If the Democrats want to pass anything in the Senate with 50 votes over the course of the next year, they have to decide now what they want to use reconciliation for and include that in next year’s budget resolution.
What kind of progressive changes can you accomplish using reconciliation? Well, anything done through reconciliation must effect the federal budget because of the Byrd rule. But that still includes a huge set of great potential issues.
A reconciliation bill gives Democrats the opportunity to pass the bills they want without compromise. It can serve as the perfect vehicle to prove to the American voters how they plan to improve the country and why they should be allowed to hold their majorities.
Below are ten areas Democrats should think about addressing using reconciliation:
1. End Tax Loopholes
Arguably the entire purpose of the reconciliation process was to end things like completely unjustifiable tax loopholes. The special loophole that allows hedge fund managers to pay only a 15% tax rate on their income is a great example of a loophole that should be on the reconciliation chopping block.
2. Job Creation
There is whole range of job creation/job protection actions that could be addressed as part of a reconciliation bill. Something like the Local Jobs For America Act is a good starting point. Tom Harkin’s plan to provide schools with sufficient funds to stop the massive teacher layoffs occurring around the country would a smart job protection idea. And Kent Conrad, Chairman of the budget committee, seems to be envisioning jobs legislation as the main purpose for any reconciliation measure this year.
3. Fixing The New Health Care Law
There are literally dozens of critical changes you could make to the new health care law using reconciliation:
- adding a public option or Medicare buy-in
- strengthening the risk adjustment mechanism
- earlier start date than 2014
- all-payer
- direct Medicare drug price negotiation
- taxing direct-to-consumer drug advertising to discourage the practice
4. Climate Change Legislation
A simple straightforward tax on greenhouse gas production would be economically and environmentally the right thing to do. Putting a tax on CO2 production would help deal with global warming, and the money it generated could be used for many other functions, including deficit reduction, pay for new social services, or proportional reductions in payroll taxes.
Moving to a system that taxes pollution instead of work is not a bad idea. Unfortunately, Kent Conrad is determined to make sure reconciliation will not be used for climate legislation.
5. Energy Efficiency Improvements
Most of our homes, offices, and public buildings are not as energy efficient as they could be. This is bad for the environment and an unneeded added cost to personal and public budgets. Obama’s “cash for caulkers” program is one idea making its way through Congress. Similar legislation could probably be moved using reconciliation with additional funds directed to local governments to add energy efficiency improvements to schools, libraries, police departments, etc.
6. End Corporate Welfare Programs
Our system is so riddled with corporate welfare programs that it is hard to even know where to start. A good place would probably be cutting the insane agricultural subsidies, which appeals to both supporters of sustainable agriculture and anti-subsidy libertarians.
7. Taxing Wall Street and CDOs
A Wall Street tax could be designed to make it unprofitable to get “too big to fail.” Another tax could be create to at least rein the insane volume of CDOs that the finance system is engaged in. The goal would be to have the new taxes on Wall Street that would reduce leverage and risk, to prevent them from bring down the whole economy during a collapse. At the very least, such taxes would allow us to get back some of the billions they have stole from the taxpayers over the years.
8. Dealing With Citizens United Ruling
The Citizens United ruling will unleash an even bigger flood of corporate spending within the political system. While reconciliation might not be the best vehicle to deal with that, there are some solutions that probably could survive the Byrd rule. A bill requiring that all corporate spending on elections be treated as profit and taxed at the top corporate tax rate, for instance. The money raised could be used to create a small donor matching fund program, or a public financing program for those seeking federal office.
9. Increase Infrastructure Investments
Many of our water and sewer systems are incredibly old. We are falling behind in broadband access, and we need to begin a serious investment program in public transportation because gas prices will eventually start to rise as world wide demand picks up. We need to direct more money toward upgrading our infrastructure, and reconciliation could be used as a vehicle to do much of that.
10. Extend Unemployment and COBRA
Republicans have been continuously holding up the temporary extension of unemployment benefits and COBRA coverage. While I think it would be a bit of a waste of reconciliation to use it for this purpose, there are a lot of people hurting in this economic downturn who need help and this is something that would easily fit within the rules of reconciliation.
You Don’t Need To Choose Just One
The great thing is that many of the possible uses for reconciliation are not mutually exclusives, so several of them could be included in one reconciliation bill. For example, jobs creation legislation could be paid for by ending tax loopholes and the billions that would be saved by a public option. A carbon tax could pay for energy efficiency investments and improving mass transit systems.
