What struck me about Harry Reid’s outline for immigration reform besides the weird, almost medieval, militant framing, like “Further Fortification of America’s Border,” is how some large group of military contractors are set to make a killing at the taxpayer’s expense if this bill ever passed:
As a result of this proposal, the Border Patrol will also receive substantial upgrades in technology—including: 1) clear and secure two-way communication capabilities among all border patrol agents conducting operations between ports of entry; 2) use of Department of Defense equipment at the border; and 3) increases in the number of sport utility vehicles, helicopters, power boats, river boats, portable computers to track illegal immigrants and drug smugglers while inside of a border patrol vehicle, night vision equipment, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Remote Video Surveillance Systems (RVSS), scope trucks, and Mobile Surveillance Systems (MSS).
High tech drones, Department of Defense equipment, helicopters–this sounds like an extremely expensive complete militarization of our border. When you are talking about this kind of a bonanza for military equipment makers, my first though is the old expression about understanding politics by “following the money.” I’m left wondering if this is meant to be an immigration bill, or the defense contractor profit protection and employment act of 2010.
With the chances of passing comprehensive immigration reform this year appearing next to zero right now, supporters of the effort can at least take heart in the knowledge that a lot of big defense contractor lobbyists are probably drooling at that thought of all the border militarization money, and will be fighting hard for it. If we ever eventually do end our deployment in Iraq and Afghanistan, those defense contractors are going to need to find a new justification for why Congress should buy billions of their toys. This border militarization immigrant reform bill sounds like it would fit the bill nicely.
Of course, if the Democrats stick to the strategy they used on health care, they will kick their own base in the teeth, tack way to the right, and waste billions of dollars by funneling it to well-connected corporations. We could actually have a bill labeled “immigration reform” this year, but it will just be a plan to stick a hundred billion dollars worth of high-tech military robots every ten feet in the desert, and provide a handful of new H1-B visas to the tech companies.





32 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
I love it when a plan comes together!
Of course the robots will have to make an occasional border excursion in order to kill those Immigrantofascists who use Mexico as a safe haven while organizing their imminent plots to work on American soil…
The obvious question is, are these measures really aimed at keeping people out, or is it actually intended to stop serfs escaping when their plutocrat overlords start to really ramp up the brutality?
The answer, of course, is “Yes.”
I think the military industrial complex would be perfectly happy if they could convince people we needed to worry about sea monsters so we need to build a trillion dollar anti sea monster navy.
Build a fence, the Corps of Engineers could wire the entire border with a double layer of fencing and solar-powered cameras for less than what we’ve already wasted on Boeing’s cordon imaginaire. That’s probably the most sensible thing the Minutemen have advocated.
http://www.borderfenceproject.com/
It would put oil on the waters (I know bad analogy today) with those opposed to any immigration reform. What’s more, leaving vast sections of the desert unfenced only encourages migrants to simply go around existing fencing, putting them at risk of dying by dehydration or heat stroke in our desert. Every city zoning code considers swimming pools to be an attractive nuisance which must be fenced and gated to protect children and other innocent trespassers from hurting themselves, likewise fencing the US border would protect innocent trespassers from hurting themselves.
As for Jon putting his head in the sand towards the sea monster threat; the danger isn’t the Navy taking the fight to the sea monsters, but rather the inevitable Air Force lobbying effort that we must be 300% sure by adding a land-based and air based component to our anti-sea monster arsenal. “Minimum deterrence” is for wimps (and sailors).
Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Arleigh Burke argued that a small force of mainly nuclear missile-launching Polaris submarines was enough for deterrence. Burke and Navy leaders developed a concept of “finite” or “minimum” deterrence–highly relevant to today’s debate–that they believed would make the United States safer because it would dissuade nuclear attacks while removing pressures for a dangerous “hair-trigger” posture.
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/nukevault/ebb275/index.htm
Admiral Burke was a great American but no Frank Luntz. Instead of “minimum deterrence” he should have called his plan “100% deterrence”.
I’m so sick of this fucking country.
Until the border is fortified like the Korean DMZ, people will continue to get through. There’s just too much motivation. It’s better to accept that fact and figure out how to either change the circumstances or make the best of them.
Considering that at least one major American city, El Paso, is right along the border, I think the idea of a DMZ-style fortification should be considered folly straight away. That doesn’t seem to have occurred to many people who are engaged in the debates on immigration reform, however.
Another thing that would keep border crossers from roaming out in the desert to get to the US, would be to open an immigration office in every border town and process applications in a timely fashion.
Big business would get it’s cheap labor, only the criminals who can’t get visas would die in the desert, and the illegal alien problem would go away. If it only took 24 hours to get papers, why would anyone enter illegally?
Eh! News! San Diego is not a Major America City?
People still escape to South Korea even with the DMZ
It would not solve the schizophrenic mind set of the Rs, one one side they hate brown people, especially ones who vote, and on the other want illegal labor to exploit (and mow their grass).
That’s hard. What’s a bigoted employer to do?
Clearly some multiple trillion dollar program to shoot seamonster from space would keep us safe? A small price to pay for safety.
I’ve only been to San Diego once, for a few days. I didn’t get the sense of a border town while I was there. I’ve been to El Paso quite a few. Still, SD is probably within any DMZ we would be talking about.
True, but it’s a rare event, often requiring the aid of one government or another.
Depends if you are Hispanic or not.
I think the Ca economy would collapse without undocumented workers. No one else would work for the wages they get and stoop labor is really awful work.
Probably depends why you’re visiting and where, too. I was in the tourist area for a course. I didn’t get much beyond there.
