President Barack Obama has a fetish for “splitting the difference” that defies both logic and common sense. It is like he is incapable of deciding what is the correct path, and feels some overwhelming desire to just take the halfway point between any two positions. Look at this passage in his health care proposal to see the absurd extreme that he has taken this split-the-difference thinking to:
Invest in Community Health Centers. Community health centers play a critical role in providing quality care in underserved areas. About 1,250 centers provide care to 20 million people, with an emphasis on preventive and primary care. The Senate bill increases funding to these centers for services by $7 billion and for construction by $1.5 billion over 5 years. The House bill provides $12 billion over the same 5 years. Bridging the difference, the President’s Proposal invests $11 billion in these centers.
This is just crazy. I doubt Obama actually thought $11 billion was, policy-wise, the right amount to spend on Community Health Centers. The idea enjoys broad popular support with the public, both parties, and policy experts. I doubt there is any political reason for splitting the difference. Either you think it is a good idea, or you do not. I don’t believe Obama studied the data and concluded $12 billion was just $1 billion too much, and that, by coincidence, that number is exactly half of the difference between the House and Senate bills. One billion dollars is a rounding error in this bill, and I doubt Obama would even risk getting into a fight over the change. Why even put the minor change in the 11-page proposal? Why not let the House have one single win?
I can just picture Obama sitting with his policy people and them all leaping for joy that they found a provision in both bills that was almost identical except for the funding level. They quickly moved to “split the difference” to show the media how compromisy they can be. They probably put no more thought into the move than thanking their lucky stars that the funding was two round numbers they could split right down the middle to show how they try to split anything right down the middle.
My advice to all Washington politicians moving forward: Always ask Obama for twice as much as you want because his overwhelmingly desire is to just split the number in half. Think of him like King Solomon, but the difference is his goal would be to really give both women one half of a baby.
Thanks to comment from puppethead




13 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Let’s be clear, make no mistake, Obama is no Solomon.
Does it even matter when one policy is proposed by, say, a Harvard health care expert, and the other by Joe the Plumber?
Just symptomatic of a broader “third-way” fetish that Obama and countless others swear by.
He still swears by his disastrous support for privately managed public housing in Illinois, “now there’s a good policy” he said. Why? Because it’s “somewhere in the middle”, isn’t it?
Probably the same logic as his bipartisanship.
Good catch.
I was wondering this when I looked at the subsidy level charts, too.
At this point they’re just making shit up as they go along. There’s no rationale for this health plan without real cost containment(robust PO at least).
Thank you so much for noticing this! I’m sick of Obama. You’re right. Instead of leadership, he’s substituting it with split the difference-ism. Every single policy is like this. Nothing decided on its merits, just split the difference between two sides. If anything Progressives, this should motivate you to get very extreme with these Rahmunist swine. If they’re going to reflexively split the difference, we might as well force them to split it a lot closer to our side.
Lol excellent. And to answer your question, yes. Remember, Obama was all gung ho for co-ops that everyone said was a sham just because Kent Conrad had a bug up his ass about them. Got to split the difference and allow them in. This fool is losing his base for good.
“compromisy” Nice.
Split the difference also applies to the Bill of Rights. Close Gitmo and respect trial by jury as he promised or do what the Republicans want. I know, let’s split the difference!
I thought Arianna Huffington had a good response for the centrism fetish on the Sunday shows when she pointed out that splitting the difference would have resulted in either freeing 1/2 the slaves, or maybe having them be slaves only from 9-5.
SNL nailed it in the sketch when the guy playing Biden said about Obama and HC “He will literally sign anything.”
Maybe some of the elected reps will be smarter than Rahm and get the PO in to save their own skin in the next election. And maybe pigs will fly.
They don’t care about the next election when they can all become lobbyists (or in President Obama’s case, make Clintonian speaker fees) if they lose.
This guy needs some basic leadership courses. He’s a lousy leader.
you’re falling into the 11 dimensional chess trap –
he is JUST a sell out. Period.
1993 on were crazy years for me – cooking on boats in alaska, on unemployment, going back to college AGAIN, getting a math degree … lying my ass off about my high tech ‘experience’ at seattle job fairs in ’96 at age 36 with “NT for Dummies” in my briefcase … all my hard earned surplus risking my ass on the Dumbest Catch getting turned into student loan debt …
was clinton this bad this fast? I was a bit too enamoured of his supposed third way for a little while – I thought we were gonna bury the fascists forever. ha ha ha. nafta.
there is good news – at least people are getting off the Big Zee-R-0 happy happy idiot train now instead of 2 years from now.
rmm.