We are one year away from when the 112th Congress will be sworn in, and that is why I’m beginning a countdown to full Congressional shutdown. When Democrats lose their 60-vote super-majority in the Senate, our entire Congress will effectively stop working altogether.
All indications point to this year being a good election for Republicans. They are projected to pick up several seats in the House, and, most importantly, they are projected to pick up several seats in the Senate. If Republicans win seats in both Houses, but not enough to gain a majority in either chamber, our Congress will effectively shut down.
If the Republican party wins, it will be by being the party of no and obstructing Democrats at every turn. They will have profited politically not because they sold the American people on their new ideas, but by simply making Democrats look like they are incapable of governing and handling problems. I see zero reason why the Republican party would throw out a successful playbook after it won them an election. To most Americans, it will look like Democrats fully control the federal government (which they would if they were willing to play true hardball), and yet are failing to get anything done.
Because of the Republicans’ incredible abuse of the filibuster, once Democrats lose their 60-vote super-majority the Senate will go from a terribly broken, barely functioning governing body to a completely broken nonfunctioning governing body. The process of legislating will effectively come to a complete stop. Any bill even slightly controversial, and even many non-controversial bills, will fail to pass the Senate. All the top-priority legislation of the Democratic base not passed inside the next year will never be passed. Even the actual management of our government will be crippled by the slow pace of approving Obama’s nominees.
Republicans would not allow themselves to walk into this failure-to-govern, political suicide trap. This will be a disaster completely of the Democrats’ own making if they refuse to pay hardball. When Democrats tried to block the GOP’s top priorities when the Republicans fully controlled the federal government, GOP Senate majority leader Bill Frist was prepared to go to the mat. He used reconciliation in creative ways to get his tax cuts past a Democratic filibuster. When Democrats threatened to filibuster judicial nominees, First was prepared to use the nuclear option to end the filibuster until Democrats backed down at the last minute. The Republican party understands that parties are elected to govern not to be incredibly nice to the party the American people just kicked out of power.
The big problem is that even the most liberal Democrats in the Senate prefer being senators to being legislators. They like their complete lack of caucus discipline. They enjoy their terrible rules governing the Senate because they give each individual senator huge amounts of power. Unfortunately, they don’t want to give up even some personal power by reforming these rulesl, even though the rules are destroying the Senate, ruining our government, and slowly crippling our nation. The Democrats in the Senate will only change when there is serious pressure from outside.
If progressives and the different constituent groups that make up the Democratic base want to see their top priorities passed into law, they need to act quickly. We have seen how this completely made-up 60-vote threshold has completely ruined health care reform, and the destruction done to progressive legislation by this made-up 60-vote requirement will only get dramatically worse in one year.
It does not matter if your goal is health care reform, gay rights, labor law, global warming, immigration reform, etc., they are all hindered by the same made up 60-vote threshold that the Democrats in the Senate refuse to acknowledge they have the power to eliminate. All progressive groups have one year before the next Congress is sworn in and the new rules are set. They have a one year window to push for Senate rule reform before the chamber effectively shuts down and takes with it all hope of progressive reform for years to come. A push to restore Constitutional majority rule to the Senate is the push for every single legislative goal of the Democratic base, but the clock is ticking.




13 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Majority rule is the simplest of American values; DC Democrats are idiots not to fight for it now, when they can actually win it. People don’t need to be educated on this, everyone understands it and embraces it, and Democrats won’t fight for it.
Could it be they like things the way they are?
Yep. They just love that revolving door between corporations, lobbyists’ offices, and congressional chambers.
So, what should we voters do?
What is the path towards reforming the rules?
I agree, we’re on a path towards a trainwreck of epic proportions (both for the Democratic party and, more importantly, for the nation). But we need to figure out the solution.
I’m sure that “vote D” is not enough.
The key sentence of your whole post, elaborated on thereafter. Not sure how we can get them to shift out of this attitude. I don’t think they’ll give up personal power for “the good of the country.” Certainly not for the good of us peasants.
Please don’t be so alarmist.
I’m sure that, in order to thank Obama for reaching across the
aisle repeatedly during the summer as the Senate was
abortingcarefully crafting the HCR bill,the Republicans, after adding to their numbers in the Fall elections,
will allow immigration reform to go forward.
First, I can’t understand why anyone would think Dems are “idiots”. I believe this is the Bill the MAJORITY of Dem Senators wanted & they are NOT idiots, they are “corrupt”.
Second, It seems equally obvious that the Dems WILL LOSE their 60 seat advantage in the Senate AND they will miraculously discover the strength of a simple majority IF AND WHEN Obama & team want something done.
My read is Obama is actually PLEASED with the Senate HealthCare Bill, he ALONE is to blame for it.
