Rep. Tim Bishop (D NY-1) has held down a tough seat for the Democrats since taking it over from the GOP in 2002. Bush won this Eastern Long Island district by 2,000 votes in 2004, and Obama won it by four points in 2008, but signs are not good for four-term incumbent Bishop.
A recent poll commissioned by potential GOP challenger Randy Altschuler shows Bishop at 46% to his 26%. Even though Obama took 52% and the district has a PVI+1, Republicans lead in a generic ballot 38%-34%.
Altschuler is on the GOP’s “young guns” list; Bishop is one of the “suburban Democrats” these guns are targeting this year. Bishop will attack Altschuler as an “outsourcing pioneer” who sent jobs out of the country. The Long Island businessman is a self-funder who has outraised Bishop, reporting $659K in the third quarter. He contributed $450,000 of his own money, and he’s already up on the air with ads.
But Altschuler isn’t the only Republican to emerge to challenge Bishop, who apparently see him as a ripe target. George Demos, one of the SEC attorneys who worked on the Bernie Maddoff case, is claiming to have $275K cash on hand at the end of the 4th quarter.
Bishop is already worried, and recently made a plea in a letter to supporters:
I need a minimum of $3 million to run this race aggressively. I need my natural allies to step up the pace and the amount of their primary and general election campaign contributions this time. I know my district and I know what’s coming.”
Bishop had to cancel his town halls in August as a result of angry tea party protests.
When Mike Stark spoke to Bishop earlier this year, he asked him if he’d pledge to vote against any bill that doesn’t have a public option. Bishop replied, “I am not going to take a pledge because I want to see how the final legislation comes out.” Mike pointed out that the right-to-lifers had pledged to vote against any bill over the abortion language, but that public option supporters like Bishop didn’t seem to feel that strongly.
Bishop voted for the House bill on the first vote. If he votes for the Senate bill, he’ll kowtow to those like Stupak and Nelson who did draw a line in the sand over abortion, piss off the tea party activists and abandon his own principles on the public option. Hard to know who the constituency is for that.
Bishop has taken $287K from the health care sector, and $72K from pro-choice advocate groups and $1 million from unions.
Bishop’s office is (631) 696-6500. Ask him if he’s really planning on voting for a mandate that will force people to pay almost as much to private insurance companies as they do in federal taxes, with the IRS acting as a collection agency — and no public plan as an alternative.
No public plan? No mandate.
Let us know what you hear from Bishop’s office on the reporting form in the war room. You can now see call reports people are submitting after their calls for all House offices as they appear, which is pretty interesting.



25 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
nice to see some criticism of the mandate from the top at FDL.
better late than never.
How is the weather in your area? It is so cold here that I saw a Democrat with his hands in his own pockets…
A corporatist Democrat may be replaced by a corporatist Republican. I feel so invested in the outcome.
Also good one, frederic.
you are serious aren’t you?
Hard to know who the constituency is for that.
People looking for a “new kind of politics” would be my guess.
Kill The Bill Baby Kill The Fucking Bill…
Reminds me of the time Oral Roberts needed so many million or god was gonna call him home. I need…..I need……I need….
So he needs $3 million does he. Well, fuck him. So do I and everyone I know.
No one will emerge to support Democrats like this one. They’ve pissed off their natural constituency in a vain attempt to curry favor with those who’ll never support them in a million years.
That there are GOPs jostling for the chance to challenge Bishop bodes ill for him.
It would be great if these endangered suburban Democrats would stand up to the corporatist elements in their party and say, “no mas” but I fear all they have to say to Rahm and the Corps is “More please!”
This will be a story line into the 2010 and 2012 elections.
My response will be the same going forward. I won’t lift a finger to help any Democrat running for office. Nada. Nothing.
I will not defend any Democrat, nor attack any Republican.
I will continue to vote in every election.
I will not vote for a Democrat nor a Republican.
The two-party system is a sham, but I refuse to take my marbles and walk away.
Who are his natural allies and why aren’t they helping him? Oh I forgot, that wld be us, and why aren’t we helping him? I am not voting for or sending money to any democrat that votes for this insurance company bill.
