Last night health care reform, HR 3962, passed the House of Representatives by a vote of 220 to 215. It was a truly historic moment and the bill will help millions of Americans. Yet as a progressive the passage of the bill is at best bittersweet.
The bill is not single payer. It does not have a public option tied to Medicare. The bill funnels billions to private insurance companies and foolishly eliminates the SCHIP program. It would prevent life-saving biosimilars from reaching the market in a timely manner. The new exchange is not well designed and lacks the robust risk adjustment mechanism needed to encourage competition based on quality. The annual out-of-pocket limit is far too high, and for many middle-class American families the tax credits are going to be insufficient. The bill did not take some of the huge steps really needed to rein in costs, like creating a single payment setting mechanism. It will not start in earnest for several years. And as a final insult, the Stupak anti-abortion amendment was added at the last minute.
It is important to acknowledge what good this bill will do. The most overlooked but important part of this bill is the expansion of Medicaid to everyone below 150% of the federal poverty level. No longer will there be a confusing patchwork of qualifications and waiting periods between the states. This expansion means that every American in poverty will have health insurance they can afford. Medicaid is not perfect, but it will expand coverage to 15 million Americans who would not have otherwise had health insurance. That is millions of Americans this bill unequivocally help.
The bill also contains many important consumer protections that are long overdue. Some of the most horrendous practices like rescission and not covering pre-existing conditions will be gone. Most importantly, the bill will set an important precedent. As a nation we will have made the commitment to help every American get health insurance if they want it. That is critical. Once a nation makes that commitment, they almost never back slide.
The bill does have a public option that would be available everywhere on “day one.” It is weaker and more restricted than it should be, but I strongly believe in the long term it will succeed. People will like it and it will grow steadily into a real force which will improve our health care system. At the very least, it would make sure right away that there was one decent insurance plan on the exchange not trying to rip off people. That is a huge accomplishment in itself.
What is most important is not how this bill will work, but what foundation it will lay. This will not be the end of health care reform. The system this bill creates is so imperfect that there is no way it will not be heavily modified, and possibly completely overhauled, over the coming years.
This bill will lay other useful foundations. It will make it so that any American who really needs/wants health insurance can get it. No longer will the Americans be denied insurance all together. By setting narrow rating bands the bill promotes the idea of equality in health insurance for all Americans regardless of sex, race, health, or pre-existing condition. (Unfortunately, on the same token the Stupak amendment lays a strong ant-choice foundation in health care reform; if it remains in the final bill, the damage done by the Stupak amendment will probably never be reversed.)
The most important foundation the bill will create is a public health insurance alternative to hold the private insurance companies honest. The public option will be something the progressive movement can build on. If our new health care system only funneled billions of government subsidies to for-profit insurance plans that all Americans are forced to buy, that would be a foundation for long term disaster. Without the public option, the reform bill will be built solely on a base of greed, profit, and corporate welfare. That will simply not be sustainable and its failure could discredit the whole universal health care movement.
This bill that passed the House is disappointingly weak for progressives; but I’m not fighting to win the whole war with this battle, I’m fighting to lay the proper ground work needed for the next health care reform battle. This bill will at least provide progressives the tools they can use build with. This is why it is important to fight for the critical components like the public option, risk adjusters, and strong community ratings. (It is also why it is important to fight to remove components that will not easly be undone, like the Stupak amendment) It is not about what public option will be right away, it is what progressive can turn it into in the future.



24 Comments








Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL Action
The next battle?
Dream on.
Democrats will lose their majorities over the 20% Corporate Welfare Tax and repealing Roe v. Wade.
And justly so.
Traitors.
until the day the republic falls there will always be another political battle.
You know…
On reading it more closely almost everything you say is nothing but an apology for bullshit-
Your apologies are not even worth responding to.
You admit it in your second graph-
Fail!
Sorry, Jon. I know that you and FDL are committed to going down the PO road. I think that was and always has been a mistake, and that your collective pursuit of it is as much too blame for this failure of a bill as anything else. It’s time to admit that you’ve been wrong and change political direction. That is, what do “they” have to do to you PO advocates to make you face reality?
The proper course is to defeat this bill, because it is worse then no bill at all, and come back immediately pushing for a Medicare for All, single-payer bill fully effective by September 2010. I won’t devote an ounce of energy or a dollar of money to further the PO. It’s just distracting from the movement we need to strengthen to pass a health care reform that will end the deaths, bankruptcies, and foreclosures, cut overall national health care expenditures by one-third, and also result in 2.5 million new jobs, according to the study by the California Nurses Association.