ALL Dem. Senators (whom we expect better of) should be held accountable for caving to his power, but Obama alone is to blame for it. The rest of the Dems in both the Senate should be retired ASAP.
I disagree. Obama must carry a large share of blame, there is no doubt. And I am *definitely* not in the Cult of Obama.
But Jon is correct that our dysfunctional Congress goes a long, long way towards enabling the rich to get richer, always and regardless of who is “in power.”
Obama probably needs to be voted out next election. But ultimately, unless we fix the system, it doesn’t matter who’s wearing the fancy hat.
I agree about Clarence Obama & also that THE principal question we face is HOW, not whether we need, to fix the system. BUT, are we to trust our BEST Senate Dems, who wouldn’t stand up against this OUTRAGEOUSLY CORRUPT HealthCare proposal, to fix the system? I’m SO disappointed in Feingold & Sanders!
As much as I respect Jons analytical skills, hard work, moral compass and energy I fear that it is the barricades or nothing. Though it is by no means a new perspective — I have seen it stated, alluded to and intimated here at FDL by certain sage and/or enraged advocates — Helen Redmond and Ian Welsh have both stated it quite succinctly. We and our scions will have to endure much pain and heartache before we see that fine day which we are searching for. (Helen at http://www.counterpunch.org/redmond12232009.html and Ian at http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/04-10 )
As Uri Averny writes, the Egyptians have only risen against their elites maybe three or four times in their 6000-8000 year history. We, subjects of the most elaborately propagandized and powerful killing machine in history, should not harbor illusions that we will be able to clever our way out of this 250 year nightmare.
Safe corporate liberal Congressmen love gridlock. They can ‘stand for’ all the progressive legislation voters demand of them and still collect from corporations – insurance, energy, finance, military: you know, their true constituents.
“If progressives and the different constituent groups that make up the Democratic base want to see their top priorities passed into law, they need to act quickly. We have seen how this completely made-up 60-vote threshold has completely ruined health care reform, and the destruction done to progressive legislation by this made-up 60-vote requirement will only get dramatically worse in one year.”
What makes us think that the same thing won’t happen to every other piece of “progressive legislation” between now and this projected “shut down” a year from now–including any proposed rule changes?
What makes us think that we don’t still 60 vote majorities in the Senate when Republicans come back to town?
It seems to me that Democrats simply lack the will to go to the mats like Frist. The Democratic Party is itself the problem.
Thanks for those links, Tex. Following is a comment I left on another thread that compliments your viewpoint rather well, I think: “Yeah, yeah. Nicely worded and all very desirable. Except that none of it is going to happen because the duopoly is never going to pass reform that effectively votes itself out of power.
“Those who came before us used strikes, and marches, and sit-ins, and boycotts.”
This is the only thing said in all these paragraphs that even begins to tackLe the heart of the matter. And even strikes and marches will only be marginally effective for 3 reasons: 1) the corporate elites don’t even care anymore. They do what they damn well please and public relations be damned. 2.) they control the media so that marchers and strikers, if they are mentioned at all, will be characterized as crackpots and commies. 3) In America, which is an emerging 3rd world nation,
protesters who become effective will be shot in the streets as “terrorists” or whatever is the perjorative term of the year. What do people think the “National Guard” is?
In future I will have only 1 criterion in voting for a candidate. Is he/she 100% anti-corporatist? If they are not or seem to be simply mouthing the right words then I will vote NOT for the “least-worst” but instead for the “MOST-worst.” Why? Because my father’s enduring maxim, that nothing fundamental ever changes in this country without a full-blown, system threatening crisis, has never been more self-evidently true. Therefore I believe that the sooner all this comes to a head the better. If people insist on being battered into complete submission before they get the message so be it. For nothing is going to change one bit until the populace gets “unruly.” I pick my word carefully. But mark my word. All this 3rd party talk, this left-right alliance business or factions within the party structures, or tinkering with election law- shall all come to naught without the strong scent of revolution and fear in the air. It will all come down to that.
I believe the confusion Dem supporters have is due to the chasm between what Dem Senators & Reps SAY vs. what they actually want. There is NO evidence to support Obama & team care one hoot about ANY of the issues he ran on. We can say he squandered his 1st year, the greatest opportunity for sweeping change. We can say that it’s too bad he had so many very important issues to deal with. We can even say it takes a while for any President to get settled & organized to accomplish large goals. This is all just rhetoric. I say, Obama & the Senate Dems are NOT the Party of the people they claim to be. I say they tell us anything they think we want to hear & do anything the Corps want to see. What we ALL MUST admit is: Obama & the Dems WE elected are a terrible dissapointment & do NOT deserve our support or our votes.