In last night’s State of the Union address, Obama only touched on health care reform briefly. He made it clear he wants something done, but left Democrats scratching their heads about what the path forward should be. Some thoughts:
Now let’s be clear – I did not choose to tackle this issue to get some legislative victory under my belt. And by now it should be fairly obvious that I didn’t take on health care because it was good politics.
I took on health care because of the stories I’ve heard from Americans with pre-existing conditions whose lives depend on getting coverage; patients who’ve been denied coverage; and families – even those with insurance – who are just one illness away from financial ruin.
The fact that Obama mentioned pre-existing conditions is an indication that he may still push for a comprehensive bill, and has not already decided to go for something much more scaled down.
After nearly a century of trying, we are closer than ever to bringing more security to the lives of so many Americans. The approach we’ve taken would protect every American from the worst practices of the insurance industry. It would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market. It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care. And by the way, I want to acknowledge our First Lady, Michelle Obama, who this year is creating a national movement to tackle the epidemic of childhood obesity and make our kids healthier.
Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan. It would reduce costs and premiums for millions of families and businesses. And according to the Congressional Budget Office – the independent organization that both parties have cited as the official scorekeeper for Congress – our approach would bring down the deficit by as much as $1 trillion over the next two decades.
Still, this is a complex issue, and the longer it was debated, the more skeptical people became. I take my share of the blame for not explaining it more clearly to the American people. And I know that with all the lobbying and horse-trading, this process left most Americans wondering what’s in it for them.
This is not just a problem of Obama failing to sell health care reform. It is true that Obama could have done more to try to market reform, but an inherent problem with the Senate bill is that it is full of unpopular ideas–ideas Obama personally campaigned against.
People don’t want a tax on their benefits or a mandate forcing them to buy private insurance. Many people do want to keep the coverage they currently have, and will not be able to do that under the Senate bill because the excise tax is designed to force your employer to change your policy. Obama should know these ideas are politically toxic because he won by running against both of them.
Obama spent all year fighting to protect ideas he claimed to be against on the campaign trail, yet he did nothing to advance, and often tried to stop, very popular ideas he campaigned on like the public option, drug re-importation, and direct Medicare drug price negotiations. Obama’s many flip-flops on health care played an important role in people’s cynicism about reform. Blaming Congress and communication strategies may feel good, but it ignores a big part of the problem.
But I also know this problem is not going away. By the time I’m finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether. I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.
As temperatures cool, I want everyone to take another look at the plan we’ve proposed.
The fact that he said, “the plan we’ve proposed” could be a sign that Obama would support the House passing the Senate bill, with or without a reconciliation sidecar.
There’s a reason why many doctors, nurses, and health care experts who know our system best consider this approach a vast improvement over the status quo. But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know. Here’s what I ask of Congress, though: Do not walk away from reform. Not now. Not when we are so close. Let us find a way to come together and finish the job for the American people.
Obama’s “let me know” line does leave open the door to a completely new bill. It could be a new bipartisan bill, or even a new pure reconciliation bill.
To Obama’s suggestion for better ideas, I think the proper response is to quote Peterr “I’ll give it to you in two words, Mr. President: Public. Option.”
I would also like to submit a three word answer: “Medicare for all,” and a one word answer, Pete Stark’s: “Americare”
This is the most painfully frustrating part of this entire health care reform effort. Obama not only refuses to point out that progressives have better ideas about health care reform, but he pretends that these progressive ideas don’t even exist at all. This is bad policy and bad politics.
If Obama did not reflexively lurch right every time Republicans came up with some new crazy lie about reform, people would be less inclined to believe the lies. The logic goes, if Democrats drop end-of-life counseling quickly because Republicans called it “death panels,” then they probably really were death panels. Why else would Democrats drop the idea so quickly?
Finally, if Obama had made a point of showing how much further to the left the vast majority of Democrats wanted health care reform to be, it would have made it easier for him to explain to the American people that the Senate bill is very much a right-of-center reform package. By never acknowledging that a large percent of the country was far to the left of Obama on this issue, he let the Republicans define his plan as extreme. Hint for Obama: if you pretend everyone to your left does not exist, then, by default, you can never be seen as a “centrist” like you crave.



44 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
From your post to his eyes!
Not just on health care, but on nearly every issue of major importance.
in general i think the po as we’ve seen from congress is stupid neoliberal policy. but i’m down with either medicare for all (the single payer version) or americare (a public option even this single payer purist was willing to support last spring):
DrSteveB: Strong Public Option: 100% Coverage & Cost Control
from sara robinson interview with ian masters (9/22/09 iirc. my rough transcription):
Nice post, Jon. Why do you prefer “Americare” to HR 676 or S 703?
