Yesterday Barack Obama’s Office of National Drug Control Policy released its National Strategy for Drug Control. While the strategy was spun by Drug Czar Gil Kerlikowske as one focusing on prevention and treatment over enforcement and criminal prosecutions, the amount of money spent proportionally is the same as during the Bush Administration. Meet the new boss…
The strategy devotes 64 percent of the budget to traditional supply reduction strategies like enforcement and interdiction while reserving only 36 percent for demand reduction approaches like treatment and prevention. And, due to accounting changes made under the Bush administration and maintained by Obama, the budget ratio doesn’t even take into account some costs of the “war on drugs” such as incarceration.
That’s from the good folks at Law Enforcement Against Prohibition, a group of cops, prosecutors, and other law enforcement officials speaking out for sensible drug laws. They were quick to jump on the Obama strategy as “just like the old ‘drug war’ approach.”
“The drug czar is saying all the right things about ending the ‘war on drugs’ and enacting a long-overdue balanced strategy focused on a public health approach,” said former Balitmore police officer and incoming LEAP leader Neil Franklin. ”Unfortunately the reality of the budget numbers doesn’t match up to the rhetoric.”
Equally disconcerting about the Obama drug strategy is its fierce opposition to marijuana legalization. From the strategy document (PDF):
We have many proven methods for reducing the demand for drugs. Keeping drugs illegal reduces their availability and lessens willingness to use them. That is why this Administration firmly opposes the legalization of marijuana or any other illicit drug. Legalizing drugs would increase accessibility and encourage promotion and acceptance of use. Diagnostic, laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological studies clearly indicate that marijuana use is associated with dependence, respiratory and mental illness, poor motor performance, and cognitive impairment, among other negative effects, and legalization would only exacerbate these problems.
Forgetting the fact that alcohol and prescription drugs also have many of those “negative effects,” there’s little evidence to support the claim that prohibition reduces availability or demand. Indeed, if marijuana were controlled and regulated, it would be significantly more difficult for minors to obtain marijuana than it is under prohibition, where almost anyone can get it off the street or in their schools.
Obama has repeatedly expressed his opposition to legalization, while Drug Czar Kerlikowske has been more sympathetic to marijuana. As police chief of Seattle, Kerlikowske said that arrests for personal marijuana use are “not a priority.” Earlier this year, Kerlikowske declined to speculate on the federal government’s response if a state such as California were to legalize marijuana.
While not surprising, the administration’s firm opposition to legalization is indicative of the government’s backwards strategy to combatting the Mexican drug cartels and the harder drugs they peddle – a key focus of the rest of the continued not-war on drugs.
The National Drug Control Strategy calls for mafia-like prosecutions of the Mexican cartels, in addition to increased enforcement targeting the cartels’ grow operations in national parks. But the main emphasis against the cartels seems to be a focus on disrupting the cartel leadership and seizing drugs, guns, and money. The reality of the situation though means that strategy is like whack-a-mole. Even by disrupting the leadership and seizing resources, those holes will be filled in a matter of time.
The FBI admits that “marijuana is the top revenue generator for Mexican cartels,” allowing the violent border gangs to finance their operations for guns, cocaine, heroin, and other hard substances. They call it “a cash crop that finances corruption and the carnage of violence year after year.”
It’s clear that if the administration really wants to continue – and win – a War on Drugs, the fastest, cleanest, best way to do so is to cut off the cartels’ bloodstream by legalizing marijuana. But of course, that’s just too easy. Cause drugs are bad, mmkay?





37 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Lots of backward leaning from the staunchly “forward looking” Obama.
(Perfect “skills” for doing the limbo. How low can he go?)
To coin a new and exclusive phrase; “Who could have imagined?”
DW
Phun Phactoids:
Last time I looked, it was estimated that 20-25 million Americans smoke more than a 1/4 ounce of marijuana each week. That works out to roughly 680 joints every SECOND.
The street price of commercial pot (known as “regs”) is $10 per gram. This has not changed in nearly 20 years.
The fact that marijuana is the prime cause of drug violence along the Mexican border is an insult to America’s farmers, teh pot is the #1 cash crop in several states.
I need one of those single serve websites that when you press a button it says “No one could have predicted.” And then I’ll just link to that in every post about Obama from here on out.
I’m not sure about those numbers; I do know that arrests are skyrocketing in the not-war on drugs. Check out this graph:
http://www.norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=7042
let’s compare and contrast, shall we ?
from Frontline:
drones are good, mmkay ?
This opposition to legalization is necessary in order to keep the prices for soldiers’ equipment low (if you think that price you hear bandied about on the ‘net — $1M per soldier in Afghanistan is high, it will be much higher without the cheap prison/slave labor used to support them).
From http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?kaid=108&subid=900003&contentid=255055
“Most domestic prison industries limit sales of goods to particular approved customers. UNICOR, for example, sells its signs, eyeglasses, electrical gear, and office furniture to the Defense Department and a few other federal agencies.