Reconciliation is the best tool the Democrats have for getting around Republican obstructionism in the Senate.
Please share your thoughts on reforms (need to effect the budgets) that you would like to see passed using reconciliation.




35 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Why not enact a national usury law? I just don’t see how anyone could be against that.
Always thought it was interesting that Conservative Christians in America were all hell’s bells on gay issues but when it comes to usury, an issue addressed way more in the bible, there is pure silence.
Why would the gov’t want to pass a usury law that would only hamper themselves in the future?
Yeah, definitely raise the tax rates on Hedge fund managers. A bunch of blood suckers on the body politic that bring nothing at all of value to the world.
Oh, I’m quite sure these noble Dems will go for 10 out of 10 /s.
There used to be very strong anti-usury laws on the books in many states, but they were swept away during the Gilded Age, roundabout the time that corporations gained legal personhood status.
Da Banks and their share holders.. it is one of the ways of transferring all of the wealth upwards to them! Fuck the middle class.. they don’t need the money…
I like everything mentioned
Taxing Hedge Funds would be great I want the GOP to defend why Hedgefunds pay less than ordinary people for every dollar earned.
A Dollar is a Dollar right?
I want to see the Tea baggers try to sell their followers on this:)
AND THE KILLIN GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Jon Walker and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
First of all, I been workin’ local politics for some time now and been active with my county Democratic Party since ’04 and I’m here to tell you that at the local and state level, job creation and Harkin’s education bailout for states along with fixin’ the healthcare bill with a public option would cement democratic victories in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Furthermore, I believe that if the Democrats blow up the fascist fillibuster of the bankin’ bill this afternoon, we could get 2 years worth of legislation through BOTH houses in the next 8 weeks. Immigration, bankin’, jobs and healthcare under reconcilliation and sunset the Bush taxcuts and keep the June pullout in Iraq, now doesn’t that sound like sumpthin’ that might get Democrats to the polls this November?
There is somethin happenin’ out here in the grassroots of the Democratic Party and it ain’t “bi-partisan” I gauranfuckin’teaparty you!!
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNIITION…POLITUICS IS WAR BY ANY MEANS!!
If the White House does not get behind this then two things happen
1 ) the Left gets mad
2 ) Every investor not drunk on GOP cool aid will assume the financial system is weaker than people think it is and that the Hedge Fund profits are a Ponzai scheme.
I’m headed to Wisconsin kenosha soon to visit my sister.
I want to believe but please explain How?
What if they want the cover of compromise as an excuse to do their masters bidding and do little or nothing? What evidence that the leadership, let alone the rank and file DINO’s want to fix an part of the piece of excrement that is the HCR law, close loop holes or pass legislation to really create jobs or any of the other worthwhile suggestion from your article?
Cui bono.
Even Warren Buffett doesn’t understand why he pays a lower tax rate than his secretary. If they don’t have money at risk, and are simply managing other peoples’ money, it makes no sense to tax them at anything other than regular income tax rates.
Lord knows they have the accountants and advisers to help them find all the loopholes, anyway.
Lets call it why should Americans pay more for drugs than Mexicans bill the GOP wants to capitalize on hate lets direct that hate back at them.
Lets list the prices of the 100 most prescribed drugs then list what Mexico pays and then send angry mobs to drug stores with guns asking why we pay more.
Flat tax for anyone who makes 1/2 million a year or has a million dollars in assets no loopholes allowed. No Charity loopholes allowed either Bill Frist’s charity paid out how much?
The Catholic Church is using charity money to defend themselves from pedophile priest lawsuits.
The Mormons are battling Gay Marriage with their charity money.
The Fundy churches have been acting like the tax free arm of the GOP since Reagan.
Hmmm? Maybe we can form a church of nonbelievers/ believers here and get the charity deduction.
Citizen TCU:
If the fascist fillibuster cracks in the face of Wall Street reform then they can’t possibly get 41 votes to kill real immigration reform. Healthcare, state aide for education and jobs can be done under reconcilliation and the June date for Iraq is still in place. If a real bankin’ bill goes forward then there is no way Obama can come off the sunset of the Bush tax cuts ‘cuz it immediately pushes the next biennial budget toward balance if the wars come to a close.
Well that is the weak spot, isn’t it.