Admit what? I think the bill is pretty bad and incredibly disappointing. I wrote that. For me the important thing is that it moves in the right direct instead of the wrong direction. No public option and the stupak amendment is the wrong direction and should led to killing the final bill. A public option and massive expansion and improvement of the single payer government run program Medicaid is the right direction.
Hear, Hear!
Wrong!
Nothing at all is better than a 20% Corporate Welfare Tax and repeal of Roe v. Wade.
The proper course of action for progressives is to oppose this.
It is NOTHING but a sellout.
Move in the right direction?!
It is capitulation and retreat!
Which you relentlessly defend above-
Do you want me to list all your apologies or just the main one?
Bullshit!
This bill guarantees Democratic losses in 2010 and 2012 and will NOT be modified except to make it worse.
20% Corporate Welfare Tax.
Repeal of Roe v. Wade.
And SO CALLED Democrats and Progressives should vote for it as an ‘incremental first step that can be improved’.
BULLSHIT!
You should be ashamed of yourself as should every so called Democrat who voted for this abortion.
I’m with Kucinich. It’s a winning deal for the insurance industry. What happens next is that “foundation” is erected square in the path of any decent progressive reform for the next 15 years.
And how many Representatives supported Kucinich…oh wait, lemme count….Kucinich….and…
Let’s look at the bright side. First, it’s not over yet. Second, won’t it be fun to watch our stalwart Dems. rationalize why they will give away even MORE to Wall St. Banks? Third, if reconciliation of this HealthCare Bill does no better I will look forward to doing everything I can to defeat EVERY Democrat at every level for every position I have an opportunity to do.
THIS is (was) the Democrats one chance, we GAVE it to them; they did NOTHING to earn it except not be Republicans. Anyone want to venture a guess how many Republicans who disagreed strongly with the Bush/Cheney/Rove team dared to vote against them? SHAME on Obama, shame on our “independent” Democratic Congress.
I don’t see the logic in trying to unseat state level Democrats for the action of federal level Democrats. I will in theory accept the argument that every Dem in congress is to blame, but attacking people who can literally do nothing to effect that debate seems silly.
Democrats voting no for concern over HR 3962 being a win for the insurance industry (a main argument given by Dennis Kucinich), and not including those who are skeptical of a public option:
Brian Baird (Wash. 3rd): “The most important of these [reasons] is the simple fact that we do not yet have reliable estimates of how this legislation will impact the premiums paid by people who already have insurance.”
Scott Murphy (NY 20th): “As a small businessman, I am also concerned that H.R. 3962 falls short of making health insurance affordable for the small businesses of the 20th District; it fails to reform the fundamentally flawed incentives in the system, which continue to drive costs upward; and it fails to restrain the monopolistic practices of private insurers, which allow them to continue to increase premiums already weighing on families and small businesses.”
There are many more…
When Ron Williams, CEO of Aetna, launches into his spiel about the 45M uninsured in America, he says something like: 15M of these uninsured should probably be in Medicaid; everyone else should be in the private health insurance system.
Translation: Aetna does not want to cover 15M of the uninsured, so we’ll happily dump those costly untouchables into the government’s anti-competitive, single-payer lap. And –surprise, surprise– HR 3962 stretches Medicaid to cover the 15M Americans that the private health insurance industry was never interested in serving.
The motive is important here. While some of America’s neediest will benefit from the bill, that’s almost an accident –a side effect of the selection process. The combo of mandates and Medicaid is a mechanism designed to clear the uninsured ground and feed the most cost effective remainders into the health insurance machine. Naive stuff like compassion and justice weren’t written into this bill.
Medicare For All / HR 676: the only option designed for the American public
Jon, This is baloney. The reason why is that politics isn’t some simple linear game where any movement towards a goal is always better than no movement at all. One can move towards a goal in such a way as to preclude any real possibility of getting there in some reasonable time, because you’ve blocked your way forward. That’s what the House did yesterday. It passed a bill that will be so ineffective and unpopular because of “the band-aid period” between now and 2013, and the disappointment due to falsely raised expectations by Democratic legislators, that the Party will lose decisively in 2010, and the Republicans will be in a position to tank much of the good parts of the reform between now and 2013. And this is apart from the fact that the bill will be immoral because it will leave so many to die in the band-aid period and also exclude choice for women who need it.
In politics, pragmatism only goes so far, and while the perfect is the enemy of the good, the timid is also the enemy of the good. This reform has been timid from the beginning and that’s why it has failed.
Who cares how many supported him. He was right, so we need to support him. If enough of do, and not continually look over our shoulders to see whose marching with us, eventually we’ll have a bloc of progressives with the guts to stand up for us.
