Lobbyists run Washington, DC. One part of the problem is that money is the mother’s milk of politics in this country, and politicians need to spend half their day fund raising. The other big problem is that there is no one in town besides lobbyists capable of running Washington. Congressional offices are dangerously understaffed and underpaid.
I’ve met many Congressional staffers, and they tend to be very hardworking, nice, smart, young professionals. That is also part of the problem, they are young professionals. The hours are very long, the stress level is high, and the pay is terrible. Add to that a huge lobbying industry waiting to give them jobs with thirty times the salary, and the result is a very high turnover rate. Even a young idealist not in it for the money can quickly burn out.
These congressional staffers are the watchdogs of the taxpayers’ money. They help shape legislation governing all our lives, and take part in deciding how trillions of federal dollars are spent. Their jobs are incredibly important to everyone in this nation. It is crazy that these watchers are, for the most part, a bunch of underpaid, overworked 20-somethings. Don’t we want this job done by well-paid, experienced technocrats?
We will never see a Washington not run by lobbyists until we make a commitment to hiring sufficient numbers of highly qualified staffers committed to doing the job long term. Each House member is limited to maximum staff of 18, and the average size staff is only 14. (These people run our government, but I’ve eaten at delis with larger staffs.) Most Hill staffers are paid $45,000 a year, or less. That is not the pay you need to retain a large staff of well-trained career technocrats. That is the level of pay that produces a farm system for the next generation of political consultants and lobbyists.
I have nothing but sympathy for these low-paid legislative aides. I have spent months focused nearly exclusively on health care reform, and I can only just barely wrap my head around it. I don’t know how they can properly study such important pieces of legislation while still trying to take care of a variety other duties.
What Congress needs is not just more staff, but better paid staff. Make the salaries sufficient so that more people will honestly look on the job as a career. Losing the institutional knowledge because of high turnover is not good for this country.
For basically the price of one completely wothless F-22, we could have doubled the size of the staff and increased salaries for every House office for one year. Maybe if we had spent more money on professional staff, we could have avoided wasting so much money on those useless planes.
I know the congressional staffers write the bills and often become the lobbyists. It is time they lobby on behalf of themselves and the American people. I say to the congressional aides, hire yourselves some much-needed help and give yourselves a raise. It would be a small price to pay to ensure that someone in Washington besides the lobbyists know how to run our government. If need be, call it a jobs bill.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
To get a sense of who these staffers are and how much it costs to run a Congressional office and pay staff, see the House report on disbursements. It makes for very interesting reading.
Sounds like just about the time a staffer might gain some competency, they get burned out and go into industry to make the cash.
Of course, it makes too much sense to hire knowledgeable staff and pay them a living wage so it will never happen.
Who likes the system the way it is?
So now when people call up their representatives, I guess they will know why the staffers can seem so clueless.
The much larger problems are the lack of public financing reform and strict limits on lobbyists.
quite a few staffers I know are trust fund babies who just want to be close to power or, who, in some cases, really want to use their personal financial flexibility to make a difference.
The US really has to take a cue from relatively uncorrupt countries like Singapore, Sweden and the Netherlands, where working for government is a reasonably well compensated and high prestige career pursuit.
I saw on a job posting for a US municipal government labor economist position in AZ that came across my desk the other day that they were offering a measly $52,000 (not a lot at all for the qualifications they were seeking) and “the successful candidate must be willing to swear a loyalty oath to the United States of America.”. The job has nothing whatsoever to do with the Federal government or national security. There were other tests that this civil service position would require a rethug litmus test.
Derrick Crowe is liveblogging Obama’s speech, upstairs!
Liveblogging the President’s Afghanistan Speech
Jaysus, I had no idea these were people making $45k a year, and in DC no less. As the post suggested, that’s an insult to the importance of these people and the work they do. Aren’t these staffers recent law school grads? How can they be making the same thing your average administrative assistant is probably making in a nice office somewhere in the DC suburbs?
