When nobody was really paying attention, Grayson began working to sign Democratic cosponsors to Ron Paul’s H.R. 1207, which authorizes the GAO to conduct a wide-ranging audit of the Fed — something that has never been done it its history. Thanks to his efforts, the bill has gone from 190 to 311 bipartisan cosponsors.
When a last-minute attempt by leadership and the banks threatened to derail the Paul-Grayson bill, Firedoglake circulated a letter signed by labor leaders, noted economists, authors and financial bloggers to demonstrate progressive support for the effort. The letter pulled no punches, asserting that the Fed had “extended massive secret bailouts to major financial institutions” and calling upon Democrats on the Financial Services Committee to stand up to the banks by supporting the Paul-Grayson bill.
Despite the vocal opposition of Chairman Barney Frank and the fierce lobbying on the part of the central bank itself, 15 Democrats bucked leadership and the measure passed. According to the Huffington Post, “Key to winning Democratic support was a letter posted early Thursday from labor leaders and progressive economists” which was “organized by the liberal blog Firedoglake…Grayson was able to show Democratic colleagues that the liberal base was behind them.” During the committee debate, Grayson quoted from the letter.
Firedoglake is proud to be a part of this historic moment, and of the role we played in supporting Rep. Grayson’s work by urging members of Congress from both parties to take an important step toward transparency in our financial system. Congratulations to the members of the Financial Services Committee for their remarkable achievement, and to Representatives Paul and Grayson for their hard work and leadership.


67 Comments
Spotlight







Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
Congratulations, Jane. FDL did a terrific job here, as did Alan Grayson. There’s nothing we need more than transparency at the Fed.
A good start, Rep. Grayson. Now, let’s do DTC next please.
Killing the Watt Amendment was no small feat, CONGRATS, good job!
And congratulations to Jane for going in the trenches and fighting for the good of transparancy.
Good job. Thanks for circulating the petition here and through e-mail. Now the fun begins in the whole house (though there are enough co-sponsors to pass) Then off to the senate where legislation goes to die.
I am a Ron Paul fan and Campaign for Liberty activist. I wanted to stop by and say thank you to your grass roots activists for supporting Audit the Fed. Though we may not agree on a lot of issues, I think we can all agree that the Paul/Grayson amendment was crucial to bringing transparency to the Fed. Thank you Alan Grayson and thanks to FDL for your activism.
And I am proud to have joined Firedoglake and to have signed this letter. Thank you, Jane, for working so hard and getting this going!
I saved the statement I included with my signature, but it’s on my computer at home. Would have liked to have shared it here.
Thanks, Jane.
Audit is Step One toward making the Fed the public representational body it should be rather than the personal territory of a Chosen Economics Toady from the most recent administration. As a personal fiefdom, the Fed was very nearly solely responsible for our economic meltdown, since Greenspan forebore to use his regulatory powers to bring ratings firms back into function, since he believed that losses would be so widely dispersed as to go unnoticed.
So where do we stand with the Watt amendment. Did it fail?
Thanks for the visit, CC!
Btw, here’s a link to the letter that Ron Paul and Alan Grayson sent to the members of the House Financial Services Committee yesterday.
Yup. Utterly. They tried a sneaky move to keep it alive, but Jane and Grayson anticipated it and headed it off at the pass.
fantastic news!
Wonderful job, Jane. And you make it look so easy!
Congratulations and TY Ms. Hamsher for all of your efforts.
This is definitely an historical moment. The FED has always been able to dodge any type of transparency.
We are making progress in our country. It’s slower than we like. We just have to change a few more Senators and House members to move a progressive agenda along a little faster.
This is a great step though.
I think there are a lot of issues where we can work together. Drop by and check out the other issues we address. Let us know if you see something else you like and want to work on. Remember, partisan politics is different from issue-oriented politics.
Great job, Jane. Your dedication has inspired me to be more active in the projects that really matter to all of us. Thank you.
