 1 million children.3
- Let 51,000 students a year attend a University of California school for zero out-of-pocket, including tuition, books, room and board, transportation and other costs.4
- Provide every undergraduate in the California State University network, another state higher-education system, with $4,026, effectively paying the university fee for 307,000 full-time undergraduates.5
- Cut tuition by $2250 for every one of the roughly 600,000 undergraduate and graduate students attending a CSU or UC school. That’s a 45 percent reduction at CSU and 20 percent at UC. 6
- Send every adult living in the state a $50 cannabis-tax dividend check.7
- Provide maximum unemployment benefits for a full year to 59,000 jobless Californians.8
- Fully fund the Department of Parks and Recreation (keeping state parks from getting closed) and the Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs purely with the revenue from the tax on cannabis–with millions left over.9
- Fully fund the annual budget of the City of Anaheim.10
The question is, what will you to sacrifice to keep cannabis illegal?
When voters decide whether to legalize, regulate and tax cannabis this November, the question should not be whether they like or dislike the idea. The real question is, how much will they sacrifice to keep marijuana off the books?
The negative consequences of prohibition are significant. Is keeping cannabis illegal worth having 23,000 teachers lose their jobs? Is it worth adding $2,000 to the tuition of more than half a million students at the state’s public universities? Is it worth denying a million children health insurance or closing many of the state’s beautiful parks?
This is the type of cost-benefit analysis voters should make before they choose how to cast their ballots.
[citations after the jump]
Citations:
The California State Board of Equalization concluded AB 390, a bill to legalize and tax cannabis, would raise $1.382 billion in new revenue for the state annually.
1. Assuming an annual compensation package of $60,000, within the range for those professions in California.
2. In 2008, average premiums for private employer-provided health insurance in California were $12,254.
3. In 2007, the average cost to provide a child with SCHIP coverage in California was around $1,200.
4. Assuming a $27,000-per-year cost of attending UC as an in-state student, including books, tuition, room and board and other expenses, which is in line with projected costs from Davis and Los Angeles.
5. 307,196 full-time undergraduates attend the CSU system and the State University fee is $4026 a year.
6. Assuming an average fee or tuition at CSU of roughly $5,000 a year and tuition at UC of $11,000.
7. $1.382 billion divided by the adult population of California, which is roughly 27,500,000.
8. The maximum unemployment benefit of $450 a week for 52 weeks equals $23,400 a year.
9. Figures for the budget of the Department of Parks and Recreation and Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs.
10. Budget of the City of Anaheim (PDF) is roughly $1.3 billion.
[Download a list of these citations here (PDF).]




31 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Only if they criminalize growing your own.
They could make you buy a license to grow your own.
Legalization needs to be sold first and foremost as a new source of revenue (Californians love when someone else pays their taxes), and secondly as a way to reduce incarceration costs (once again saving taxpayers money).
I think that’s where the “Tax Cannabis” campaign is already headed, but much more needs to be done between now and November to raise public awareness of these issues.
read the report from the board. They calculated assume some people will grow their own. I brew my own beer but I’m part of that .1% minority of Americans that do. My homebrewing really does not change the beer tax revenues.
Wonderful Jon, Just what CA needs – to hire MORE employees & further subsidize private insurers! I ask a different, perhaps politically incorrect question on this site: What accountability will pot users agree to accept for their actions while under the influence?
A lot of the reason more people don’t brew their own beer is that it is so inexpensive, even with rather high taxes. I’m curious about how much they calculate legalized marijuana will sell for on average. The more it costs, the more people will be inclined to grow their own.
I’m sure California Republicans will demand that the windfall be offset by tax cuts for the wealthy
Skimming the pdf, I get the impression their calculations probably use the existing medical marijuana pricing structure as a reference. Might not be entirely accurate but pretty much the only real world model available.
While demanding a balanced budget.
Heh, it’s really and literally a No Brainer.
Legalize and Tax It!
You would think so but the no brain crowd typically makes statements like the following.
“What about the children?! Won’t somebody please think of the children!?”
-Helen Lovejoy
A BIG YUP Kelly! Anything else is just stooopid! Duh the state needs the money to help the most vulnerable in the state! Not to give Tax cuts for the rich asses of the state… ☻ ☻
Literally no brain?
I literally died laughing! :)
I’m constantly amazed that the snack food industry doesn’t push hard for legal weed.
