| Sign the petition to President Obama: 200,000 gallons of oil leaking into the Gulf of Mexico each day. 1800 miles of oil slicks. 11 dead workers. This is the future
of our energy independence? The oil rig disaster proves offshore drilling is too risky. Cancel plans to expand offshore drilling and invest in clean energy instead.
|
The Deepwater Horizon oil rig disaster is getting worse by the hour. At the Seminal, diarist Seymour Friendly writes that the collapsed well is leaking oil at the pace of 200,000 gallons a day.
At a rate of 200,000 gallons per day, the well leaks will expel 1,000,000 gallons oil. In twenty days, the well will have effectively emptied into the Gulf of Mexico in a spill just under half of the total volume of the Exxon Valdez disaster.
Evidence has emerged that the new total leak rate is in excess of BP’s reported worse-case scenario response capacity.
Janet Napolitano declared the explosion to be an event of “national significance.” Yet despite the explosion, President Obama’s spokesman says there are no plans to reconsider Obama’s proposal to greatly expand offshore drilling in the very same waters where spilled oil now threatens thousands of miles of coastline and ocean.
If Obama moves forward with expanded offshore drilling, this disaster will only be the beginning.
This is exactly the kind of disaster critics warned about when Obama changed course earlier this month in announcing expanded offshore drilling as part of his energy plan. Indeed, it’s the very kind of disaster Obama himself warned about when he opposed offshore drilling during the presidential campaign.
Candidate Obama called offshore drilling a “gimmick” that would fail to protect “pristine coastlines” from environmental disaster. He praised the decades-long “bipartisan consensus” against offshore drilling to protect our coasts and criticized John McCain’s flip-flop on the issue to support drilling.
And just weeks after his own flip-flop in favor of offshore drilling, the brutal reality of the dangers of offshore drilling show themselves in an 1800 mile-long oil slick in the Gulf of Mexico.
Forget the fact that offshore drilling is expensive, takes no less than a decade to start extracting oil, and would only yield about one year’s worth of oil anyway. Now we see the very real, deadly consequences of drilling for oil in our oceans.
The oil rig explosion has already covered more than 1800 miles of ocean in oil, killed 11 workers on the rig and harmed untold numbers of animals in the water. It could easily be the worst oil spill since the Exxon Valdez disaster, if not worse. And the slick is just 16 miles from the mouth of the Mississippi River.
Between the mining disaster in West Virginia and the oil rig explosion, it’s clear that we need to come up with new sources of energy that don’t put our environment — and our workers — at risk.




57 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
We have to wean ourselves from corporate culture. Seriously.
BP’s insistence they could handle this, and that the outflow from the well was less than the government’s estimates, created delays that have exacerbated the problem. Now, with little time to act, it’s a mad scramble to keep the oil, now 12 miles or less offshore, from the coastline.
The company was irresponsible and stalled for time.
NO offshore oil drilling!
END DEREGULATION!!!!!
CEASE accepting CRONY CAPITALISM as a FORM OF GOVERNMENT!!!
Bwahahahaha…
ooops – sorry
The only way I can sign that no to offshore drilling is to take total responsibility of my own habits and quit driving.
Rather sign a petition focused on making the drilling operation safer and to put an accessible turn off valve.
Not hearing much about the 11 dead, barely even hear them mentioned. Nothing about the safety issue. Or these people’s families
Signed and forwarded! Thanks Michael Whitney.
(Quick note Michael – the slick isn’t last I saw 1800 miles long – that would be a previous reading on the square-mile area of the slick, which probably in excess of 2500 square miles long now. The slick at its widest point as of yesterday was 100 miles long, and today, oddly, the Coast Guard and NOAA broke with their daily trend of updating the public with new slick extents and approximate area. Instead, they publicized images of the cleanup on the response site. Something tells me someone’s PR damage control team is now “assisting with” the spill response.)
Michael – the slick isn’t 1800 miles long. That was its approximate surface area two days ago. It is now probably in excess of 2500 square miles in area. The Gulf of Mexico itself is less than 1000 miles wide.