So…what is Barney Frank’s problem with this? Substantive or procedural?
This victory really raises the bar on what it means to “whip” the votes.
Proud to be one of the first signers there! Thanks, Jane!
Blows my mind that a Dem from FL does what he’s supposed to do. Such a refreshing change from the norm.
So, Rep Grayson, what’s next?
I’m curious, as well…
Kudos, FDL!
Auditing the Fed will probably be on the order of building the Great Pyramid of Cheops.
mover and shaker, that’s me!
congratulations jane and everyone involved at the lake, don’t forget it’s the members here as much as it is the authors who give this blog the influence it can demonstrate
man oh man I am all shivers right now
This is a welcome bit of great news. The health care debate has me feeling a bit like Sisyphus lately, so it’s nice to see real, tangible progress on something important.
Thanks to Jane and everyone here at FDL.
Sometimes I doubt wether all the time I spend here means something. Then there are days like today. Its good to see the Lefty blogs working together with labor leaders, noted economists, authors and financial bloggers to get something done.
Transparency is always embedded in a context. How independent is the Fed when Ben Bernananke the current chairman is a member of the Bilderberg Group? As are a number of very high officals in the Obama administration like Hillary Clinton, Tim Geithner and Larry Summers. And advisers like Paul Volcker [a past Fed chairman himself].
How does his his agenda overlap their’s?
Bilderberg?
Daniel Estulin | May 21, 2007:
In 1954, the most powerful men in the world met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal crown and the Rockefeller family in the luxurious Hotel Bilderberg of the small Dutch town of Oosterbeck. For an entire weekend they debated the future of the world. When it was over, they decided to meet once every year to exchange ideas and analyze international affairs. They named themselves the Bilderberg Club. Since then, they have gathered yearly in a luxurious hotel somewhere in the world to decide the future of humanity.
In more than fifty years of meetings that brings together unprecedented power and money in the same time and place, never has any information been leaked as to what subjects were debated during the Bilderberg Club meetings. Bilderberg, one of the world’s most powerful secret organizations is run out of an 18m2 offices, staffed by one person, using one telephone line and a single fax number.
[snip]
There is no web page and no brass name plate on the door. The independent press has never been allowed in, and no statements have ever been released on the attendees’ conclusions nor has any agenda for a Bilderberg meeting been made public. How, in God’s name, can this be possible when Bilderberg´s elite membership list includes all of the most powerful individuals who run the Planet?
What guarantees do citizens have that the Bilderberg Club isn’t a centre for influence trafficking and lobbying if they aren’t allowed to know what their representatives talk about at the Club’s secret gatherings? Why are the Davos World Economic Forum and G8 meetings carried in every newspaper, given front page coverage, with thousands of journalists in attendance, while no one covers Bilderberg Club meetings even though they are annually attended by Presidents of the International Monetary Fund, The World Bank, Federal Reserve, chairmen of 100 most powerful corporations in the world such as DaimlerChrysler, Coca Cola, British Petroleum, Chase Manhattan Bank, American Express, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Vice Presidents of the United States, Directors of the CIA and the FBI, General Secretaries of NATO, American Senators and members of Congress, European Prime Ministers and leaders of opposition parties, top editors and CEOs of the leading newspapers in the world. It is surprising that no mainstream corporate media outlets consider a gathering of such figures, whose wealth far exceeds the combined wealth of all United States citizens, to be newsworthy when a trip by any one of them on their own makes headline news on TV.
george:
Among the membership or attendees at Bilderberg meetings is David Rockefeller, HENRY KISSINGER, Lloyd Bentsen, Helmut Kohl, Prince Charles, Prince Juan Carlos, KATHERINE GRAHAM, Alice Rivlin, Gerald Ford, BILL CLINTON, HILLARY CLINTON, Dan Quayle, DONALD RUMSFELD, Colin L. Powell, John Edwards, Bill Bradley, Bill Richardson, CHRISTOPHER DODD, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Kathleen Sebelius, Alexander Haig, Ralph E. Reed, GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, William J McDonough & TIMOTHY GEITHNER, LARRY SUMMERS, GEORGE SOROS, PAUL VOLCKER AND ALAN GREENSPAN, H. J. Heinz II, Peter A. Thiel,, Eric E. Schmidt (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Google), LLOYD BLANKFEIN, RUPERT MURDOCH, DONALD GRAHAM (Chairman of the Board of The Washington Post Company). HENRY KRAVIS.
