Google apparently must not be working today. Either that, or Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher has yet to master this useful internet tool:
Hamsher, meanwhile, drew the ire of many progressives when she led a last-minute assault on the health care reform bill. In trashing the bill, she invoked the $80 billion PhRMA deal, with which she had no problem six months earlier, when she was still on board.
We objected to the PhRMA deal vociferously and strenuously from the moment the New York Times reported its existence on August 9, 2009:
August 9: “In ten years, $30 billion a year would mean $300 billion in savings. The deal cut by the White House is for $80 billion in savings. So the pharmaceutical industry gets to keep $220 billion for the low low price of $150 million in August to pass health care reform so Rahm Emanual won’t be 13-1.”
August 10: Eshoo biogics amendment “was a big boon to PhRMA, and a serious blow to cost control efforts for phramaceutical drugs….The details of the deal between the White House and PhRMA have have not been released. As Robert Reich says, those responsible for the deal — including Max Baucus and the White House — need to be forthcoming about what it entails.”
August 13: “Ryan Grim of the Huffington Post got his hands on a July 7 memo documenting the deal between PhRMA and the White House, which both are now denying but which was initially confirmed by Jim Messina, Deputy White House Chief of Staff to the New York Times….The White House needs to be open and transparent about the deals that they cut, who was involved in making them, and what the ultimate impact on a health care package might be.”
August 19: “The White House never cared about getting Republican votes — it cared about keeping the Republicans from peeling off the dollars of stakeholders like PhRMA. Giving in to “Republican” demands was cover for writing shitty things into the bill that would keep the stakeholders happy. ”
November 2: “The pharmaceutical industry, which has donated over $712,000 to Rep. Eshoo, may be less than happy to learn that she is committed to eradicating evergreening language from her legislation. But as the young medical students who recently protested in front of her office told her staff, access to these lifesaving drugs for their patients is far more important than protecting pharmaceutical monopolies.”
December 10: Harry Reid, Crook for PhRMA, Tries To Kill Drug Reimportation.
The pharmaceutical industry had 42 members of Congress insert the same language into the Congressional Record expressly to push back against our campaign against the PhRMA deal. That one was kind of hard to miss.
Dan Abrams is the publisher of Mediate. Earlier this year, Mediaite along with Gawker and others promoted the National Enquirer story that Obama was having an affair. Abrams indicated that a Drudge link made it newsworthy from a media perspective.
Sorry Mediaite, no link. Not going to be baited into driving traffic to you and reward this kind of sensationalism. You want traffic, do your own homework. Anyone unwilling to do that is in no position to set themselves up as judge of anything.
Note: This post has been altered from its original form to indicate more accurately what happened with the National Enquirer story.





56 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Mediaidiot
Geez, what fools.
Don’t forget, Jane, (And don’t let mediaite forget) That you and this site were all over digging out the Billy Tauzin meetings and all the other chicanery that went on int he spring of 2009, literally months before the first of the dates you post in the timeline of the main post. You, and this site, were properly critical of the f’d-up way a crooked deal was crafted and rammed, and did it in real time.
Need a link on the November 2 reference. I don’t know how to use the Google, either. Ha! ;-)
I detect “professional” (that’s a joke) jealousy and attempt to rewrite history. Jane, the firepups know very well that you were critical of the whole process and the dirty deals from the very beginning. FDL is where I got the full analysis long before the SCLM, to use Eric A.’s version, seemed to have any idea of what was going on, and, in fact, never gave a real probing look at the whole situation. You were never part of the veal pen, but apparently some are trying to drag you in. I think this site has consistently the best analysis of events.
“Will no one rid me of this meddlesome hack!”
You can’t FIX moran.
Le Sigh.
Ours is to endure . . . . . ;-)
Way to smack ‘em down, Ma’am . . . . .
sitting here chuckling . . . . simply amazed by the sheer number of these rockheads en queue
oh and p.s. I have never heard of Mediaite and these fingers cast a pretty wide net, heckuva . . .
Recall discussing this very thing with you as much as a year ago.
Don’t let up ‘em , Jane.
I didn’t know Abrams let his folks stoop to read blogs; I thought his entire operation was Olbermann focused. It sure seems that way on the Twitt.