Ok :)
Numbers 8 and 10 are particularly good. Wish I thought there was even a prayer of such legislation getting through.
Our elected reps have been out and about and are hearing that they better start getting some things done PDQ. . .I hope they are getting the message. Perhaps a little success on some small amount of financial reform will fill their sails a bit. I hope so.
wishing :-)
I am mystified why anyone thinks the Democrats want to seriously move on any of these issues, let alone go to reconciliation on them. Sure they might do a few small things around the edges, but Democrats have as little interest in fixing anything as Republicans.
Wish lists are fun, but reality is Dem control is likely to end after Nov elections (lameduck session anyone????)
The left will not reward the corporate Obama – the “new voters” no longer love him and will not vote in the mid-term – and Rahm Emanuel’s FU to the base on health will result in a blowout worse than 94 – Hillary was forget and forgive – but health care folks are not about to do so.
The energy bill seems to have been drained of progressive effective change like a carbon tax and is now more welfare for corporations, the Wall Street Bank bill will not ban un-necessary derivatives and is limited to exchange and clearing house exposing the transactions (useful but not enough), the immigration bill is set to fail as it is needed by the Dems only to get the Latin vote out, and the deficit commission bill will refuse to do large cuts in the military or a large tax increases on the rich, as it tries to sell cuts in Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid.
Actually something needs to be done about futures markets in commodities as well. They are being gamed as well. Why do you think gas is up around $3 a gallon in a recession? Non-commercial traders, OTC markets need to be banned and margins and rollovers might need looking at too. As for interest rate swaps, the first blow up with derivatives happened in the 1990s with LTCM and involved, you guessed it, interest rate derivatives.
Well said and agree. It’s a good list, and perhaps in earlier days, something along these lines might have happened with a so-called Democratic majority. But these days? Doubtful in the extreme.
As for the earlier comment about usary and today’s fundies not getting their panties in a bunch about that: good point. Hadn’t considered that, but indeed the Bible does have much more to say (on point) about usary than about teh gheyz. My comment to that is that the rightwing C Street “christianists” (certainly not all persons of faith) have their own “take” on the Bible and definitely pick and choose which verses to focus on – often way out of context.
And finally, I’d like to see most churches lose their 501(c)(3) status for the reasons that TCU mentions. My blood boils to think of all the political organizing done by many of the more “main stream” churches. Really burns me how the Utah Mormons – those of odd sexual practices – had the nerve to use their money to run a political campaign to stop gay marriage in CA. And don’t get me started on the Pederasts in the RC church, who got to weigh in on the HCR debate in re to limiting women’s right to choose (I guess women must be forced to pump out more kids for the bishops to rape or something)…. urf!
Finally: tax the hedge funds at the same levels as the rest of us. That’s another thing that’s especially gauling. My preference would be to revert to pre-Reagan tax levels, but I’ll be even somewhat mollified to have those %$#@ taxed at today’s levels.
Good post. Won’t hold my breath, though.
I say, “Please file for reconciliation in the budget.” The GOP could use it next year when they regain the majorities.
Love to have Reid make it possible for them.
Go Harry, go Harry, go Harry…..
you can’t use reconciliation instructions from one congress for the next. They expire.
The 1990s with LTCM did not – mainly – involve interest rate derivatives as used in life insurance risk management – at least to my recollection. In speaking to the math types that were there I came away with the impression that they had found – or thought they had found – non-interest and sorta interest rate related items from around the world that moved in some statistical correlation with the interest rate derivatives they were selling – and were using those discovered – and cheap to buy a derivative on — correlations as a lower cost way to offset the US based risk, thereby giving them a cheap middle that was as “guaranteed” as a “pure hedge”. It was much like housing in that activities in other countries were thought to be independent of the interest rate movements in this country, except for this correlation they had discovered. This is similar to 2008 the Street saying housing mortgages were diversified and independent because of geographical location – the assumption makes the math work but was a poor assumption. Indeed the actuarial fear of the “bad tail” was nowhere to be seen in those young men, nor did one see a lot of scenario testing with a reasonable range of assumptions (Monte Carlo simulations fail to impress by themselves, of course). I am sure I explained the Long Term Capital thing incorrectly as I am relying on a poor memory – but that is my memory.