Its very peculiar, the Coast Guard and NOAA today broke with the trend of daily reports on spill extent, and instead have photos of people working on the relief effort – it is as if a PR/damage control team is now “assisting” with public reporting on the spill. Previously, the Coast Guard and NOAA were producing a fairly detailed graph depicting spill extents with detailed measurements. Why that information would now suddenly be less important than photos of for example the slick at sea, or a pallet with dispersant bags loaded on it, is not clear to me at all.
After the oil rig disaster the Dems could lose the whole East Coast if they push this. Sarah’s Drill Baby Drill could haunt the GOP if we abandon this.
What’s the gov’t going to do for Louisiana and Mississippi this time? Will Obama go down and make pretty speeches? Are they doing anything to prepare for the damage that will be done to the coastal regions? I think not. Apparently Obama just can’t be bothered.
Instead of offshore oil wells how about offshore windmills Denmark is giving a $40,000 tax break to everyone with an electric car. If we do that for the GM Volt and we sell 1 million or so cars the first few years we would not need more oil.
Thanks. Signed it, and added this in the comments:
Cape Wind is a proposed wind turbine farm that will be built off the coast of Cape Cod. It should provide most of the energy needs of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket. Might even supply all of it if they get serious about geothermal and conserving energy there. Yet the rich folks in the area were trying to stop this thing, because they didn’t like the idea of having to look at windmills.
I think they’re kinda cool, actually. They’re a lot better looking than offshore oil platforms, that’s for sure.
It seemed to work for his predecessor.
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/35493
We can follow Denmark’s example or we can watch Florida terrified of oil slicks killing Spring Break go GOP as everyone with beach front property leaves the party.
Think about it Rahm if you own beach front property in any state you want to offshore drill from then chances are you have Mega cash to give to political parties.
Rahm your suppose to be a tool of the rich the rich may own oil companies but they also have beach front property guess what is more important to them?
Besides the rich can always invest in wind mills its not like they would be left out.
The absolute worst part is that while BP stock may drop as a result, oil futures could actually rise, they often do when we have “turbulence” in the Middle East, or military coup’s in parts of Africa. Anything that could disrupt the flow, and boom, the very people poisoning our world and making money off of it make even more. Which always makes me think, is it an accident that’s preventable, criminal negligence, or something worse, akin to some kind of terrorism on planet earth, for profit?
Captain Joe was notoriously drunk, perhaps it is part of the lifestyle, but it would seem to me that this is getting way to common for the answer to be that, oh we’re sorry, it was our fault, just an accident nothing more, we’ll try to do better in the future. I mean, if people can find a way to make a buck off of something, they usually do it. And you’d think the answer would be to make them pay for it where it counts, hit their bottom line, but Exxon hasn’t paid a dime yet for the Valdez, they keep getting the fine reduced, it went from 2 billion to 500 million, which they still haven’t paid. Pays to have friends in high places, like say, a certain judge on a certain very high court of the Italian persuasion, not naming names or anything, Scalia.
Why do we have to beg this president to cancel his plans for offshore drilling? If we had wanted “drill, baby, drill” we would have elected Palin, no?
Meanwhile, we have US solar companies shipping jobs to China because they can’t afford the costs of making their products in the US.
Sign the petition and say we want to buy more foreign oil, when we are spending trillions buying their oil now.
A dollar spent on foreign oil is gone forever, and that dollar will never come back to the USA.
If You think the American debt is to much now keep spending our money proping up the oil rich states and watch our debt put us in bankruptcy.
Great China still can’t build a decent wind mill our market is going to be flooded with third rate cheap solar cells. Its better to buy the best sometimes the low cost contractor’s quality is just to low to be ignored.
Don’t forget Osama gets his funds from rich oil states. Don’t forget Iran pays for their nuclear program with oil.
Cut oil demand save an American Solder!
Obama/25% lieberman says immigration reform is dead! Long live Oil Companies!
Sorry couldn’t resist.
I’m thinking specifically of Evergreen Solar, a company that will announce next week that they’ve had a great first quarter in sales. Unfortunately, it costs them almost as much to produce the cells in the US as they get for them. They have been trying to produce quality, but even this successful small solar company has had to accept moving production to China if they’re going to survive.
That’s pathetic.