“But if anyone from either party has a better approach that will bring down premiums, bring down the deficit, cover the uninsured, strengthen Medicare for seniors, and stop insurance company abuses, let me know”
Jon,
Those two graphs from the Americare link (Commonwealth Fund report), comparing different health reform proposals speak volumes (The Senate bill is a watered down “Building Blocks” proposal– stripping out the public option increases costs and reduces coverage of the uninsured from what’s shown in the graphs). Of the eleven proposals considered, Stark’s Americare bill was the only that provided 100% coverage and was also the only that actually reduced National Health Expenditures.
Number of Uninsured People Newly Covered
Changes in National Health Expenditures
Americare is a spending bill, expanding the existing Medicare system. As I mentioned yesterday, Pete Stark has three cosponsors this Congress, and had 32 cosponsors last Congress. Why hasn’t Stark or any of the cosponsors (including Miller, Rangel and Waxman) still in Congress called for using THEIR OWN FREAKIN’ BILL as the basis of the reconciliation bill?
The 2009 version of Americare is co-sponsored by: Earl Blumenauer [D-OR3], Keith Ellison [D-MN5]:Janice Schakowsky [D-IL9]
The 2007 version was cosponsored by: André Carson [D-IN15], Donna Christensen [D-VI], Eleanor Norton [D-DC], Neil Abercrombie [D-HI1], Tammy Baldwin [D-WI2], Xavier Becerra [D-CA31], Corrine Brown [D-FL3], Lois Capps [D-CA23], Julia Carson [D-IN7], Steve Cohen [D-TN9], John Conyers [D-MI14], Bob Filner [D-CA51], Raul Grijalva [D-AZ7], Phil Hare [D-IL17], Maurice Hinchey [D-NY22], Jesse Jackson [D-IL2], Carolyn Kilpatrick [D-MI13], Tom Lantos [D-CA12], Barbara Lee [D-CA9], John Lewis [D-GA5], Michael McNulty [D-NY21], George Miller [D-CA7], Jerrold Nadler [D-NY8], Edward Pastor [D-AZ4], Charles Rangel [D-NY15], Janice Schakowsky [D-IL9], Louise Slaughter [D-NY28], Bennie Thompson [D-MS2], Edolphus Towns [D-NY10], Henry Waxman [D-CA30], Peter Welch [D-VT], Lynn Woolsey [D-CA6]
Selise,
I’m right with you that even Americare is inferior to Medicare to All (and yet still a big improvement over the status quo and either the House Tricommittee or Senate bills).
After we win the battle (whether this year or in the future) to provide 100% coverage, the next battle would be to move from premium funding to general revenue funding. The first battle is against the insurance industry, the second one will be against the deficit hawks. Ellen Brown has an interesting article up on how Canada initially funded its single payer system with low-interest loans from the Canadian central bank (that lasted until the neoliberals got their mitts on the Bank of Canada).
amen! amen!
(and thanks for the link!)
If Obama did not reflexively lurch right every time Republicans came up with some new crazy lie…
and if frogs had wings, they wouldn’t whomp their ass every tine they jump.
Folks have probably linked to this already, but here’s a petition from Healthcare-Now! calling on the President to revisit Medicare for All.
HCN! is also calling on folks to contact the White House, in response to the President’s ever-so-sincere call for suggestions on health care reform solutions, to agree to meet with Margaret Flowers, MD, and other representatives of the Leadership Conference on Guaranteed Health Care to get an earful on Medicare for All. The WH phone number is 202-456-1111.
See the open letter from Dr. Flowers here.
Why does FDL keep coming back to HCR??….The “Goal” was to “kill the Senate Bill”..Guess what? It’s dead!.. Forget about “what’s next” because no one at FDL was really INTERESTED in what happened after the bill was killed…It’s doubtful the reconciliation would produce 50 votes. I doubt if Bayh, Nelson(FL), Nelson(NE), Lieberman, Landrieau, Lincoln, Webb, Pryor, Carper or Wyden can be “counted on” to support reconciliation. They’ve ALL spoken against “jamming a bill down Americans throats”..ALl the Mass election did was give them cover. There will be over 30MIL Americans without healthcare, who would have been covered if HCR passed. Stop talking about who’s to “blame”. You won! Go celebrate.
schizophrenic
Is this Optional Medicare for All, or Mandatory Medicare for All.
Seems to me the people have spoken when it comes to mandates.
