One thing you find out pretty quickly when dealing with beltway press is that Rahm Emanuel is a source for most of them, and that they’re generally unwilling to criticize him lest they blow up one of their best sources of White House spin. So, it’s rare that a journalist (in this case the Wall Street Journal’s Peter Wallsten, recently arrived from the LA Times) runs a non-lapdog profile.
Most amusing to me was the fact that he finally got the goods about Rahm’s famous Veal Pen tirade, when Rahm showed up at the Common Purpose meeting and lambasted the liberal interest groups because MoveOn was running radio ads against Blue Dogs. Previously it had been reported that Rahm called them “f*#king stupid,” even though the scuttlebut was that Rahm said they were “f*#king retards.” It’s a tight-lipped crowd to penetrate, and nobody wants to get zapped from the meetings for talking to the press. But Wallsten managed to get the story:
The friction was laid bare in August when Mr. Emanuel showed up at a weekly strategy session featuring liberal groups and White House aides. Some attendees said they were planning to air ads attacking conservative Democrats who were balking at Mr. Obama’s health-care overhaul.
“F—ing retarded,” Mr. Emanuel scolded the group, according to several participants. He warned them not to alienate lawmakers whose votes would be needed on health care and other top legislative items.
Yesterday a journalist asked me if I thought Rahm was a “tough guy,” because he’s hearing many people say that he’s actually shallow and weak. I pointed him to this famous story:
[T]he definitive Rahm Emanuel story takes place in Little Rock, Ark., in the heady days after Bill Clinton was first elected President.
It was there that Emanuel, then Clinton’s chief fund-raiser, repaired with George Stephanopoulos, Mandy Grunwald and other aides to Doe’s, the campaign hangout. Revenge was heavy in the air as the group discussed the enemies – Democrats, Republicans, members of the press – who wronged them during the 1992 campaign. Clifford Jackson, the ex-friend of the President and peddler of the Clinton draft-dodging stories, was high on the list. So was William Donald Schaefer, then the Governor of Maryland and a Democrat who endorsed George Bush. Nathan Landow, the fund-raiser who backed the candidacy of Paul Tsongas, made it, too.
Suddenly Emanuel grabbed his steak knife and, as those who were there remeber it, shouted out the name of another enemy, lifted the knife, then brought it down with full force into the table.
”Dead!” he screamed.
That’s not “tough.”
“Tough” is knowing you’re going to take massive shit for standing up to powerful interests and then doing it anyway, because it’s the right thing to do — that’s what Obama told people he would do when he was running for President.
You’re not a tough guy if your first thought upon assuming the power of the Presidency is to use it to punish your enemies. You’re a cowardly, petty, small-minded thug.
I’m sure Rahm spreads the knife story around to promote the myth of himself as a rebel and a fighter, but most people experience “that guy” as a brown nose for power ready to rumble on behalf of the status-quo.
It’s like watching a sixth grader snatch the lunch money from a kindergartner for calling him a bully. The day that becomes “tough” is the day Rahm fits the bill.




178 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
“A cowardly, petty, small-minded thug.”
Spot on.
Retarded is not the word. Jane, I salute you for keeping after them all. But I can’t watch it any more. I am getting so discouraged that it is harming my mental health.
I will go back to local organizing and see what can be done here. They are not listening, they don’t get it and probably never will.
A year gone and we are farther away from the dream than ever.
May I suggest if you want to help deal with climate change getting involved with local smart growth ideas. Walkable communities are not just better for the planet but much better for our health.
You can dress a thug in tie and tails and even crown him with a high-hat.
Still, you have a thug.
Nothing more.
Tough? No. Pathetic and insecure? Definitely.
Walkable communities.
Might revive Democracy.
Otherwise it is like a movie.
Drive by, safe behind the windshield, with the muscic turned up loud …
Morning, Jon.
DW
I’m right there with you. I’ve had to make a conscious effort to stop listening to news shows, visit blogs, etc. for the sake of my mental health. But occasionally I accidentally overhear the news and I’m suddenly livid and sucked back in.
That’s what happened today, when my alarm woke me to NPR and I heard Obama’s asinine budget plan before I could shut it off.
I need to go listen to a comedy album….
Rahm Emanuel = Scut Farkas
For you, Sufi:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAaWvVFERVA
Hint: Monty Python: The Annoying Peasant.
I didn’t intend to kill the thread. I think that scene is very appropo for this topic.
Sounds like Little Dick Syndrome to me.
“Just when I thought I was out… they pull me back in.”
No kidding. He’s far more helpful to the Republicans than to anyone else, which is probably why we haven’t seen a herd of Congressional GOPers stampede to support Dennis Kucinich’s probe of Rahm and Fannie/Freddie: They like him right where he is.
“Help, help, I’m being repressed!”
“David Steiner, a New Jersey real-estate developer who was then serving as aipac’s president, was caught on tape boasting that he had “cut a deal” with the Administration of George H. W. Bush to provide more aid to Israel. Steiner also said that he was “negotiating” with the incoming Clinton Administration over the appointment of a pro-Israel Secretary of State. “We have a dozen people in his”—Clinton’s—“headquarters . . . and they are all going to get big jobs,”
Was Rahm foisted upon Clinton and Obama by AIPAC?
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2005/07/04/050704fa_fact
Thug Lite
So many supporters, who probably under it all have no joy for the Obama policies and actions, but go along due to loyalty, are equally thuggish and, because they hide their true beliefs, exhibit a cynical hypocrisy with their behavior.
They are in bed with the banks and drug and insurance companies. So who is really in alliance with the dark side?
We need to communicate this to Obama somehow (Ad campaign speaking directly to the pres?). Right now he clearly gets neither this, nor even the need for for him to be tough in these times.
