A lot of people are asking why HCAN is spending money praising Blanche Lincoln this morning:
Health Care for America Now has launched new television ads praising the two Democratic senators from Arkansas and giving quiet support to Ben Nelson, the centrist Democrat from Nebraska.
HCAN, as the coalition is known, includes liberal groups such as Campaign for America’s Future and MoveOn.org and labor unions such as the AFL-CIO.
[]
Airing on broadcast and cable in Little Rock, Jonesboro, and Ft. Smith, that ad praises Lincoln and Pryor for standing up to health insurance companies.
Hmm….”standing up to health insurance companies.” Well, that is a bit of a stretch. Goldman-Sachs expects health insurance stocks to rise by 59% with no public option, but drop 36% if there is one to challenge their monopolies and help keep costs down. Blanche has taken over half a million dollars from insurance companies in campaign donations. She went on to the floor of the Senate and guaranteed them no public option by offering up a “ransom note” on the health care bill with her pledge to join a Republican filibuster. How that qualifies as “standing up” to them is anyone’s guess.
But they’re spending $175,000 in Arkansas. That will pretty much wallpaper the state with accolades for Lincoln for “standing up” to health insurance companies, when actually she pledged to filibuster the public option on Saturday.
People gave $10, $15, $20 from their social security and fixed income checks to help FDL Action PAC put up an ad in Arkansas in September telling Blanche Lincoln to “act like a Democrat, or we’ll find someone who will.” It wasn’t one of those cheap, shitty cable buys that raises a bunch of money and then spends only a small fraction of it on ads nobody ever sees. We raised $80,000 and spent more than that ($85,000, I believe) wallpapering the state with 1,000 points of prime time network buys for two weeks. The average person in Arkansas saw the ad 10 times. Our goal was to draw out primary challengers.
It was the talk of the state, it freaked Lincoln out, and PhRMA jumped in with an ad buy in her defense (which they put out through Americans for Stable Quality Care) the next week.
But if anyone is surprised that HCAN jumped in to undo all of that, they shouldn’t be. Blanche Lincoln is an incumbent. HCAN is an extension of the incumbency protection racket. They get their money because the Democratic Party and the White House direct donors to them for the purpose of using health care reform for political advantage. PhRMA has paid for their ad buys. Their job is to see that $80 million in health care reform money makes its way into the pockets of loyal Democratic operatives and makes it easier for Democrats to get reelected.
If left to their own devices, I think the people at HCAN would do the right thing. I don’t even think Richard Kirsch is venal, he’s just unbelievably stupid.
“We are absolutely surprised at the way that the right focused so much on this as soon as August began,” said Richard Kirsch, campaign manager for HCAN.
The push to provide late air cover comes after a bruising at the hands of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has dumped a multimillion-dollar sum into ads, and the 60-Plus Association, a conservative seniors’ group.
“We were surprised by the scale,” said Richard Kirsch, national campaign manager for Health Care for America Now.
Really? The Chamber dropped $100 million on lobbying alone last year, and somebody is surprised they’re spending like drunken sailors against health care reform?
Because the unions are on the board and there was division in those ranks over how health care reform was going to go down, there were few opportunities to “do the right thing,” and when that happened, HCAN took them for optical reasons if nothing else. But their list of “accomplishments,” next to their stated goals, are pathetic.
Everyone bought into the “coalition” concept because that was where the money was going to flow, and they figured, well, better us than somebody else. But they did so at the price of their own personal credibility, and they’ll always have to wear that. Their concern for “health care reform” lasted only as long as there wasn’t money involved, and when millions of dollars entered the picture, most of their energies were spent trying to appear to be doing something they weren’t.
Remember Richard Kirsch’s “Guns of August?” How does protecting Blanche Lincoln from a primary challenge and insulating her from responsibility for shilling for insurance companies fit into that?
The whole “coalition” model is busted, at least as a vehicle for reform. As a way for Democratic operatives to get rich, it’s quite good. Same thing happened with AAEI and immigration. Tens of millions of dollars in foundation money from Atlantic Philanthropies, Robert Wood Johnson and Soros that was earmarked for non-partisan health care reform got shoveled out the door for attack ads against Republicans.
If HCAN’s ads on behalf of Lincoln were a surprise to anyone, they shouldn’t have been. They will continue to operate as part of the Democratic party infrastructure, try to kill primary challengers and move to protect their “own.” And that means Blanche Lincoln. If health care reform happens in the meantime, well, what a happy coincidence.