The part of the MSM that considers itself neutral, in word if not deed, seems to be presenting the criteria for the SOTU success being based upon two goals. Whether Obama has managed to get some of the Republicans on board and whether the unempowered and unacknowledged lefties liked his smooth talk and vague promises to reduce taxes so much that past deeds would not be important for just a while longer. The answer to the former is a given and maybe some lefties will give him more slack. Still, I’ll go with no and no.
All of the good ideas that Obama says he might be willing to listen to that include changing course weren’t on the table and they still aren’t. When he says “the plan we’ve proposed” we can probably safely assume that the hundreds of thousands paid to Gruber were intended to promote that previously mentioned plan. The plan that looks like the Senate version, if they bipartisan it a bit more in the future all the better.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Jon Walker and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
“…if you pretend every one to your left does not exist, then, by default, you can never be seen as a ‘centerist’, as you crave.”
This is exactly the problem we all have with Obama and it’s why I am wonderin’ jest how politically smart he really is. This snookerin’ the progressive base of the party into voting for you because you raise the boogie men of the fascist Republicans worked for Bill Clinton but now that Clinton and his wife have been exposed as the right wing opportunists they are, it won’t happen again. AND, more importantly, it won’t work because the coalition of youth, minorities and “liberals” is a much tougher coalition to keep together than the coalition of fear and lowered expectations of 1992 and 1996. Reality is simply history teaching by example and if Obama doesn’t realize that he won’t be re-elected without all three elements of his coalition not only in place but in power then he really isn’t as smart as I give ‘im credit for but he has created a coalition that will outlive even his short lived Presidency.
Thanx again for the post Brother Jon and…
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION, IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CORPORATE WARS DON’TCHA KNOW!!
Actually, I’d say the the most painfully frustrating part is that both Obama and Republicans act like his plan is somehow the idea of the left.
What Obama is using to praise it is that it’s comprehensive, and what the Republicans are using to slam it is that it’s comprehensive. The Senate bill or something like it may be comprehensive, but it sucks. We should drop the effort to pass comprehensive legislation (there aren’t enough Democrats who aren’t corrupt to pass decent comprehensive legislation anyway) and start focusing on the piecemeal approach.
Raven…after reading your numerous comments online, I must apologize for my rudeness on another thread. It was uncalled for. Peace.
We won? Man I’m always the last to know these things. Hopefully there will be a team meeting fairly soon.
So when Obama talked about HRC in the SOTU speech he was blowing smoke or maybe making the troops feel better. Sure doesn’t sound right to me but I’m a long way from the seats of power.
If a few people commenting on a blog can change DC politics without even knowing they did it someone must have finally solved the hard math on chaos theory. If this thing died, which is not actually certain at this point, it died because sometimes even Pharmaceutical and Insurance lobbyist cash isn’t deep enough cover for doing the wrong thing. So far I’d say the jury is still out.
Wow, I didn’t think it was all that bad but I should say the same to you.
peas
Being fairly new I didn’t want to come off as an a-hole for no apparent reason.
when Obama says he “chose to tackle this issue” and “took on health care”, I guess he means that he made a couple of speeches about it.
If Obama wants to “tackle the issue” he should “tackle the issue”.
If Obama wants to “take on health care” he should “take on health care”.
Hang tough, we’ll all go down together.
Citizen canadianbeaver:
You are indeed a real Canadian, the honesty you express is “stand up”…and for your information, Citizen Raven is a real American hero who represents the best my generation has to offer. He has walked right through “the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” and his understanding of things is ignored only out of ignorance.
“a sign that Obama would support the House passing the Senate bill…”
Are you serious? He would support literally anything at this point with the words “Health Care Reform” scrawled across the top of it.
Stupak/Nelson not slut-shaming enough? Hell, make them suffer 20 lashes in the public square before they can get their precious abortions. Obama will sign it. And say, “This is not a perfect bill. But it represents an historic first step…”
And many could care less whether they have Aetna or Wellpoint or Blue Shield.
Wow bro, that is embarrassing.
Find the Cost of Freedom
I’ve said this before until Health Care is Free for everyone in Amerika then any other plan is corp. welfare. I will accept the Swiss plan.
Citizen Raven:
Listenin’ to that is like listenin’ to “Taps” on Veteran’s Day…like I said about you, brother,it is the truth.
I seriously don’t give a fuck what Obama says at this point, he’s just doing the same thing he did all summer, make a nice speech, let congress fuck Americans over for the insurance companies. Jibber jabber a bunch of kabuki bullshit to everyone until nobody knows the plan, then drop the sellout when you think you got the votes. Massachusetts blew a hole in their scheme, but it’s the same shtick. Shut them down House Progressives!
: )
Seconded!
