Per the Hill, the White House is asking for tougher restrictions on lobbyists just as the President said in the State of the Union speech the other night. Which is a very good thing:
The Obama administration wants to close a “loophole” in the 1995 Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) that allows individuals to avoid registering as lobbyists if they spend less than 20 percent of their time lobbying.
Such a proposal could force Washington heavyweights, such as former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), to register as lobbyists.
Unfortunately, Daschle doesn’t use the “20%” excuse. Rather, he slides under the wire by not communicating requests specifically on behalf of clients:
Lobbyists, after all, are required to register with Congress and file quarterly reports disclosing their actions on behalf of clients. The South Dakota Democrat, like a growing number of people in his line of work, has made sure he doesn’t have to do that.
“I’ve not made a call nor made a visit since I left the Senate on behalf of a client. And I don’t have any expectation that I’ll do that in the future,” Daschle told the New York Times recently.
By claiming that he never picks up the phone on his clients’ behalf, Daschle is not legally obliged to declare himself a lobbyist, even if all his work for those clients falls under the general definition of “lobbying activity.” That means he can keep his clients’ identities and how much they pay him entirely secret.
How do we know? Because he says so. But Daschle’s a choir boy compared to Newt, who is writing legislation along with members of Congress on behalf of his clients. But Newt’s not a registered lobbyist. Neither is Dick Gephardt, who runs a “PR firm.”
Lobbying isn’t an inherently evil activity. Unfortunately, what often happens is that the rules put in place to limit the influence of lobbyists get used against those like Tom Malinowski, a lobbyist for Human Rights Watch who was denied a job at the White House on that basis. But a waiver was given to William Lynn III, a lobbyist for Raytheon, who got a top deputy job at the Pentagon.
There have been a rash of lobbyists canceling their registrations after the administration requested they no longer serve on advisory committees, restricted them from lobbying on the stimulus package and issued the executive order limiting their ability to be hired for administration jobs. And because it’s really hard to monitor whether someone spends 20% of their time doing something or not, it’s also difficult to enforce compliance.
As Craig Holman of Public Citizen notes, the best way to be able to collect that data is to make policymakers disclose who they meet with, something Obama called for in his speech. To his credit, Max Baucus posts his schedule every day, though there is no archive on the site. OpenCongress has an archive of those members of the House and Senate who post their schedules, but because it’s done manually there’s always a lag in reporting.
If members of Congress and the administration and posted their schedules as well, it would be a lot harder for the Daschles and the Newts to slide under the wire and claim they weren’t “lobbying” when they show up inserting themselves into deliberation on issues that their clients have an interest in.
A recent report by the IMF showed that there’s a direct correlation between lobbying and the financial crisis. Organizations who spent a lot of money lobbying Congress for weaker lending restrictions went on to practice “horrible underwriting. As shown in the map above, they conclude that many of these firms “did near collapse and needed to be bailed out by taxpayers.”
Lobbying has had a serious impact on our disfunctional Congress. It’s good to see the President taking the lead on much-needed transparency, because Congress doesn’t want their future gravy train messed with and will fight reform every step of the way.




24 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Jane, there’s no shortage of gravy trains on the horizon with the latest scotus ruling, if that goes unchecked we are screwed, big time.
As I mentioned yesterday, even listing the primary person in the appointment obscured the tagalongs.
Obama stated explicitly in the SotU address, “That’s why we’ve excluded lobbyists from policy-making jobs or seats on federal boards and commissions.”
We could also consider the source of the most recent anti-lobbyist rhetoric. From the Hill, After Obama rips lobbyists, K Street insiders get private policy briefings as an indicator of good faith on the subject.
Being reminded of Daschle’s state and having grown up in Montana I have to wonder if the ethics have become completely optional as one gets to the Rockies. The Senate doesn’t adhere and the voters don’t seem to care. Montana had Mike Mansfield, when I was a kid, for heaven’s sake. Now we have Baucus and more recently Tester the bought-and-paid for psueudo-populist. I’m sure Baucus will follow Daschle if Montanans ever wise up.
I’m wondering why the chart says “especially in the Northeast”. It appears that Central and Southern California have a concentration as well. I was just having a conversation with a friend about how the foreclosures have finally hit Orange County, where I do not live btw. That’s always been a bastion of teh uber ugly, but then, Central Cali has all that farmland. None of this is good.
You’ve never been to Florida, have you? *g*
Interesting map. And it looks like the areas of Kentucky with the highest numbers of underwater mortgages are also the areas around Ft Knox and Ft Campbell (with Bowling Green as well being hit with WKU, Corvette factory and a few other auto related industries)
I think there’s a sufficient lack of ethics to be spread equally in our country. With enough to spare to be shared with other countries too. I also believe there are some folks with hearts in the right place, but we need more of that, please.
Yes, and my state of Washington (upper left) has had to cut around $700 million from Higher Ed alone this biennium. And that’s only Higher Ed, and doesn’t take into account K-12. This is economically disastrous not only now, but 20 and 40 years out.
And look at California and its budget problems; and that state has never really recovered from Enron’s price hikes a decade ago.
The impacts of corruption in Congress go all the way down to every city, county, state, and local taxing agency (ports, libraries, hospitals, water districts and utilities…). And that doesn’t even begin to state that it offloads huge ‘externalities’ to small and local businesses to bring in more revenue in cities and counties that are starved for tax revenues.
The corruption goes to all levels of American life.
Thanks, Jane, for another remarkable post.