As a “natural ally” of Mr. Bishop’s and a constituent, I’d strongly urge him to vote against this bill. It’s win-win, politically: he doesn’t have to take a hit supporting bad legislation that will hurt Suffolk County residents disproportionately with new taxes, etc. while showing his commitment for true health care reform. Bishop has been a very party-line Democrat since going to Washington: he’s more than due for some political independence.
If he does vote for this terrible bill as it’s likely to emerge, that would make voting very tough for me. The alternative is a greedy investment banker who made a fortune sending American jobs to Chennai, India. Randy Altschuler is the most laughably plutocratic candidate the Republicans could possibly throw up. Even Tea Party folks should be disgusted by such a horrible candidate and enemy of working Americans. I doubt the Working Families Party would cross Bishop even if he voted to ban unions… so that doesn’t really leave a choice. This is democracy?
If he votes for it, it will be an act of courage. An act of courage that FDL should be SUPPORTING, not vilifying every other minute.
Could FDL please stop doing the GOP’s work for them?
I like Rep. Bishop, but to be honest it wouldn’t take a great deal of courage to march with the rest of the Democratic Establishment over a cliff supporting this alleged reform bill. Bishop certainly hasn’t shown much courage since going to Washington: he’s a party line guy on every issue I can remember.
As to political courage, I think it’d be bolder to risk alienating the Democratic funding base with a no vote for liberal reasons. The election in the First District won’t be decided on voting record, but on whether Bishop can raise enough money to run wall-to-wall ads highlighting Altschuler’s outsourcing and investment banking career. I think any Joe Average with $2 million should be able to take that clown down.
A comment this lacking in thought doesn’t deserve much of a response, so I’ll boil mine down to this – if you think that making tens of millions of Americans buy crappy insurance and setting up the conditions so that the employer-provided insurance of tens of millions more Americans is devalued will help the Democratic Party’s chances, then you are either:
- too ignorant or unimaginative to understand the implications of the Senate bill
- too far removed from the lives of most Americans to understand how it will affect them
Tim Bishop is asking for money and support but he appears not able to commit to any political stand. SOP. They really do believe one has *nothing* to do with the other.
That call reports thingy at the War Room is way cool!
Are you always this kind and persuasive?
If you think “killing the bill” and starting from scratch is actually a viable possibility for the Democrats as we get closer and closer to the midterms, or if you think it would be better to simply scrap the entire health care project and go to the voters with nothing to show for a year of agonizing debate , or if you think healthcare legislation will improve with fewer Democrats in Congress next year, you are either:
–a GOP flack pretending to be a progressive who wants to “improve” the bill by killing it
–someone who has never paid any attention to the legislative and political process in any serious way
Hey cujo359. You left out setting back a woman’s right to choose about 30 years from your list.
Damn, I don’t have my Troll Bingo link here at work.
This one?
So true:
Our system just does not seem to be offering up good alternatives.
So now fellow progressives who want to get the first major healthcare overhaul in 40+ years passed, so that they can build on and improve it going forward, rather than repeat the failures of the Truman administration, the Nixon Administration, the Clinton Administration, etc., are “trolls”.
This is just sad.
So be sad. Have you opened your pocket to help the useless schmuck with his three million needs yet? Me neither.
It would be nice if the only ones who paid a price for their vote to institutionalize mandatory consumerism were the blue-
cross-dog democrats. It would be poetic justice if they lost their seats after they worked so hard to ruin any chance at real reform.I wonder if that could be a strategy which most of the disgusted healthcare activists could get behind. Progressives could cut free any donations to party-machine pols, like Rahm’s dog-pound, or the conservadems*, but would agree to support pols like Grijalva and Sanders, even if they were disappointed by them. Let the machine pols fund themselves (and supply their own volunteers). For instance, I’m perfectly willing to forego donations to my senator and send them to Alan Grayson or Bernie Sanders instead. I’m also willing to phone-bank for a real progressive, even if he’s in the next state, than spend time at my local Dem HQ, trying to work up enthusiasm for a bought-and-paid-for DINO who just wants to screw me, anyway.
*who would more accurately be called “corporadems”, but I realize it doesn’t have the same ring to it, maybe “conservacrat”?
Sanders could have held out for the public option. He didn’t, and neither is Grayson.
been offline since fri. today seems like the calm before the storm. now is the time to stand strong on principle and common sense. good work Jane.
Into the Mystic.