Tags: advertisements, Atlantic Philanthropies, Blanche Lincoln, fdl action pac, HCAN, nonprofit, Richard Kirsch, Robert Wood Johnson, soros



79 Comments
Spotlight

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
I thought they were just trying to lock her into the position of “supporting” hcr.
Maybe I shouldn’t be surprised that hcan is supporting Blanche Lincoln, but it is shocking how corrupt fundraising has become.
On a day when I feel particularly cynical about any prospect for real change, this is just the final icing straw that breaks the cake.
Good Morning Jane and Firedogs –
been thinking about all of this wrt to Lt Gov Halter and the difficulties viable primary opponents face when contemplating jumping in – I am all but certain someone’s had the be-patient-it’s-not-your-turn talk with him
i confess i thought it impossible for me to think worse of hcan than i already did. my bad — was wrong again.
Blanche is trussed up like a holiday turkey. Who gets the drumsticks? The drug lords of course!
OT – but what the f**k is it with these autoplay video ads? I click on nothing but suddenlythe page yells at me about delsym cough remedy or deep carpet cleaning.
Not good.
wow! and MoveOn is taking part in the scam too.
Maybe,the payoff was an invite for Moveon Execs to the State Dinner last night.
That moveon is part of the racket really bothers me.
HCAN=Whores
I think that bothers me most of all, too. Have given money to them in the past but am not at all sure that I will in the future. They also held a rally at Eshoo’s office to thank her. Something’s wrong with Move-On.
Jane, that’s a really good question.
Anyone know if Move.on offers any response to this?
I signed up early with them during the impeachment but ever since the ‘Betrayus’ blunder I have kept my distance.
I thinks it’s a typo, they meant to say Blanche Lincoln is standing “with” health insurance companies, not “up to.”
What’s next? An ad supporting Joe Lieberman?
I know, we’re fixing it. Spent a bunch of time trying to locate the problem this morning.
Apologies to all.
access is the opiate of the asses
I have stopped giving money to MoveOn and the Democratic Party. Who else should I avoid that I might otherwise support? Thanks.
Americans United for Change have been in the bag for some now – no surprise at all that they unleashed an ad campaign thanking several Dems who voted for HCR, even though they voted for Stupak
OFA did the same – going so far as to invite folks to the airport to welcome home and thank Jim Cooper
Was a whole new section of the veal pen created just for HCAN? If not, should one be?
Lincoln’s beyond saving if a serious primary challenger takes her on.
In a comment Nate Silver’s Advice To Blanche Lincoln: Speak Softly, But Carry Firm Position on Health Care Reform (11/22/09), I wrote:
Lincoln’s position in Arkansas was already shaky at best. HCAN ads aren’t going to save her. She’s got nothing on which to build a base of support in Arkansas.
Someone should ask Rich Trumka WTF is up with that ad.
The list for giving is easier:
Local Women’s Health services
Local Food Pantry
Local Homeless shelter
Identifeid, honest Progressive candidates
And they wonder why the labor movement is dead.
fyi – participation can vary from one ad campaign to another – not saying he’s innocent, just saying this may not have AFL CIO’s specific imprimatur on it -
How did that event turn out for OFA and Jim Cooper? Not so good! =D
OFA and HCAN can cheerlead for these immoral, failed, corrupt losers all they want. It won’t save Lincoln if a serious primary challenger emerges to take her on.
The damnable thing is that the vote was just to bring the debate to the floor…. nothing else. Durbin said that it was a “very hard vote for some Senators” for krysake it was a totally unnecessary vote as the bill could have come to the floor on 51 votes if the pathetic leadership had an ounce of gumption. A number of Senators that voted for a debate, have stated that they will not support a, now pathetic, public option a number have said that they do not want any choice for women and so it goes. I swear once these people get a sniff of money that give not a hoot about their constituents.
Methinks HCAN has premature congratulation troubles.
I too was dismayed by the breathless coverage and the high fives all around for merely going with their own caucus on a procedural vote – for goodness sakes, Republicans voted Yes to proceed in ‘94
I got an email wanting money from MoveOn the other day. I’ll have to look for it but I don’t remember anything in it about ads for Lincoln.
I have never considered MoveOn a progressive organization. They’re Clintonistas and their mantra is neoliberalism.
I wonder if Rahm directed the veal pen to insulate Arkansas dem senators, otherwise a public option might be a reality which was dealt away long ago. Is Rahm protecting his flank?
It is almost like we have 2 Corporate parties–one pro-life and one pro-choice. And now even the choice is getting smaller.