Sounds like a pay scale the Republicans dreamed up for reasons suggested in the post, i.e., to keep K Street well staffed with experienced people while Congress gets its share of the best and brightest but can’t keep them. Thing about it is, in the end we’re paying for the whole shuck and jive, some damn way.
Industry and the “non-profit” sector do it no differently unless you agree to wear their “leg irons” (reference: Masaccio’s “Veal Pen: Report from Academia” and “The Urban Institute Helps Push Triggers… with Help from Robert Wood Johnson”).
By the way EmptyWheel is bullseye (reference: “Sprint’s 50 Million Customers Have Been Geo-Tracked 8 Million Times – in the Last Year”) on the facts just in case you were wondering. The rest of the picture is the LEO satellites, truck-deployed joystick-operated drone craft and fusion centers (reference: “What’s Wrong With Fusion Centers – Executive Summary” by ACL.org) for data distribution/redundancy so it’s all openly done on commercial systems (“mil-cots”; more at Wired.com “Threat Level”; Mr. Klein’s revelations about AT&T duplicate Central Offices). All you need is 3 personnel (more is better; probably a private contractor) data-linked SUVs on contract from Ford to stay in visual range of the target aware enough to untether from the societal pan-data-con. This is why the Afghanis bomb cell towers and would take out satellites if they could. In response we steal their antiquities and serve them Depleted Uranium (DU) munitions and white phosphorus for desert.
Nothing said here is new. All of this data, all of these issues have been written about for decades now only with recent technological updates to punctuate it. The World Wide Mind is blaring the reality 24/7, color and in graphic detail. Americans actually do know how to problem-solve but appear quite content to play out “Clockwork Orange.” And why would that be? Beyond the answer of selfishness, apathy, greed, hatred, and fear there clearly is the illusion of freedom. If that last statement strikes a chord within you, check out “Cutting Through Spiritual Materialism” or “The Myth of Freedom and the Way of Meditation.” Freedom is possible but, as Ghandhi, Mandala and King discovered, it has to come from the inside-out.
Most junior congressional staffers are female, or at least it was a few years ago when I worked there. Quite a few of them were dating lobbyists.
Although it is funny how jobs done by women are underpaid and overworked (teachers, nurses)
Uh sorry late to the party but why don’t they use us EW would love a look at future homeland security ideas, me green tech, Jane everything and with all our commentors we can look stuff over get public reaction, fact check, and debate differing bills.
Glad to see you scratching at what is a much larger problem than even you detail here. I have been the Washington Representative for my union — UE — for 17 years. And the staffing situation in a majority of House — and some Senate offices — is so bad as to be catastrophic.
A bit of history as I have seen it… The Newt Gingrich “Contract on America” included a nice slashing of the commitee, sub committee and Member staffing budgets. It was done as a war on “waste.” What it really turned out to be was a privatization of the process, since Republican NGO’s (Heritage, etc.) merely did much of the work by proxy, wrote the legislation, told the staff how to vote, what earmarks to put in, etc. The Democrats have never even attempted to restore this funding, and I don’t think more than a dozen of them even realize that this is what happened.
As to the salaries and the youth factor, I see it differently. A $45,000 is a living wage, that’s more than what I earn after 20+ years on the union staff. If the middle class appetite needs more, so be it. Folks should move on to middle class work. When folks move on to become lobbyists and claim they “needed more money” they should be banished – not welcomed back again and again and again. The Merry-go-round of personal profiteering can be stopped that fast. Do you serve the people in the district, or are you following the fastest course to the very middle class lifestyle? A $45,000 salary is far more than the wages of the majority of constituents in nearly all districts and states. And, staff might try organizing a union. The law does not allow it, but since when do we wait for the government to “allow” us to join a union. But again, it’s easier to move on up the job ladder than to fight for your own community of interest.