But if we keep acting like the veal pen folks who say it’s OK, it’s moving in the right direction, we’ll get rolled every time. Watch out for getting rolled again. This bill will come out of the Senate with no PO, because that’s what’s necessary to get 60 votes. Never mind that there’s no law that says they have to have 60 votes, and can use reconciliation or the nuclear option to pass what we need. And then, when the bill comes out of the Seante that way, Reid and other Dems will be crowing about how they did the greatest thing in 60 years, even though it’s imperfect, and still will kill another 108,000 Americans before the 2013.
It’s not silly. it’s a message. That message will be that the Democratic Party as an institution can’t be trusted and that it won’t get any support or any offices at any level until it can be.
One of the worst things about this is the degree to which the Democrats in Congress are out of touch with how people feel. They were celebrating last night as if they’d created a monumental achievement, instead of a sell-out to the insurance companies. What planet are these people living on?
Millions want single payer…but..after the Clintons efforts were solidly slapped down in 93, there is some wisdom and a huge reality check when it comes to accepting incremental steps.
Can someone explain why progressives are so keen on loosing? Check the votes. There isn’t any to spare. The house, which is much more liberal than the Senate, does not want “single payer”, federally funded or mandated payments for abortion. These are your representatives. They are working for you.
Of course you all will blame Obama for putting through a weak bill. But, the fact is it is better than what you want and it is, unlike what you want, achievable. The U.S. is not a progressive country. It is a center to center right country. Obama has pushed it as hard as possible without politically and personally imploding. This is as close as you’re going to get. Perhaps you think it will get better under Huckabee or Romney?
BINGO!
By and large, despite a few seemingly “good” features (like no denials based on pre-existing but this is disingenuous — how else can they have mandates forcing everyone to buy their products but to disallow denials based on pre-existing?), we are being had in this bill — and not just by GOP and insurers but by our own party and prez. Rather than solidify a corporate HI system with a few very weak consumer protections, using public Treasury funds to subsidize private insurance premiums to fatten Wall Street coffers (what a racket!), come back next year, legislate a few bits like banning rescissions, institute premium caps but by and large let the current commercial system show itself for what a disaster it is and cause an electoral uprising that renews the Dem Party and elects a prez like Howard Dean and we institute single payer/Medicare for All. Maybe it’s a pipe-dream but this Baucus-generated boondoggle with a pissant PO is a wet-dream for insurers and a nightmare for us, essentially turning healthcare into a massive welfare system when, in fact, we can pay for ourselves if we have a non-profit human-priority single payer system with efficient adminstration — Medicare for All — that will largely support itself (better than current Medicare for seniors because a younger/healthier subscriber pool) without sandbagging the Treasury except for the extremely disabled individuals we have taken care of for generations.
The insurance lobby in cahoots with corrupted/cowardly Dems and cowardly prez (who wants a trigger for crissake) will never let us expand the PO to a broad enough risk pool and money pool to be effective, get real.
Let’s not settle for this lame bill. We can do better.
War. Wall Street bailouts. Health insurance. Last straw. Democrat no more.
Sorry. I don’t accept your frame. Obama could have gotten a better bill. Here are the steps:
1) Start by getting behind HR 676 which had been introduced into the House in January prior to his inauguration, and make it clear that this is just a better version of existing Medicare for everyone. Trumpet all the advantages over the present system
1a) Insist that he wouldn’t sign any bill passed by Congress that produced an economic deficit for the nation. All bills being seriously considered by Congress would be scored by OMB to see whether they produced a National Economic Surplus, or a National Economic deficit, in order to determine whether a bill fit this criterion.
2) Get Pelosi and Reed to accept his marching orders
3) Get Reid to threaten the nuclear option in the Senate if anyone filibustered the bill
4) Held Town Halls in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and France, using Hillary Clinton and himself to get the experience of people there
5) Made it clear that Medicare for All would result in roughly 33% less expenditure on health care immediately
6) Made it clear that the US would gain 2.5 million jobs if Medicare for All were passed
7) Made it clear that 45,000 people per year were dying and that this would be cut down to nothing
8) Made it clear that more than one million people per year were bankrupt per year and that this would be cut to nothing
9) Make it clear that hundreds of thousands of foreclosures due to Medical would also be cut to nothing and that this would raise housing values
10) Let progressives in Congress know that the President needed their help which they could give by firming up the backbone of their caucus so that everyone took a pledge to support nothing else except HR 676
11) Get his veal pen movement apparatus moving to back HR 676 and mobilize all progressives outside of Congress
12) Get Reid and Pelosi to emphasize that anyone at odds with the leadership on this core Democratic bill would get thrown out of the caucus immediately
There are other things also, that I won’t take the time to think up. But the point is that thios country is not a “center-right” country on health care. It wants the problem of health insurance solved, period. Obama could have sold this as the solution to the health insurance problem and the first essential step in keeping costs under control for the future.