It’s looking bleak for House Democrats in 2010. Stu Rothenberg says recent polling by FDL and DailyKos “show Democratic incumbents in horrible shape — about where Republicans were in 2006 and 2008.” And this morning, he shifts 28 seats toward the GOP.
The corporate bootlicking of Senate “centrists” and House Blue Dogs has taken a huge toll across the country.
The Blue Dogs are on their own — they did this to themselves, sucking up huge donations from lobbyists and letting them write the health care bill. But our online community can be a big help to progressives.
We want to know which members of Congress you think we should help
We can, of course, raise money. But our online tools and organizing abilities have grown tremendously, and we’re light years ahead of the GOP.
When 65 Democrats voted for Stupak, FDL PAC’s “One Voice for Choice” project bought lists of likely Democratic voters in those districts and then phone banked directly to those households to alert them to what was going on. It was largely conducted below the radar, but we wound up with over 21,000 voters who often didn’t know what was happening, and who added their names to a list opposing the amendment:
| District | Member of Congress | Likely Dem 2010 Voters who oppose Stupak |
District | Member of Congress | Likely Dem 2010 Voters who oppose Stupak |
| PA 04 | Altmire | 1857 | OH 09 | Kaptur | 842 |
| AR 01 | Berry | 1049 | RI 02 | Langevin | 1443 |
| OH 16 | Bocceiri | 994 | IL 03 | Lipinski | 1545 |
| TN 05 | Cooper | 817 | NC 07 | McIntyre | 1689 |
| OH 01 | Driehaus | 989 | AR 04 | Ross | 1207 |
| NC 02 | Ethridge | 1397 | NC 11 | Shuler | 1834 |
| TN 06 | Gordon | 2037 | AR 02 | Snyder | 1371 |
| PA 17 | Holden | 1038 | TN 08 | Tanner | 1111 |
| Total | 21200 | ||||
Many of these Democratic voters didn’t know where their Reps stood, and we were able to direct them to contact their Reps to oppose Stupak.
In a close race, a thousand or two thousand Democratic voters can make the difference. These members of Congress need these Democrats to show up for them at the polls in 2010. They’re the ones that they lost sight of in their zeal to appeal to the extreme right wing.
“Fascinating New Force in Politics”
Our tools can also be used to identify and turn out voters to support members of Congress who have been willing to fight on the issues we care about. We can recruit volunteers, inform people about campaign events, promote the work of these members and help them to achieve reform that encourages accountability and transparency. Mike Allen called the One Voice for Choice district campaign a “fascinating new force in politics” on Morning Joe, and we want to use it to help progressives to keep their seats.
If you think your member of Congress is someone we should help, please nominate them (your nomination will only count if you’re a resident of the district.). The deadline is midnight tomorrow night. We’ll start the voting Wednesday, which will be open to the entire community.
Who should it be? Raul Grijalva, Alan Grayson, Dennis Kucinich? Eric Massa, Carol-Shea Porter, Emanuel Cleaver? Someone else?
Let’s help our friends. You decide who that should be.
Nominate your member of Congress for the FDL 2010 election support program.



86 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Obama’s a sellout!
Oh wait, wrong thread..sorry.
Thanks for the list. Personally, I won’t give a dime anymore to Dinos. That includes Obama.
Can we nominate our member of Congress to not be supported?
Okay, which is it? *g*
After the rush to the right of so many of candidates from the last couple elections, I have no idea how to tell who really is progressive.
One thing is perfectly clear: my rep, http://lamarsmith.house.gov/
is not.
In my general area, I’m not even sure about Charlie Gonzalez anymore.
No local suggestionns right now.
Spoke to Dina Titus-Nevada in person yesterday. She promised a no vote on the Senate bill. Not ever having talked to her in person before I can honestly say she has never not told me the truth. She is going to be fighting, not only for her job, but against all the money coming here to Nevada to defeat Senator Reid. While I may not agree with all of her actions, I do have a tremendous amount of respect for her and she deserves our support.
Well, Jason Altmire should be dead to us all. He voted for the Stupak amendment and still voted against the final bill.
There are two people who might run against him: Georgia O Berner and the son of Franco Harris. He’s already beaten the former last time out and the latter just lost a Pittsburgh mayoral race run.