No conspiriacy theory here. It is just the richest men and women in the world making sure that always stays the same.
Cash?
What? No Bush in that list?
The Morons did such a great job managing the economy they almost Undone the entire world wide banking system and to be honest the banking system could still collapse at any moment for any number of reasons.
Everything changes nothing stays the same forever everything Comes Undone sooner or later.
I’m sure his dad must be a member Bush 1 got into all the cool clubs Skull and Bones, the CIA, the White House.
The Carlyle Group Hedge fund
When it comes to the Clintons and the Bushes and their offspring, you just have to close your eyes and wish for better. At least FDL is on to the game that the Clintons have played.
Ok when will the fed audit take place and how long will it take assuming no last minute surprises happen? Does the Senate need to approve this?
I am so proud. Thank you Jane!
Thank you so much for stopping by. There are many things we agree on and we appreciate your support.
I wonder if they will be allowed to find anything of substance.
Jon Walker has a fresh cross-post ready: “Is Harry Reid Laying The Ground Work To Betray Progressives For Snowe’s Vote?”
“Despite the vocal opposition of Chairman Barney Frank and the fierce lobbying on the part of the central bank itself…”
And the more vigorously they balk at any attempts to look inside the machinations of the FED, the more convinced we all should be that it’s way past time to do just exactly that. Let’s hope it leads to serious ass-rape jail time for any number of them.
Clinton thought she could ignore us in the Primary and was trying to get the Moderate vote in a change election when Moderate was a dirty word. End the Wars, National Healthcare 5 words and she would be President today.
But her advisors said it was politically impossible, we asked Why. She like the GOP had no real answer so we started asking why Vote for her.
The GOP today they got lies scary but stupid lies as their reason why.
sorry to be late to this thread, but wanted to add my congrats and thanks to all who did the work for this one.
Bankers not keep records? then Greenspan better ask himself if he looks good in Orange Jammies the word Fraud comes to mind.
We took advantage of the GOP’s and Blue Dogs’ preoccupation with killing HCR to push this through.
If the obstructions are removed and the GAO is allowed to do its job, I have no doubt that it can produce a First Class report – which is a major reason why Frank and his cronies are screeching so hysterically about the possibility of such an examination ever taking place.
Hi, I’m a Ron Paul-ite and I’ve been working on getting this bill passed for a while. I just registered on this site now so I could thank you guys, it’s amazing that you organized support from left-leaning organizations and organize it so beautifully into a letter, just in time for this vote.
We also would not have been able to do this without the support of Alan Grayson personally visiting more than a hundred members of congress to get them to cosponsor this bill.
I hope in the future, we might be able to organize on other issues where we meet, such as ending wars, restoring civil liberties, and ending the war on drugs.
That’s exactly it.
It’s because of you, the readers, who go out and hammer the folks on the Hill, that we can do what we did yesterday.
It’s because Congress knows that our readership is politically active and also informed by FDL (and informs FDL as well) that Jane can go to Alan Grayson and Ron Paul — two usually diametrically-opposed persons — and pull this off.
It’s because of you that the public option is still alive instead of dead and buried months ago back when the deal to kill it was first cut.
Take a bow, each and every one of you!
Thanks, J! Oversight is good. And anything that takes our taxpayer money — be it a church or the Federal Reserve — needs effective oversight. That’s something on which all Americans, whatever their politics, can and should agree.
And anything that takes our taxpayer money — be it a church or the Federal Reserve — needs effective oversight.