Yes, fortifying the border has boondoggle and pork written all over it. But the other big initiative in the Democrats’ immigration proposal was a new electronic Social Security card for everyone. Just think of the bucks in verifying who 300 million people are, in producing the cards, in producing the machines that every employer is supposed to have to be used with the cards. It might even cost more than what they wanted to blow on “fortifying” the border.
What stuck me about the Dems’ immigration proposal was the substantively awful and unbelievably politically tone deaf nation ID card.
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/95235-democrats-spark-alarm-with-call-for-national-id-card%22
The Believe System?
This is sure to cause a (legitimate) freak out on both the right and the left. The ACLU has already declared its opposition. Can’t want to see what the teabaggers say.
Will they also find something in this bill to call
H.O.P.E.?
Sick of this country, depressed about this country, pissed at this country…I need that legalization of marijuana to pass really soon….
There is the DREAM act as part of it.
right as rain Mr Hugh – was inquiring in an earlier post as to just who is in line for the big phat Nat’l ID contract – remembering it was a Soros minion, credited with doing all the HCR negotiating with ‘stakeholders’ who turned out to have the big phat contract for signing people up for their mandated coverage
Ah, yes, but if you listen to certain radio stations all over the Golden State, you will hear local shock jocks ranting to their choirs about how the brown-skinned ones have robbed us red-necked whities of all kinds of “great jobs.” Yeah, right. Wander around a bit and witness the stoop labor of picking strawberries or lettuce crops (hunders of acres of ‘em), and tell me how great a job that is at less than minimum wage with inhumane conditions, like working under a beating sun, bring your own water, and you can only go pee once in a while.
Sheesh. Hey, look, I’m all for immigration reform if it means cracking down on employers, esp AG, hospitality, construction and meat packing, plus the gardners, nannies and pool boys to the starz and other obscenely wealthy types.
Meh, we all knew that this was yet another snatch and rip off for the our corporate overlords in one fashion or another. They ain’t interested in keeping the dirty messicans outta here; they wante ‘em to come on over and work in crummy conditions for crummy wages. Demonizing the undocumented workers is just red meat tossed out to mollify the tea party base. Fools.
Ugly, brutal, nasty, waste: your tax dollah at work.
And no, a fence won’t work. Too stupid.
jeez!! even worse than the Bush Administration
San Diego is very much a border town despite it’s Beach Boys Little Surfer Girl appearance. Make no mistake. Sadly, that there border’s gotten a lot more dangerous these days due to the unfettered Mexican drug cartel war. I doubt a fence would do much good, though, in “dealing” with that.
To me, this is all a monumental waste and a bunch of porkulous stupidity. The Mexicans and other Central Americans cross the border all the time and come up through the desert. There is a fence (of sorts) across the part of SD County that borders the more populated parts of Tiajuana… and then they just build tunnels under it (happens a lot). It’s reasonably easy to build tunnels under fences built across the desert, which is another thing these liars don’t tell the dumbed down voters.
True. There isn’t a form of ID that can’t be faked, at least for some purposes. There’s already a big industry in faking ID for undocumented immigrants, and that’s not going to go away because someone puts a chip in the cards. Eventually, they’ll figure out the chips. There’s too much money in it for that not to happen.
These are thoughts that seem to elude our politicians when they discuss this stuff. The “Real ID” initiative, or whatever it was called, that mandated new requirements for driver’s licenses is a case in point.
Oh and btw, those inhumane working conditions? Esp in Ag, the lack of appropriate facilities and humane toilet breaks results in guess what? Yeah, food poisoning issues for the rest of us. Actually, the meat packing industry is even worse in terms of food safety and cleanliness issues, all brought to you by the Republics, esp under Bush, but continued with joy by “Democrat” Barackstar Obama.
Nice, eh? Wash your food carefully, kiddies, as those picking your fruits and veggies probably didn’t get a proper toilet break, and there’s no place for them to wash their hands, either. Get the picture?
Greece this time of year is nice. Oh, whoops.
If it only took 24 hours to get papers, why would anyone enter illegally?
If it only took 24 hours to get papers, it’d be unconscionable to not first accommodate the millions of visa applicants who’ve played by the rules and waited their turn in line.
From a 2009 article:
The waiting times vary according to country and category. The shortest wait is for spouses of LPRs. Those now receiving green cards in that category applied in December of 2004, except for Mexicans, who submitted their application in May, 2002. The longest wait is for Filipino siblings of U.S. citizens; those now getting visas applied in August, 1986.
http://www.cis.org/Vaughan/FamilyImmigrantWaitingList
Its easier to get a change accepted if its seen as just an extension of something tried and true. Like, say, providing healthcare coverage through the existing Medicare system instead of starting from scratch.
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/03/25/insurers-immediately-try-to-game-health-care-regulations/#comment-27278
Likewise, there’s already a biometric national ID that every American has seen (and perhaps has already).
http://travel.state.gov/passport
This isn’t rocket science– waive the $100 application fee (don’t tell the cat food commission!) and then make federal highway grants to states contingent on requiring drivers to provide passport or green card (also a biometric ID) at traffic stops. Call it an anti-terrorist measure and everyone will support it.
This is exactly right!
I would alter it slightly. I would have one official border crossing in each state, and have very streamlined and easy process for crossing. That way, the only people not crossing at the official border crossings could be assumed to be people with nefarious intent.
However, I would make the ability to stay in the country any amount of time conditional on Mexico adopting the exact same policies for US Citizens crossing into their country (same for any other provision like owning property, starting a business, access to social services, etc).
There is no reason why we cannot have more “open borders” with equal rules for citizens from both countries. We are neighbors after all.
I would propose the same thing for Canada, if Canada would go along with the program of EQUAL immigration/visitation rules.