So maybe the Mediaitelies were just confused. Or maybe they are no smarter than their boss. Remember whence Dan came: Judy Miller’s lawyer.
The Google. Hm. I have a list of search engines in the browser – though admittedly I don’t use thm all routinely. From Info.com
Obama’s Swine Emergency is Fraud against Americans
http://www.politicolnews.com/obamas-emergency-is-fraud
Barack Obama/on lobbyists
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama/on_lobbyists
“But behind Obama’s campaign rhetoric about taking on special interests lies a more complicated truth,” Scott Helman wrote August 9, 2007, in the Boston Globe.[1] A “review of Obama’s campaign finance records shows that he collected hundreds of thousands of dollars from lobbyists and PACs as a state legislator in Illinois, a US senator, and a presidential aspirant.”
Health Insurers and Drug Companies Contributed $26.2 Million to 111th Congress
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org/patients/articles/?storyId=28527
The health insurance industry’s two top priorities are requiring every American to buy health insurance – the so-called individual mandate – and eliminating a “public option” that would give Americans an alternative to private, for-profit health insurance.
Despite Rhetoric, Obama Pushed Lobbyists’ Interests
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/07/despite-rhetori.html
It’s an entire culture in Washington — some of it legal, some of it not,” the Democratic hopeful told a New York crowd in June, rallying support for his ethics reform agenda.
But last year, at the request of a hired representative for an Australian-owned chemical corporation Nufarm, Obama introduced nine separate bills exempting the company from import fees on a range of chemical ingredients it uses in the manufacture of pesticides and herbicides. Nufarm’s U.S. subsidiary is based in Illinois.
Nufarm wasn’t the only beneficiary of Obama’s efforts to reduce customs fees and duties.
Health Sector Has Donated Millions to Lawmakers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/07/AR2009030701748.html
The donations underscore the stakes in the health-care debate as President Obama pushes for dramatic changes by year’s end, with the aim of sharply expanding the number of Americans covered by health insurance. Obama held a health-care summit at the White House last week and has proposed a $634 billion reserve fund to kick off the process.
The health-care sector has long ranked with financial services and energy interests as one of the most powerful political forces in Washington, and it spent nearly $1 billion on lobbying in the past two years alone.
So the MSM actually does – selectively – report the news. Who knew ?
What an incredible steaming pile of shit. You possibly drew the ire of blue dogs, but certainly not progressives. I suppose this dumb ass considers this administration progressive?
What of Sen. Dorgan’s amendment for the re-imporation of drugs and White House opposition to that?
Speaking only for myself, this is the reason I will not vote for the lying bastard again. He promised me healthcare and I got fucking squat. Only fools think this is a good bill.
Maybe Dubya can coach Tommy on using The Google.
Minor typo in last paragraph, “sensasionalism.”
One can only guess that these lazy bastard hacks are doing their “jobs” by libeling real progressives.
We get Audit the Fed done and then the “tell the lie long enough they’ll believe it” psych-ops comes out?
Hmm, something tells me that aspects of the HC bill which we stood against are about to hit-the-fan in some way. This is an attempt to change the narrative to shift the blame onto progressives.
Go Jane go!
JANE OR MOD – please correct spelling – sensationalism.
Yeah of all the things you’re going to accuse us of, not opposing the PhRMA deal?
There have to be at the very least a hundred posts opposing it consistently form the very day its existence was reported by the Times.
I mean, WTF?
Don’t Set Yourself Up As Drudge If You’re Not Willing To Do The Egg Work
sorry, couldn’t resist
Ditto – I do lot of internet searching and I never heard of Mediaite, not referenced, not in search results, nothing…I wonder what their traffic number is. It’s gotta be mighty tiny.
What always strikes me about their condemnation of people who criticize Obama from the left is the implication that they approve of him governing from the right.
Over the long haul it is possible that six months might look like a last minute assault. Perhaps the author(s?) are Galapagos turtles who just stuck their heads out of their shells, noticed a disturbance in the force and wrote about it. Or maybe they read about it first in the Inquirer and cribbed some notes.
Things were so much easier in the print-on-paper days, when a person could write nearly anything and never have to worry that the actual target would ever end up reading it. Since I haven’t gone there to look around this is of course mostly a guess.