Other than create a commission to study solar, what have Democrats in power done to keep these green jobs in the US?
I’ll sign and shut up
I did just that, eight years ago. I drive about once a year just to make sure I haven’t lost it, and I do miss it a lot, so it is true what they say, absence makes the heart grow fonder, I enjoy that drive a lot. Sometimes I even go to the extreme of playing racing video games but it isn’t quite the same. I have biked countless countless miles in the meantime, learned to use every alternative means of transportation and “relied on the kindness of strangers” and friends.
I made up my mind while watching the Senate Foreign Relations committee on Cspan chaired by Biden and Lugar as they discussed plans for the invasion of Iraq. They actually used the term “war booty” to describe the shared proceeds of the coalition of the willing (I hate using their terminology, what the hell is a coalition of the willing anyway). It just got me so angry. I made a decision that I wouldn’t drive again until the war was over. (OK OK, even I didn’t anticipate it being this long.) But I guess somewhere in there I realized I could live without it, it wasn’t akin to water or shelter, there were accomadations that could be made for school and work, and technology like video streaming is a big help. I bought a new laptop with a built in webcam and I spend an extra hundred a year getting my bike tuned up. But I easily spent $30,000 on gas and repairs and insurance alone in the 1990′s, half of which was just to get to and fro work, and I’m not even what you’d call a car-guy, I’ve always car pooled and even then I rode the subway or took buses a lot of the time if I could anyway. I mean I’m sure a lot of people spend a lot more than I did on gas, repairs and insurance not to mention the vehicles themselves. But then too, I think, a lot of people don’t even have the luxury, especially if you look globaly.
It isn’t easy, but if we all did it, we could break the cartel.
Not shuting up—-and soooo not signing anything! What the heck, why are we all playing into this crap? Who here give a rats azz about something that the dems and the OBAMA administration wants? NOT I! NOT after he f>>>ed our base over time and time again like he did and to this very day continues to do. NO F>>>ing way, he and our so call party leaders can “GO F>>K themself!………………A liberal yes, a stupid liberal NO.
Signed and here’s my message:
Dear Mr. President,
You say that immigration reform is dead. Is this because you want to help oil companies more? Or do you hate immigrants, love Arizona state law and Graham and McCain and Lieberman? Or is your “reform” proposal, which probably written by lobbyists of Lieberman and Graham’s choosing, too “soft” and not helpful enough to some security industry? Inquiring minds want to know.At any rate, as a long time liberal and Democrat, I really think you should at least be seen as standing for something. It will make a good photo op. Because we know that after you declare plans to end offshore drilling, you’ll accuse obstructionist Republicans of holding your plans up. Say hello to Joe Lieberman for me. His career is nose diving in CT. I imagine yours will too soon.
The answer Knox is Government Tariffs to protect our Solar and wind industry. If Foreign companies want to build plants in America and give us jobs then fine. Otherwise why create another foreign power dependency?
Jane Hamsher is upstairs!
Late Nite FDL: Welcome to Third Round Semifinal Voting of “Name Our Pot Campaign” Contest
We should probably count our blessings. Nothing they’ve tried to reform so far has actually been reformed in any useful sense.
Actually? It seems like Dubya all over. Only they’re sweet talking us. That’s the difference. The sweet talk.
The business of our elites is looting, plain and simple. Worker and environmental safety are just so many corners to be cut. As West Virginia and now the Louisiana Gulf Coast, as the testimony by the Goldman boys show our elites have no qualms, no remorse, no “regrets” (because as Sparks said that indicate they had done something wrong) about the death and destruction they leave in their wake. There is just no way for me to underline this enough. Our elites kill people not just in far distant lands but right here in this country, and they absolutely positively don’t care, not a whit or a bit or an iota. What we see are not accidents. They are policy.
False dichotomy. Using less electricity means we import less oil. Using less gasoline does, too. Conserving energy, and finding alternative sources of energy that don’t damage the environment can achieve much more than offshore drilling.
Oh, and I think you’ll find that there will be parts of the Gulf Of Mexico now that are gone forever, at least when measured in a human lifetime. The fishing will suffer, and so will tourism. That’s money, too.