This would be an excellent race to run an independent against both the republican and the democrat if Jason were to win, which he’s likely to. you need $300000 to run a viable house race. I have a plan if anyone is interested…
Two: you need to take a look at state races more closely because of reapportionment. For example, if you want to keep safe democratic seats democratic then you might want to back dem Dan Onorato for Governor. He’s not a progressive but he’s not a republican either. More than likely republicans will retain their majorities in the both the house and senate…so we need a governor. I kept on wondering how the white house could even threaten reps in safe seats and then it occurred to me: reapportionment. They might not be safe seats for long…
You want to use the tool to help turn out voters for one progressive, or more than one? Is this for a primary or the midterms?
I believe it likely that my rep, Jim McDermott, is caving in and will vote for the Senate bill. He’s had a long career in the House. Perhaps, this year he could retire, and FDL could help him advance in that direction.
Err…I gotta say I am REAL skittish about supporting anyone until I see actual progressiveness in their actions. Too many “progressive” candidates that I have seen my money go to have turned out to be DLCers in progressive clothing at worst, or major league pansy progressives who have absolutely no courage of conviction and cave at the first sign of stink eye from party “masters”.
Damn, I forgot, he was re-elected in 2008 :)
I’ll have to wait a couple more years to hope that he can retire.
Uh, you do realize that ALL Reps are up for election every two years and it is only the Senate that has six year terms?
So yes, you will have a chance to beat up on McDermott again this November
I had stuffed the differences in the terms into the corner of my head. Add to that fact I am currently on a massively over-deadline work project AND running on about 3 hours worth of sleep … and you have Seymour making idiotic comments.
So, I reverse my previous reversal, and return to my original position. Perhaps FDL can help speed Jimmy on his way to a fine retirement. This year.
eh, should’ve been “tomorrow night”, fixed now.
Thanks!
I don’t know that much about Ethridge, Langevin or Lipinski, but everyone else on that list is a Blue
Crossdog democrat, and deserves to be starved of donations and volunteers.Now as for who we should be helping, one name jumps to mind. You have his picture at the top right-hand corner of your homepage.
Raul Grijalva has been fighting to make the healthcare bill better almost since we knew there would be a healthcare bill. It was his idea to try to get the CPC to stand firm on the public option. And even though some members of the CPC have most shamefully caved, nobody would have even tried it were it not for Grijalva.
Before Grijalva became co-chair, the CPC spent most of their time arguing about their “shadow budget”, which supposedly shows how our money would be better spent if progressives were in charge. This shadow-budget was then happily ignored by the rest of Congress. Raul Grijalva is the first person in years to try and turn this glass-bead gaming society into a real political caucus.
For that reason alone he deserves much support.
McDee, sadly, is pretty much a congressman-for-life. He hasn’t been effectively opposed in probably 150-200 years. Some say he was a congressman before the Congress itself was created, that his tenure might actually have predated the US Constitution. Nobody is left alive from when he first ran, so we don’t know all the facts …
(He’s been fair to vote for the entire time, about 15 years, I’ve lived in his district. He’s not great, but he opposes wars, tax cuts for the rich, corporate giveaways, etc. He’s not a leader of any sort, but his votes are normally O-K.)
This is for the midterms. A lot of Dems are going to go bye-bye for good reasons, and others will get swept along with them through no fault of their own — unless they get help. And none of them will be replaced by anyone we like.
So you get to pick: who do we try to save? Basically, we’re trying to gauge whether members have support in their district that we can work with. That’s why we want nominations from people in the district.
If they don’t have that, there isn’t a lot we can do.
Wait, wait wait. Those people are not the ones we want to save. But I understand your confusion. Click through to the page at the bottom.
Ken Calvert (R) is the dirtbag incumbent, but unseating him would be a welcome gift. It was close last time around.
Apologies for the misread.
Well that takes me out, my district is represented by a bed-wetting republican.
Mine isn’t one of those up there, I’m waiting to see how he acts with this Health Insurance Bill fiasco to decide whether to support him. He’s been OK so far, but he needs to stand with Grijalva ASAP. If he caves to the senate bill I’m done with him, see ya sucker!
They have to be nominated by someone in the district, but anyone will be able to vote for them.
Unlike his co-chair, who needs to go down.
I am in a red pocket of blue California, so I don’t want anyone to help my reps. I will help donate, phonebank, whatever I can for people my fellow FDL’ers back as true progressives. Those who stick to the pledge would be a good place to start.
I’d like to support some primary candidates like Meister in Illinois, Tasini in NY and of course Winograd in CA. I think we’re going to be in big trouble if we don’t have some good primary candidates because it’s going to get ugly for incumbents but we don’t want a government full of teabaggers as the only option. That’s the lesson we need to take from Mass.