And Stupid and Ugly and a Bad Liar and Lousy at Political Strategy. Tough Guy Hah! Chicago Pol Naw he’s what we call a Patsy he is Too Obvious.
Being Obvious is crime in Chicago Politics.
He is a typical bully. Your typical privileged, overindulged, overgrown sociopath. All he needs is [edited by mod]. The only way I’m going to stop hating this guy (again) is if he goes away. Preferably to jail.
[modnote: please, no violence]
Isn’t Rahm’s brother the prototype for Ari Gold on “Entourage”? News flash Rahm… Jeremy Piven might play you in a movie, but he’d have to hold his nose… Ari Gold is a normal human compared to you…
Tough is being on your third or fourth tour in SW Asia, not being a pampered putz inside the Beltway.
This diary reminder of the Arkansas Rahm knife story and spot on characterization of what Rahm really is needs to go viral
Except that “smart growth” in cities lacking access to reliable and rapid local and regional transit is not “smart growth,” rather real estate profiteering gussied up in green enviro schtick.
@mod: Rahm started it! ;)
Yes, indeed. His brother Ezekiel is apparently a good guy, though.
Like most bullies the second we hit back Rahm will run to the teacher crying about how we hit him back. I expect the WH Press Machine to be on us right after the State of the Union.
Certainly Rahm is a disaster and deserves to be fired but to think that with Rahm gone Obama will have an epiphany is wishful thinking. It’s time to find a serious primary challenger to the failures of Obama.
Only slightly OT:
Paul Krugman has weighed in on Obama’s plan [via his blog; his column doesn't run until tomorrow], and it’s not pretty:
With Krugman’s past reluctance to criticize Bernanke, I’m surprised at the strength of his disapproval of what must be Bernanke’s work.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/opinion/editorialsandoped/oped/columnists/paulkrugman/index.html
My heart sand when Obama appointed Emanuel.I knew then we were not going to get what we had been promised during the campaign.
He’s the V.I. Lenin of the Democratic Party:
“Everyone is free to write and say whatever he likes, without any restrictions. But every voluntary association (including the party) is also free to expel members who use the name of the party to advocate anti-party views. Freedom of speech and the press must be complete. But then freedom of association must be complete too. I am bound to accord you, in the name of free speech, the full right to shout, lie and write to your heart’s content. But you are bound to grant me, in the name of freedom of association, the right to enter into, or withdraw from, association with people advocating this or that view. The party is a voluntary association, which would inevitably break up, first ideologically and then physically, if it did not cleanse itself of people advocating anti-party views.”
http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1905/nov/13.htm
Meanwhile, over at DKos the apologist’s club is hollering “but this is old news!” at the top of their lungs in the comments section of a diary on the topic, ignoring the inconvenient fact that the real story is that the true quote was suppressed for five months by a media that didn’t wish to lose his White House access.
Rahm is to Sun Tzu and Machiavelli as Sarah Palin is to a Katie Couric interview. Rahm is a Comedic Bad Guy in a real life Drama.
In the end, however, Obama is the president. Obama is just as much of an empty suit as Rham Emanuel, and I suspect he’s just as smug and spiteful, though he doesn’t show it because Rham can do it for him. Rham is the bad cop to Obama’s “good” cop.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Hamsher and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
Thanks for the post, Sister Hamsher but we out here among the great unwashed have known this bastard is a cruel little joke on us for a long time and the real question is how long has Obama known? If Obama is so stupid as to not have known Rahm’s real character before the election and he refuses to put a muzzle on ‘im now, then Obama is the problem. And if most of the corporate media info from the administration comes from Rahm then how do we know where the Chinese wall breaks down in the party leadership in Congress and beyond? That is why, Dear Heart, I have been askin’ if there has been any contact made or relationship established with Pelosi in the House…it would seem that unless she wants to retire in November and see Rahm take over the minority leadership in the House in 2011 she has gotta be ripe to confront the administration now on heal;thcare, jobs and the wars.
The strategy goin forward turns on whether or not Pelosi is willin’ to force good changes to the healthcare bill thru reconcilliation…if she’s not then, the progressive activists and the organizers in the field need to hunker down, kill the healthcare bill and shoreup real Democrats in November and be ready to kick Obama’s scrawny ass back into the Rose Garden until 2012.
There is no way forward politically without dealin’ with the problem of Rahm and Clintonian triangulation BEFORE this November and healthcare reform is the place ta do it. So, Citizen Hamsher, what’s the story on Pelosi and where is this goin from here?
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION AND REMEMBER IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CORPORATE WARS!!
Does anyone remember the opening voice over for the Superman television show?
Yay, Jane! Emanuel is one of the monsters.
I don’t think the media suppressed it — I know Greg Sargent was trying to get confirmation but the veal pen were tight-lipped. “F–king stupid” was as far as anyone would go on the record.
It’s not personal, Rahm likes to say, it’s strictly business. Right. He’s a Chicago thug. So what does that make the guy who hired him – or accepted him as a necessary price to pay for being president?
I was originally happy as 1) getting Rahm out of the DCCC and Congress was a good thing, 2) I hoped he’d hit as hard against Republicans as he does DFHs, and 3) Chiefs of Staff tend not to last very long. But that was before I recalled his role in NAFTA, and his bully’s preference for targets he thinks are weak.
Abusive loudmouth types are never tough. Only in circles where nobody has been punched in the face since the 6th grade are such people considered tough.
Ah, thanks.
So I guess my question is the same as Larue’s ( http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/26502 ): What do we do?
Dems have proved that 99% of them can’t be trusted.
If I take Ian Welsh’s advice in “The Unvarnished Truth About the US” ( http://www.ianwelsh.net/the-unvarnished-truth-about-the-us/ ), then I’m headed for another country to live.