Signed the petition and wrote the following:
That’s my assessment, too. Oh, maybe slightly less horrible Supreme Court justices, but the jury’s still out on that one.
You want Obama to ask Americans not to drive around in Expeditions, Escalades, and other SUVs the size of tanks? I think he’d rather send more troops to Iraq.
(I went from having hope to losing faith since Nov 2008…)
Stop driving your car
Stop running the airco
Stop using your elefctrical appliances, use a hand land mower
Stop whining
Then get back to me with you real solution
Actually, people have been, thanks to higher oil prices. Just doing things like making real improvements to CAFE and public transportation could do quite a bit of good without too much political fallout.
I don’t know where You get Your reasoning from, but You are part of the problem.
You guys are so worried about this one rig and this spill, and have never looked the gulf over. Just to the west billions upon billions of barrels of oil come into the gulf in tankers and sitting there waiting to feed the refineries that supply your cars. One major storm and more oil could be spilled in that same Gulf as if hundereds of these rigs blew up.
Had Katrina been a little more west we might have had a worse spill then.
You want to stop things like this quit using oil. As long as people like yes You keep buying oil someone will be out there drilling for it to sell it to You.
Hey Things. Cut oil demand and save our Country.
All these complainers about drilling and this accident have done nothing since the Exon Valdez accident to even conserve on oil. Instead our usage went way up.
They not only drive their cars, but have riding mowers, chain saws, weedeaters, and motercycles, snowmobiles, ATV’s, go carts, and even gasoline powered toys and equipment they can buy.
Then they have the balls to bitch when things go wrong.
I have been trying to tell people we can get off of oil and fast, but I get laughed at and haranged for it.
We keep showing ourselves to be a Country of fools. They get upset when told that, but prove it more everyday.
I’m afraid it’s people like you who are the problem – the ones who assume that the way things are right now is the only way they can be. What I wrote, both in response to you and others, is that we can seriously change where energy comes from in this country. That won’t happen overnight, but neither will a new oil rig. Do you have any idea how long it takes? Do you realize that all the oil they’re talking about exploiting offshore would only serve our oil supply needs for a few months?
You just blithely assume that since my ideas don’t conform to yours then they aren’t serious. You need to start learning about what you’re talking about before you start delivering condescending lectures.
I was watching Rachel Maddow interview a Coast Guard officer about the spill, when she asked a question about the drilling equipment. The Coast Guard officer said he did not know, all the experts in that field that might know the answer were working for the oil company.
Why doesn’t the government have independent experts available to it in a situation like this?
I don’t have a car, I ride public transportation.
No a/c in my apt. building.
No yard.
An energy company that’s very involved in wind power was reported to have gotten it’s stock DOWNGRADED this week because the rating service decided the wind power the company would be producing would be getting produced TOO CHEAPLY!
I submit that the little bit of electricity I use on my lights, computer, stove and hot water heater ARE NOT THE FUCKING PROBLEM!
Automatic shutoff valve in the well (as required in Norway and the UK) would have prevented the calamity.
I think you’re jumping to a conclusion when whatever evidence there is a mile underwater. The experts can’t say much about what would or wouldn’t have prevented this disaster.
Maybe it would have helped. Maybe not. Too early to say. Too little evidence.
What experts? State your reference.
Sorry, you’re incorrect. Don’t need any evidence, evidently you’re missing the knowledge. This is exactly the type of occurrence that an Automatic Shutoff Valve is designed to stop. A Well Blow Out.
And I’m jumping to a conclusion? Do some reading since you’re simply guessing and making stuff up.
and yards, they’re very good for many things, cooling surrounding ambient air, producing oxygen, fixating co2. Yards are not a negative but a positive
You guys should check me on this – I have been detached from the goings on under the sea…
But if I remember an early news report about this, there is a shutoff valve on this thing, but the submersibles and their ‘pilots’ don’t know how to effectuate the cutoff.
Again, check the googles, but I believe this was reported on day 2.
This land is BP’s land, this land is BP’s land
From California, to the New York Island
From the redwood forest, to the gulf stream waters
This land was made for BP.
That’s the BOP, blow out preventer and it’s not responding. (maybe because the controls are laying submerged in 5000 feet of water)
What the well doesn’t have is the valve that’s required in the UK and Norway. An Automatic Shutoff Value.