Thanks for writing what I was thinking. I normally create a list of my own, Slobber And Spittle Blue, that only includes people whose actions demonstrate their support for progressive causes. So far, I haven’t been too disappointed in the two who made it into Congress. I think that’s a standard FDL should apply to any candidates it’s thinking of supporting.
Hmmm excepting for Raul Grijalva & Kucinich who appears to be standing alone, all the other ‘Progressives’ are meally mouth, weak-kneed nervous nellies. I would argue that NONE should be supported unless they deliver on backing the PO as they have signed. Maybe you can select from a pared down list of Progressives to not more than 10 (less if you can’t find 10 that are principled) and only give them support commitments AFTER we see what they do with the SIDECAR negotiations.
Jane pre-support will result in the Charley Brown football, aren’t you tired of being Charley Brown, geez, the question shouldn’t be who should be supported, but rather WHO DESERVES BEING SUPPORTED. Until the left demands something for their votes it will continue to be taken for granted.
I must say that I do agree with your effort overall. We know that we’re going to lose some seats in 2010. Making sure that all the losses come from blue dogs is a great way to ensure a more progressive senate. Let the insurance company lobbyists walk the precincts, and knock on doors for them. Let PHARMA lobbyists stuff envelopes, or do phone banking for them. Progressive activists should work to help progressive candidates.
I would vote NO on Alan Grayson. To me he will go along with whatever party leaders say. His stunts is just that stunts, sorry they are great for attacking Republicans but unfortunately it’s the corporatist that are causing the DEMS to be going over the cliff and he has not said much on this. I think he is doing the ultimate Kabuki dance with progressives, but maybe I am cynical.
If the voters in this country decide to put a complete idiot like John Boehner in charge, we deserve every last bit of crap we’ll have to eat. And you can bet Michael Steele and Sarah Palin will be taking credit for it as well. It’s hard to believe the Democrats could fuck this thing up so badly, but I guess if a guy like Reagan can get in, anything is possible.
I’m saving my money for primary challengers. I’ve come to the conclusion that very few elected Dems will ever listen to progressives unless they fear their power to remove them from office. First fear, then respect?
So where’s the tool for identifying and contributing to progressive primary challengers?
None. Even electing good Dems just props up the DNC and prolongs the pain. If they’re really good candidates, let them leave the party and run independent. Then I’ll donate/volunteer/vote for them.
Does anyone know if Mary Jo Kilroy of Ohio (not my rep) is worthy of support? She did at least one FDL live blog and promised to come back again.
Is Marcy Kaptur up for re-election. If she is…send that woman money. She is amazing
To Jane;
I look forward to the voting process
@ PaulaT:
Agreed on Woolsey. We need a stronger co-chair. One who is willing to campaign for progressives, not rich warhawks. Also, one who is more adept at explaining progressive points of view. I think that Woolsey is a perfectly nice person, but she has been a weak advocate for progressive policies, and her messaging has been muddled and muted, at best. We need someone stronger.
@ Monty Karlo:
Look, if we only support the perfect candidates, the ones who meet your every qualification, well, we’ll end up supporting maybe three people. Please realize that imperfect progressives would behave better if they had more back-up, and less pressure to conform to a corporatist agenda. Some of them, to be sure, have acted in a embarrassingly servile manner towards the more conservative wing of the party. But hey, you have to start somewhere.
Eric Massa. I love that he basically calls out Cheney and the chickenhawks, and he seems to be genuinely interested in his Congressional work.
Carol Shea-Porter, who seems grounded and sensible.
Also, I have not followed Bruce Braley recently, but that diagram that he developed to show how phenomenally things shifted under BushCheney with respect to DoJ meddling made a huge impact.
And Earl Blumenaur?
jane,
you go girl.
I get your message.
We’ve got a good Dem challenging Bill Young in FL-10 this time round. Good name recognition and has done a good job in the state House and Senate. Since the legislature has been controlled by Rethugs for so long it’s not hard to get small concessions from them but big stuff won’t see the light of day. I’m not completely on board with Charlie Justice but I’m leaning that way. I am helping get petitions signed to get him on the ballot without paying the county the joss.
She’s not my rep either but I will ask around.
Jane,
I am flexible. I bend to your message. Peace.
Can we nominate reps. for PUNISHMENT rather than support? That would be easier for me. Of course, the list gets awfully long …
There are 4 Ohio reps on the tea party target list.
They’re “Enemies of Liberty,” oooh scary.
Whoa, Jane. Masterful program. The new political social media/action movement, right here, right now. With crowdsourcing!! Thank you.
