Two freshman Democratic Representatives ,Jared Polis (CO2) and Chellie Pringree (ME1), are pushing hard to include a public option in any reconciliation measure meant to fix the current Senate bill. Polis and Pingree are currently circulating a letter in support of the public option, and are looking for signatures from their colleagues. From the Huffington Post:
“It is very likely that the public option could have passed the Senate, if brought up under majority-vote ‘budget reconciliation’ rules,” reads the letter. “While there were valid reasons stated for not using reconciliation before, especially given that some important provisions of health care reform wouldn’t qualify under the reconciliation rules, those reasons no longer exist.”
[...]
“There’s enthusiasm that if a majority of senators are on board with it, then we should go for it,” he said. “I think the inclusion of the public option would make that route much more attractive to House Democrats.”Health care reform became less popular, Polis argued, when the public option was taken out but the requirement to buy private insurance or pay a fine remained.
It is good to see that at least two Democratic House members can read simple polling data. The public option is extremely popular, while the individual mandate in the Senate bill, which forces people to buy only private insurance, is incredibly unpopular. Fortunately, the addition of a public option even makes the unpopular individual mandate much more palatable to regular Americans.
No New Taxes?
What is very interesting about the letter is that Polis is one of the two authors. Throughout the health care debate, Polis was mainly known for taking the lead against the House’s surtax on the wealthy.
It is possible that Polis’s strong push for the public option right now might have a lot to due with its ability to save the bill money. It is rumored the current plan is to use reconciliation to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for the union deal on the excise tax. A move that would be political suicide for Democrats.
Any health care reconciliation measure this year must reduce the deficit to some extent, so any change to the very unpopular excise tax must be paid for. One option is new taxes or increases elsewhere; the other is to pay for the changes with popular cost savings provisions like a public option, Medicaid expansion, and/or Medicare buy-in. Clearly, the latter is what Polis should prefer personally, as it would be the smart choice politically for all Democrats. Sometimes good policy makes for good politics.




31 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
the public option is the compromise
Better late than never.As the wind blows.Freshman year old dogs are still trainable
What happened to the PO paid for by the rich = $1M per year?
Freshman year old dogs are still trainable
Until they get a whiff of them tasty lobbyist treats…
Sheesh, they’ve got to be kidding. It’s getting embarassing.
Obama doesn’t want the Public Option. I saw that from the get go.
And what Obama wants, Obama gets.
Give it up!
Taxing the rich? Oh, can’t do that. They might crash the economy.
45,000 people die each year from lack of health care, and Reid say’s, “No rush”.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2010/jan/26/harry-reid-there-no-rush-health-care-reform/
Mabe we could put a really strong shock collar on and give The People controls.
[modnote; please no violence, even fantasy.]
Barry wants to reward the Health Ins. vandals for giving him millions. He has no intention of allowing a bill with a PO to ever come to vote. Us wanting it means shit to this Corporatist lackey. He’s hoping that in 3 yrs. all will be forgotten and we’ll vote for his twin brother Barak again.
Interesting developoment, Jon. But I guess we’ll see how far this goes, or whether it’s more kabuki theater. I’d be interested to know if Kucinich has an opinion on this, he’s one of the (very) few in the House that I trust.
The tax on the wealthy is still an important piece, and it is an effective way to control the cost. I don’t know that it is political suicide for Dems, after all, it’s not the wealthy who elected them, it’s only that the Repubs will use it as a club.
While on the subject of taxes, it’s been on my mind of late – weren’t the Bush tax cuts supposed to expire in 2010? Haven’t heard any news about this lately.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Jon Walker and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
“The public option IS the compromise”, Citizen KKing @#1.
After almost a year since the last State of the Union, it appears we are back to the starting point and that the compromise between real healthcare and insurance reform and no reform or extending the control and profits of the insurance industry is now, once again, back to a public option. All the hundreds of millions of dollars spent lobbying, bribing and advertising has bought not ONLY another year of public suffering but, more importantly, the complete exposure of the corporate corruption of our politics and BOTH political parties.
I have said this before but I think given the movement since the Massachusetts Massacre it’s worth sayin’ one more time: The loss of the Massachusets Senate seat is the best thing that could happen to the Democratic Party and the progressive fight against this corporatist President.
There now that’s outta the way we can look to the dilema that the corporatists and their stooges face. Until the loss in Massachusets the progressive Democrats were said to be caught between passing an unpopular and regressive bill or not passing anything and losing majorities in BOTH houses of Congress. Now it is the corporatists who suffer if there is no bill and the only political faction who come out stronger after this November stand to be the progressives. In addition, the entire structure put in place over the last 50 years to styme government and populist legislation is being called into question and will most certainly be part of the political argument in November. Actually what we are seeing is the collapse of the “no government is good government” argument that was last blasted outta the water with Newt Gingrich and his government shutdown.
If there is no healthcare reform thru reconcilliation that has a public option, the only folks who suffer politically will be corporatists, Blue Dogs and the ObamaRhama administration. I think Rahm must be howlin’ at the moon and protesting that God isn’t fair to give us this moment of beautiful irony.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…AND REMEMBER THIS IS ALL ABOPUT THE CORPORATE WARS FOR PROFITS!!
You screwed the pooch on that one dude. I too appreciated the first comment: “the public option is the compromise” but lets give credit where credit is due and acknowledge that it was posted by Leen.