BP saved $500,000 not implementing an Automatic Shutoff Valve.
ok
“….“We don’t know what the ultimate liability is going to be,” said Geoff Kieburtz, an analyst at Weeden & Co. in Greenwich, Connecticut, who rates Cameron’s shares at “hold” and owns none. “It’s an enormous unknown.”
Cameron’s gear has been used on the Deepwater Horizon rig, which was built in 2001 to operate in seas as deep as 8,000 feet (2,438 meters), since the vessel was commissioned, Scott Amann, a company spokesman, said yesterday in a telephone interview….”
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-29/cameron-plunges-on-concern-over-role-in-oil-rig-blast-update3-.html
“… April 29 (Bloomberg) — Cameron International Corp., the second-largest U.S. maker of oilfield equipment, had its biggest decline since 2008 in New York trading on concern over possible liability for a Gulf of Mexico rig explosion and oil spill.
Cameron dropped $5.77, or 13 percent, to $38.70 as of the 4 p.m. close of the New York Stock Exchange and traded as low as $34.65. The Houston-based company said yesterday that it provided so-called blowout preventers for Transocean Ltd.’s Deepwater Horizon rig, which caught fire and sank after an explosion last week.
Other companies connected to the incident, including BP Plc, which owned the well the rig was drilling, and Halliburton Co., which provided oilfield services on the project, also fell after the U.S. Coast Guard said 5,000 barrels of oil are leaking into the Gulf, five times more than previously estimated. The oil slick, which is about twice the size of Maryland, is drifting toward the U.S. coastline….”
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-29/cameron-plunges-on-concern-over-role-in-oil-rig-blast-update3-.html
Sign a useless protest that the Demopublican plutocrats will laugh at? No, pointless. Although well-intended, it will only add to the kabuki.
How about voting Green instead? How about explaining why it’s the only vote that can stop this and many things much worse from happening again and again and again. Start along the Gulf Coast. Move on from there.
Yes, but the Nigerian offshore industry doesn’t require them. Surely that’s the model the US should be following? Not the pinko-commie, crypto-terrorist UK-Norwegian rules. /s
*actually, I’m not even sure about this. It may very well be that most offshore, African operations do require them. I’d love to know what offshore Brazilian regulations state as well…
And finally, isn’t it time to just primary Bambi? Either that or switch all the efforts of this blog to getting the Green Party elected?
My problem with the “Green Party” is the the whole concept of a “Green Party” is too limited. It hasn’t ever left the fringes of political thought in Europe.
If the Green Party can’t break through in W. Europe, then how does it ever have a chance of catching on here.
I think we need a 3rd Party, but I think it needs to be the Labor Party to have a fighting chance. Far easier to point to Labor Parties in England and Australia as examples.
Additionally…
-The GOP and Tea Party have turned calling someone a Communist or a Socialist cartoon-ish. Something Foghorn Leghorn yells at the barnyard dawg. Taken all the sting out it. We ought to take advantage of that mistake.
-Nobody will be taken seriously trying to call Tony Blair a “communist.”
It has broken through in Germany and to some degree in Scandinavia. It formed a coalition government with the Social Democrats until 2006. Unfortunately, being brought into government meant abandoning most of its useful policies – but nevertheless, it has significant popular support. The voting system matters too. We have real democracy here i.e. proportional representation at the national level. That is very significant for 3rd parties, but the effect here is that there are 5 parties always competing nationally to represent you. It is hard to complain that no one represents your views at a national election as a result.
But indeed, for the US, ANY 3rd party would be useful. I think you need electoral reform as well however.
…Labour Party – provided it isn’t Tony Blair’s NuLiebor, Neocon project under another name !!!
Good One!
News Flash, Obama just realize, may need to stop talking about Drill Baby Drill Baby, due to the fact, that the GULF of Mexico is about to become a nightmare for supporting OFF Shore Drilling.
The WORLD is BEGGING for a real progressive!
Thanks for the correction, Seymour – we’ll make it in future alerts. And let me thank you again for your fantastic work on covering this issue. It’s invaluable for our community