I wish everyone here would see things as I do.
The First Amendment has been taken over by corporate frauds.
Jane knows this.
Goddamn, give money to change this piece of shit.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen Hamsher and the Firepup Freedom Fighters:
It looks to me like you’ve given up on the healthcare fight and are gearin’ up to create a progressive minority party in Congress…maybe you have missed a step because if House Progressives hold firm and actually get a progressive healthcare bill, the Democrats in the House of Representatives will not lose any seats except a whole bunch of Blue Dogs. This lead me to ask the same questions I been askin you for about a month now: have you made any contacts with Pelosi? What is Pelosi’s relationship with Rahm and isn’t she interested in keepin’ her Speakership?
I don’t think that Obama will let Rahm bury the House Democrati8c majority unless he’s already got his retirement plans for 2013. Don’t give up on the healthcare fight, the longer it gets strung out the worse it is for Obama…and even an egocentric, ambitious politician like Obama can’t avoid the reality that he can’t get anyone elected but his policies can if they’re right!
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE WARS!!
And Stu Rothenberg shifts 28 races to the GOP just this morning.
Freefalling dems! Run for cover!!
Bruce braley is my rep and has my recommendation but I think he’ll be ok this cycle without our support.
Citizen Monty Karlo:
No, Citizen, you got Grayson right…he’s a very smart right wing libertarian who knows how toplay a crowd as long as he doesn’t hafta answer any questions about what he thinks is the roll of government in the economy and what he learned clerkin’ for the neo-fascist Antonin Scalia.
Unfortunately, I have to go outside my state to find someone to represent my interests. I will not support any congressperson who votes for the senate bill as it stands and that includes anyone who votes for it in “fix it later mode’. I suspect that I will direct any money I may have to issue oriented action rather than to individuals.
I am getting increasingly pissed at everybody on the left. Today, I get an email from SEIU that starts out:
“The headlines are ominous. “Large scale health care reform is dead,” reads one newspaper. “Time for Democrats to cut their losses?” asks another. But now is not the time for scaling back reform. That’s why we need your help to whip votes for comprehensive health reform.”
Note how they cleverly avoid mentioning the Senate Bill which is the only thing available to vote on anytime soon. I went to the SEIU site to object and there was no “contact us” mechanism.
And then there is this one from Move On;
“If Democrats do not pass comprehensive health care reform this year, will you donate to Democratic candidates in the 2010 elections? Just click the appropriate link below to let us know:
Definitely won’t donate
Probably won’t donate
Probably will donate
Definitely will donate”
I don’t even know how to answer that question. It is the wrong question. I will actively work to defeat anyone who votes for the senate bill.
I want to fire them all and start over. I am not nearly as stupid as they seem to think I am.
DENNIS KUCINICH!
Allyson Schwartz is my rep and I don’t nominate her.
Thus I won’t be “voting”. How metaphorical.
Seems like rage outweighs adoration about 10:1.
Raul Grijalva, and Grayson seem like the heroes.
cc
Oh, I wish I could express myself here fully in favor of Jane Hamsher.
I think it’s pretty much the same question, myself. And I imagine the community will vote for those who they feel are going to honor their commitments.
Since I think the likelihood of health care passing soon is probably pretty small, we may not know soon if ever if they live up to them. But if if it does come to a vote, and we’re working successfully in someone’s district to help them, the chance that they’re going to screw their supporters over goes down.
Yep, I hope someone nominates Dennis. Looking forward to his Fannie/Freddie hearings.
Norske, why would you think we’ve given up on the health care fight when we’ve been writing about it and running call reports all day?
Not sure there are going to be a lot of primary challengers this year. It would be great, but with even incumbents retiring in droves, it’s damn hard to find people who want to take that on.
Believe me, we’ve been trying. Hard.
Strongly disagree. These are not the same questions – but if football is your game, continue to give freely while losing your leverage to demand accountability.
Cheers
That makes sense. What progressive wants to join *Rahms* team. *sigh.*
Grijalva, for sure. Maybe we should see who Rahm chooses and then go for the opponent.
I am not likely to vote for any major party candidate that cannot find at least one other candidate that agrees with them. Not even Senators. Why waste my vote!
As you may be aware U.S. parties have few powers other than raising $$ – by law!
Apparently U.S. parties are somewhat unique in this regard.
SEE: Can You Define what a Political Party is?
One elected politician cannot pass a law. Heck one elected politician cannot even get a bill out of committee!
