Again and again and again, the cries go up from Capitol Hill about the cost of the various health care reform proposals. The one thing — the ONE thing — that President Obama has been firm on from the beginning is the financial cost to the federal government.
But there are other metrics, you know, that tell us whether a particular provision is helpful.
An interfaith group called Faithful Reform in Health Care continued their push for health care reform, and sent a letter today to members of Congress [pdf], urging them to keep working on “meaningful reform” of our health care system.
What do they say meaningful reform look like? Things that change the ugly reality of the current health care system:
- Without reform, tens of thousands will continue to die needlessly each year for lack of access to care.
- Without reform, tens of millions will remain uninsured and without adequate access to a full range of services.
- Without reform, health costs will continue to grow much faster than wages.
- Without reform, many millions of hard-working people and their children will join the ranks of the uninsured and underinsured.
- Without reform, businesses, staggered by increasing employee health costs, will either drop coverage or will be unable to make needed investments.
- Without reform, the nation’s economy — and its ability to create jobs — will suffer.
These are metrics that get far too little notice.
In a letter earlier this year [pdf] to both Obama and members of Congress, FRHC noted the kind of specifics they think will improve matters — things like a public option, subsidies that provide assistance to families below 400% of the federal poverty level, the elimination of exclusions based on pre-existing conditions, and the inclusion of all immigrants in health care reform regardless of their immigration status.
In all the talk about cost savings to the federal government, the real costs that our current insurance mess impose are all too often lost and the ability of the various proposals to change these costs is rarely addressed. Today’s letter doesn’t get specific about the House or Senate bills, nor the path for reform (reconciliation? new bill?), but simply holds up the enormous need for “meaningful reform” to be passed.
Meaningful reform asks more than “What’s the CBO score?” Meaningful reform asks “How many lives will be saved?” and “How many jobs will be preserved?” and “How can we deliver health care in a more productive manner?”
Now if only folks on Capitol Hill would ask those questions more often.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Thanks for this, Peterr. I suspect that the persons on the right who normally favor government aid to and involvement with faith-based groups aren’t going to be too eager to publicize this letter. Thank you for bringing it to our attention.
Did the group mention Martha Coakley? If not, why should Congress take them seriously”?
There are no shortage of great ideas on ways to measure real health insurance reform. The effort is not failing for lack of ideas, nor of measures.
The trouble is the only legislation the US government is capable of creating re: health care “reform” is legislation that transfers vast sums of money from people who work for a living into the pockets of the crown prince maggots who sit atop the insurance and pharmaceutical cartels.
Yes, the broad public definitely needs a good health care system. And we have many developed nation models that have been studied by the finest experts in policy and economics available, and determined to be much better and much more just than anything we have now. But we can’t have that because our government officials are corrupt. The best they will produce for us is a law requiring us to pay tribute to Aetna.
1. Infant mortality Rates.
2. Longevity.
Early life and late life metrics are the only ones that are valid. See the lifecycle defect curve for all systems
And the bottom line that doesn’t ever seem to come up in these discussions is that We the People are paying for this one way or another. We can pay through taxes or we can pay through insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses but it doesn’t matter what portion gets funneled through the government as far as Joe Q Public should be concerned it’s all coming out of our pockets initially.
This is what should have been publicized widely well before the Congress even began to consider a reform bill.
I have never understood how it happened that nobody talked about the current costs, the effect of the current costs on business and job creation, as well as pay. How was it nobody started out discussing the outrageous “getting in between you and your doctor” done insurance companies for decades now? This has always been part of what outraged people, but since the Dems didn’t talk about it, the R’s got to define the proposals, and there was no pushback. And individuals somehow forgot what they actually knew about insurance companies.
I still don’t understand it. That failure was my first clue (well, after the Cabinet appointments) that Obama governing was not going to be close to the skill with which he campaigned.
I’m still not sure why – plenty of theories discussed here and elsewhere. But that this was a huge failure is perfectly clear.
yeah, if only he stepped right up, laid out the reforms necessary — Voila! heath CARE reform
I think that’s because if the true costs were discussed, it would work to the detriment of private insurance, drug companies, and possibly the big medical care deliverers. When you get right down to it, they have too much money to spend on buying not only congressmen and Presidents, but favorable news coverage as well.
This discussion should have been about the cost to all of us. It should have been about the opportunity cost involved in letting 100 million of us do without the health care we need, and about the cost of doing business in such an insane environment. But that wasn’t profitable to the people who matter, and so it wasn’t discussed.