I excluded interest from my ban because in life insurance investments true risk management occurs, using derivatives in a most conservative manner – usually in my day to get the higher rate available from lower rated bonds (the Milken effect of the higher interest more than offsetting the higher risk) while presenting a prettier balance sheet (granted that is a bit of a fraud – you had to read the notes to the balance sheet) .
I was unaware of derivatives causing gas to rise – but then I have never studied this market. I thought all roads led to China, but must admit I was curious about why there was obviously no correlation with reported on land stocks of oil, of distillate, of gas, or of in transit or just sitting on ship inventories – or a correlation with “OPEC pretend control announcements”.
But I buy into your conclusion that non-commercial traders and OTC markets need to be banned and margins and rollovers need looking at. I have always felt that the odds were not clear enough for a gaming house approach, so an insurance approach with reserves was need – and on the street this equates to the rough justice of margins and collateral.
Fellow progressives, how does it make you feel…knowing that Biden could have presided over the reconcilliation process from the gitgo… so why exactly do we not have a public option…we bought the cry baby from michigan….so his 5 were not going to be an issue and from what I understand the Public option in the house was never a nail biter ..it was abortion. I mean, what I am getting at is Obamas cool deference/caution/timidity….realy pisses me off sometimes…dont get me wrong …I admire the hell out of him and am still one of his biggest supporters…but damn, everything he does is so tepid,…and he starts out every negotiation from the most center right centrist position—give away the store at the onset and every trade-off is at our expense. The Arizona law is a GodSend for the Democrats..and what is his input ? Seething Outrage ? No ….”I have instructed my justice dept to take a look at it”….I mean give me a break…..No I am not energized in the least….and Oh Mr. Obama we are NOT going to just swoon in response to your lying acting when closer to election time….we have seen your timidity…and willingness to trade principle for policy impotence at every turn…..and yeah I understand politics is the art of the possible…and appreciate your feeble efforts non the less….the only motivation and it is a big one….is the outright fascist insanity of the Republican party.
Ok ..now that I have gotten that vent off my chest….some more sage sanguine advise….Mr. Obama is still working in his own way to navigate all the crosscurrents to repair the damage of idiots who screwed the country for 8 years….so I understand…some of the signs so far show that maybe some lessons have been learned from the mistakes during the healthcare debate….swifter responses and actually holding the vote to put them on the record….the Repuglicans may be and are over-playing there hands on this one…The entire country is singularly focused on jobs and know who the villains are..so its just a matter of marketing..the 64%
is not going to shink like approval for health reform….as long as this economy stinks….a huge majority are going to have the pitch forks out for Wall Street and their is nothing Luntz and his loony language can do to change that….the simple challenge is for the Democrats to not screw it up….
“I’d like to see most churches lose their 501(c)(3) status for the reasons that TCU mentions”
Hard to justify taking Churches out of politics and leaving corporations in.
As to control of 501C3 (and all the other 501C”some number” and 527′s and so on), non-purpose income (as in business income from the shop next to the church selling crafts) is already taxed – it would not be hard – at least in terms of writing the bill and the paying of the tax – to include as income any spending by churches on prohibited activities. The problem of course is the power to tax is the power to destroy idea in the Constitution – so taxing anything other than commercial activity would most likely violate the Constitution – as would any direct prohibition on that activity.
Not that Churches are pushing all that much evil – for all the anti-gay nonsense Church activity (Fundi and Roman Catholic) there is 10 times that in pro-gay rights activity by other Churches (mainline protestant and Episcopal Catholic). Indeed I fear corporate control much much more than I fear some church getting its views made into law.
Until you have ovaries.
The gradual chipping-away at Roe as an example is demonstrated by that bastard Henry Hyde praying with his constituents – Presto – the Hyde Amendment.
That was for God… and Republican prospects at the polls.
Ugly public policy in the minds of a huge number of people, because religion was used as a wedge. That is not a small-ticket item.
All good ideas. Too bad the Progressives in Congress don’t organize themselves into a group or caucus or task forrce, whatever you’d call it… If they every got around to doing that, I imagine these are the sort of proposals they’d insist be added to the budget if the Administration expects their vote for anything.
Jon, if you’re in DC this week, you should hit the Fiscal Sustainability Teach-In on Wednesday at GW that Letsgetitdone has taken the leading oar in organizing. You’ll leave there positively antagonistic towards any politician that wants to raise taxes OR cut spending (who the hell in the White House thought, “you know what America is missing? Alan Simpson!”).
http://www.fiscalsustainability.org/node/20