In fact as I look at the map, I think a lot of the areas where the underwaters are greater than 10% (but less than 30%) are in transient areas near military installations.
That might be something worth researching (he says to self)
Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism picked up on The Hill article and quoted this bit:
All of this talk about lobbying limits is just that talk. This is Obama. It’s always talk all the time. But that’s for the rubes. The reality is business as usual with lobbyists getting all the access they want and the Administration bending over backwards to give it to them and show that Obama really didn’t mean what he was saying, i.e. that he was lying again.
How long before we hear “How can you tell if Obama is lying?”? “If his lips are moving.”
Hey, did you happen to notice that a majority of the red spaces on the “underwater” map also have strong concentrations of blue voters?
Boy, if I were able to make blue voters move away from concentrated areas I could really mess with gerrymandering…but I could do this only with a really big pile of money and a decade of time.
Huh.
In my state of Washington, the central region that is ‘red’ has a higher than state average minority population.
Which raises a legitimate question: legitimate businesses generally have legislative needs, but they can compete without ‘special favors’.
If the lobbying were only destroying our political system, that would be one problem.
IMVHO, it is also destroying our business ethos and economic viability by allowing non-competitive ‘businesses’ to act in financially predatory ways because they’ve been able to alter the laws, and then gut (or else capture) the regulatory agencies.
One final thought: this also looks as if Congress need more, better paid staff.
I’ve seen lobbying happen when staff are so overwhelmed and unfamiliar with a technology or situation that they look to lobbyists as ‘the experts’, which is why lobbyists end up writing the laws.
So in addition to more transparent lobbying, you’d need to address the staffing deficits in D.C.
Yup, in Washington that is very, very true.
And the same thought crossed my mind, although I’m not as familiar with the other states…
It makes some sense as a lot of folks buy a new home when they get to a new duty station. If the price has continually been going up then the bottom falls out of a local or national market, it would leave a lot of military types underwater as they would have bought more recently than folks in non-transient areas or folks who are permanent in the area.
It’s also a problem of scale.
Back in the 1960s, the population was smaller throughout the US, and the Senators lives weren’t as high-speed.
With the increase in population, I don’t know that Congress has staffed itself to scale.
Regulatory agencies certainly haven’t hired to scale (except TSA).
And don’t get me started on all the FBI requests for mortgage and fraud investigators back in 2004 -2007 that fell on deaf ears in the GOP controlled Senate and WH (!). Had those FBI agents been hired several years back, this could have been prevented. But there were so many people making so much get-RICH-quick money that the homebuilders had enormous political influence.
Absolutely; but all the realtors, title agents, mortgage brokers, regional bankers — and then securitizers on Wall Street — all were paid up-front fees. So they had zero interest in what happened to those properties; they got their money.
IMVHO, those jobs are not coming back.
Real estate has very low barriers to entry, and that’s both good and bad. The downside is that a lot of people who should not have been realtors were making a lot of money doing it, and were not one bit savvy about the quality of loans reps they dealt with — who also had no state qualifications to pass, BTW.
In Washington state, the people who assess houses (housing appraisers) ARE licensed by the state.
I’m told by a friend who has had so much business the past two years that he has had a tough time keeping up that the state went in and lined up the records between ‘sunk’ properties and appraisers; the state then yanked a whole lot of appraiser licenses.
My pal, who could hardly even get work 4 years ago at the height of the boom because he refused to falsely inflate home prices, has a gold star by his name and as much work as he has time to do.
So there’s the silver lining ;-))
Short term, ethical people get hosed.
Long term, they do just fine…
David Dayen has a fresh cross-post up: White House Asks DoJ To Move Terror Trials From NYC UPDATED: Or Not?
Except for Arizona, it looks to me like the concentration of upside down mortgages is in higher population urban areas. More people, more houses, more mortgage inflation. Interesting that states with lower populations overall have lower percentages. Yet the concentration (even if not red) is in urban areas, more or less.
Stockton is the foreclosure capital.
Bakersfield is hard hit.
OC has had a flood of foreclosure for 2 years.
That the Obama administration finally wants to take on the system that has worked far too well for lobbyists and K Street insiders is both good for our democracy and smart politically after what happened in Massachusetts last week.
Let’s hope Obama’s getting the right message. Thanks, Jane.
I find this to be just more “speechifying” by Obama. Remember, he’s the guy who cut the secret backroom deals with PhRMA and others on healthcare legislation. He no longer has credibility on this subject.
What’s even more sickening to watch is Obama begging the GOPers to work with him this morning. He still hasn’t figured out that for GOPers, it’s party first and country second. They’re HOPING for a economic disaster to occur so they can pick up the pieces. I’m beginning to think Obama is just stupid for pursuing “bipartisanship” when there obviously isn’t any around.
Why not break the cycle of the revolving door of Congress people leaving congress and then becoming a lobbyist? Pass legislation that anyone leaving Congress has to wait 5 years before they can join any corporation, law firm or pr firm that does business on Capitol Hill.
“A day after bashing lobbyists, President Barack Obama’s administration has invited K Street insiders to join private briefings on a range of topics addressed in Wednesday’s State of the Union.
The Treasury Department on Thursday morning invited selected individuals to “a series of conference calls with senior Obama administration officials to discuss key aspects of the State of the Union address.”…
The invitation stated, “The White House is encouraging you to participate in these calls and will have a question and answer session at the end of each call. As a reminder, these calls are not intended for press purposes.”…”
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/01/obama-hypocrisy-watch-obama-rips-lobbyists-then-gives-them-private-briefings.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29