There has to something, but I’m not sure what it is.
A friend — acquaintance, really, but someone I have always liked — responded to me this summer, when I was criticizing Rahm, that she liked him because she loved dance, and he was a former dancer.
Agreed Good Catch Paul being this upset says something. I wonder just what WH moron came up with this plan. Heck the BT noted many of the Lefty Blogs, Rachels show yesterday, and now Paul all think this sucks.
This much agreement this fast on an issue means either the Left is much more organized than I thought or this plan really really bites.
That and Big Government is much more popular than even the Left thought.
If it is bad over at TGOS … wait till they see this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/double-standard-for-berna_n_436971.html
Rahm is tough in the way soft squishy to the eye Rove was not so long ago. Able to do maximal harm for his own personal aggrandizement without concern for anyone else. Piranha is too nice. Sharks are essential parts of their ecosystem. It needs to be something more abrasive, less appealing and less functional.
Rahm is sort of like one of Rush’s anal cysts that got him his deferment. Irritating but he serves a purpose. The role of Rush is left as an exercise to the reader.
Jane:
I suppose this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/26/double-standard-for-berna_n_436971.html
Is grist for the next FP’er.
In certain circles cement boots were thought to be “just business” – Rahm is just a bully and needs his ego stroked by all those good little Blue Dogs.
Tough guys don’t roll over for Joe Lieberman.
To paraphrase H.L. Mencken “never underestimate the ignornace of the American public.” Both Rahm and Obama are “celebrities” and unfortunately that’s how much of the public view their politicians, not their policies or lack thereof but rather their “star power.”
Rove didn’t alienate Bush’s base.
…actually
destructive and self-interested…
since he took over the Obama thing has gone straight down the tubes.
but Rahm is a simple narcissist, so he is blind…
while Obama simply doesn’t care
he just wanted to be president, and he got that.
And Obama’s legacy? First President of color, period!
Citizen Phoenix Woman:
I was right with you on numbers one thru three and I knew his history on NAFTA and the 1994 killing of the Democrats in the House of Representatives…but I thought Obama was smart enough that he would use ‘im as the attack dog he is and point ‘im in the right direction. The fact that he hasn’t means that we have the problem of takin’ the leadership of the party from a sitting President and locate the center of leadership in the House of Representatives…it’s NEVER been done before except when the Dixiecrats were still in the Democratic Party congressional leadership and most of that was done with a Republican President but they controlled JFK too until they had ta shoot ‘im.
I’m not gonna take this. Wormer, he’s a dead man! Marmalard, dead! Niedermeyer – Dead!
thank you Chief of Staff Blutarsky
Uh ok I will admit Rahm might be a good dancer and some people may admire him for that.
That Barack Obama picked him and uses him speaks volumes about Barack Obama.
Leprechauns are great dancers, just don’t ask Rahm to share his Lucky Charms.
I’ve been reading about the anarchist assassinations of the late 1800′s, early 1900′s. They impelled a lot of change, really. Franz Ferdinand might not have been a great idea, but it did lead to the downfall of that monarchy and several others. And certainly McKinley, a typical republican tool of big business, had it coming.
I do not like Rahm Emanuel. Granted I, have never met him, but, my Congressman, John Larson claimed he (Emanuel) was another “Patton” of electoral politics. Granted, I not only met but know Congressman Larson personally, but, have disagreed with him on a number of issues for years now.
Rahm Emanuel is full of emotion and full of crap I must add. Emanuel has a very high opinion of himself as well.
The question is this though…..Emanuel’s thinking of liberals as parasites to the Democratic Party’s fortunes are shared by many pro-business, middle-of-the-road Democrats who see winning elections as the most important aspect of the party. Since the formation of the DLC, these same Democrats view many of what they view as special interest groups within as the enemy holding them back from electoral victories.
So, again the question is this—Does Emanuel simply share the consensus opinion of all the elected Democrats in the party and is actually more honest about it compared to the elected Democrats who say they are progressive yet their voting records, ala, health care and the upcoming budget cuts talk the liberal/progressive game but vote the conservative way?
Is Emanuel’s view about liberals-progressives actually consistent with the majority of elected Democrats? Are most Democrats actually anti-liberal in their views and sellouts to real economic-social-political justice for all as the Dems at least once stood for, if not in real terms, but at least in rhetoric?
I think you’re assuming that we are what Rahn sees as Obama’s base. My guess is that to Rahm the cute Bush quote to some of his big donors about them being his base is fairly true for Rahm as well.
We’re not the base he was looking for.
Rahm has Bad Luck Charms but a Great Publicity Dept.
Did Obama actually pick Emanuel?
Perhaps, more like it, was Emanuel the one who chose Obama to run as president because the Democratic Party establishment did not think Hillary Clinton would win the general election?
He is not a Chicago thug! He is Mossad in the White House!
here’s the thing for me eoh -
he’s not even an effective thug. broadly speaking, he’s all sizzle and no steak. they are enthralled simply because he appears bold and agressive and as PW and others have pointed out, he is an abject failure wrt to results. quite depressing to think about the character of those so under the sway of his style and not substance
“He can be a ‘mamzer,’ but he’s our mamzer,” said Rabinowitz, using the Yiddish term for “bastard,” speaking both as a Democrat and a Jew. “Sometimes that’s what you need.”
Whose mamzer?
our MsMolly had that on FB this am . . .
as Jane points out, he is a reliable ‘validator’ – so just where in the hell are the apologists going to get Unicorn feed now ??
The Obama team of ConserverDems made a huge miscalculation about Politics after Bush.
They probably thought we will passify the progressives by talking about hope and change. Once they got to DC, they thought people would simply be happy to see Bush gone. WRONG!!!