Kind of curious that the author waited until the controversy and attacks from the various supporters of the health insurance and PhRMA giveaways, who visited FDL so regularly for months until the voting was finished. Perhaps Mediaite thought they saw a wounded liberal in the pack and sent their best hunter to take it down.
good one
that stuff has been leaking via TradMed for weeks now.
no, it’s just the usual Drudge worshipping chuckleheads – and no one’s asked, but I am of the opinion they see her as an easy target, ’cause she’s a ‘girl’ – and are always unpleasantly surprised when she hands them their vapid little heads with one hand still on the keyboard
It is an old debate tactic employed by those with weak arguments. Deny some previously established fact, forcing your opponent to squander time and energy reestablishing the truth.
Example:
Creationist: “There is no fossil evidence of evolution.”
Scientist: (smacks forehead)
I thought it maybe wasn’t a typo but a play on words. Sensasstionalism. But, then, that would have been two s’s.
I think maybe they are just Jealous of Jane.
Thus they try to re-write history, whilst also dissing the “effing retarded” progressives.
You go, Jane!! Thanks for all the heavy lifting that YOU did to uncover the lies and b.s. I come to FDL mainly because I get REAL news here, NOT propoganda, lies, media crap, infotainment and rewritten history.
This Christopher is either lazy, a moronic hack, stupid, bought off or all of the above.
I pick “e” – all of the above.
First let me begin by saying that I have long read and enjoyed your site. It is a must read for me re: the progressive positions on the most important topics of the day.
With that said, I will let Tommy Christopher defend himself since I had nothing to do with his piece. My understanding is that he was referring to a television appearance you made that is not addressed here.
The two of you can duke that out.
I am writing regarding the hypocrisy of claiming you are being misrepresented and then you, in turn, mischaracterize Mediaite covering the Enquirer/Drudge link story. You say “They thought a Drudge link “added credibility” to the claim” As I am sure you well know, Mediaite Managing Editor Colby Hall removed that phrase from the overnight piece when he awoke that morning and announced he was so doing. So Mediaite thought nothing of the sort, an overnight editor wrote it and Hall publicly corrected her.
You also seem to relish the fact that you are not linking to Mediaite. Even if you disagree with us it would certainly be common courtesy to provide a link. But since every major traffic rating site (quantcast, alexa, compete etc.) places mediaite in a far higher traffic category than firedoglake (after our just nine months in existence) its not that we need your traffic, it would just the right thing to do.
Finally while I appreciate you placing my name in the tag apropos nothing, I thought you might find something I actually wrote today of interest. Elena Kagan: Way Too Boring For Scandal-Starved Media http://www.mediaite.com/smhof.
If you disagree with this, I take full responsibility for its content. Please feel free to comment on it in our comments the same way I am commenting here.
Again, I hope we can have a better relationship with your generally excellent site in the future.
Dan Abrams
thanks :D
you left out abject hypocrite – Tommy on the Enquirer:
Um, Dan. We don’t need your traffic sounds kind of 1st grade to me.
You have to recognize that, when someone sends out a hack to put a journalistic hit on you, you must have been scoring some real shots.
Ah the ‘old but he did it too’ defense, well done. Seriously, if you were not going to address the topic at hand, why pick nits?
Dan, what comes to mind is “I’m not a journalist; I just play one on TV.”
Only you don’t even get to do that anymore.
Whydontcha hang it up, take that YLS sheepskin and go practice real law for real, deserving people for a while, and see for yourself how fucked they are, every stinking day of their stinking lives. And how that fucking comes at the hands of the same people you and your site are being fed by.
Mediaite if littered with loons and the writers seem to focus on Keith and Rachel. Is it because Maddow took you’re spot Dan? Don’t get me wrong, I’m still trying to figure out how Jane could state that Erick Erickson is an honest broker in the face of some of the bullshit statements he’s made. That said, Mediaite is full of trolls who watch fox news. And every story no matter who it’s about will be filled with anti Obama comments. Just check out their current story on Laura Bush’s appearance on Larry King. There are several anti Michelle Obama comments. I often head over to the site when I’m bored so I can tweak the idiot commenters.
where the hell’s Jane ?!?! I went and made a big ol whooping bowl of popcorn . . .fine, how ’bout some sleight of hand while we wait ?
