Republicans who want to destroy our social safety net, meant to help regular Americans when they fall on hard times, are fighting tooth and nail to protect corporate profits. GOP Senators James Inhofe (R-OK) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) are trying to stop attempts to lift the liability cap on oil companies’ offshore drilling.
Currently, the laughably low $75 million cap privatizes the profit but socializes the risk of a catastrophe like we are now seeing in the Gulf of Mexico. Democrats want to raise the cap and by doing so, force companies to bear full financial responsibility for their actions.
The Republican argument against raising the cap is that without corporate welfare and the promise of a government bailout if anything goes wrong, some companies might find the risky business no longer profitable enough to undertake:
Inhofe also said that raising the cap by such a drastic amount would hurt independent oil producers, since all but the largest oil companies could weather such a large liability cap.
That is an amazing statement from a supposed believer in the “free market.” It’s also complete nonsense. Smaller companies don’t need to weather the liability alone. They can buy insurance to spread the risk. If, without a corporate welfare program, a company no longer takes an action because the cost of insuring against potential liability makes that action unprofitable, that is a good thing. That is how the market should work, without moral hazard. We don’t want companies taking foolish risks that are only profitable because the taxpayers have promised a bailout if anything goes wrong.
The Republicans love corporate welfare, privatized profit, socialized losses and endless bailouts. They fought against universal single-payer government-run health insurance for middle-class families, but they think a de facto version for oil companies is a great idea. That’s what the liability cap is: the government insuring corporations against their own risky behavior.
If anyone should be protected from the harshest aspects of the free market, it’s regular people, not corporations. I support single-payer health insurance because the market should not be choosing who lives and dies, who gets treatment and who suffers. I’m more than happy, though, for the market to decide which corporations live and die. Let the market decide which actions by oil companies are too risky to be profitable, and which companies should go bankrupt for their mistakes.
Senate Republicans want a government welfare program to protect oil companies from the market and socialize their risk. The poor oil companies need a government safety net. The health of the average person can be subject to the whims of the free market.
Republicans actually support “socialism,” government-run insurance and bailouts–for big companies. Will crusading for unlimited benefits for irresponsible oil powers be a winning campaign message for Republicans in the midterm elections? If Democrats can’t capitalize on this ridiculous hypocrisy, they don’t deserve to win either.
Update – Sadly it looks like Democrats are maybe not going to capitalize on this Republican hypocrisy and in fact the Obama administration might be jumping on the “protect unlimited bailouts for oil companies” bandwagon.




25 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
This is a darn good read. Thanks.
So very true and so inevitable that Republicans won’t be called on it.
No back bone on the demos side for sure. Corp. shills just like the repugs.
But… but… but… Corporations are people, too!
At an Anchorage Chamber of Commerce luncheon Monday, all three members of the Alaska legislative delegation strongly supported expanded offshore drilling and opening up drilling in the arctic:
Single payer lives!
Thanks for telling it like it is, Jon.
Hey, GOP? No more idiotic free-market blah-blah from you douchebags. It’s over.
Oh, jeebus, I just read your update. Is there any opportunity to skewer the GOP as the protector of corporate privilege that the Obama Administration will not squander?
“If Democrats can’t capitalize on this ridiculous hypocrisy, they don’t deserve to win either.” I agree fully, Jon. Yet, come Nov. how many posters & visitors to this site will vote to return “their” Dem. Representatives to Washington?
I was wrong to say I’ll vote against EVERY Democrat at every level come Nov., I see that now. My modified strategy is to vote against every EVERY Democratic Incumbant & where there’s a choice of newbies, decide (not by party affiliation) who will be most likely to stand up to the enormous corporate influence he/she will face.
fyi: Link to very strong Economicsofcontent post, “Merkley-Levin is a joke” follows: http://economicsofcontempt.blogspot.com/2010/05/merkley-levin-is-joke.html
Simple solution to ‘protect little oil’; liability will be limited to one half of market capitalization. Such would protect ‘wildcatters’ because they aren’t market capitalized (usually venture capital) and would surely provide incentive to ‘big oil’ to do their ‘thing’ with all possible precautions as half their capitalization (read stock price) would be gone. And possibly -one can only hope- the entire corproate structure.
So is Soilent Green.
BP is clearly, at this point, a criminal enterprise, even before this current ongoing disaster. Why is the GOP protecting this planet-befouler?
Oh, I think there is lots of hypocricy to go around. Ask Obama about his free press signing without any press questions.
But, for this issue, there should be no liability limit.
I should note, there is a difference between someone who does nothing and demands to get contributed to, and a group of people working hard and doing something who ask for help on something.
But, but, but … if they were to actually skewer the GOP for protecting the corporations, their hypocrisy would show!
You know, if they would only share. They don’t have to have ALL the money, you know. Letting Social Security exist would be a nice gesture.
It’s almost as if the First Family is being held hostage by these powerful money forces and no threat is too terrible. That would explain a lot of O’s caving. I’m just sayin’…
That’s right. It’s not just Republicans but Democrats who have been bought by Big Oil.
Isn’t this moral hazard implicit in the very notion of incorporation? Fundamentally any shelter from liability results in the incentive for taking on greater risk, no?
As I was reading your excellent blog, I was thinking Obama wouldn’t ever pass up a chance to screw up a starving person’s last chance at a meal, if instead, he could give taxpayer money to, not just any corporation, but a foreign corporation that didn’t really need it. Then, I reached the update.
If Obama isn’t as close to pure evil as it’s possible to get in an imperfect world, evil doesn’t exist.
The only thing free in the market these guys promote is the handouts to them and their corporate patrons. All others pay cash or GTFO. The shameless hypocrisy, self-centeredness and self-dealing is alarming, even when you expect it.
So, the solution is to elect a suicidal, childless, spouseless President. That way the “powerful money forces” won’t have any leverage with their threats?
Huh? Since the Dems and the Reps are in the same bed with the same corporations, exactly who is squandering what with whom? Oh, I see, you still think there are two political parties. The bad news: there aren’t; the good news: there could be. Peace brother.
Good catch.
In truth, Congress has been bailing out (subsidizing) Big Oil, Big Ag, Big Whatever for so long they don’t even have the sense to hide what they are up to. To them, and let’s face it, a lot of their constiuents, pork is yummy, as long as it’s on their plate.
I wouldn’t single Republicans out though. Democrats have never met a bailout or a pork program they didn’t like … unless it benefits someone else’s district over theirs.
So they can share the same SuperMax cells with the Oil Company pals!! Tyrone will love these guys… chomp..chomp…chomp…
Republicans? Democrats? What’s the difference? They’re all in bed with the big corporations. Let’s face it: our political system is broken.
What are my suggestions? As one prior comment says: really look at who you vote for the next time. To the extent possible, vote out all incumbents. Yes, the newer pols will likely be bought off, too, but if they keep getting voted out (aka Specter and Lincoln), just maybe we can have a dampening effect on the currently raping and pillaging.
Good post, though. I’m all for keeping this information out where all can see it. Too many citizens are unaware of what’s really going on. Anyway to have the info available is good.
Libertarian readers of NakedCapitalism concur that BP should pay all damages, even if it puts them out of business:
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/05/what-is-the-proper-libertarian-response-to-the-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill.html