The 8 years of Bush radicalize american politics. Bush said it best you either with me or against me. Bush did not leave any wiggle room.
A lot of people was against Bush and everything he stood for.
Obama and the ConserverDems are using a 1994 game plan, when they need a 2010 game plan.
This is not the Progressive Wing of the Party that existed in 1994. Bush made a lot of people stand up and take notice about politics.
Obama and Rahm clearly have no idea the hell they will face in 2010 and beyond from the left.
David Plouffe and David Axelrod if they have any intelligence about politics in the era after Bush, are probably telling OBAMA if we continue with the Clinton ideas we will be ran out of DC in 3 years.
Obama may also lose total control of the DEM party, if he continues to play to the right.
Obama is the first casualty of Politics after Bush.
I’m starting to see Rahm as a blessing in disguise.
Thanks to Rahm, Summers, Geithner, Gibbs, et al., the “Obama Administration” is going to be a one-term disaster. But at least we won’t have eight years of them.
Now I remember “faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive, able to leap tall buildings in a single bound, Look! Up in the sky! It’s a bird. It’s a plane. It’s Superrahm.
Mossad? Israel would be gone if men like Rahm were made agents.
Bush’s base was the low information voter. Let’s see Obama win a second term without the progressive/liberal base that elected him.
I seem to recall that Rahm Emanuel was the mastermind behind the Clinton administration health care fiasco in 1993. Why was he allowed to get anywhere near health care reform again?
Well, look at the bright side. At least Rahm will be a one-term chief of staff since his boss is so enamored of the idea.
Rahm is no master of multi-dimensional chess. As the post noted, by many accounts he is quite shallow and what we can discern of his behavior confirms that. Case in point, the photos of him thumbing his nose during the inauguration.
He is nothing more than a crude, dim-witted political operator. In a different era he never could have made it but we live in a time when politicians fail upward.
He warned them not to alienate lawmakers whose votes would be needed on health care and other top legislative items.
Yesterday a journalist asked me if I thought Rahm was a “tough guy,”
Ha! Tough guys are quiet and self-assured. They never feel the compulsion to flaunt it. Rahm, on the other hand, sounds like the classic schoolyard bully, and anyone with an ounce of brains knows that the best way to deal with bullies is to blacken their eyes, bloody their noses, and send them crying home to their mommies. (Figuratively speaking, of course.)
Hey Rahm: Tell it to someone who gives a shit…
This is where you find out that you are not Obama’s base:
That is and always has been Wall Street.
It shows you how puerile the press corps is, and what pantywaists they are, that they think saying “fuck” is tough.
The only big win Rahm has ever had was NAFTA…something Obama said he was going to change in the Campaign, something that almost never gets mentioned in the press these days.
I would like to see a dozen other Democrats announce their intention to mount a primary challenge against Obama… TODAY. It would be the equivalent of a no-confidence vote. Maybe that would provide some incentive for him to try a little harder.
Obama hired him and Obama can fire him. The problem is Obama.
I have to say that I am indifferent to whether Rahm is tough or not. I would rather ask has he been effective in delivering on the President’s agenda. Now in one way this is a difficult question because it is not clear what Obama’s agenda has been. He talked progressive and acted Blue Dog.
Obama did get his stimulus. It was too small and badly constructed, but it looks to be what he wanted so I would chalk that up as a win for Rahm.
But even if Obama became more anti-civil liberties after a few months, Blue Dogs and Republicans kept him from closing Guantanamo and moving prisoners to Illinois. So I would chalk up a win for Rahm for winning Obama over to a more conservative Bushite view on detention but a defeat in terms of Congressional action.
Healthcare was a Rahm loss. Although Obama worked mostly with Blue Dogs in its crafting, Rahm wasn’t able to keep them on board even after all the concessions. The process took too long. It was supposed to be the crowning jewel of the SOTU. Instead it’s an uncompleted mess.
Something similar could be said about global warming. Obama wanted a fairly slow and conservative approach and both House and Senate bills reflect this. But it was supposed to be done by December to highlight US and Obama leadership on climate change for the Copenhagen conference. Instead it too went nowhere and spent a long time getting there.
Afghanistan had the endless months long review. At the end the choice was between a very narrow set of views, all hawkish. I think we should get out of Afghanistan but this was the kind of decision that could have been, and should have been made back in March or April of 2009. I think Rahm gets a fail on this because he really didn’t expedite the process.
Then there are the races, Virginia, NJ, and MA. But before these there were the replacements for Obama, Biden, and Hillary. Illinois was an unavoidable disaster with Blagojevich but Rahm managed to be involved just enough for it to look bad. OTOH both New York and Delaware were self-inflicted wounds. Rahm should have coordinated with the states not to pick but encourage strong candidates as replacements. It didn’t happen. I still think Gillibrand was a bad choice in terms of her politics and the placeholder for Beau Biden was too cute by half. Virginia and NJ should have been a wake up call to rethink WH strategies but clearly weren’t. All the MA debacle has shown is just how much in chaos the WH is. Big fails for Rahm.
I expect people can add to these.
You got photos of this? This is the kind of thing we need to spread around and have the front pagers put on top of posts.
“Dead” he screams.
He doesn’t sound stable. And obama needs him to push his corporatist agenda.Wish I hadn’t voted for obamarahm.
Old news, it already made the rounds at the time.
That’s exactly what I’ve maintained. There needs to be a credible challenge to Obama to try and get him to move in a direction other than to the right. His lack of leadership will surely drive the electorate into a disastrous Republican default choice.
New news to me. So if it is old news , it makes you wonder about obama.
Just wishful thinking, unfortunately.
