Comments on: Stupak Threatens to Block Health Care over Abortion, Planned Parenthood and NARAL Take a Nap

By: Auduboner

Auduboner — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:28:52 +0000

First – God, doesn’t he look Retarded with a capital R? Like most pro-lifers…

Second, the only e-mails I get from NARAL are ones asking for cash – have NEVER seen an action program from that organization. And why would you give money to a completely ineffectual organization? Has NARAL done ANYthing??

And finally, 42: Reagan Dems?? lololol… There is NO SUCH THING!!!

By: letsgetitdone

letsgetitdone — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:17:04 +0000

I’m old enough to remember that too. So many women dies in those alleys. It was horrible, and they are the American Taliban.

By: mmc9431

mmc9431 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:23:42 +0000

You may be able to force people to have children but there isn’t a law made that can force them to be parents. There’s a big difference.

By: Jo Fish

Jo Fish — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:59:08 +0000

And Stoopak is also a signatory/supporter of Eschoo/Barton, which is going to give the drug companies eternal patent protection for their “biologics”, which are some of the most effective medicines currently on the market for such minor diseases as I don’t know, like CANCER. Thanks, Bart! You’re a real doubleheader of a good guy!

By: regulararmyfool

regulararmyfool — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:43:34 +0000

The number of congressmen and senators that I think need a short back and sides with their castration is raising alarmingly.

By: Elliott

Elliott — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:29:44 +0000

eXactly!

It is never about male sexual behavior, not ever. Where’s Stupak’s movement to have men take responsibility for preventing pregnancies?

By: laurastrand

laurastrand — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:25:59 +0000

It ALWAYS comes back around to controlling women. It ALWAYS is a majority of men attempting to do the controlling. It’s NEVER about male sexual behavoir, it’s always the women needing to have their choice or power diminished, minimized, belittled, berated, or shut the fucked up because some man says so.
I’d like Bart Stupak to offer an amendment that requires men to submit to some kind of anti-viagra until and unless some women thinks it’s ok for him to get an erection. Not holding my breath.

By: Mauimom

Mauimom — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:23:43 +0000

I'm wondering how many of the clowns on the list were recruited by Rahm in 2006, and supported with DCCC money. [And undoubtedly will continue to be supported with DCCC money, since they don't seem to have any "qualifying terms" other than being a Dem incumbent.]

By: Mauimom

Mauimom — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:11:59 +0000

You see, I was in college when Roe vs. Wade happened. I actually remember back alley abortions

I was in college BEFORE Roe v. Wade [1962-1966,] and I too remember back alley abortions and fellow women students going to Mexico to get an abortion.

Today’s folks — particularly women — have a hard time imagining what it was like then, and what it will be like again if this kind of crap resurfaces.

Women have taken these rights for granted for 35 years. These right wingers are the American Taliban.

By: cbl2

cbl2 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:02:05 +0000

uh, my comment was snark. we’ve been pretty well behaved with our cloven hooved, phallicly challenged ‘visitors’. was laughing (still am) ’bout how we’ve gone from patient to ok, mf, I’m gonna rip your head off and shit down your neck ! response appropriate as it were