Mega-churches and televangelists next, please. Major-league gangsters…
Just read the dead-tree NYTimes article about this, and there wasn’t a single mention of Alan Grayson or FDL, or not even “activist pressure” or some such thing. It was all about the heroic efforts of Republican Ron Paul. More of that Librul Media at work!
Actually,PW, the GOP was far more involved here than the Dems.
Republicans and conservatives tend to be wary of Bilderberg. Why? Because they see it largely as organization aiming to break down nationalism and establish a One World agenda revolving around an *internationalist* global economy. They associate it with the U.N. and the European Union—and an attempt to establish a similiar *union* between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico. And eventually an integrated alliance between North, Central and South America.
But isn’t that what free trade which the GOp supports is creating anyway?
From: Christopher Ruddy
CEO & Editor: Newsmax & Moneynews
A Rogue Group of Average Americans
Has Secretly Grown Filthy Rich by Shadowing
Wall Street Insiders, Washington, D.C. Bureaucrats,
Even the U.S. Military to Become . . .
THE ROBBER BARONS NEXT DOOR!
Join Them As They Pull Off
the Greatest “Heist” in Human History!
http://w3.newsmax.com/newsletters/mmi/offer1.cfm?s=al&promo_code=9194-1
This is the rag that Palin reads, and this is the face of GOP’s Patriotism ?!
Congratulations, all! FDL shines. Thanks to Grayson, Paul, and especially to the organized labor folks, who finally decided to throw some weight around. Bravo to Jane and all who pushed this.
The Paul-Grayson bill – and how and with whose support it succeeded in the House – is an elegant example of constructive bipartisanship with a public good in mind. It is, I fear, not the kind Mr. Obama has in mind when he displays his tailfeather-fluffed post-partisan rhetoric, but it’s the kind we need. Thank you, Jane.
Glenn Greenwald gives Jane the nod (emphasis mine):
I think Elizabeth Warren might be available to supervise this job.
Thank you, Jane. You are indeed a “shrewd and driven organizer.” And a really, really great person!!!
“I think Elizabeth Warren might be available to supervise this job.”
She’s got my vote. And looking to 2012?
Hamsher/Warren – 2012
Congratulations. I’m impressed at the way in which you’ve taken issues, helped us lobby for them … and won! Nice job!
Nafta has been a boon for American farmers and a disaster for farmers in Mexico. Republicans [and DLC Democrats] are quite content to keep it that way. But conservatives don’t link this in any way shape and form with a North American rendition of the EU. On the contrary you hear these endless conspiracy theories about The Highway linking all three countries in North America. Canada, fine. But Mexico? In a Fox News/talk radio world?
Thanks. Ron Paul is a bit controversial here for some of his ideas. still we’ve tried to come together (viz the strange bedfellows campaign over FISA reform), and while we don’t buy into the Ayn Rand ideology we should work together where we share goals.
Ron Paul is my man!
Now that’s what I’m talkin’ about! Trust me, the coming together of disparate points of view to focus on the banking elite is THEIR NIGHTMARE.
Hoist a glass of bubbly to the beauties of cross-pollenation!
Amazing what can get done when coalitions of convenience, with what is traditionally the opposition, are established. They may have all kinds of hypocritical and ironic reasons for their position on a given issue, but co-opting the overlap with your own ideals looks like a great way to overcome the long odds, and the most powerful lobby in Washington.
Congratulations!
He doesn’t buy into it either. He’s a free-markteer who’s an immigration hawk. Sorry, but that’s completely logically incoherent; restricting labor mobility isn’t a free-market.
That’s why I can’t get onboard with Paul, he’s correct by accident, not by reason.
Hello,
Thanks for circulating the letter. Thank you Alan Grayson we appreciate your efforts.
Hope to work with you folks again soon.
Sincerely
Ed a Ron Paul republican.
Why has BARNEY FRANK gone over to the banks? Is he paid off? He says he is a socialist would you believe?