From http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8289
“According to the Left Business Observer, the federal prison industry produces 100% of all military helmets, ammunition belts, bullet-proof vests, ID tags, shirts, pants, tents, bags, and canteens. Along with war supplies, prison workers supply 98% of the entire market for equipment assembly services; 93% of paints and paintbrushes; 92% of stove assembly; 46% of body armor; 36% of home appliances; 30% of headphones/microphones/speakers; and 21% of office furniture. Airplane parts, medical supplies, and much more: prisoners are even raising seeing-eye dogs for blind people.
From http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/may2000/pris-m08.shtml
“The growth of prison labor has directly led to the destruction of other workers’ jobs. For example, Lockhart Technologies, Inc. closed its plant in Austin, Texas, dismissing its 150 workers so that it could open shop in a state prison in Lockhart. The prisoners assemble circuit boards for industrial giants such as IBM, Compaq and Dell. Lockhart is not required to pay for health or any other benefits. The company must pay the prison the federal minimum wage for each laborer, but the inmates get to keep only 20 percent of that.
Lots of apple carts will be upset if, in a burst of sanity, legalization occurred.
It should be noted that Kerlikowske was responding to Seattle voters in saying cannabis arrests were not a priority. Initiative 75 passed while he was police chief.
Question. Even though the people in California approved of legalizing marijuana for medical use, I heard that the feds were still busting up pot shops. Shouldn’t the Feds support what States decide to do? I know, really stupid question, but, as California is one of the states that is looking at a Legalize Marijuana Bill, I’m wondering how the Federal Drug Strategy will affect Our Bill, if it passes. I can only ask for speculations.
Interesting double-talk. Opposes legalizing drugs because they are illicit – i.e. prohibited by law. One doesn’t legalize drugs that are not illicit; only illicit drugs get legalized.
It is time once again to start talking about the “prison industrial complex”. From plantation slavery to store credit slavery to prison industrial slavery – the evolution of the US slave system.
Exactly. We jail more of our own people than any major nation outside of China — and much if not most of it is for things that shouldn’t be illegal.
You wanna know what I think? I think a hit or two at lunch time for the congress might yield us more results than the four martini lunches they currently enjoy.
Or, brownies.
yeah, right.
These guys haven’t even read their own studies and reports, have they?
That the drugs are illegal is what drives the criminal activity – we learned that with prohibition, or should have learned it.
Decriminalizing pot, if nothing else, will go a long way toward improving things.
Geez, I’m beginning to think John McCain would have been no worse than Obama. Talk about false advertising – Obama is nowhere close to being a liberal or a progressive. He sounds more like Bush I or a more conservative Bill Clinton.
Still no recognition at all of the ill effects on society of The War On Drugs.
They don’t have time to read. They’re busy with the vaseline and the lobbyists and their stupid hearings and 4 martini lunches.
So, you would think that at least their “aides” would be reading and giving them the dummy notes. But, no. Their aides are out buying the booze, setting up the meetings, etc. Also, giving stupid interviews to the msm. Blah, blah.
Actually the Feds have pretty much disappeared since Eric Holder became AG. The problem in LA is the DA is a right wing prick, he’s the one directing the most recent busts. Also, the City Council just passed a law that attempts to cut the number of dispensaries from over a thousand to just 70. I get the feeling that the owners of those 70 just hit the lottery.
But here’s the bigger issue. We can vote to legalize it in November, and once we do that the floodgates are going to open up. Marijuana is already the biggest cash crop in California by far, and once it becomes legal every head west of the Mississippi is going to come here for their vacation. The economic impact to California will reach $30 billion or more, IMHO. And THAT will spell the beginning of the end for the “war on drugs.”
Might even be required, post Obama, Michael.
Who can … um … er … ah … say?
DW
Not to mention funding our education system. I heard that there had been some loophole in the law about dispensaries. I haven’t seen the wording of the bill, but I heard that it might include a clause about growing one’s own. Do you have info on that?
Well if the laws we currently have so discourage drug usage why is there even a need for a special war on drugs?
What this sounds like is a rationale to keep a cash cow. The laws don’t work but if we got rid of them then the enforcement industry that has grown up around them would be threatened. Can’t have that.
The drug czar is mandated by law to take these positions, even when he/she disagrees with them:
http://www.drugwarrant.com/articles/drug-czar-required/
It’s up to us to win in California to change the tide.
Is he required by law to say stuff like this, in the face of facts?
Poor motor performance and cognitive impairment? Tell that to Canadian Olympic Gold Medalist (in freestyle snowboarding no less) Ross Rebagliati. After finding marijuana in Ross’s system the Olympic committee initially tried to take his medal away, but eventually had to give it back. It seems that M-J wasn’t on the list of banned substances, and besides they didn’t want to precipitate an international incident by claiming it to be performance-ENHANCING. heh heh heh
Anyway, it’s obvious from the arguments of the prohibitionists that it is they who suffer from cognitive impairment.
Yes. Click the link, mate. He’s mandated by law to lie. Irony doesn’t even begin to describe it.
He’s required to oppose any attempts to legalize, no matter what the facts say. Even if it means lying.
Jane has a fresh cross-post up: Mediaite: Don’t Set Yourself Up as Judge If You’re Not Willing to Do the Legwork
Just another example of how this Administration has disappointing so many.