I dunno, .1% may be into some microbrewing, but as we speak, I have 12 girls basking in the California sun, and several of my neighbors who are now buying legally at medical dispensaries will certainly grow their own.
We need universal healthcare instead of relying upon some loopy tax schemes which avoid confronting the moral as well as economic underpinnings of America’s/California’s failed health care system.
Did you know that former President Jimmy Carter signed into law the tax exempt home brewing of beer by persons 21 and older in amounts of 100 gallons per year (200 gallons per household) – Senate Amendment 3534. (However, the states still had the right to deny homebrewing). This came 45 years after the repeal of Prohibition.
During the Great Depression, there was a major decrease in revenue from income. The government then increased the taxes on alcohol to generate revenue. It is time to use that philosophy for cannabis.
um, isn’t there a federal law saying marijuana is illegal — NULLIFICATION!
A state trying to pass laws that fly in the face of established (and, actually in this case, tested) federal laws! Californians should realize that this war has been fought and lost!
The lawsuits, which the state cannot win, will drain the state coffers (but they are already empty…) and drain energy away from important issues, like fighting Prop 8 — which merely upholds another established federal law (guess that is not a good example).
At least when proponents go back to their pre-civil war era existence… they won’t care… but they’ll have the munchies!
And so- efforts to overturn, block, roll back the health insurance industry/ government cabal known as ‘health care reform’ (where maybe the tag line ought to be: Health Care Reform — If You Won’t Pay Wellpoint Directly, We’ll Send the IRS After You!) — are apparently just as admirable.
I urge all reasonable thinking, pro-choice Americans to support the Health Care Freedom Act in Arizona, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Florida when it appears on the ballot in those states — and get California to get on board as well!
http://www.azhealthcarefreedom.com for those of you who care…
We should insist on the government ending the War on drugs ( among many other wars) and use that money (between Federal and State something on the order of 60 billion per year) towards HC.
Unless there were multiple creations, pot was in the garden of Eden and the religious right should get behind the legalize marijuana initiative. After all,God said to Adam all in the garden was mankind’s for the taking. Ain’t nature grand!
Just what we need. Another regressive tax.
Federal marijuana prohibition is a fully unconstitutional religious prohibition based on Exodus 22:18 Thou shall not suffer a witch to live.
Here is a nice book on the issue as world history, I highly recommend it,
Marijuana – The First Twelve Thousand Years
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/histor…
Marijuana is completely harmless and a very useful medicine. From FOXN,
Are You Cannabis Deficient?
http://health.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/10/are-…
That means the argument used to regulate it as interstate commerce is totally bogus.
That is also why even though weed is completely harmless, it is scheduled all wrong, and they refuse to change it. Like including Native Americans in the religion section at Borders Books, it would rip a hole in their space/time/legal argument continuum, granting us equal rights, including the right to keep OUR property.
You see when it gets to American Indians, and our religions based on smoking things, the Doctrine of Discovery gives white men the right to take away everything we have.
How else do you think they have gotten away with drug war asset seizures that are completely unconstitutional? There is a legal precedent.
From our constitution,
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF (smoking pot); or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
From my church,
Cultivation and enjoyment of Cannabis sacrament is a fundamental human right provided by God and protected by the first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is our opinion that Cannabis is the original sacrament of Hebrew, Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Shinto, Buddhist, Rasta and more, and fulfills the prophesies to ‘raise up for them a plant of renown…’
http://www.thc-ministry.org/
Our church was raided by the IRS not too long ago.
VIDEO: Hilo marijuana ministry open after federal raid
http://www.bigislandvideonews.com/2010/03/14/vi…
Do you think the supreme court is going to rule against the first amendment freedom of religion? Because I don’t. I think we actually have freedom of religion.
Reverend Lauren Unruh
THC Ministry
Pleasant Hill, Ca
http://www.saferchoice.org/
Not a fan of the drug war either but isn’t Prop 13 what’s in bad need of reform?
Artifically low property taxes disproportionally benefit the rich.
Even more, Prop 13 disproportionally benefits large corporations. Before Prop 13 75% of CA property tax revenue was paid by commercial property. Now 75% is paid by residential property. A complete switch of tax responsibility, as well as a starve the commons approach toward feudalism.
do you think americans will ever give up their imperialism around the world to have money for these social programs.
naw not in the near future most americans are imperialists to the core.
southern states even raise the children to fight in these wars for profits.
and call their children heros for fighting in these wars.
the parents get a sense of pride to say their kid is killing iraqis for their personal freedoms.