Hate to be such a cynic, but that’s what I think.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Peterr:
Another great post, Brother Peter, but after a year of this stuff we know now where ALL the matrices fall out in the financial costs and the moral and human costs. We are waaaay past needing to ratchet up the moral or economic arguments…these arguments blasted the do-nothin’ folks and the snakeoil folks right outta the water last September. No, Citizen, now is the time to vote on the only plan that meets both the moral and financial demands of reform…public option of Medicare plus 5%!
Let’s not get caught up all over again in the arguments that have long since been settled. The folks that wanna kill healthcare reform want nothing more than to do another year of this political circle jerk, enough is enough. Let the Stupaks and the Nelsons and the Liebermans stand up and vote, the people have spoken volumes since November of 2008 and nuthin has changed. Time to manup!
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION BECAUSE IT’S ALL ABOUT THE CORPORATE WARS FOR PROFIT!!
Especially given that, as the CBO director reiterated yesterday, the best case scenario with regard to the federal budget only, projecting out ten years for both the House and Senate reform bills, is that the proposals they contain would shave $100-$200 Billion off a $6 TRILLION-plus increase in our national debt over the same time period…
And even that slight savings conveniently omits the unfunded $200-$300 BILLION that a ten-year “doc fix” – which Congress has pledged to pass by March – is going to cost, if “off-sets” aren’t found somewhere. So even the alleged, vaunted “budget neutrality” of the present bills is just an illusion.
What’s getting to me right now is the fact that the Baucus Gang – now supposedly being criticized by Rahm Emanuel for the failure of the Senate bill – managed to completely poison the well for genuine legislative debate and deliberation in the Senate, and no one seems to be doing anything about it.
Instead we get these increasingly-common attempts to avoid the democratic distribution of power in our Congress, based on Party affiliation, and resulting committee assignments, by self-appointed “negotiators” like Ben Nelson, Mary Landrieu or Joe Lieberman. Who want to go into a back room – off the public record – with certain hand-picked fellow Senators to “deal” – with the aim of foisting their resultant “deal” on the rest of the Senate and the House, democratic process be damned.
It is the responsibility of every Senator – and their “leaders” – to stop this subversion of the Congress in its tracks. It’s the exact same dynamic that Baucus exploited – quietly enabled by Reid and every other Finance Committee member – with his “Gang of Six” show – where Baucus unilaterally wiped away the Democratic majority in the Senate, and even the jurisdiction and seniority privileges of the other members of the Senate Finance Committee, to decide who was qualified or eligible to write legislation in Congress, and who wasn’t. Don’t ask me why anyone in the Senate stood for that, except that the President was known to them to be behind it all the way (and I believe ‘montanamaven’ has noted here that Baucus repeatedly claimed just that to fellow Party members in Montana).
Of course, Party leaders originally established this practice, of helping to turn Congress into sheep pens full of people who take orders from the top, without question, after backroom deals with “the other Party” – on a fifty/fifty playing field regardless of the actual Party split in Congress – emerge to be rubberstamped. But now it’s spreading to others in the Congress who can’t be bothered with open, democratic process in committees of jurisdiction, apparently because their collusion with their corporate underwriters is now so blatant that it can no longer be discussed even in code in public, and must be maintained in any future “deal,” at all costs to the public interest and the well-being of the American people.
By most metrics, including cost, the US health system is pretty lousy, with the US ranking along side of slovakia or something. The one metric where the US ranks highest in the world is very likely the amount of profit derived by private companies that deal with health care.
This disconnect between profit and poor outcomes show that these two parameters are mutually exclusive. In the US profits of any kind are glorified as ends and this fact is what precludes any meaningful change in the health system to be adopted.
Makes me sick, Obama is about to address the nation. The dems blame the republicans for health care failure. But that’s a big lie.. the dems health care was a huge pile of garbage. A massive give away of our citizens wealth to the corporate profits of the insurance industry. THE REASON HEALTH CARE FAILED IS BECAUSE THE DEMS OFFERED US A PILE OF SHIT WITH A FEW CHOCOLATE CHIPS IN IT.. and said “this is a good bill”. THAT LIE.. is what pissed me off. CALLING that GARBAGE they tried to dump on us a good bill is a LIE! .. maybe THATS what pissed off mass voters enought to elect a republican to protect us from the corporate shaft obama’s friends tried to crap onto us.
Careful – the Insurance Industry can be ANIMALS!
Watch the new cartoon at:
http://iblogwesthartford.blogspot.com/2010/01/aetna-cigna-and-connecticare-would-they.html
“THE REASON HEALTH CARE FAILED IS BECAUSE THE DEMS OFFERED US A PILE OF SHIT WITH A FEW CHOCOLATE CHIPS IN IT.. ”
Agreed, but we must not let the mediocre become the enemy of the truly awful!
IF they are feeling any shame over their corporate affiliations and even more, a need to hide these connections, that is indeed another surprising sign of progress!