Good idea, Jon. I have been involved in this sort of thing for a long time. We have state-wide elections coming this year, and we have a good D to defend in Congress, so there is plenty of work to do.
A year ago I was excited. Now it is all a terrible slog. And it just gets worse and worse. Normally, I am hopeful and remain so. But that is just not working for me now.
And get this. The senate only needs 50 votes to keep bernake in .
Ralph Nader was right about the two parties being the same.
Someone just posted a good comment to Krugman’s article:
In regard to there actually only being one party, I’ve been saying it for over 10 years but Cliff105 pointed out to me recently that Gore Vidal said it (better) LONG ago. I’d be surprised if Vidal was the first. Nothing new under the sun and all that…
Charms? Rahm has Lucky Charms? Well I want him to wear tights at his next appearance so i can see!
I like it.
Mr. Emanuel ought not to freely employ this unseemly, cringe-worthy language that he is so famous for tossing toward others at his whimsy!
Because if I hear him do it, and I am close enough, I will skull fuck that bitch.
Pelosi just announced she will not support a filibuster of Bernanke. The Dems roll over again.
Obama’s track record was out there for all who had the time and energy to investigate it. If we were relying on the MSM to tell us about his true character, the MSM which “sells” people on the level of a moderately developed reptilian reflex response, then we got exactly what we deserved. But Rahm and Obama are simply affects of this whole casino clusterf*&k we call a democracy.
Regarding bases (voting or buying thereof): a base with no relative disposable financial worth versus a base with limitless resources. Well, isn’t natural what these “thugs” Barry and Manny would choose?
Communists, socialists, the IWW among others were saying the same thing early in the 20th Century. This country has really suffered not having a viable leftist party. It’s now stuck in “Groundhog Day.”
“Tough is Jane for standing up to him and that is exactly why I nominated you for “citizen of the year”, on the WH web page. I told them you had great courage and it showed since you had the guts to stand up to people like Rahm, who is known for being a bully, especially if you go after his corporate cronies or corporate candidates. This is just another example. Way to go Jane. I think you are on the way to having the WH choose you for “citizen of the year”.
Me too.
Bush was bad. Reagan was bad. Vietnam was bad. But during all those times, there was something uniting those of us “railing against the machine.”
To have our “leaders” [and I use the plural, because Obama has pulled lots of could-be-leaders into his sway] be the ones we have to fight against? Shit, it’s hard enough fighting the bat-shit crazy Republicans and the Blue Dogs. Now we have to fight Obama too?
And Obama’s going to take down good Democrats. Unless we’re able to mount progressive challengers in many, many districts, we’re gonna be stuck with Tea Baggers.
Do Democrats really want to campaign on “supporting the Democratic agenda [as articulated by Obama]?
Does Obama think his crazy-ass “policies” are going to win independent voters over to Democrats?
This is just wrong on so many levels, and i despair of where to turn to oppose it.
I will say, this POS infuriated me when he labeled me fucking retarded.
For many months now, I suspected that Obama was a stealth republican, and now I am convinced that he is. It’s all been a set-up, and the timing of the SC decision couldn’t be clearer.
Krugman today said he felt like an idiot for supporting Obama. I feel the same.
I hope that blogs like this one can organize with other progressive blogs with one goal: To ignite the base, to get us off our lazy asses, and to do something to stop the madness we are falling into.
“Fucking retarded”…it burns.
lol!
Just reported that the banksters (a couple of thousand people not the corporations themselves) took 1% of the total GDP of the United States in bonuses alone.
If Rahm is so smart, why would he openly say that about any voter? That’s just dumb – you don’t ever call people who vote for you stupid. And you don’t use the word “retarded.”
Conservatives first linked workers’ movements with anarchists, later with Soviet style communism. They’ve used their capital to win the spin war from the get-go. Now SCOTUS has officially made that advantage the law of the land.
Maybe we should name our new party “Common Purpose”
HA! Thank, demi, that’s one of my favs, just watched it the other night. The title is “Constitutional Peasants,” FWIW. Best send-up ever of the contrast between atavistic myths and anything coming from the grassroots up.
No one spoofs the power of myths over facts in politics than the Pythons. But the Daily Show is a close second.
How are Emanuel, Plouffe, and Obama jacking us with reality-distorting myths? What are some good recent send-ups of Dems making use of the myth of American Exceptionalism, the type of war-mongering myth-making found in Obama’s Nobel Speech?
These are a few of my favorite things:
* Even Better Than the Real Thing
“John Oliver searches for the simple time in American history longed for by Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly.”
* American Idealogues
“In their dueling speeches on national security, Barack Obama opens with familiar rhetoric, while Dick Cheney does the one thing terrorists love most.”
* Scott McClellan Parts 1 & 2 (on “manipulating the media narrative” aka our sense of reality itself)
* A Relatively Closer Look – White House Press Secretary
“The press secretary’s job is to put a semi-human face on the lack of information we receive from the White House.”
* The Less You Know – Message Force Multipliers
“Calling military personnel embedded in the media either “military analysts” or “message force multipliers” sounds so much cooler than calling them ‘sneaky old guys.’”
Rahm is just another guy smugly insisting on playing last year’s game, in fact he’s playing a version missing a couple important updates/features.
Third-way politics hit the wall some time ago, and those who don’t understand that the game has changed are in for a rude awakening.
As always happens when the game changes, the first person to realize a viable way out of the rubble is a genius, the second person is a schmuck.
Rahm has been left behind, but we have to remember that faact evidently works for his handlers.
He thinks he’s a hammer, but he’s a nail.
I was so blinded by anger, that I said “stupid”.
He said “retarded”…which is worse because it is also a decidedly non-PC word that a politician ought to avoid using.
I’d love to see Rahm and Jane in a cage match. I got a thousand dollars on Jane.