Gotta get more progressives into office.
Why is HCAN defending Blanche Lincoln?
The better question is why is anyone defending the D party as a viable party unless they’re beholden to them?
Our whole political system is FUBAR.
It’s all about the money and fuck you if ya don’t have any.
Y’all have a nice Thanksgiving, if ya can, and like someone up thread said, go local.
Our local safety net systems are overwhelmed. Donate something.
These crooked bastards will still be around after tomorrow.
Is HCAN running similar ads in Vermont congratulating Bernie Sanders?
of course, and we have to work on ways to keep them progressive – some of course (McNerney, Kissell) where they misrepresent themselves to progressives and we are getting better at weeding them out, but, anecdotally there’s a behavior pattern wherein they stay true their first term but things change ’bout half way through the 2nd term (looking at you Anna Eshoo) – clearly more consistent attention and communication is called for on our parts – identifying other means are above my dfh paygrade but we have to get better
Call HCAN 202 454 6200.
Co Directors:
Bob Borsage
Roger or Rodger Hickey.
Ask why they are supporting Blanche Linclone, when she did not attend the free health clinic last weekend to understand the needs of her state, and why HCAN is running ads supporting her.
Also ask why HCAN (or HCAN’T) have been silent on the actual price to consumer of Single Payer vs Pubic (Pun Intended) Option, and the length of time before any option takes effect.
Maybe not. The system is corrupting. Who get elected is not relevant. It’s how they need to pay for their reelection that has the most effect.
One could elected Jesus Christ himself, Buddha, or Gandhi, but they’d have to bow to their paymasters to get re-elected.
This is part of an email I got from MoveOn this morning. Not the one I mentioned earlier, which I can’t find. Is MoveOn talking out of all sides of its mouth?
Very good point.
Ya THINK!!??
If candidates took a real stance on who they would and would not take campaign contributions from they could maintain their integrity. It would also involve not taking money from the DNC, DSCC, DCCC or any of their joined-at-the-hip PACs. A good campaign treasurer and staff have the wherewithal to make this a reality.
So where is Jason?
They get their money because the Democratic Party and the White House direct donors to them for the purpose of using health care reform for political advantage.
Makes me wonder what those donors thought they were getting in return. It certainly hasn’t been a better health care system.
Back to work. Got my new 64-bit Windoze 7 up and running this morning now have the exciting task of installing software. They sure didn’t set the resolution for a 66yo dude with bifocals.
Namaste
this will be jarring to a lot of folks – it’s quite the slog having to explain what NARAL is really up to, but even the most casual observer understands there is zero reason for anyone, let alone HCAN to be thanking Lincoln for anything
One way I’ve heard that expressed is that we have one corporate party with two right wings.
Look for a change of ownership for HCAN. We should be able to find the new owner shortly.
After the smoke clears from the health care debate, there needs to be something done about the lobbying influence/money/corruption in Washington. We need to make this an issue now, and stop the complacency. Its not a right/left issue, I don’t know what can specifically be done about it, I just know what I’ve these past few months wasn’t right. Glen Greenwald on Rachel Maddow called it “legalized bribery”… its time to make it illegal.
Hey lady,
you throwin’ rocks at me??
I was just connecting some dots that you have sprinkled so liberally over here. It was a rhetorical question, obviously, but for the benefit of all, sometimes obvious shit needs to be said out loud.
Gore Vidal?
Sure sounds like it, eh?
Probably doing what most are — celebrating the holidays.
I want to weigh in on Jason’s behalf, though, and not just because he works here. To the extent that there is good work being done by HCAN (and there has been some) Jason does it. He works really hard and as far as I can tell does 95% of the work around the place, and 99% of all the work of worth.
The problem with HCAN is the same problem with NARAL or Planned Parenthood or any of the very worst veal pen groups — funding. It’s damn tough to set up a financial structure that doesn’t make you beholden to those who can cut you off if you challenge entrenched power. Jason had nothing to do with that.
Indeed. He hasn’t learned anything politically from 1994, when his pushing the NAFTA sellout caused millions of Dems to stay home on Election Day, but it hasn’t hurt his pocketbook any.
Word.
This, of course is true. The feeble budgets of working class cannot possibly match the donations of corporate lobbyists. Meanwhile, we do what we can and we do phenomenal work. FDL raised a little over $65K and got 14 firm commitments while HCAN raised $40 million and didn’t get one commitment (which may be a feature and not a bug). We are pretty good at getting bang for the buck.
Nope, I was just giving you props for being the one to connect them!