What Congressional offices will not do is EVER consider job candidates who are not right out of college or grad school, or recycled through another office or committee. A handful of Members employ long term professional staff who are not cut from the college cloth, but they are the tiny exception. Most offices have junior staff (30ish at best) do the hiring, so they hire a crop of 23-24-25 year old graduates who are soon overwhelmed and burned out. There is no expansive diversity. There is the census diversity of male-female-race, etc. but little age or background diversity. It’s really unfair to many of these younger folks because in a better environment of real diversity they might stick around and learn the craft, and be prepared better to keep the good fight going down the road.
Most offices are also poorly managed, in my opinion. Or not managed at all, the auto-pilot method. The staff frequently have no knowledge of their subject, or too much. Many don’t come from the state or district or know much about it. All are overwhelemd by the volume of calls, meetings, e-mails, much of it robo-generated. Most staff are not taught to prioritize; many will ignore real letters from substantial groups in favor of sending form e-mails back to spammers. Hand delivered letters are now lost and ignored as a routine. If it doesn’t fit on the blackberry it doesn’t exist.
As a union man I can tell you that almost no Congressional staffers know anything about the union world, the workplace world as I know it, and certainly few know how companies really work out there. I will also say that prior to our great recession turnover was so high that it was common for me to deal with 3-4-5 successive staff on one single project with an office. The lack of any institutional memory in too many offices is also a disastrous shortcoming.
I will wrap up by saying that I feel better knowing I am not the only one to see the Capitol Hill staffing fiasco for what it is — a disaster we can’t afford. Ultimately the Members of the House and the Senate need to confront this, but don’t hold your breath. The Democratic “Party” does nothing in this regard that I am aware of, so that’s another guilty party.
Thanks very much. Chris Towsnend, UE Washington Office
Is this your union?
Don’t mean to be insulting, but although I’m old enough to be a union supporter, I don’t recognize the name “UE.” You might want to introduce yourself and your union. Do you represent government employees, too?
Actually, that’s not a bad idea. It seems to me that one way to relieve “underpayment” of staffers is to shift some of the work out of DC and into the districts. In this era of telecommuting, when a blogger in, say, San Diego or New York can have a significant impact on the national conversation, it doesn’t seem at all far-fetched that folks could keep up with their areas outside of the beltway.
Maybe establish a budget for staff, and let congresspeople decide how many folks they can hire with that money, and where?
This is so true.
In reference to some who say staffers are just trust funds kids- you must severely out of touch with the people working in these offices. Most of them do not come from trust fund families! Not to mention most of them are swimming in debt from student loans.
Lower staff pay starts at 24,000 and after taxes are taken out, that is poverty level not mention trying to live in DC where housing costs are outrageous!
Besides the point that the hours are awful and the pay is insulting. The differences between senior staff and junior staff pay should really be examined. A Chief of Staff can be making 150,000 but a lower member on 28,000. The jump between the 3 hightest positions in an office (COS, LD and Press Sec) in comparison to LAs, LC and SAs is huge! If office really wanted to even out the pay scale even just slightly it would make a difference in the lives of the lower in a big way. Just imagine not having to worry about your finances at work and how much more productive and happy Congressional staff might be.
You wonder why staffer might not be Susie Sunshine when you call their office. Maybe they are stressed about how they will pay their rent and buy groceries that month, not to mention they only get paid once a month! (God help you if you call near the end of the month you get a staffer cranky due to the 3 dollars in his bank account)
These are some of the greatest minds of our generation, forming public policy and frankly, a lot of them go on to be major influencers in the public and private sector if not elected members. They are doing the work of the people and changing the way our country functions. The lease we can do is pay them a decent wage.
i don’t know if that’s his union or not, but kudos to them. as for representing govt employees [excellent question!], i found this at their website.
Hello my friend – “UE” is the United Electrical Workers Union, and we are not a “name brand” union generally. Web page is http://www.ueunion.org We are one of the few living strands of the militant CIO thread that comes down to today. You may have noticed UE in action one year ago in Chicago, when the members of our Local 1110 occupied the Republic Windows plant. Thanks for your interest. /s/Chris Townsend
PS: we do represent state-county-local govt workers in about 10 states. They comprise half of our membership today.