So very true. Those who have dual citizenship are fortunate. They have a way out.
Heh, thank you madma. I think I’ll let things move a little further down the line before I start picking out my ensemble.
You could always wear what Obama wears, nothing.
Rahm Emanuel typifies what is wrong with Washington. Tough? He’s a 5’5″ Napoleon who has an inferiority complex. Send him out here in the real world and I’ll make him my bitch. We’ll see how tough that little fucker is. I can’t stand him and his petty Clinton politics. Why did Obama ever hire all of these God-forsaken Clinton assholes? That set his Presidency back two years out of the gate. Obama has shown very poor decision-making skills as a President. He needs to embrace the progressive agenda and dump these douchebag leftovers from the Clinton administration or his Presidency is toast. Come hither Rahm, you little bitch.
Big difference between being citizen of the year and emperor. The latter has lobbyists to keep him warm.
Actually, I’d say tough is doing hard time in prison for refusing to fight, for opposing militarism and the empire, for publicizing the ecological crisis, etc.
Of course, the irony is that Rahm and his fucking retarded Blue Dogs are the very people responsible for the shitty health insurance bill. It’s a watered-down piece of trash that isn’t moving anywhere BECAUSE Rahm’s Blue Dogs were more interested in holding the Senate hostage to get goodies for themselves and their fucking retarded corporate buds.
hey rahm, I’m a retard ???
I ain’t the one who just preposed a ronnie raygun era herbert hooverized’ repuglitard approved budget freeze
way to validate the repuglitarded talking points
come next November, I’ll remember who the retard is
have fun at your impeachment party, you fucking fool
Moving to another country just moves the problem under a different rock.
All countries have problems. What’s important is family & friends.
I’ve lived in 8 or 9. By choice.
Hey Rahm, how does it feel to get your ass kicked by f’n retards in Massachusetts?
Could we please stop using the word ‘retarded’
There’s a difference between brittle and tough. Rahm is brittle.
Jane is all-day tough.
There’s a major rift going on, as more and more people find that they can’t keep making excuses for him any more — and the ones that still are seem to be falling back on silly word games, evasions, and smears, because the facts are not on their side. (See, for example, the comments of one of them in response to a comment of mine. Beyond pathetic.)
Most of us have. Rahm, not so much — though he (and the Veal Penners who went out of their way to hide his exact words) must know he shouldn’t be saying things like that.
Don’t forget The Knights of Labor, The People’s Party, SDS, The War Resisters League, etc. The tradition is there. But so also a record of important victories set against a background defined by eventual defeat.
The bastards will never give it — power, money, influence — away. It must be won and then defended.
“Shut Up!” *g* Glad you enjoyed it. It’s a true classic, isn’t it?
Little Rhambo Bonaparte,in all his glory
http://john07eom.files.wordpress.com/2009/03/napoleon_great.jpg
We will see how long te true retards get to stick around after no one of the left votes.
You win the internet for today. :-)
Thousands without healthcare DEAD!
These DLC members are worse than Republicans!! They’re all trying to outdo each other in proving that they can be a MORE Republican-Lite more than the other guy.
The want the original Democratic Party to turn into their DLC/Republican party.
It’s time for a long list, in one central place, of all the DLC Members and what their Anti-Democratic Party votes have been – - and to restore our party to what it use to be.
Last time I talked to my Mom, she said she wasn’t voting. This will be the first time in decades she hasn’t voted, but she said Obama and Congress were the reasons she was going to be sitting home from here on out.
I thought about Ian’s and Larue’s articles, and I’m all for sitting home *-or-* voting for the Greens until another party is up and running. The system is broken, and all I get from the blogs is a lot of noise (aka “complaints) but no real plan for an alternative.
The Greens really aren’t a viable party since they can’t contend, and the Socialists are only a movement party. And Bloomberg if he runs will be a more educated of Perot, even though he’s probably the most qualified candidate (one of my complaints with him is his unwavering support for Israel).
So, I guess the answer to Larue’s question is an alternative party to the Dems & Reps. A true Progressive party, and I’m working on setting that up in the next couple of weeks.
As far as countries, my preferences would be Canada and South America.
Big picture: We need to take it to an entirely new venue: LOCAL POLITICS.
After the midterm slaughter, we’re going to have to take a page out of the other side’s playbook and go for the rural electorate. In a post-Citizens United world, there is no other choice. Win back the countryside. Organize with Tea-baggers to oppose corporate rule. Re-arrange the fault-lines. Take back the country, one county at a time, through the accumulation of people-power.
Here is the model: in rural PA several townships banned factory farming:
http://www.ratical.org/corporations/SiaDG.html
Action: Run for local school boards, water boards, Boards of Supervisors, etc. … Ban corporate power at the local level and then expand the circles. Eventually they will intersect. It’s going to be a long hard slog.
When, say, Omaha is as much of a hotbed for progressivism as it was in 1896, then we can say we’ve made progress. At that point, the concept of a “Senator Ben Nelson” will be laughably inconceivable. That’s where we have to go. … What could be more “American” than truly Jeffersonian self-governance?
And as far as Rahm, he’s got size issues. He’s short and and he’s got a 3-1/2″ fully erect dick.
He needs to be hung up on the fire extinguisher.
For your sides interest, shouldn’t rahm be pushing for soem of the lib SCOTUS Justices to lay down the gavel now when you can actually confirm their replacements.
Again, I am from the exact opposite political side, but I really admire a lot of the passion here and I share some of the same concerns, just have a different idea of how to get there. but I have to say Jane is dead on on her assesment of what tough is. Tough is not using your aquired might to punish your perceived eneemies. tough is doing what is right, when it ain’t easy…standing with your friend in a fight when there are 2 of you and 5 of them.