Dan Abrams 5/1/10:
in response to outcry over publication of subject matter British Tabloids and TMZ wouldn’t touch:
uh Mr Abrams, just what is it you do do at that “far higher traffic” site when you’re not dodging accountabilty ?
‘
Mediaite is a sort of a media celeb gossip site, so not surprising if there is substantial emphasis on KO and Rachel (among others). From Dan’s wiki bio:
I’ve got hot butter!
Want to see me pull a rabbit out of my hat? Oh, that’s not my rabbit. Or hat.
crkey! gotta head out. mad firedog love
I emailed you asking to have a conversation about this. And I just got off the phone with your editor Colby Hall who said that you were too “busy” to talk yourself.
He might have mentioned that you were “busy” in our comments section.
I updated the post to reflect what Colby felt was a more fair representation of what had happened with your National Enquirer link.
I understand that you’re new to this world and don’t understand many of its traditions. When someone consistently writes sensationalistic, inaccurate things to bait for traffic, it’s common practice to not link them. Google “Atrios” and “Politico.” It’s sort of a default community policing of standards.
You also don’t apparently know that Google Analytics, which is a metric based on code installed on the actual sites, is much more accurate than Alexa etc, which are estimates.
And according to Google Analytics, we’re still kicking your ass:
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=mediaite.com%2C+firedoglake.com&geo=all&date=mtd&sort=0
Sites that traffic in gossip and inuendo generally do tend to attract a lot more traffic than news sites, though. So you’ll no doubt pass us soon. But you should more fairly be comparing yourself to Perez Hilton:
http://trends.google.com/websites?q=mediaite.com,+perezhilton.com&sa=N
You’ve got a ways to go. Stay busy, Dan.
“Film at 11?”
*G*
Yer on fire . . . ;-)
“Unguentine, anybutty?”
*G*
Cuz that’s gotta sting some . . .
I’m guessing Dan’s comment will be a hit and run and he won’t check back unless he has a waaambulance on standby.
He’s still bitter he lost his show to a GIRL!!!!!
A lesbian, one, at that.
*G*
I wonder if he’s related to Elliot Abrams in any way . . . about 20 years difference between them. Both involved with sleazy doings, though, that’s the commonality I’m seeing . . . ;-) Google shows no info on my question . .
Chirps to you and Bob, how’s the day there!
Rain, now sun, rain again later.
4:30, off to seize the day. Best to you and your’n.
*G*
Saw it outside the window.
Wasn’t Hedda Hopper a gossip columnist? Didn’t she wear outrageous hats? Is Dan a Hedda wannabe? Does he wear outrageous hats?
Seize The Carp!
And I gotta run an errand or two, too . . . also. ;-)
Nice ride, SD, @46!!!
Hot BUTTER! Hot damn! Thanks, demi. *nom* *nom* *nom*
Seems the chain of command is still a bit fuzzy …
Go Jane!!!!
Oh, just for kicks….
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/firedoglake.com#
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mediaite.com#
Oh, and mediaite has no reviews yet. Who’s with me?
Hmmm, coming here and pimping your own story, with a link, doesn’t exactly scream, “we don’t need your steenking traffic!”
I bit anyway, and saw:
“Is The Japanese Prime Minister’s Low Approval Ratings Due To Poor Fashion Choices?”
OK, sure.
Great job always, Jane.
I tend to get very pissed over the way things are going in this country, the way they’ve been going since I left for Vietnam and came back to be confronted by an all-out assault on organized labor when I became a Teamster.
I was a little hesitant when you aligned with Bathtub Grover but I never questioned your determination to do the right thing for everyone, deals with the devil aside.
You never disappoint and you will continue to have my support.
Dan,
Thank you for the nice words about what Jane has built here.
Since you are in the public relations business, here are the three rules:
1. Do the Right Thing
2. Be Seen to be Doing the Right Thing
3. Don’t Get #1 and #2 Mixed Up.
Elisabeth was always terrific in Law and Order.
I think what Dan’s really saying is he wants to date you.