I wondeer how many germans knew their country was an imperialist country but could say nothing.
with this new corp controlled supreme court the day may come we americans cannot speak out about our imperialism.
I wonder if the $1.4 billion is actually an understatement?
When I was in the Federal penitentiary in the mid-’90′s for growing medical cannabis, California’s Prop 215 was the most hopeful, inspiring thing that happened to me other than the warmth, love and support I got from the cannabis community and my wife, friends and family. I love California, and would love to retire there someday.
Probably something like 15% of the folks who were there, were there for a cannabis “offense” [sic]. I wonder what the savings would be in California when cannabis lovers are no longer harassed and imprisoned? It may be a lot: I recall that Prop 215′s main funding came from the California Prison Guard’s union (whatever its name was).
In any event, relegalization in Cali would open the floodgates. I’ve still got my Big Bambu paper; I’ve been saving it for nearly 40 years now for the day I can roll up a phattie and smoke it legally. It may yet happen in my lifetime–and if it does, Cali will deserve the credit.
Nice post ~a
CORRECTION:
I meant the OPPOSITION to Prop 215 in 1996 came mainly from the California Prison Guard’s union, and if there was that much money going to them because of the oppressive law, then there must be a lot of cannabis prisoners.
I wonder how much money California would save by firing some of those little nazis and closing down some unneeded jails?
Though some extra income for the state coffers would be a great benefit, the most crucial need is for an end to criminalization and disenfranchisement of people for using an herbal that they find helpful. Jailing and destroying people’s lives who wish to use cannabis is not acceptable.
If some people wish to invest the time and effort it would take to grow medical quality cannabis in my opinion that is similar to someone growing other gourmet produce or herbals. Not everyone is inclined or talented in doing that sort of thing, and for most consumers it would be easier to simply buy it.
Off Topic but i wanted highlight a new report by the National Institute for Health Care Reform that I thought Jon and the regulars would find interesting–
Health Coverage for the High-Risk Uninsured: Policy Options for Design of the Temporary High-Risk Pool
The buried lede is that HHS is in a mad sprint to provide a federal high-risk pool by July 1 for residents of the 18 or so states that’ve opted out of creating a state-run risk pool. There’s no practical way HHS can do this without opening a can of worms near and dear to our hearts. :o)
Administration of the program in non-contracting states. In the states that have chosen not to participate in the risk pool program, HHS appears to have three basic options: 1) operate through Medicare; 2) contract with the national Blue Cross arrangement that serves Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) enrollees or with another national carrier; or 3) contract with private nonprofit entities in each state. The last seems least practical: if there were states where HHS could not find a contractor, it would have to use the Medicare or national carrier option as a backup. It would probably be more efficient to settle on one or the other for all non-participating states…
Using Medicare as the coverage vehicle for pools also could raise political concerns; some might perceive this approach as a step toward a single-payer program…. The national carrier option might or might not be workable….. Under FEHBP, the plans have no involvement with processing applications and enrollments or collecting premiums; these functions are performed by employing agencies. Some entity would be needed to perform these tasks.
http://www.nihcr.org/High-RiskPools.html#section9
Interesting, thanks I will keep on eye on how this develops.
I just donated AGAIN to Bill Halter’s campaign. PLEASE Everyone, this Primary is VERY important and we can help make it happen! Obama & team refused to listen to the message we sent via Martha Coakley. It will be IMPOSSIBLE for Obama & team,Reid & Pelosi to run away from Blanche “the shill” Lincoln’s primary defeat! It would be a real shame to sit on the sidelines & miss this enormous opportunity. http://www.actblue.com/page/halterrunoff?refcode=bh2&gclid=CKjLlLnki6ICFSEjawodClpRUw
No problem Jon. I see that HHS already has the special Medicare expansion for Libby Montana already up and running (you can’t say that Max Baucus doesn’t take care of his constituents). Funny that the White House didn’t add this to list of “immediate benefits” of the HCR law.
You can also come to the Old City Hall, 609 Mineral Avenue, Libby, MT beginning May 17, 2010, from 8:00 to 4:30 Monday through Friday to file an application
http://www.socialsecurity.gov/libby/faqs.htm
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/22/818225/-The-Tommy-Douglas-of-Libby,-Montana