Rahm should know better than to bring a steak knife to a gun fight.
- Tom
When I first heard that Pres. Obama had selected Rahm to be his chief of staff, I knew that we were in big trouble. He is just as corporate as Republican Clinton, only now we can’t afford any slackness, after eight years of torture, treason, tyranny, stolen elections, thousands of lies and millions of felonies under the Cheney-Bush regime.
Pres. Obama needs to be much more progressive; that is what outraged the voters in Massachusetts. Doesn’t the White House even listen to Keith O. on MSNBC? Keith showed the after-election polls, which clearly indicated that the voters wanted/still want the Public Option. If Pres. Obama moves any further to the right, he will be a Republican…
Ever so slightly O/T:
US imperialism is a 112-year old tradition. Invading, occupying, bombing, overthrowing third world countries so that our corporations can get raw materials on the cheap. Enslaving the poor people of Haiti for cheap labor for American clothing manufacturers…
Pres. Obama is the drone-murder-King. No charges, no judge, no trials, just drone-executions, murder Obama-style.
I’ve always kind of liked the guy. Obama would be in a world of hurt without him. Obama does what Rahm says about 90% of the time but it’s the other 10% that hurts Obama’s popularity numbers.
As I understand it Rahm still doesn’t like progressives.
“Pres. Obama needs to be much more progressive; that is what outraged the voters in Massachusetts”
Oh, so the people of Mass. are outraged that government isn’t even bigger and more wasteful? Now I get it.
I worked for Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities OMRDD for a bit more than 11 years. Is it the word that bothers or the stigma associated with people with those sorts of disabilities? Would you like NY to change the name of their agency? My wife works with the profoundly retarded every working day. Maybe Rahm’s goal was to be abrasive but there is a clinical usage for the word.
Too too tough…
I’ve thought of Rahm in just those terms for years. He’s despicable, and he’s the guy Obama chose to run his office. That should dispel any idea that people have that Obama is simply going along with the flow. He knew who Emanuel was, and deliberately chose him for the role.
I read this piece earlier this morning and almost commented on it over at WSJ, but then decided what the fuck.
They actually had some schmuck in the comments saying that Obama ran as a centrist and as soon as he was elected he went hard left… and that Obama and his ilk are therefore “very dangerous.”
Well, I think they are dangerous, but not for going hard left.
But… to my point.
I do not think the article was a non-lapdog piece at all.
Yeah, he made a few swipes at Emanuel, but then always posted a disclaimer… eg, Podesta criticized him for his bullying in congress and then said paraphrasing “well, it’s better for them to criticize the COS and not the president.”
It seemed every bad description was countered with an oh, well….
But the thing that pissed me off the most was completely attributing the 2006 Dem wins to fucking Emanuel… and then saying he did it by putting Blue Dogs in conservative districts… most of Emanuel’s choices cratered and we all know the 2006 win was due to Dean’s 50-state strategy.
So to me… in the article, Emanuel came across as a cocky SOB who get things done.
My favorite quote from Emanuel was something to the effect:
“They may not like me, but they still like the President.”
Wrong again … fuckface.
The offensiveness comes when someone like Rahm Emanuel uses it specifically as a slur directed towards folks who disagree with him.
And yes, it might not be a bad idea for NYS to consider re-naming that particular agency. It does happen sometimes. Has the DSM-!V continued that usage in a clinical sense?
This might be politically correct, but have you or your wife considered asking those that are differently abled and their families how they feel about the name?
Has anyone seen the blog at Democracy For America on Obama’s new Tisticular Agenda?
http://www.democracyforamerica.com/users/818847-www-tampahardmoney-net/blog_posts
So you want to let oligopolies socialize their losses on the backs of the taxpayers, while they privatize profits.
Please do not vote.
Evidently the tin man has a matching set of tin ears.
the “apologist’s club” is a polite way to put it….
I’ve settled on “a 3rd grade lynch mob scouring every post for any criticism of Obama”
Or perhaps the DK Gestapo might also work.
When I hear Rahm tough ,I think of a “Dodge”.
TGOS?
Oh, he wasn’t rolling over for Lieberman… Lieberman was fulfilling his wet dream.
For those who care:
http://tinyurl.com/yzyn5op
A CNN poll suposedly shows 88% of Democrats approve of the job Obama is doing. Or was 82%? Either way. If that’s true, we can all go home.
As the article points out… Emanuel, such a smart man having learned his lessons from 1994, in 2009 promptly signed back room deals with pharma and insurance selling out the middle class so pharma and insurance would not oppose HCR!!
Kind of destroys the whole point of HCR, no?
God, the guy must be stupid… to think we would not notice and stand in the Rose Garden with Obama all smug about getting pharma and insurance to make “concessions”.
Jesus… what planet are we on?
Why is the WSJ publishing a real, live piece of what used to be called “journalism” while the NYT and WaPo move farther to the right?
Did the WSJ lay off all their copy editors?
It’s just temporary. Krugman will ultimately support the freeze. He uses these columns to get liberals reading him then ultimately tells them to support the bad bill that he claimed he didn’t like. Remeber he used to oppose a health care bill with no public option. Now he supports the bill.
Since being profoundly retarded is a clinical definition for a difficult problem my sense it that most people are more worried about the condition than the word. Using a different word would not actually change the treatments or therapies.
One of the issues that was an ongoing controversy for those that are only considered somewhat mentally disabled has been that a few of the disabled did not like being called clients so the usage was changed to consumer. At some point consumer may be seen to have the same value and they will have to find a new word.
Follow Rahm’s money
Well, we may be talking past each other but I know I was chastised (correctly so) a number of years ago when dealing at work with numerous folks who told me their preference was to be termed “differently abled”. This was in New Haven, CT around the time they hosted the Special Olympics World Games there.