One form of activism that (might) even filch money from my pocket would be an email campaign designed to inundate ( for a day or so ) both incumbent and primary candidates campaigns with something like the following text.
Dear Candidate:
One elected politician cannot pass a law. Heck one elected politician cannot even get a bill out of committee! This voter tends to be much more interested in voting for political platforms. It is with great respect that I have decided to remind some of my favorite candidates of my lack of enthusiasm for any candidates that cannot find a single other candidate that agrees with them – on even a single (specific) issue! It is very distressing to be forced to vote for candidates that I view as ether lazy or wishing to make me waste my vote.
Yours sincerely,
Registered voter
Just did a first-pass on this regarding my US Congressperson. I paused when I saw that the individual “supported the interests of the The Alliance for Worker Freedom 0 percent in 2008″ (from VoteSmart.Org). I am not done yet reviewing/drilling down but it’s not looking good. I am very interested to see what FDL et al comes up with when they slice and dice the information they get regarding this survey.
They will be targeting Congressman Zack Space. Some good news for Space in our neck of the woods
http://www.athensnews.com/news/national-news/30196-area-congressmen-react-to-health-reform-stall
Area congressmen react to health-reform stall
Written by David DeWitt
Monday, 25 January 2010 11:44
The fate of U.S. congressional health-care reform efforts are up in the air now that Republican Scott Brown has been elected in the Massachusetts special election to replace former Sen. Ted Kennedy, a Democrat, who passed away in August.
The Republican victory gives that party 41 seats in the U.S. Senate, which takes away the Democrats’ filibuster-proof majority. Democrats now have the options of either scaling back and slowing down health-care reform, or attempting to get the House to pass the Senate-passed version of the legislation, which would negate the need for the bill to return to the Senate.
——————————————————————
Just rescently the tough Democratic Chair was knocked out by David Warren a prosecuting attorney in our region. The claim was that David Warrenwent after Attorney and Former chair of Athens County Dems because she ran against him for the Prosecuting Attorney spot.
Dave Warren went digging and then turned the investigation over to Prosecutor David Yost (Republican Columbus Ohio)
http://www.athensnews.com/news/local-news/29931-gwinn-trial-continues-after-judge-dismisses-charges-related-to-5-bounty
Even though the felony charges against Susan Gwinn were dropped she was asked to step down as Chair of Athens County Dem Party. Now Susan is one tough cookie and has been very good at rallying in the Dem Troops around Athens County. Which has been a consistent blue patch in most national elections in Ohio
I think the Republicans will try to work this area big time tipping it to the Republicans. I think they will run Ohio Republican State Rep Jimmy Stewart for Congressman Wilson’s spot. I think they believe by taking Gwinn out they will have more of a chance to shake this region up by electing some Republicans from the area
Started a mounthly donation that I stoped.Alen Grason was loud on the floor talking about the Republicans.Then shortly after that Grason started pushing for the bill for the insurance conglomerates.Anyone should understand that haveing health insurance is not the same as haveing Health Care. Could not support Allen Grason.Really the only one I would like to see doing The Peoples business is Eric Massa.He appears to be a Honorable Man.
The Republicans are more than likely to run Republican state Rep Jimmy Stewart against Congressman Zack Space
http://www.athensnews.com/news/national-news/29014-candidates-line-up-in-gop-primary-to-challenge-space
I’ll support anyone thats not an incumbent.Unless thay deliver on backing of the Public Option or better that 57 in congress signed the 7/30/09 letter.Can thay be trusted on there word of honor.
I’m in TN-2, so I can’t nominate either. Looks like we’ll have to wait for the voting to begin.
That’s been my impression, i.e. that you’ve been working hard to find good candidates who want to take it on and that there really aren’t very many this year.
http://www.actblue.com/page/fdlblueamerica
Jane, It is way to early to decide this.
Right now talk, and even votes, are cheap. It’s really easy for a vote to be crafted so that so called progressives get to ineffectually vote “the right way” while really bad legislation is passed. The history of betrayal we have faced is to blatant for us to do anything but withhold support until we see real, meaningful actions. Otherwise, no money, support, anything should go to incumbents. We’ve been burned too many times, there are too many head shaped holes in our walls, the football has been pulled away too many times…
We have to prove we at least have a capacity for learning even if the incumbent dems do not.
When they pass good legislation I’ll support them. Until then, I have better uses for my money.
You seem to make sense to me. If Democratic Senators support a 60 vote administrative cloture rule then they cannot use 60 votes as an excuse. Also: If a Senator does not believe in representative democracy they will not represent me just because I give them $100. Heck, they will just use the 60 vote cloture rule as an excuse for wasting my cash donations – and it will be a valid excuse!