Here’s a dissection of what Obama said last night, as interpreted by GW Bush:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1uUejf5-zU
In other words……blah, blah, blah…I hear you…blah, blah, blah…I promise…blah, blah, blah…hopey hopey change change…God help the world in 2012 when a Rethuglican again gains the presidency and has Congress at their backs…maybe the Mayans were right and it is the end of the world.
WOO HOO, a few blue collar and white collar folks at FDL killed healthcare! WOO HOO, those millions we have to go up against our enemies really paid off this time.
This is the best *recent* example of why I <3 the Raven.
yup & lol.
So, now we know where Geitner gets his economic terrorism tactics.
Barack Obama. Pretty sickening.
The more I see, the more I’m certain Obama is the greatest force behind maintaining the downward spiral of the middle class.
The folks here at FDL (or anybody who wants to play) ought to collaborate to create a non-profit insurance company to perform the functions we’re wanting from the public option. “Public Option Plan, LLC”. It’s just an insurance company which decides in advance that the mission is to deliver on all legitimate claims with the lowest operating expenses manageable.
Everyone working for the company would be assured of a decent salary and benefits, but with a pay-scale which caps the highest executive salaries at a level not to exceed those paid our highest-level public servants. The president of the company can’t make more than the President of the United States. Everyone makes a living, but nobody gets rich.
A daydream perhaps. But it’s evident that Congress will not make any effort to create competition for the insurance industry. Looks like we’ll have to roll our own.
thanks! just signed. generic letter is good:
and here’s a couple of bits from dr. flower’s open letter:
tried calling WH, the line was busy, but will keep trying to get through. as SD says,
Never. Give. Up.
it’s like having a fire dept or police or the courts. it’s a public good we all share.
Oddly appropriate…
I went to your linky to sign the collective rant, and was required to type in the squiggly words presented (to verify that I’m a bio-unit rather than a program). The words I was presented with were:
Administration piglets
I was wondering if everyone got the same words or if they’re randomly generated. At any rate, I thought it was amusing. I stopped scowling for nearly an entire minute…
I just signed it. My squiggly words were “Washington temping.”
Perhaps the Whitehouse phones were too busy with the K street gang today!
Hilariously apt!
I know it FEELS GOOD to say pass the bill, medicare for all, etc. But PLEASE READ THE BILLS! I’ve read the bills, CBO/CMMS docs, Mgr’s Amendment and CBO comments on that. THIS BILL IS DISASTEROUS! Why: CBO states deficits WILL INCREASE; CBO states estimates for 2nd 10 yrs are MEANINGLESS (CBO’s word re Mgr’s Amend.); Medicare is gutted (Mayo Clinic in AS NO LONGER providing trtmnt to Medicare patients). CBO states access to care is LIKELY TO DECREASE; quality of care is LIKELY TO DECREASE. You WILL LOSE your current plan. Independent Payment Advisory Board WILL DETERMINE “cost effective” treatments-this is called RATIONING BY THE GOVT. Medicare pmt rates to be reduced 21% in 2010 w/ more in coming years. CBO states this will lead to BANKRUPTCIES w/in 5 years. MD’s deemed to be prescribing “excessive” costly procedures WILL BE FINED by GOVT. Same re “excessive” readmissions.
The bill is so bad the Senate BRIBED some of its own members to vote for it. The bill is so bad that O BRIBED the drug co’s (patent extensions leading to limited generics; Medicare CANT negotiate lower prices; NO importation of cheaper drugs from canada); BRIBED Insurance co’s (anti-trust provision still applies, tens of millions of “customers” who MUST buy their product/service). BRIBED SEIU and other unions (the cadillac tax does NOT apply to Unions for a number of years). CONgress won’t participate (I know they are “urged” to participate by a resolution. Dont hold your breath). I can be FORCED by the Govt to BUY a product/service, defined by the Govt, I DON’T want from a private company chosen by the Govt. If I don’t, the Govt can FINE me and INCARCERATE ME and SEIZE ASSETS TO FORCE ME TO BUY THE PRODUCT I REFUSED INITIALLY.
Pre-existing conditions: Govt funded high risk pool. Interstate purchasing, portability, tax credits as needed for “poor” people. ETC.
This bill is probably going to face constitutional challenges on a variety of issues. The concept sounds great. The realities of these bills are TERRIBLE! Please read the bills and the CBO and the Manager’s Amendment (380 pp) CBO comment on Mgr’s Amend 40 pp; concise, clear language, easily understood.
i haven’t read the bills, but i have read the cbo and cms reports, letters, etc. and agree with your conclusions.
i wish supporters of the senate bill would address the issues you’ve raised.