DITTO.We The People can be the power in this imformation age.KEEPING THE POWDER DRY.
MSNBC just reported the pelosi has the votes to pass the senate’s bad joke on the american people. no mention of a po.
I really do not understand how the Democrats and the unions could sign up for that deal. It’s a sure-fire way for resentment to build between unions and the rest of the public, which is a thing that I think any sensible union leader would want to avoid right now. If they’d held out for an end to the excise tax, they probably could have gotten it. After all, the Senate was willing to tax the rich to pay for the union deal.
Either they know something that I don’t, or union leaders are real schmucks these days.
I emailed my rep to ask him to please sign on to the Polis/Pingreee letter directing the Senate to include a public option in the HCR reconciliaton process, but I do not hold out much hope for him coming around. Regardless, everyone that supports this idea should contact their critters and voice their opinion. We need to be heard on this!
If the Democrats take heed of the real lessons of that loss, then I agree. Many show absolutely no sign of having comprehended it, though, and there are plenty of folks willing to enable them.
Good policy is good politics. Words to live by.
That gets us into one of those discussions about benefits to a group versus individuals. I don’t know how strong the ties are between the Democratic Party and its politicians, but I imagine that they run the gamut.
The problem is that long-term, you’re right – a prosperous, just society ought to benefit the party that brought it to us. Unfortunately, as we’ve seen with the health care reform “debate”, too often there are hazards for the folks who take the chance. Are they willing to take one for the team?
We’ve gotten awfully far away from the original idea of citizen-politicians, folks who just take a few years out of their lives to run for Congress and serve there. Now, just about everyone is a professional, for reasons that in some cases I can’t even guess at. For professionals, the rewards are different than they are for amateurs.
Most agree that the public option is the best way forward…
But those that have been fighting for health care…with no health care..know there is only one way forward and that is a “Health Care Reform Bill” that can be passed Now !!
If the Democrats blow this “real” chance to pass this bill now, then …the enemy has won..and progress has lost…
Folks, the time is now…Pass this darn health care bill now…
November is coming… Us real Democrats will be held accountable !!
lets “Getterdone” on health care now !!
Yeah I like that it that the corporatists are sweating out this roadblock to their pet boondoggle, but I fear you are overly optimistic that the Administration and the Dem leaders (oxymoronic?) will ever cave and let a real public option in the door.
Hey, “real” Democrat,
This “fake” Democrat doesn’t think passing a bad health care bill now is going to help Democrats at the polls in Nov.
And if the Senate’s bad joke on the American people is the best that these Democrats can do, then they deserve to have to answer for it in Nov. Holding them accountable is fine by me.
Btw, “fake” Democrats like me don’t appreciate “real” Democrats like you using the bad situation of Americans who do not have health insurance to push for passing bad legislation now !!
Right Jon, taxing the rich would be political sue a side. Sure wish I could afford the buck 99 to download that sarcasm symbol!
I find myself agreeing with about 95% of what you write, but you’re going to have to show me some numbers regarding taxing millionaires.
Taxing the wealthy is the most popular tax but still why raise taxes when you don’t need to?
The most popular new tax is no new tax.
Jon,
I guess my answer would be “to slow the wealth gap”. If you were to tax over 10 mil at say 85%, perhaps it would change the desire to “earn” more than 10 mil. Just sayin’
Sometimes I think that we might be better off if we just picked people at random out of phone books or voter rolls to serve in Congress for the minimum term length. That way at least they would be forced out before they learned how to game the system and they would not be beholden to the special interests.
Is that supposed to be a good thing or a bad thing?
From my point of view, good. Your millage my vary.
I agree. I was just curious because I was recently fascinated by the Krugman description of the 20th century history of income inequality in this country. You probably know that the super-rich were taxed at that rate after the great depression, I think the highest tax rate actually was up to 90% during what Krugman calls the great compression, which we are now on the other side of. We need another great compression in this country today and we will have it soon, one way or another.
Huh?
Plum Line pickup:
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/political-media/happy-hour-roundup-152/
Er… Does this mean that the public option has absolutely no chance getting anywhere near the sidekick recon stuff? [Post above being another Kabuki Dance] — Or, is Woolsey just out to lunch — maybe with Jane Harman?
Bird Rule about “not a budget matter” may kill the idea.
However – Budget recon sets limits on everything and can not be stopped as shown by the 19 times beginning with Reagan that it has been used
Debate in both houses is limited to 20 hours, and no Senate filibusters are allowed.
Nonbudget legislation is include often – the GOP used it to pass welfare reform in 1996, SCHIP in 97, opening Alaska to drilling in 2004.
The process is already started since they met the rule that the budget resolution include reconciliation instructions that direct them to produce legislation by a certain date that meets the mandatory spending or tax targets – and the Senate Finance and Health committees each are supposed to send proposed changes in laws within their jurisdictions to the Senate Budget Committee that would save $1 billion over the next five years. In the Senate, the bill may be challenged on the floor by any senator who asserts that a provision runs afoul of the “Byrd Rule.” with the chair making a decision. The resulting bills become a final conference report which goes to the floor under a strict timetable for action and with a prohibition of any amendments. The compromise measure is also subject to Byrd Rule objections. Once passed, the president signs.