Over at Hardball some interesting figures. In Massachusetts 2/3 of white voters without college educations went with Brown.
In New Jersey’s recent race 70% of white voters without college educations went with the Republican
I’d vote for Alan Grayson, but he’s not my Representative. I’m lumbered with John (DINO) Barrow. I’m sorely tempted to just give in and vote for the Republican in November, because at least I’ll know I’m gonna get screwed…
Is it possible to use these donations for media buys in major markets (eg. NYTimes, WaPo) to put a spotlight on the duplicity of the Obama Administration, their betrayal of the platform they were elected to enact, and the majority support for such? Since we’re largely ignored or spat-upon, and haven’t had equal access to the MSM to promote our message, this might be a way to carefully kraft a fist-in-the-face, esepcially if it was a shared buy with numerous like-minded organizations and entities.
51% of voters in Mass registered Independents.
Coakley went to 19 public events
Brown went to 60 events.
Coakley blew it. How did they miss what was going on up there?
error
Coakley was a terrible candidate. No doubt about that. But if she had been a great candidate she still would have lost. The real issue in the MA election was that Dem’s and Independents both thought they had elected a government that would start adressing the real needs of the country rather than fluffing the corporate powers on our dime and our time.
If you want to understand what happened in MA, read this poll:
http://act.boldprogressives.org/cms/sign/mapollresults/
It is the best data on what was behind Coakley’s loss. Lots of folks looking at the lint in their navels reached all the conclusions they had already drawn anyways but the data is the only real thing here.
The sad thing is that the dem-i-lemmings seem determined to run over the cliff just to show they can.
Not so far.i will nominate NONE,not a damn penny.lET’S SEE the outcome of
health care reform.
LOVE the chart on the front page! This exercise is exactly what I want out of FDL. (Though my MD rep, Dem. Donna Edwards, is not up for reelection, so I can’t help here).
I guess since I live in this district, I can only nominate whoever runs against Nancy Pelosi. I usually write in Scooby-Doo, but his candidacy has not been gaining much traction.
Thanks for the follow up. I did a bit of phone calling for Mary Jo Kilroy via MoveOn.orgpac in 2004 and 2006 and didn’t want to see it go to waste as many other efforts for Moveon did.
Forgot to add: Maybe we can take this a step further and nominate and fundraise for one of our own? Anyone live in AR, PA, NC or TN? Want to move to one of these states?
Isn’t it a bit premature for this? Afterall, we don’t know which Dems will support a public option and which will bail out on us. My Rep. Jay Inslee, wouldn’t make the pledge. But will he vote on the Senate sellout? I don’t know. So how can I nominate him yet?
If you like everything about him other than not being sure about the public option, I would think we could put him on the list tentatively. That would be up to Jane. Frankly, I prefer the ones who don’t sign the pledge to those who do and then break it. If you honestly can’t say what you would vote for in the future, I’d rather you just say so. Know what I mean?
Dennis Kucinich is the best Rep in congress and he’s always gotten my support all the way from CA. I live in CA 1 and would love to get rid of Mike Thompson, but we’re moving to Rep Woolsey’s district within the year and haven’t heard of a challenge. I’d love to see a strong progressive run against her even to shake her a bit, but doubtful. I hear she’s quite popular there and she of course has had a great voting record. shaky on health care, but hopefully we can change that. Thanks for starting this.
Brad Sherman, CA 27th (SFV)
As far as I know, the first to reveal SecTreas Paulson’s threat to declare martial law if the House didn’t immediately bail out the banksters back in Sept 08.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaG9d_4zij8
And grilled Geithner a year later on the Fed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEpmRv2kAng
Brad Shereman does rock. Good call.
Unless she is retiring Donna Edwards is running for reelection. All Reps have to run every two years.
Oh yeah, I forgot it is 2010. ;)
Well then, I guess I don’t really know about Ms. Edwards. She seems to toe the party line. She sent me a letter congratulating herself for voting for the Health bill in the House with nary a mention of the Stupak amendment (for which, of course, she did not vote Yea). She pretty much said to the Post that the public option is expendable.
As it stands now, if I like a Progressive candidate running against Ms. Edwards, I’d give her/him a shot.
I’m done “liking everything else” about who I vote for. It’s time the line was drawn in the sand. People are dying and if Inslee doesn’t stand up for a strong public option, then I’m through with him no matter what.