This administration is beyond redemption
Anytime, anyone listens to the feds on drug use and prevention, you will get bamboozled, and out tax dollars pay for all this public consumption of crappola.
Being from Arizona, it does not take a rocket designer to understand that the white supremecists have hooked up with the drug cartels, and together are importing the illegal drugs manufactured in Mexico and all points South. In the meantime, my family is ‘checked’ and the usual response among my family members is that “the white folks, ain’t got a clue to what’s happening.” But if one listens to McCain and Kyl, sending the National Guard to “secure” the border, is just more of this self-inflicted “BamaBoozlement”.
Jaango
Has anyone heard of the Flores Family?
Nah, I didn’t think so.
The former Minutemen and still white supremecists, invaded the Flores home and killed some family members while in search of drugs and monies in order to finance their political beliefs.
To wit, what the Feds continue to “market and sell” has a deadly impact at the local level.
And in reference to my post above, as well, an Arizona rancher from Southeastern Arizona was killed. The law enforcement ‘team’ tracked a trail some 20 miles in distance, and naturally, this trail led into Mexico. A couple of weeks later, this law enforcement team is quietly speaking that the suspected killer did not enter into Mexico and is considered a citizen of the USA. However, I find it interesting that law enforcement team won’t say if the suspected killer is a “non-minority” or not. And from this standpoint, it’s almost a certainty that this suspected killer is “non-minority”. And that’s Arizona Logic, given that Southeastern Arizona is a haven for ‘drug growing’ especially since this geographical location is rural and comprised mostly of federal, tribal, and state lands.
I love prohibition! Thaaaaat’s right! I love prohibition! As the Obaminator notes, prohibition helps reduce demand for substances and so I think he should immediately apply it to tobacco and alcohol, too! Then, there’d be no demand for these two horrific poisons! Yay! Everybody’s a winner!
…wait, what? Prohibition’s already been tried, failed, and hung out to dry wrt booze? Oh noes! It can’t be! Well, at least we’re not sending out mexed missages regarding our moralistic stances on how to control (or leave to bloody gangs to control) our substances.
I’d have zero problem with prohibition if they were at least consistent. BUT, these schmucks can have their booze and smokes, but I can’t vaporize my favorite nuggets? Fuck that. Kiss my bud-tokin’ ass.
Jaango,
How you and bmaz maintain your sanity in the ‘Zone, surrounded by your fellow “citizens” who’ve gone rather amok is a wonder to me.
I suspect you are both, in some way, “used” to “it”, but things out your lovely and magnificent way have gone quite downhill since the days of Barry Goldwater, it would seem.
Do you have any reason to imagine that things might change?
There must be more thoughtful people than you and bmaz, and the two other intrepid souls whom I know in Arizona, working for change?
In any case, you are all in my thoughts … and even, concerns.
Thus, it is always good to “see” you here, hale and hearty and in no way subdued.
DW
So the bullshit artist extraordinaire is at it again, this time on drug “policy.” Would like to see Pete DeFazio of Oregon mount a primary challenge to the fraud in the WH. DeFazio is on to Mr. Bipartisan’s shtick.
Name one.
Thanks for that. VERY interesting, and I didn’t know that, although I did know that some prison industries were taking away already low-wage jobs from citizens. But then we know that the whole goal of our corporate overlords is turn all of us into low wage, grasping, starving serfs.
Most of the “war on drugs,” plus keeping pot illegal, is solely and only about MONEY in one fashion or another. It’s either stuff like having a ready-made population of prisoner-slaves forced to do heavy labor for Big Daddy WarBuck$$$. Or you have others making big Buck$$$ from the illegal drug trade.
Citizens who buy the sheer unmitigated b.s. crap about the “war on drugs” are manipulated and bamboozled idiots. This has been plain as day since Tricky Dick’s time, and nothing’s changed.
And yes, I know all about the problems on the AZ border with the rancher who got killed. The Native American Indians on Tahono O’odham reservation (close to where the rancher got killed) have been complaining for years about drug runners harassing and scaring them as they go across the Rez with their illegal drugs and weapons. None of the people on the border had many problems with illegals coming through looking for work; they are NOT the problem.
War on drugs… yet another giant steaming pile from that empty suit, Rahmbama. Color me completely unsurprised but thoroughly disgusted.
Hope you’re right, and I agree, Eric Holder did put paid to the Fed harassment of local or state approved marijuana dispensaries. Yet another hypocricy by the rightwing, who *professes* to “hate big gov’t”… except when it can be used to harass citizens that the right doesn’t like.
Whatever. It would go a long to solving CA’s financial crisis, which is HUGE and growing every day. We’ll see.
Interesting info.
Didn’t obama da bum admit to taking a toke and a little blow in his youth?
Seems he didn’t have trouble scoring then, if he brought an 8-ball he was a felon, weather caught or not.
Hoo-Hooo! Well said, topcat! I’ve begun to think likewise!
Obama is more then a hypocrite on this one. Rahm doesn’t want a drop in illegal drug prices that would crash all the banks and investment houses he’s racking huge campaign donations from.