So, I guess there’s a big gulf between those having to deal with the clinical side of things (and work in an office where the perceived insulting name is in the title) versus the use of the word in general terms out in the rest of the wolrd.
So I do hope you understand why they and others DO find it an offensive term, even if your work has you using it in a specific clinical context.
Or do you support Rahm’s usage of the word?
He’s the Trojan Horse. Letting the conservatives into the policy hub.
I would be curious regarding David Axelrod,and his opinion on this.
Axelrod has a daughter ,a disabled daughter who has severe epilepsy-so I have read.She is pressently in a home for the disabled.
Michele Malkin took some pot shots at her.
One could expect that insensitivity from the right, but when it comes from Emmanuel taking potshots are other equally unfortunate souls,…well, that’s gotta sting…or embarrass for sure.
Absolutely not. But then I don’t support much about Rahm. I agree that he intended to be offensive but that doesn’t mean I should accept that the word is inherently offensive.
The people that my wife works with are not referred to except by their names unless anonymity is required or for instance when talking about consumers going on an outing. The clinical definition applies to what is possible and what they have to work around with in order to try to give them a reasonable quality of life. The people that help the disabled are generally real heros in my book. Where my wife works, as would be expected, they are all union.
In the land of the brainless, the half wit is king.
I guess the point I am making is that outside of the limited context of the usage where you and your wife have worked, it IS considered an offensive word, when used by Rahm (and others) OR even when referring directly to those who are differently abled.
As I say, it was the folks who were running the paper recycle program in New Haven who got quite incensed when it was applied to them. Many of them had varying degrees (for lack of a better term) of Down’s syndrome.
So, if you don’t mind, I will still continue to get incensed for them and others when the term is tossed around in any context other than that deeply clinical context you’ve described. And would hope that you and others could consider getting DSM IV (or V when it comes out) updated to reflect this. And NYS can consider renaming the office, I know they’ve done so before.
“One could expect that insensitivity from the right, but when it comes from Emmanuel taking potshots are other equally unfortunate souls,…well, that’s gotta sting…or embarrass for sure.”
And that way goes our vigilance. Emanuel is somehow “better” by virtue of NOTHING than anything referred to generally as “the right.” While our razor sharp perceptions are weighing Rahm and his “better” ilk in one hand, the riff-raff known as the right in the other, the world continues to crumble. Will we know, when the crunch comes, what the proper term is for a person of native descent (both parents as opposed to just one) in Canada, that the fork always goes to the left of the plate, and that one never introduces a duke to a person of lower rank?
I trust we will.
I don’t mind and wouldn’t ask for a vote if I did. Given the relative proclivity toward profanity that ramps up from time to time I’m hard pressed to put it at the top of my personal requirements. Also note that other than quoting the name of the organization I used to work for, I didn’t actually use it myself. I prefer other words and generally only when they are context appropriate.
As me making changes within OMRDD, I was just a lowly programmer which at the time was the lowest of the middle. Getting NYS to change their a name would require way more juice than I ever had.
Its so sad isn’t it? I can’t even bear to look at Obama or listen to him anymore. He’s a lying sack of shit and I really don’t like to be conned.
Not that Rahm cares about my vote, but I’m not voting as a Democrat or a Republican again.
In fact, I would advise the real progressives and honest elected officials to form their own party.
To me the Democratic party is now the Corporacratic Party and I will refer to them as such.
Rahm, you are a dirtbag sellout.
I wonder if anyone has done any research on the number of ads the insurance and pharma industries have bought in the NYT, WaPo, and LAT. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you, and the newspapers are starving.
How right you are.
You are spot on!
“Obama is to weak to lead. He must be replaced in 2012!”
To, instead of TOO! Too weak to lead.
Hard to take them seriously if they can’t overcome basic English language deficiencies.
There are no – zero – Spelling Police on duty at this time.
I question if there are any on duty at that site at ANY time.
*G*
I don’t see those mistakes at THIS site.
*G*
BINGO!! A bully. Nothing more and nothing less.
Eeeewwww!
I disagree with your historical assesment that anarchists and assassinations have been a vehicle for progress. Historically they have been tools used to conquer and destroy civilizations as opposed to building them.
Sure, I’d agree that our current leadership is bad enough to turn pacifists into a lynch mob. But the proper tools to fix things are the ballot box, strikes and peaceful protests. Personally I want to see strong primary challenges of the Bluedogs and at least a few in key leadership positions.
And as much as I hate to defend McKinley, I would point out that even he protected American jobs and development with a 48% tariff. For the last 20 years our elected officials won’t even do that. Bush Sr, Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama… are all worse than knuckle dragger McKinley. Without jobs and development all other issues quickly become meaningless.
Rahm, Summers, Geithner, Orszag, Sunstein… it’s a whole basket full of bad apples. They need to be given the boot ASAP. And I’ve reached the conclusion that Obama himself is a part of that basket, he needs to be given a primary challenge in 2012.
Either we turn this ship around or we’ll be telling our kids that thier choice of career opportunies come down to: Politician, Banker, Mercenary or Pornstar.
Emanuel is an ignorant, vindictive, foul-mouthed corporate suckup. That Obama hired him to run his White House says all, sadly, that we need to know about Obama.
My sister is mentally retarded. I don’t mind the term because she is slow at learning things. I don’t like that it is used as a slur. I actually hate differently abled because it sounds like something people made up to try to make the poor babies feel better about not being like everyone else, like a backhanded compliment. It has always come across as condescending to me. I don’t insist that people stop using it, though, because I understand that their view of what it means may be very different, just as my view of the word retarded differs from that of others. I save my disgust for those like Rahm who are trying to be offensive.