Exactly. A lot of these outfits, on both the left and right, are essentially sheltered workshops for the friends and relations of various well-connected politicians and the donors who love them.
Jane,
heard you on the teevee machine the other day note that Blanche supports the public option on her website. Please pat me on the head here if that was my catch on a prior thread, or at least nudged it to the forefront of your brilliant mind.
(see my lips can reach your hiney from here!)
Probably.
The incumbency protection racket. One thing that gets missed in this is for every dollar we force them to spend defending the indefensible are dollars they do not have to spend elsewhere. Take Lieberman for instance. Vast sums of money were spent by corporations and republican operatives to protect that little prick which allowed progressive dollars spent elsewhere to have a greater impact. Let them play defense so we can get offensive as possible.
Should we call this HCAN maneuver NARAL Veal 2.0?
thanks Jane.
I suspect that the work Jason, and perhaps a few others (I don’t know enough about who does what at HCAN to say), is why the folks who are doing things like these pro-Blanche Lincoln ads can justify themselves. Might be the answer to my previous question.
Well, I feel better about avoiding the calls I get from the local MoveOn folks. They’re well-intentioned, but the “actions” they take are on side issues, not the core issues. Plus, they pretty much never get any media coverage.
I started balking early in the year when MoveOn was still focused on “green energy jobs” while Health Care was beginning to blow up. Not a word was coming from MoveOn on what really mattered to me. And now, as I say, the stuff they do come up with seems useless to me. Guess it’s really time to get off the mailing list altogether.
We agree. The majority of contributions should come from constituents.
You did in fact suss that out, and you rock, OFG!
So now that it is clear that HCAN’t is a sham, will Firedoglake join with the Leadership Conference for Guaranteed Healthcare?
Individually you are correct. In aggregate the working class have more to spend and more to gain from spending.
Our congress people are cheap. We can buy them back, and it could be quicker to buy them than have publicly funded campaigns happen.
Time to move on?
I just get nauseous when I hear Obama lecturing other countries (often within those countries) about how they should adopt our form of liberal democracy. How trite and pathetic that is, especially now that we are seeing how unjust and corrupt our gov’t is.
Sorry but I think trumpeting Lincoln for “standing up to insurance companies” is a really smart strategy. Because the minute she starts giving into them everyone will know.
And this is why we need to stop donating and supporting “centrist” dems.
There were two sentences back to back in Lincoln’s last stump speech on the floor that were so contradictory that it made one’s head spin.
I am for private insurance companies offering the option ….oh but I am FOR THE PEOPLE!
Lincoln speaks with forked tongue
Are you sure that’s right?
I’m pretty sure it’s just gotten worse since 2001.
It seems even in aggregate, we really DON’T have a fraction the money those who oppose us possess. Even if every single person in the lower 90% of the income scale contributes every penny we have, the corporatists can double that and still have more money in their pockets than we started out with.
Jane,
My comment @ 20 was meant to respond to this point in your post:
I’ll rephrase as a question:
Do you think that HCAN’s bullshit really undoes what was accomplished by the FDL Action PAC’s ad telling Blanche Lincoln to “act like a Democrat, or we’ll find someone who will” that ran in September?
Put another way, wasn’t it always inevitable that groups with greater resources – HCAN or others – would run ads like the one you mention from PhRMA jumped in to defend Lincoln?
I really hope that you don’t think the impact of the FDL Action PAC has been totally undone!
Maybe it just means that it’s the right time to run the new online ads, Blanche Lincoln vs. Sick Arkansans, juxtaposing her speech on the Senate floor last Saturday with the Arkansans who went to the free clinic on the same day.
Just in case you see this long after the fact, please make checks payable to barbara . . . that’s b-a-r-b-a-r-a . . . . . . . . . . a definite not-for-profit entity.
Some day, I hope someone at one of those press conferences will ask “So, when will your Congress quit screwing around and provide your citizens health care that’s as good as ours?”. I’d like it even better if the country in which that was asked was something like Zimbabwe or China.
It would be more telling to hear Jason weigh in, nonetheless. In each and every instance of criticism here of HCAN practices and policies, Jason has been utterly silent. That was Hugh’s point, I believe.
Jane, I would like to suggest that there be a permanent place on the FDL website where readers can look up crucial bits of information-like which bought-off organizations belong to the veal pen. That would help readers like me avoid giving to these organizations. And it might also be a good way to start putting pressure on these organizations to clean up their act some. Though I’ve been faithfully FDL everyday for awhile now, I still only know of a few organizations that belong.